Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0330, written 21 Jul 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 21 Jul 2017 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2017-0330 |
| Deceased | Pauline Taylor |
| Coroner | Mary Burke |
| Coroner area | West Yorkshire (West) |
| Category | Community health care and emergency services related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 5 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT {S BEING SENT TO:
41. Mr Jeremy Hunt MP, Secretary of State for Health , Department of Health,
Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SW1A 2NS
2. Dr tan Hudson, Chief Executive, Medicines and Healthcare Products
Regulatory Agency( | would request separate responses from the medicines
and Medical Devices Division )151 Buckingham Palace Road London SW1W
9SZ
3. EE Director Of Patient Safety, NHS Improvement, 133-155
Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG
4. Chief Executive of the Proprietary Association of Great Britain, Vernon
House Sicilian Avenue London WC1A 2QS
5. Chief Executive, Thornton and Ross Ltd ,manufacturers of Zerobase
emollient cream, Manchester Road, Linthwaite, Huddersfield, West
Yorkshire HD7 5QH
6. Chief Executive, LOCALA , Beckside Court First Floor, Bradford Road
Batley WF17 5PW
7. Chief Executive, U.K Home Care Association, Sutton Business Centre
Restmor Way Wallington Surrey SM6 7AH
8. Chief Executive, Care Quality Commission, 151 Buckingham Palace Road
London SW1W 9SZ
9. EE Systems Compliance Manager Arjo Huntliegh,
(manufacturers Nimbus 6 of airflow mattress)Houghton Hall Business Park,
Houghton Regis, Bedfordshire LU5 5XF
CORONER
| am Mary Burke Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of West Yorkshire Western
District.
2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On the 9" June 2015 an inquest was opened into the death of Pauline Taylor, aged 74
years. The inquest concluded on 28" April 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was
accidental death. The medical cause of Mrs Taylor death was due to smoke inhalation
and burns.
oo +
4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Mrs Taylor lived alone at 108 Whitehead Lane Huddersfield, a 2 bedroom ground
floor flat. She was becoming increasingly immobile due to a number of significant
health issues and from March 2015 she had become bedbound.
She had a longstanding history of psoriasis and was treated with daily applications of
Zerobase emollient cream.
Mrs Taylor was a regular smoker and smoked in bed despite being repeatedly advised
of the fire hazards by health care professionals and various members of her family.
Mrs Taylor was of sound mind and had full mental capacity.
Mrs Taylor was supported in her home by numerous daily visits by both carers provided
by Care Watch Services, District Nurses provided by Locala and a very supportive
family.
Mrs Taylor was provided with a medical bed with a Nimbus 6 dynamic airflow mattress in
place manufactured by Arjo Huntleigh,
The property had a fire alarm system fitted which was connected to a care alert facility
which in turn was linked to a monitoring unit provided by the local authority which was
manned 24 hours a day.
On the 29" May 2015 upon the request of Mrs Taylor one of her carers purchased a
box of matches for her, as her safety lighter was no longer working.
She was last visited by Locala team of carers at 23.30 hours on the 29" May 2015 when
Mrs Tayior was alert and her presentation gave no cause for concern.
Just after 4.10 hours 30" May 2015 an operator in the monitoring unit identified that the
smoke detector in the hallway of Mrs Taylor's home had been activated.
Fire officers from West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Services were despatched and
subsequently attended Mrs Taylor home, sadly she was found by officers to have died
laid on her bed.
There was evidence that there had been a rapidly developing fire that was now in its
decay stage, which had been localised in and around Mrs Taylor's bed.
Initial investigations undertaken by West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Services concluded
that the cause of the fire was due to a match or cigarette coming into contact with non fire
retardant bedding.
It was also considered likely that magazines and matches which were on Mrs Taylor's bed
had contributed to the speed and intensity of the fire.
