Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0115, written 23 Mar 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 23 Mar 2016 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2016-0115 |
| Deceased | Alwyn Head |
| Coroner | Patricia Harding |
| Coroner area | Mid Kent and Medway |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Medway NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Chief Executive Medway NHS Foundation Trust 1 | CORONER | am Patricia Harding, senior coroner for the coroner area of Mid Kent & Medway 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 2™ September 2015 | commenced an investigation into the death of Alwyn Ann Head, 70 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 21° March 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was that Alwyn Ann Head died from a recognised complication of a consented and necessary procedure 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Alwyn Head was admitted to Medway Maritime Hospital on 10" August 2015 following two falls in which she fractured her left femur at the site of a prosthesis which had been previously placed in Belgium following a similar fracture after a fall. She underwent surgery and approx.12 days post-operatively a wound infection was noted which was later determined to be MRSA. She was given antibiotics the following day and two days later underwent a debridement and washout. She deteriorated post-operatively requiring increasing inotropic support. She died on 20" August 2015 5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1) That Mrs Head had a history of MRSA was not established prior to surgery despite opportunities in 3 different hospital departments to obtain this information from Mrs. Head or her family (2) ProphylacticTeicoplanin was not provided pre- or post-operatively even though the results of an MRSA screen would not have been available at the time of surgery (MRSA —ve written on pre-op form erroneously) (3) A post-operative wound care plan was not instituted contrary to NICE guidelines (4) There was no evidence of the surgical wound having been inspected by nursing staff or doctors between 13” August and 25" August 2015 (5) Entries in the nursing notes relating to dressing and wound were meaningless and would not assist a determination of whether there was deterioration in the wound ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your organisation has the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 19" May 2016. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent.a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persone) Care Quality Commission | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 237 March 2016 [SIGNED BY CORONER] Plus I, |
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Medway NHS Foundation Trust CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S OFFICE Direct Line 01634 833944 i la st ss Email: Windmill Road mail: Gillingham Kent Our Ref: LD/mijc ME7 BNY 18 April 2016 01634 830000 Strictly Private & Confidential Ms Patricia Harding Senior HM Coroner Mid Kent & Medway Kent Register Office The Archbishop’s Palace Mill Street MAIDSTONE Kent ME15 6YE Dear Ms Harding Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths: Alwyn Ann Head (“the Report”) | refer to your Report issued following the inquest pertaining to Alwyn Head and reporting the circumstances of the death to me, pursuant to Regulation 28 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. The Trust has sent a letter of apology to Mrs Head’s family and has offered to meet with them to discuss the circumstances of her death, and the actions taken by the Trust as part of our coronial investigation process. A full investigation was carried out following Mrs Head’s death and a copy of the actions from that investigation are provided to you within this response (Appendix 1). " [can confirm that lessons have been learnt and the Trust has changed its practice to minimise the chance of any other family having the same experience. | will address the specific issues that you identified in your Report of 23 March 2016, as follows: 1 That Mrs Head had a history of MRSA that was not established prior to surgery despite opportunities in 3 different hospital departments to obtain this information from Mrs Head or her family. We acknowledge that although Mrs Head had a history of MRSA this was not established prior to the surgical procedure. We have therefore introduced a series of measures to reduce the risk of this situation re-occurring, which are: e New admission/transfer assessment documentation of patient infection status was introduced in April 2016. e Staff are made aware of the new documentation on the twice monthly level 3 infection control update sessions. e As part of their daily routine patient reviews the infection control team are checking the new documentation has been completed and provide the nursing staff with feedback at the time. Delivering high quality healthcare’ An Associate Teaching Hospital; of the University of London www.medwaymaritimehospital.nhs.uk +2 LD/mjc 18 April 2016 e The outcome of the patient reviews are reported monthly and areas of poor compliance will receive additional support from the infection control team. e The new documentation will be incorporated into a new nursing patient assessment / care planning document which is due to be implemented in July 2016. 2 Prophylactic Teicoplanin was not provided pre or post operatively even though the results of the MRSA Screen would not have been available at the time of the surgery (MRSA -ve written on pre-op form erroneously) We have recognised the importance of ensuring that MRSA status is checked and appropriate antibiotic regime applied. The orthopaedic antimicrobial guidelines have been updated to provide more clarity over the prophylaxis for patients with unknown MRSA status. The surgical safety checklist is being amended to ensure MRSA status and MRSA History is verified by two staff and with the patient pre operatively in the Anaesthetic Room before induction and again with the whole theatre team at ‘sign in’. 3. A post-operative wound care plan was not instituted contrary to NICE guidelines and 4. There was no evidence of the surgical wound having been inspected by nursing staff or doctors between 13th August and 25th August 2015 and 5. Entries in the nursing notes relating to dressing and wound were meaningless and would not assist a determination of whether there was deterioration in the wound. We are updating our tissue viability policy and associated standard operating procedures (SOPs) to include NICE guidance and standards for post-operative surgical wound management. Wound care documentation, care plans and wound assessment standards have all been reviewed. The wound care documentation will be incorporated into the new nursing assessment / care planning document in July 2016. The documentation and standards will be presented to the Trust Patient Safety Group and the Nursing & Midwifery Quality Forum. Directorate representatives will be responsible for cascading the information through their Directorate. Compliance with the policies and SOPs will be monitored as part of our established assurance audits. Results of audits are presented at Patient Safety Group which has responsibility for monitoring compliance in this area and the Nursing & Midwifery Quality Forum. . In addition, the recognition and management of Sepsis and the Deteriorating Patient are key priorities for the Trust. A programme of work has commenced which aims to improve patient safety, outcomes and reduce the incidence of deterioration and sepsis, through early recognition and timely response. Summary of actions: e Ward to Board rounds to assess and monitor patients’ conditions more regularly e Deteriorating Patient Programme commenced in January 2016 which includes three key work streams - 1. Recognise 2. Respond, 3. Data Quality e A multi-disciplinary Sepsis Action group is in place which monitors performance against the Sepsis six bundle, the National CQUIN performance and sepsis mortality. e The Trust has provided feedback to the NICE consultation on the proposed new Sepsis Guidance (due to be published in July 2016). Delivering high quality healthcare’ An Associate Teaching Hospital; of the University of London www.medwaymaritinehospital.nhs.uk aii LD/mjc 18 April 2016 Trust representation at the Sepsis Nurse Forum. Monthly auditing against the Sepsis bundle A robust Education and Training programme in place Learning events have commenced across the Trust The Standardised Mortality Ratio for patients with a primary diagnosis of Septicaemia is currently the lowest it has been in the last two year period. This reflects the work undertaken currently. The learning from our investigation into Mrs Head’s death has been shared with the specific ward and also Trust wide. | hope you will agree that the learning points have been acted upon, and the actions developed following Mrs Head’s death continue to be actively and robustly implemented and reviewed. Although we know that we will never eliminate risk completely, the action plan will continue to be addressed and monitored via the Trust’s Governance processes to ensure that we reduce our risks to the lowest level possible. We apologise unreservedly to Mrs Head's family for any distress and anxiety caused by us. Yours sincerely Lesley Dwyer Chief Executive } Encl: Appendix 1: Action Plan Delivering high quality healthcare’ An Associate Teaching Hospital; of the University of London www.medwaymaritimehospital.nhs.uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Medway NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.