Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0318, written 27 Jul 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 27 Jul 2017 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2017-0318 |
| Deceased | Maureen Colclough |
| Coroner | Jean Harkin |
| Coroner area | Cheshire |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Chief Coroner 2. Quality Care Commission 3 Care Agency — Unique Care Services —_=_a ° | Daughter of Deceased CORONER | am Mrs Jean Harkin, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of County of Cheshire. 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 3 | INQUEST Date:- Friday 27" July 2017 Name of Deceased:- Maureen Ann Colclough Date of Birth:- 16" July 1985 Date of Death:- 16"" December 2016 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On the 16 December 2016 he deceased was found unresponsive at home by two carers from Unique Care Services at 1600 hours on 16" December 2016. The deceased was breathing heavily and her eyes were flickering, the carers were unable to rouse her despite sitting her up higher in bed and shouting her name. The carers telephoned their care manager who agreed that the deceased be left asleep as she was breathing. The carers presumed she had been drinking alcohol and that was why she would not wake up. The carers then left the property at approximately 16.15 Hours. The Deceased’s daughter returned home from work at 17.25 hours and on finding her mother unresponsive called 999. Sadly paramedics confirmed her deceased at 17.41 hours. The deceased had recently completed a 12 week alcohol reduction programme and there was no evidence presented in court by police or other witnesses that there was alcohol abuse by the deceased. No bottles or glasses were found near or around the deceased. The evidence of fact was that the deceased was likely in a comatose state and that earlier intervention could have saved her. The deceased was taking opiates for pain and had alcoholic fatty liver disease along with other co morbidities. It emerge that the carers remained of the opinion that they acted accordingly. The care manager, after hearing evidence in court, confirmed that had she known the detail she would have advised calling the emergency services rather than leaving the deceased alone. An advanced nurse practitioner gave evidence that the deceased was likely ina comatose state that could have been reversed with appropriate medical intervention. Evidence in court also confirmed the fact that the carers had lifted the deceased into a higher position on the bed, this did not awaken the deceased. CORONER’S CONCERNS 1. Inadequate training of staff to recognise emergency situation. 2. Relying on presumptions when finding an unresponsive patient in a serious situation. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 21 September 2017. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION Copies to: 1. Chief Coroner Quality Care Commission 2. 3. Care Agency ~ Unique Care Services 4. a Daughter of Deceased 5. nd copy record of Inquest DATE iy Y CORONER 27" July 2017 2 nN _— (Mrs Jean Harkin)
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Care Quality Commission HSCA Further Information Citygate Gallowgate Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4PA Telephone: 03000 616161 Mrs Jean Harkin Fax: 03000 616171 Assistant Coroner Office of HM Coroner County of Cheshire West Annexe Town Hall Sankey Street Warrington Cheshire WA1 1UH emai to: as 16 October 2017 Our Reference: MRR1-4155695452 Dear HM Coroner Ref: Maureen Ann Colclough Re: Regulation 28 Report - Inquest into the death of Maureen Ann Colclough Thank you for sending the Care Quality Commission (CQC) a copy of the Regulation 28 Report issued following the inquest touching on the death of Maureen Ann Colclough. We are writing to you with our response to the matters of concern raised in relation to Unique Care Services. We note the legal requirement upon CQC to respond to your report within 56 days and thank you for granting CQC a four week extension to provide a response. Following the receipt of the Regulation 28 Report we held three internal management review meetings to discuss the findings of the report and determine what action CQC should take. We reviewed our records and found that the Registered Provider had not notified us of the death of Maureen Ann Colclough as legally required. This failure to report has been raised with the Registered Provider and we will consider whether criminal enforcement action is appropriate. 1 We also agreed to conduct an inspection of the service, reviewing staff training in the event of an emergency and also the oversight that is provided by | Two inspectors visited the service on 11 September 2017 and 21 September. | have detailed some of our findings under your specific questions below. Background The Registered Provider, TT wa: registered on 1 December 2014. In May 2017, the Registered Provider moved location from Unique Care Services, 19 Caldy Drive, Great Sutton, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, CH66 4RN to Stanlaw Business Centre, Unit C11 Stanlaw Abbey Business Centre, Dover Drive, Ellesmere Port, Merseyside, CH65 9BF. Unique Care Services was inspected on 17 and 24 October 2016. The service was rated ‘inadequate’ in the Well Led domain, ‘requires improvement’ in the Safe domain and ‘good’ in