Subsequently West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Services undertook a number of
controlled fire tests using various types of mattresses including a Nimbus 6 airflow
mattress and night clothes and bedding similar to those which Mrs Taylor had on her bed,
in some of the tests Zerobase emollient cream was impregnated upon the bedding and
nightclothes.
The results revealed that the presence of Zerobase emollient cream caused the fires to
develop with much greater speed and intensity as compared to those tests where no
Zerobase emollient cream was present.
In addition the tests also revealed that the polyurethane material used in coating the
outer surface of the airflow mattress is likely to have intensified the fire causing the
mattress to burn hotter and more quickly.
West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service gave evidence at the inquest that in light of the
results of these controlled test results they concluded that the airflow mattress and the
presence of Zerobase emollient cream in Mrs Taylor's case is likely to have contributed to
the speed and intensity of the fire that occurred on the 30th May 2015 at her home.
Evidence presented at the inquest suggested that various previous alerts and guidance
had been issued to the medical profession, advising that emollient creams posed a fire
tisk, however the alerts appeared to indicate that such a risk related only to emollient
creams which had a much higher paraffin content to the levels contained in other forms of
emollient creams such as Zerobase.
The Managing Director of Care Watch Services(one of the major community care
providers in the country), the company who employed some of Mrs Taylors carers
indicated in evidence that companies which provide private community care do not
receive regular alerts concerning medicines drugs or devices.
| have sought approval from West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service that | may disclose
their report of the subsequent controlled fire tests using various mattresses and Zerobase
emollient cream. If any recipient of my report wishes to have sight of this report please
contact (IEEE her ernall accross (cia ae
5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. in
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —
[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN]
(1) Zerobase and other emollient creams which contain a low level of paraffin pose a
potential fire hazard risk.
(2) Warnings of such risks are not displayed on all product packaging.
(3) Health care professionals both in a hospital and community setting may not be
aware of the potential fire hazard posed by emollient creams which contain a low
level of paraffin.
| understand from subsequent enquiries | have made that a number of public bodies
are presently undertaking a review of the risks posed by emollient creams in order to
consider whether further advices/ alerts should be issued to the medical profession
and further afield.
It is clear that this is a complex area as some of these products are registered as
medicines and some as medical devices and therefore different regulatory provisions
apply. Notwithstanding such differences | would ask that my concerns be considered
by both the medicines and medical devices divisions of the appropriate regulatory
bodies and that each division provide a separate response to this report.
(4) Members of the public are able to purchase emollient creams across the counter
but are not verbally made aware of the potential fire hazards of emollient
cream containing a low level of paraffin.
(5) Private companies who provide carers in the community do not receive alerts
with regard to medicines and medical devices which could impact on the risk
assessments and the manner in which carers working in the private sector
provide care.
(6) Care homes (in both the local authority and private sector) who provide
residential/nursing care may not be aware of the potential fire hazard risk of
emollient creams which contain low levels of paraffin.
(7) The polyurethane coating used in the outer covering of the nimbus 6 airflow
mattress appears to have contributed to the speed of the fires development and
also its intensity.
(8) Following a significant change in Mrs Taylor's circumstances in March 2015 a
further risk assessment had not been undertaken by Locala.
(9) A further fire risk assessment referral/review was not offered to Mrs Taylor by
Locala following a major change in her circumstance (she had become bedbound
in March 2017.)
7 |
6 | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe the recipients
of this report have the power to take such action.
