Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016

Rio Andrew

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-026, written 26 Jan 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report26 Jan 2016
Reference2016-026
DeceasedRio Andrew
CoronerSelena Lynch
Coroner areaSouth London
CategoryCommunity health care and emergency services related deaths · Child Death (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Report to Prevent Future Deaths
(Coroners (Investigations) Regulation 28)

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. RtHon Jeremy Hunt MP, Secretary of State for Health

2. P| Lifeskills Medical UK

CORONER

| am Selena Lynch senior coroner for the coroner area of South London

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 18"" June 2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Rio Andrew, age 15.
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6" January 2016. The
conclusion of the inquest was that Rio died from multiple organ failure due to acute
MDMA (3,4-Methylenedioxymethylamphetamine) intoxication, having taken MDMA
some time late on the 14" or early 15" June 2014. | concluded that his death was drug
related.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Rio attended an illegal rave at a large disused Post Office building in Croydon. He
became unwell as a result of taking MDMA and was taken to the “medics”.

The organisers of the rave had arranged for a private company to provide event medical
cover at the venue. The company was registered with the Care Quality Commission
(CQC) who regulate “transport services, triage and medical advice provided remotely”.
They do not regulate treatment provided through temporary arrangements for sporting or
cultural events.

One of the “medics” provided by the company had received classroom training from
Lifeskills Medical UK. His practical work (necessary to complete his certification) was
being mentored and signed off by an ambulance technician whose qualifications have
not been found acceptable to Lifeskills Medical UK

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

(1) The regulation of the private company by the CQC provided false security as to
what was in fact being regulated. The only activity that was regulated was
transport from the rave in an ambulance on a public road, which activity was not
in fact needed because Rio was handed over to the London Ambulance Service
outside the venue. The level of medical knowledge displayed by the private
medical staff was poor.

The exemption for temporary arrangements means that the provision of medical
assistance at events is entirely unregulated. This includes not only illegal raves,
but legal events such as sporting events, fetes and festivals.

~~
N

This lack of regulation extends to individuals calling themselves ambulance
technicians. They are not regulated and the title is not protected.

(3

YS

Individuals undergoing training at Lifeskills UK Ltd (and possibly other private
training providers) are left to find their own mentor(s) without checks being
made by the company as their suitability or any register or panel from which the
choice can be made.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the
power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 22"? March 2016 |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons:

and to the local safeguarding board.
| have also sent it to the following, who may find it useful or of interest:

- The Care Quality Commission
- Pearson Education Limited

- Association of Ambulance Chief Executives Ji
lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary

form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your

response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. |

DATE Dara

26" January 2016 SIGNED BY CORONER

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Association of Ambulance NHS (PDF)
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives 
3rd floor 
32 Southwark Bridge Road 
London 
SE1 9EU 

T:  020 7783 2043 
W:  www.aace.org.uk 

Selena Lynch 
Senior Coroner  
London South 

By E-mail. 

20th March 2016 

Dear Mrs Lynch, 

Thank you for copying the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives AACE into the 
Regulation 28 ruling associated with the sad death of Rio Andrew age 15 at an illegal rave in 
Croydon in June 2014. 

As you note in your letter AACE has not been required to respond to the Regulation 28 notice 
but was copied in as you felt it may be of interest to us. 

Having considered the issue and discussed with the National Ambulance Medical Directors 
Group we did feel that we should write to you to make a few salient points and to encourage 
your engagement with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to address the regulatory issues. 

AACE remains concerned that private ambulance providers who are providing medical cover at 
events remain unregulated by CQC in terms of the medical care they are delivering within the 
event footprint. We have raised this previously with CQC and whilst we appreciate the additional 
workload it would bring them it is clear that at times the medical care provided can be tragically 
inadequate. This also brings an unquantifiable additional burden for the statutory ambulance 
service who have to intervene and also puts patients at risk. 

We are also aware of course that the term ‘Ambulance Technician’ is not a protected title and is 
not regulated. The college of Paramedics has been lobbying for some time to have this title 
protected and to bring Ambulance Technicians under the same level of regulation as 
Paramedics. AACE is supportive of this and works closely with the College of Paramedics to 
attempt to progress this issue. 

