Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0315, written 9 Aug 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 9 Aug 2017 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2017-0315 |
| Deceased | Dennis Redmore |
| Coroner | Andrew Barkley |
| Coroner area | South Wales Central |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1} NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Chief Executive ABMU Health Board CORONER lam Andrew Barkley, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South Wales Central. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 14" March 2017 | commenced an investigation into the death of Dennis George Redmore aged 88. The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest on the 3 August 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was that of a narrative :- “Dennis George Redmore died as a result of the effects of a head injury which he sustained when he fell in Hospital. The evidence did not reveal a clear cause for the fall but it is likely that his medical conditions, both acute and chronic, contributed.” CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The deceased was admitted to hospital in the early hours of the 6" March 2017 suffering with the effects of a blocked catheter and presumed urinary tract infection. He was suffering with lymphoma and was being treated palliatively at the time. He had had urinary issues in the past. On being transferred from the A&E Department to the Acute Medical Unit he sustained an unwitnessed fall in the toilet around 8pm was put back to bed and kept under observation. Observations commenced after the fall at 8:15pm on the 6" March through to 7:30 AM on the 7" March when an acute deterioration in his condition was noted. A subsequent CT scan revealed a subdural haematoma, which is not suitable for surgical intervention. His condition deteriorated and he passed away later the same evening. CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest, and the investigation leading up to it, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — [BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) There where clear failures to monitor the deceased neurologically with gaps of several hours between observations. He should have been monitored every 30 minutes but was in fact, according to the evidence monitored at 20:15, 21:00, 22:00, 23:00, 01:00, 04:00, 07:30 and 08:50. “NEWS" observations were carried out and one was carried out at 06:20 on the morning of the 7" March which revealed an elevation in blood pressure and pulse. That was not acted upon for approximately another hour. The evidence suggested that the observations may have undertaken but not recorded. The clear concern is that observations were not carried out in accordance with local and national guidance. There was no clear evidence in this case that the lack of observations had in fact caused or contributed to the death of Mr Redmore but this must give rise to a concern for the welfare of others. No appropriate management of the nurse responsible for the observations was in place to ensure the checks were carried out. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 4" October 2017. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, the Welsh Assembly Government and the family who may find it useful or of interest. | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9™ August 2017 HM Senior Coroner
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
oN, G IG Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Reply to:
“jo Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Colly Read, Hospital
\ NHS University Health Board Eine
v
ro
Direct line/Rhif llinell union:01656 754194
BFax/ffacs:
Your ref/Eich Cyf:
Our Ref/Ein Cyf: JA/jw Dyddiad/Date: 27*" September 2017
Mr. Andrew Barkley,
HM Senior Coroner,
South Wales Central Area,
Rock Grounds,
First Floor,
Aberdare.
CF44 7AE
Dear Mr. Barkley,
Inquest - The late Dennis Redmore
| write further to your correspondence dated 9'" August 2017 regarding the above and
the Regulation 28 notification issued.
The Regulation 28 was issued as a result of the inquest completed on 3 August 2017
which concluded that Mr Redmore died as a result of the effects of a head injury which
he sustained when he fell in hospital. The evidence did not reveal a clear cause for the
fall but it is likely that his medical condition, both acute and chronic, contributed.
You detailed your concerns in respect of:
Failure to monitor Mr Redmore neurologically
Failure to act upon NEWS observations
Failure to undertake observations in line with local and national guidance
Lack of appropriate management of the nurse responsible for undertaking the
observations
Please find below a resume of the actions we are currently undertaking and those
planned. These are described in detail in the attached action plan.
e Chairman/Cadeirydd: Andrew Davles
« Interim Chief Executive/ Prif Weithredydd: Alexandra Howells
ABM Headquarters/ Pencadlys ABM, One Talbot Gateway, Seaway Parade, Baglan Energy Park, Port Talbot. SA12 7BR.