~
©
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 14" September 2017. |, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION |
| have sent_a copy of m he Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons iii «iin Mrs Taylor's daughters and DACbeachcroft
Solicitors tegal representatives for West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service
| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of
interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response,
about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
[DATE] [SIGNED BY CORONER]
an | g| &e
5 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
‘Locala’ Community Partnerships Locala Beckside Court 286 Bradford Road Batley PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL WF17 5PW 030 3003 4529 Mrs M Burke HM Assistant Coroner ein (Western District) City Courts The Tyrls Bradford 13 September 2017 West Yorkshire BD1 1LA Dear Ma’am INQUEST TOUCHING UPON THE DEATH OF PAULINE TAYLOR DECEASED - REGULATION 28 REPORT RESPONSE Thank you for your letter dated 21 July 2017 attaching the Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths that you issued following the conclusion of the Inquest you held touching upon the death of Pauline Taylor. This is the Response of Locala Community Partnerships. As an organisation we have considered the content of your report very carefully. We note that at section 5 you have raised a number of matters of concern relating to zerobase and other emollient creams which whilst containing potentially a relatively low level of paraffin, still pose a potential fire hazard risk. We note the recommendations concerning warnings on the packaging and to members of the public at large, who as you note are able to purchase many such creams over the counter. Locala would support the raising of awareness in this area and if it is permissible, would be interested to see the responses that you obtain from the other recipients of your Regulation 28 report that have a broader remit. Within Locala, we have undertaken work to share the learning from this case in relation to the risks posed by any cream, lotion or other substance that contains any amount of paraffin. As was evident from the evidence given at the Inquest there are potentially a large number of such products that are regularly in use. In May 2017, within our monthly medicines management report that goes to all business units, we specifically raised the issue concerning paraffin containing skin products and made reference to a guidance document produced by the South West Yorkshire Area Prescribing Committee, advising staff this must be adhered to when prescribing or treating patients with paraffin based emollients. The Prescribing Committee’s advice note was attached to our medicines update and a copy of this is attached. In particular, this document identifies that any paraffin containing product poses a risk, regardless of the amount of paraffin contained within it. Caving for you, locally Locala Community Partnerships C1.C. ve gt Moy, on Syys >) INVESTORS Registered Office: Beckside Court, Bradford Road, Batley, WF17 5PW & Co \ iv IN PEOPLE Registered in England and Wales. Company No: 07584906 Asay nd This does represent a shift in emphasis as compared some previous guidance that had been issued about paraffin containing products. This advice note has been disseminated within Locala. Training has also been updated to include reference to this latest guidance note regarding the use of paraffin based products and the use of such products now forms part of the risk assessment that has to be completed when requesting any air products from the supplier, Medequip. This issue has also been discussed within team meetings amongst community nursing staff. This has also included warnings concerning service users that use an air mattress, where the risk is further heightened. When Locaia shares care of service users that are within a residential home there is a prompt on the form that has to be completed in relation to assessment of an individual’s skin — the prompt tells staff to ensure appropriate fire risk assessments have been completed and the risk discussed with any patient that smokes, uses an air mattress and/or emollients. Locaia Live is a bulletin that goes to all staff and the Area Prescribing Guidance was also attached to this bulletin via a link, with a note advising staff of the risk associated with skin products containing paraffin. Staff were reminded relevant service users need to be advised of the risks. Additionally, we are piloting a project in the Dewsbury locality where we are evaluating the use of non-paraffin based emollients as alternatives to those with paraffin. Local GPs are being involved and this project is to be evaluated in October 2017. Many of these points are encapsulated on the attached action plan. There were two further specific concerns raised, at points 8 and 9 of the Regulation 28 report, concerning the fact no further risk assessment had been undertaken following a significant change in the Deceased’s circumstances as at March 2015. It is perhaps noteworthy that the Deceased’s underlying medical condition had not deteriorated as such, but it is acknowledged that there was a gradual change in her preferences in terms of the fact that whilst