the Responsive, Effective and Caring domains. The service was rated ‘requires improvement’ overall. We issued a requirement notice for a breach of regulation 17 (good governance). We inspected the service again in May 2017. The service was rated ‘good’ overall with ‘good’ ratings in four domains (Safe, Effective, Caring and Responsive) and ‘requires improvement’ in the Well Led domain. Coroner’s concerns In relation to the specific matters of concern raised in your report: 4 Inadequate training of staff to recognise emergency situations. During our recent inspection we found that all members of staff had received basic life support training. This took place during August and early September 2017. The Registered Provider confirmed that additional classroom based training has been provided to staff on 26 September and 3 October 2017. We also noted that the two members of staff involved in the incident had received training prior to the incident and one of them has subsequently received updated training on emergency procedures. CQC is of the view that although the Registered Provider has provided adequate training for staff in dealing with emergency situations in response to the death of MC, the lack of training for some staff prior to December 2016 and the delay in the provision of that training put service users at risk at that time. Although the risk has been mitigated whereby all staff have now had training, CQC considers that there had been a system failure to oversee the management of the service. 2 Relying on presumptions when finding an unresponsive patient in a serious situation. CQc is of the view that carers relying on presumptions when finding an unresponsive patient in a serious condition place that individual at high risk. Whilst some of this risk has been mitigated as emergency training has been provided for staff, more robust action by the Registered Provider is required with regard to his oversight of the service. Due to the concerns found during our inspection CQC is now taking substantive enforcement action. In addition, the Registered Provider is required to provide CQC with an action plan detailing how they intend to improve the care provided to service users. Inspectors will continue to monitor the service to ensure that service users receive safe and effective care. A copy of the report detailing our findings will be available when published on our website. Should you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me on my telephone number Yours sincerely Head of Inspection
MEE. 2evistered Manager Stanlaw Abbey Business Centre Unit C11 Dover Drive Ellesmere Port CH659BF uniquecareservices@hotmail.co.uk 0151 356 0426 Mrs. Jean Harkin Assistant Coroner Dear Mrs. Harkin: | am writing in response to your request for Unique Care Services to provide details of actions and proposed actions taken regarding your concerns after the passing away of Maureen Ann Colclough. We will always be open to new suggestions or information of how to continuously improve the training that we provide for all employees at Unique Care Services. In response to your concerns | have provided details of actions we have already taken since the inquest took place as well as further steps that we have taken in an effort to prevent future deaths. e All employees have been notified and almost ALL have undertaken a revised performance appraisal (regardless of any recent or up to date training) containing specific information and questions relating to recognizing an emergency situation as well as steps to take when finding an unresponsive service user. e All new starters will be given the relevant information and must answer a series of questions and show a satisfactory level of competence and understanding in recognizing an emergency situation and responding accordingly. (Employees have always been given this information in the past in the form of a handbook and have been required to sign to confirm receipt) « All employees of Unique Care Services have been made aware of that they MUST attend an extra Emergency First Aid training course on either of the dates provided and confirmed (Tuesday 26” September & Tuesday 37 October) | sincerely hope that the actions and extra measures that we have taken prove to be satisfactory for you report but please do not hesitate to get in further contact if there is anything else you require from myself or any other employees. Please allow me to state that we as a company have ALWAYS provided the relevant training as well as promoting the options of many other training courses and qualifications even for developing skills unrelated to Domiciliary Care. I state this in relation to the unchallenged evidence provided by BE Gurins the recent inquest. HE «ate that she had not been given the relevant first aid training. This is a statement that | must declare false but was unfortunately made out of our hands. We have since provided the Care Quality Commission with training records as well as qualification certificates as evidence. When asked why ae had made such a statement, she stated that she had not understood the question answered while under oath. Unfortunately the matter remains unresolved as a. been on sickness leave for a number of months since suffering a stroke and has not yet returned to work. Sincerely Registered Manager
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.