Telephone: (01656) 752752
Bwrdd lechyd ABM yw enw gweithredu Bwrdd lechyd Lleol Prifysgol Abertawe Bro Morgannwg
ABM University Health Board is the operational name of Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board
www. abm.wales.nhs.uk
Action Plan/Actions Undertaken
The following have been incorporated into a formal action plan with clear timescales
and responsibilities assigned to key individuals in undertaking and monitoring of the
required actions as follows:
e Staff to be reminded of the need to adhere to the ABMU neurological guidelines
e Ward sister to reiterate to the nursing team on AMU the Leadership and
delegation responsibilities of the nurse in charge of each shift
e For the month of October 2017 documentation to be reviewed (audit) on all
patients who have sustained a fall on AMU which will include compliance with
neurological observations
e Learning from the above audit to be shared with staff in AMU and actions agreed
for implementation
e Outreach team are currently auditing NEWS compliance across all acute wards
in a rolling programme
e Training Needs Analysis (TNA) to be undertaken in relation to need for ALERT
and Beach training in AMU
e Feedback from review of current Falls Policy and revised documentation
currently on trial in Princess of Wales
e Monitor this action plan monthly to ensure compliance and adherence to
timescale
In addition, the above actions will be reviewed by the Unit Nurse Director and Unit
Medical Director and a summary report will be provided to the Quality and Patient
Safety Committee in April 2018.
On the 10% March 2017 a Spot the Sick Patient Steering Group was set up which meet
on a bi-monthly basis. One of the aims of the Group is to improve the recognition,
treatment and outcome of deteriorating patients in hospital. Enclosed is a copy of the
Terms of Reference of the Group for your information.
{ trust that the action plan to address the matters of concern raised in the Regulation 28
notice are to your satisfaction and provide with the required level of assurance.
Yours sincerely,
Alexandra Howells
INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE.
‘ G IG Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol
ntiirc. | Abertawe Bro Morgannwg
N HS University Health Board
Terms of Reference — Spotting the Sick Patient Steering Group
Type and nature
This is a standing group that aims to improve the recognition, treatment and outcomes
of deteriorating patients in hospital. It will do this by:
© coordinating the efforts of hospital (Unit) — based groups with the same
aims
¢ agreeing on standard case definitions, monitoring arrangements and
treatments
e facilitating collection, analysis and reporting of clinical data
Executive sponsors
Hamish Laing, Rory Farrelly
Chairperson and vice-chairperson
Chair: Assistant Medical Director, Patient Safety.
Vice Chair: TBC
Members/Composition
Each Unit to be represented by one senior medical and one senior nursing
representative
Critical Care Outreach
Emergency Medicine
Medical Director's Department
Paediatrics
Representative of the RRAILS Steering Group
Innovation and OD / Service Improvement team
Critical Care
Resus Committee
Formation Details
* The care of hospital patients who clinically deteriorate is one of the HB’s main
safety concerns, as reflected by its place as one of 7 Quality Priorities in the
Quality Strategy.
The previous Steering Group’s main purpose was the running of an
improvement project to investigate obstacles and test small scale changes. This
group is designed to implement the findings of that project on all wards and
Emergency Departments.
It will also further test refinements to the system as dictated by experience, new
scientific evidence, national initiatives etc.
It will coordinate the collection, analysis and feedback of performance data to
improvement teams, Unit Management, ABMUHB management and Welsh
Government as appropriate.
Goals and or objectives
4. Reduce avoidable mortality and morbidity in this group of patients
2. Improve the function of systems that enable early recognition and treatment
of deteriorating patients
Deliverables
A number of outcome and process measures will need to be agreed by the
group that allow continuous improvement and the necessary governance
assurances.
The following data items are required by WG:
* The number of patients identified as positive to sepsis screening requiring a
new response in a 24 hour period.
* Number who received all six elements of the sepsis bundle within one hour.