still being encouraged from time to time to leave her bed, the Deceased very largely preferred to remain within her bed in her last weeks. There was no further specific risk assessment around March 2015. We note the evidence at the Inquest conceming the Deceased’s capacity for decision making and also the acknowledgement that professional staff and family members were continuing to raise with the Deceased the dangers associated with her continued smoking of cigarettes in her bed. The first two points on the action plan seek to address the issue you have raised concerning further risk assessment: the action Locala will seek to achieve is that further risk assessments will be completed on all patients who smoke and/or have emollients in use with or without air products, at any stage where there is a change in their physical, physiological or mental health condition or circumstances, and a change in their environment or habits as a result. In addition, a flowchart is being designed to enable staff to identify patients that are deteriorating with changing circumstances and documentation and training is being worked up to implement this throughout the organisation. Caving for you, locally In relation to undertaking further risk assessments records are being audited to see that this happening, and situations are not being missed, and this is being managed through the community nursing team leaders group. They are responsible within their teams for ensuring staff understand the need for further risk assessment when circumstances change. May | thank you again for raising these matters. CQC have contacted us concerning the Regulation 28 report and we trust that it is in order that we have provided them with a copy of this response and our action plan. Yours sincerely ye KMOWK Director or Operations Caving for you, locally
13 SEP 2017 MHRA Regulating Medicmes and Medical Devices Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency H.M Coroner MHRA For the West Yorkshire (Western) Coroner Area 151 Buckingham Palace Road City Courts London The Tyris SW1W 98Z BRADFORD United Kingdom ea www.gov.uk/mhra 12 September 2017 Dear Ms Burke Regulation 28 Report concerning Pauline Taylor — Ref: HK/1067-2015 Thank you for your letter of 21July 2017, with the attached Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths, to the MHRA regarding the death of Pauline Taylor. This response deals with medical device aspects, relating to both the issues raised regarding emollients and mattresses. A response dealing with the medicines aspects of emollients will be supplied to you separately, in line with your request. As you may be aware, The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is an executive agency of the Department of Health. The aim of the MHRA Devices Division is to take all reasonable steps to protect the public’s health and safeguard the interests of patients and users by ensuring that medical devices and equipment meet appropriate standards of safety, quality and performance and that they comply with relevant Directives of the European Union. One major area of MHRA Devices’ responsibilities is the investigation of adverse incidents. An adverse incident is an event involving a medical device, which produces, or has the potential to produce, unwanted effects involving the safety of patients, users and other persons. These effects may arise from shortcomings in the device, its operating instructions, user practice or conditions of use. We have addressed the points relevant to medical device aspects in our response below. MHRA received the first adverse incident reports of fires involving emollients in March 2017. However, we were aware of the work undertaken by the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) in 2007 and highlighted this work to healthcare workers when it was published. In the form of a “One Liner” publication in March 2008, issue 56. Since that time, as no adverse incident reports were received. it was not considered necessary to issue any further communication. it is recognised that there are differences in the labelling of these products and in light of this during 2017, both Medicines and Devices parts of MHRA are undertaking an in-depth review of instructions for use and reported adverse incidents. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency MHRA Regulating Medicines and Medical Devices We aim to have completed our review by the end of 2017 and will consider the need for publication of any additional safety advice at this time in conjunction with our medicine colleagues. Additionally, we have worked with manufacturers to raise awareness of this potential risk. This work highlighted the need for risk of fire to be included in their product risk analysis and ensuring warnings of the potential risk were placed either on packaging or included in the device’s instructions for use. We have previously issued warnings regarding the dangers around smoking and bed fires (MDA/2013/073). Medical devices must be CE marked before they are placed on the market in the UK and throughout the EU. MHRA’s expectation is that, when CE marking and placing a medical device on the market, manufacturers will have evaluated the potential risks that could occur, including that of fire. The CE mark demonstrates that the medical