Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015

Eliza Bowen

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0160, written 22 Apr 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report22 Apr 2015
Reference2015-0160
DeceasedEliza Bowen
CoronerZafar Siddique
Coroner areaBlack Country
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, 10 Spring

Gardens, London, SWIA 2BU

2. Springfield House Care Home, Oaken Drive, Staffordshire WV8 2EE
3.

, Bilbrook Medical Centre, Wolverhampton, WV8 IDX.

CORONER

I am Zafar Siddique, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of the Black Country.

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 25 November 2014,
I commenced an investigation into the death of Eliza Rebecca
Bowen. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20 April 2015. The
conclusion of the inquest was the deceased died on the 15 November 2014 from
la. Hyperosmolar non-ketotic coma and this was a natural cause of death.

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Eliza Bowen was admitted as a resident at the Springfield House Care Home on
the 18 August 2014.
She had a medical history including previous sub
arachnoid haemorrhage,
shunt
situ, hypertension and had suffered a
CVAlstroke.
Her medical needs were complex and she had limited
communication and was fed via a gastrostomy or PEG tube.
She was
effectively immobile.

in

2. Her medication and care needs were managed and a detailed care plan was
drawn up to cater for her needs. This also included regular contact with the
General Practitioner for medical advice. There was no previous history of
diabetes and previous blood glucose levels were within the normal range.

3. On the 15 November 2014. she became suddenly unwell and was admftted to
New Cross Hospitai. VVoiverhampton with significantly raisea glucose levels
(o77mmo/i1 In hospital she was diagno.sed with acute Kidney niury and raiseo
urea and creatimne. Desnite medical
intervention, she died as result of
—etaoc
‘cala’ces o ogbt ado o
a ca’a c cease
giucose.
This condition is called hyperosmolar nonketotc coma and is
recognised as a life threatenng emergency in diabetics.

‘er c

4. Dunng the course of the inquest evdence emerged that she may have recently
developed diabetes in the last
Her family
described that a few days before her admisson to Hospital she appeared
drowsy and sleepy and less responsive than normal. However her last recorded
reading for blood glucose taken at Hospital on the 27.11,1.3 was raised when a
reading of 9.9mmoIiL was recorded. This may iave been an indication of pre
diabetes condition and she had known risk factors including a BMI greater than

few months before her death.

 5. There was no follow up blood ucose monitonng throughout 2014 because1

there was no indication she was diabetic
However, she was regularly
monitored throughout 2013 and for reasons which remain unclear no blood
glucose tests were performed in 2014

ONER’S CERNS

-———H

-

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

1

A simple blood glucose test done on a regular basis may have identified the
diabetes sooner and the condition managed.

2. Although the patient wasn’t identified as a diabetic she presented with some of

the key associated risk factors including BMI greater than 30 and immobility due
to her medical condition.

3. Consideration of specific medical guidance for management of patients and
screening for diabetes in these circumstances should be made available to
medical staff.

6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the
power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 18 June 2015. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken setting out
the timetable for actiOn. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8 COPIES and PUBLICATION

have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the followng Interested
Persons M s Bower s family

a
espo se ab uttIe elease r te publ cato e yo

ps at

a

e

a

espo se y he. CI’ ef

ron

iAprN 2015

Related reports

Other reports by Zafar Siddique

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Care Home Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.