* Number of patients who received a positive screening for sepsis but did not
receive a diagnosis of sepsis.
Other useful figures would include cardiac arrest rates; time between
deterioration and resuscitation; mortality rates for sepsis.
2
Jurisdiction
The Group is an advisory group that helps the Unit teams deliver the above
improvements. it will work by developing an ABMUHB consensus to
recommend standardisation of best practice.
Resources and Budget
No identified budget.
Governance
The Group reports to the Quality and Safety Committee via the Q&S Forum
every 2 months.
Decision-making will be by consensus.
Quorum will be Chair/Vice Chair plus representatives from the 4 acute Units.
Communications
Meetings will be held every 2 months with urgent issues communicated /
decided by email. Minutes will be circulated with a week of the meeting.
Relationships to other groups
The Group will work closely with the RRAILS Steering Group that has similar
aims at an all-Wales level.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the committee/group
The Group will be judged by the data members collect and report, as detailed
above.
Reviewed September 2017
ssesseel Udu}
sugyjey Aq
yeeyo jods Ajyjuow ¢
ueyeLepun eq [JIM
(4Nd) s6uysew
wnoy SsJnN
Jeuolssajolg ye pereys
8q 0} UONHeUWOJUT
sBunsow
puem ye payuewinoop
pue passnosip ueeq
Sey SIU} pue su9}sIS
PUeM YIM UOHeWWOLUI
Si} peseys
pue pajeinoiio exey
sugujeW yeu} souspiag
seuyepin6
pue = syjuow suonoe peyeioosse Sucujey YIM jea16ojouneu nyway out
Q 40} AjyjuoW PUB ,SMAIAS | ~paveys pue peyejnouio
MOIAOY Jlod,, A|yJUOW | Useq Sey UOeWOYU 2102 ShiSvSURE IO} ipaeul Sin
Jey} BouUapIAg 49qO}00 js} | UOJUIAG sIGqaq | Jo papujWial aq 0} WEIS
| sjuewebueny | A1sISNOdSau
| SNivis BuyoUOW | ewoano peediojuy| N3IHMAG | S/NOSHad NOLLOV
SUONPAIaSqO
J22}6ojosneu Jo yoedse. ul sjuswelnbau UUM eouel|dWod jo yoedsaJ U! UOeULIOJU! JIPNe 21qe1|01 BplAcid OF
SuOHeAIEsgo |eo)|Gojosneu Bulyeyepun usym
#e}s Buysunu Aq pesinbes suojoe pue Aouenbey etp 0} uonejel u
SUOTEMasqo jeo|Hojoineu 0} Bujpuodses pue Bulpsozai
W1dSOH S31VM 40 SSSONINd
8z uopeinBey yd — NV1d NOLLOV
| Splepue}s pej}oedxe 0} eye[noWe Ayee|a 0] «
seanoeiqg
‘Bupyepepun 0} uopejed ul syyeep einzny Jo ySLU ayy sonpel OL
== —_ Ty ~~ geunseeul T |
210Z Jequeaon SWUIODJNO Jealo suojoe = pue nny |
Ul (Sd) SENWWOD | YM paedojarep Use} ul yes YM peseys
2102 Ayayes juaned 8 suojoe pue sBulpuy,
JOQWSAON | Ayjent o} peyueseud Je9|o UM pejusseld Jeysis prem pue eq OF upne = eaoge