device is fit for its stated intended purpose and meets legislation relating to safety. This requires the manufacturer to demonstrate their medical device meets the requirements in the Medical Devices Directive (MDD) by carrying out a conformity assessment. Additionally, higher risk medical devices require certification from a third party conformity assessment body (“Notified Body”) prior to being placed on the market. MHRA is responsible for the oversight of UK Notified Bodies and has a post-market role in investigating reported safety issues. Emollients may fall into any of the risk classes according to their constituents and mode of action. The paraffin content of these products varies over a wide range, also, from as little as 5%, in some cases and has no bearing on whether the product is classed as a device or as a medicine. This difference is due to their mode of action. in Spring 2017 MHRA wrote to UK manufacturers of Class | medical devices (the lowest risk category) directly and asked them to undertake a review of their products. In addition, we asked the UK Notified Bodies to ensure that a review and risk assessment was undertaken by manufacturers of higher risk classification medical devices. We also brought the issue to the notice of European regulatory colleagues to highlight the dangers internationally. All European Competent Authorities were asked to share the letter mentioned above with Notified Bodies they oversee to ensure coverage of all manufacturers with products in the European market. The issue has been raised with NHS Improvement and Medical Device Safety Officers (MDSOs). The fatter are individuals in each NHS Trust in England who ensure safety information is made available to relevant staff. MHRA is also liaising with the Care Quality Commission to highlight the potential dangers to users within the care community. The therapeutic benefits of the mattress system will generally have been found to outweigh the likelihood and consequences of a fire, in part mitigated by the labelling and instructions for use, advising against smoking or using naked flames whilst in bed. Polyurethane (PU) is the industry standard cover material on most types of healthcare mattress, including pressure reduction mattress systems, such as the ArjoHuntleigh Nimbus 3. The cover Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency MHRA Regulating Medicines and Medical Devices material of healthcare mattresses has to withstand heavy use, must be impervious to liquid ingress and withstand frequent exposure to decontamination agents. MHRA has contacted the manufacturer, ArjoHuntleigh, to confirm that their current risk mitigation factors are appropriate. This includes meeting the standard BS7175:1989, (Methods of test for the ignitability of bedcovers and pillows by smouldering and flaming ignition sources) and the product labelling and instructions for use, which contain the warming about fire risk. MHRA is continually reviewing methods of communicating important healthcare information to healthcare professionals and members of the public. However, communication to the general public is a challenging area for all aspects of healthcare. The MHRA does publish Medical Device Alerts and Drug Alerts issued via the Central Alerting System (CAS). Within CAS there are thousands of subscribers from organisations in the independent/private sectors, with frequent requests received at the helpdesk to add new subscribers and alter existing records. This is a well-established and effective mechanism for communicating important safety information to healthcare professionals throughout the NHS and private health sectors. Yours sincerely Director of Devices
) 27 SEP 2047 NHS improvement Your ref: HK/1067-2015 Senior Administrator City Courts The Tyrls Bradford BD1 1LA 19 September 2014 Dear Re: Pauline Taylor, deceased Thank you for your letter of 21 July enclosing a report sent under the provisions of Regulation 28 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. | can confirm that the NHS Patient Safety Team was in fact notified of Mrs Taylor's tragic death in 2015 by the local fire safety officer. Considerable work has subsequently been undertaken by the team in conjunction with the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and other organisations in response to the concerns you describe in your report. The actions taken in response to Mrs Taylor's death were included in the Patient safety review and response report (page 17) published by NHS Improvement in June 2017. | am enclosing a copy of the Report for ease of reference. | am grateful to you for bringing this matter to my attention and hope this response is helpful. Yours sincerely, DR KATHY MCLEAN EXECUTIVE MEDICAL DIRECTOR