Statutory Ambulance services when contracting with private providers will undertake their own 
quality assurance checks to ensure that all staff of all grades used by that private provider in the 
execution of that contract are appropriately qualified and skilled. It would appear however that 
some private providers do not operate to the same level of diligence as would appear to be the 
situation in this case. 

I hope this is helpful 

Chairman:  Dr Anthony C Marsh QAM SBStJ DSci (Hon) MBA MSc MA FASI 
Managing Director:  Martin Flaherty OBE 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yours sincerely 

Anthony C Marsh QAM SBStJ DSci (Hon) MBA MSc MA FASI 
Chief Executive, West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 
Chairman, Association of Ambulance Chief Executives 

Chairman:  Dr Anthony C Marsh QAM SBStJ DSci (Hon) MBA MSc MA FASI 
Managing Director:  Martin Flaherty OBE
Response from Department of Health (PDF)
From Ben Gummer MP
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Care Quality

Department Richmond House
79 Whitehall
of Health itehal
POC 1014368 SWIA 2NS
Tel: 020 7210 4850

Ms Selena Lynch

HM Coroner — South London Area
Coroner’s Office, St Blaise Building
Bromley Civic Centre

Stockwell Close

Bromley T*

Ce hbad—

Thank you for your letter of 27" January to the Secretary of State about the death of Rio
Andrew . I am responding as the Minister with portfolio responsibility for patient safety
at the Department of Health.

I was saddened to read of Rio’s death. The death of a young person is always a great loss.
Please pass my condolences to his family.

Your report noted a number of concerns which include the regulation of the private
ambulance company by the Care Quality Commission (CQC), exemptions around
temporary events and regulation of the title ‘ambulance technician’,

With regards to the regulation of the private company by the CQC, the exemption for
temporary arrangements means that the provision of medical assistance at events is
entirely unregulated. This includes not only illegal raves, but legal events such as sporting
events, fetes and festivals.

Although Local Authorities are generally responsible for enforcing health and safety
legislation at events where an event is actually organised by a local authority, the Health
and Safety Executive (HSE) is normally responsible for enforcement. HSE is sponsored
by the Department for Work and Pensions.

To assist in the provision of safe and well run events Local Authorities have Safety
Advisory Groups which
e promote high levels of safety and welfare at events by giving advice and guidance
e promote good practice in safety and welfare planning for events
e ensure events have a minimal adverse impact on the community

The CQC does not regulate the “treatment of disease, disorder or injury” where it is
delivered under temporary arrangements for the purposes of sporting or cultural events.
The rational for this is because the short term nature of such events means system
regulation does not offer an effective mitigation of the risks in the care provided over the
course of the event. In most cases, the event would be over before the CQC would have
chance to inspect it or provided any sort of assurance about the quality and safety of
services provided at the event.

In addition, the costs and requirements of regulation to one-off events, such as village
fetes and similar, would place a disproportionate burden on the organisations wishing to
carry out those events.

The Department has become aware of some permanent established companies that
provide cover at temporary events. These providers deliver services on a year round basis,
to one off events and other social and cultural events. The range of services provided
appears to go some way beyond basic first aid and in some cases involves the delivery of
services by a multi-disciplinary team. The Department is intending to consult later this
year as to whether providers of this sorty should be brought into the scope of regulation by
CQC. The Department is proposing that permanent nature of these providers, as opposed
to the temporary nature of the events they provide services at, does offer sufficient
continuity of service that system regulation by CQC could help mitigate the risks of the
public receiving unsafe care at events.

This proposal would not extend to organisations established on a temporary basis for the
purpose of delivering services at a cultural or sporting event, for the reasons already set
out above.

I note that you have been sent a report from Ri: Life Skills

Medical UK which was, in this case, the Approved Training Centre and Provider of
ambulance service qualifications training. ade a number of
recommendations which he believes would prevent future deaths.

I have asked my officials to review the issues and proposals put forward by Life Skills
Medical UK and discuss them with the relevant bodies (e.g. CQC, Association of
Ambulance Chief Executives) in the light of on-going developments in the field.

I hope that this ¢nforyhgtion is useful. Thank you for bringing the circumstances of Rio’s

death to our attentjon.
(Ces (

BEN G R ——_—

Related reports

Other reports by Selena Lynch

See all →

More reports categorised “Community health care and emergency services related deaths”

See all →

Track Community health care and emergency services related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.