| MOlAOY _ 8q 0} yiodey 1 aq 01 Hodey | ZL0Z JeqUeAON | NIN JO} UoWeW | eu; Wd} _Buywesy |
suoyensesqo
eo16ojouneu
UM eoueljdiuo0o
epnpur ||MOM
NIV uo {12} @ poulejsns
aaey ouM — sjusjed
110z -pewuyuico speau je uo (ypne) pemelvci
JOQUISAON yoddns pue Bululedy eq 0} UONe}UeWNDOp
jo pues LL0@ ‘payyuep! Apea|o
ye pemolAgl JOQWSAON Ul SdO aq 0} JUSWeAOIdUUI J9]SIS Puem pue LL0e 40q0}/0
| 4 or] peyodel oq OL Jo} seauy | 2,02 4eqWeAON | NW JO} vane | Jo you ay} Joy
| ylys |
yoee Jo eGyeyo ul esunu
ay} jo saljiqisuodsel
uonebejep pue
Buyjecw sompiqisuodsal diysiepee] ou; MWY
puem ye yOeqpes} Jy} UO BIeMe L402
210Z 48q0}9O pue sjuapioul | 98q 0} ylys @ Jo eBieyo Jequiaydes | Je}sis puem pue uo wee} Bujsinu 4) O}
Jo pue Maley jo Buuoyu0jy ul yeys Bulsunu ny | jo pug 1 | NIV 404 uowjeYy | eyes0}1eu 0} J9O}SIS PIEAA | _
syuewebueny =| FIGISNOdS3y
| SNLVLS i BuyoyUuoW awiooyng pejedionuy | NAHMAG | SINOSHAd | NOLLOV
SI@j Pueog Uyeey
jeueg Auniog sje pue eouel|duoo
8L0¢ Arenuer ANd 8102 L102 uojuueg
MINDY sBupjeow | Arenuer jo pua fq Jequiaydeg | aiqqaq/Aajqog | USS OF Ajyjuow ued
uouyew Joluas | peysjdwioo suoyoe jy wou AjuUOWy uosiy | uonoe = siyy- soytuopy | “g
SE]eAA JO SSEOULd
ul jeu} uo Ajjuauno
paaaidde pue usm
pueog|}eq 0} ~ seulapin6 uoRe\UeUINSOP
yeeH Aq peyiyes pue | jeuopeu juauno jeew pesiAcu pue
8L0¢ Arenuer | Aoyod = syje4 — pueog | 0} uojejUslNsOp
Maley | uyeoy Aq peroidde peyeloosse Adie siJ@4 Juauno 40
aq 0} Aoljod pesinoy | pue Aoiod pesiney | /10z JOQUISAON | UOluUEg aIqqeq | MelAe: WO} yOeqpese4| +7
NW u! Gulurey yoeog |
L40Z ajeudoudde pue LYaTy 40} paeu o}
49qo}9Q ul Buysew | se GBurupey jeuonippe uoyejei ul usyeyepun
dnais wale, | jo Bunebie) pue spseu J9}sIS
Z10z Jeqo~9 | ¥9IS ey} Jods ye | BujUIeR pue UoHeonpe prem pue nwy | 4 % (WNL) sishleuy
M@IASY | pevodes eq 0} WN | Jo sseugiemy | £102 48q0}0 | 0} uoneyW) | Spoon Bululesy | “9
dNd
0} pajyueseid aq osje
JIM syipne jo au09}no
ewuesBoid Bujjjos @ uy
SPUeM 9yNoe [je ssoloe
eouel|dwio0s SMAIN
2102 ; dnaoig yuaned
JOQUBAON ‘SdOD | 21S ye pejussaid uosyoer Gugpne Aqueuns
meinen | 0} wode: AjujUO;W || supne jo awios;no ZbL0Z 48q0}9O a ae wes} RebacLUOy
uoneyuewe|dut
SNLVLS
sjuewebueny
Bupo}UCW
awosjno peyedionuy
N3HM Ad
F1sISNOdS3au
S/NOSU3d
Joy psaibe
NOILOV
SdO 0} payweses
aq 0} Hodes pue ued
uonjoe peyejduuog
dnoi6 yuewebeuew
pue uonusaeid Q}LOSELUI} 0} eOUQIOUpe
sjuowabueny i F1EISNOdS3a
SNLVLS Sur0}]u0W ewioajno payedjonuy | NAHM Ag S/NOSYAd NOLLOV
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.