i13 SEP 2017 Representing the Consumer Healthcare Industry since 1919 PAGB 12 September 2017 Your ref: HK/1067-2015 Pawtuhe FT Bgl ¢ Ms M Burke Assistant Coroner Her Majesty’s Coroner West Yorkshire (Western) Coroner Area City Courts The Tyrls Bradford BD1 1LA Dear Ms Burke Re: Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths Thank you for your letter of 21 July 2017. Safety is of paramount importance to the consumer healthcare industry and we are extremely concerned about incidents where emollient creams and ointments have been found to have contributed to the intensity of accidental fires with grave and fatal consequences. PAGB, together with member companies that manufacture emollient medicines and medical devices, acknowledges the seriousness of this situation and we are committed to doing what we can to address the concerns you raise in your letter and ensure people are aware of the potential risks. Paraffin-containing emollient products are the first line of treatment for helping people manage dry or scaly skin conditions, such as eczema and psoriasis. When severe, these conditions can be highly debilitating and it is important for people to have access to effective emollients to manage these conditions. Paraffin based oils such as liquid paraffin and white soft paraffin have been carefully chosen for use in emollients because extensive clinical experience has shown these particular ingredients to be effective for softening and moisturising medically dry skin conditions and are well tolerated by sensitive skin. It is important to note that paraffin-containing emollients are not flammable in and of themselves. However, repeated applications of larger quantities of these products can lead to a build-up of residue on clothing and bedding, which results in the fabric becoming more flammable. If an individual is then subsequently exposed to a naked flame, for example a lighted match or cigarette, there is an increased risk of fire. Having considered the issues raised in your letter, PAGB and its member companies have identified three areas where we feel we have a role to play in reducing the likelihood of future incidents. 1. By ensuring there is an accurate and meaningful warning statement on product packaging 2. By helping to effectively communicate the potential risk to consumers, healthcare professionals and care workers Registered Address: Vernon House Sicilian Avenue London WC1A 2QS Telephone 020 7242 8331 Fax 020 7405 7719 info@pagb.co.uk www.pagb.co.uk Proprietary Association of Great Britain is a Company Limited by Guarantee and Registered in England. Registration No. 375216 3. By providing information and evidence to the regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). | will address these points in turn. 1. Accurate and meaningful warning statement PAGB and its member companies recognise that clear information needs to be made available to warn of the risk of increased flammability of clothing and bedding which has been in contact with paraffin-containing emollients. in addition to ensuring warning statements are included on the packaging of all appropriate products, it is imperative that these warnings are consistent as well as clear and meaningful to members of the public who will read them. PAGB has been working with its member companies to develop wording which we will submit for user-testing to ensure its clarity. User-testing is a vital part of this process. It is important that users are involved in the drafting of any warning statements, such that we can be confident they will be clearly understood when placed on packaging. Following the results of user-testing, PAGB will work with MHRA to ensure there is consistency in implementation of a standard warning for packaging and patient information leaflets. PAGB requested a meeting with MHRA to discuss this process in May 2017, we have been given the opportunity to make a written submission to the agency, which we will do by 30" September 2017 and we hope to have the opportunity to meet with MHRA officials thereafter. 2. Communicate the potential risk effectively The Coroner's report of Mrs Taylor's accidental death highlights that repeated advice of the fire hazards from healthcare professionals and family members was ignored. It is therefore important that, in addition to the inclusion of an appropriately worded warning on packaging and on patient information leaflets, the risk is adequately communicated to healthcare professionals, care workers and other key professional groups. PAGB will continue to work collaboratively with MHRA, Fire Brigades and other stakeholders to ensure there is clear and consistent communication, and those health and care professionals have appropriate information on how to minimise and manage the risk with their patients. 3. Provide information and evidence to MHRA PAGB member companies have already submitted data on adverse events associated with paraffin-containing products to the MHRA review, which is currently underway. PAGB has been advised that following this MHRA review, expert advice will be sought from the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM), the timescale for this is autumn 2017. As mentioned previously, PAGB will be providing a written submission to the CHM (via MHRA) by 30 September 2017 and we hope to have the opportunity to meet with MHRA officials after that date. To conclude, | would like to reassure you that together with our member companies, we are taking this issue seriously and working hard to ensure we take all the appropriate actions we can as an industry to prevent future incidents from occurring. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or require any additional information. Yours sincerely Kilbane P Bonn Smith Chief Executive Officer
United Kingdom Homecare Association _ Wr The professional association for homecare providers q UNITED KINGDOM HOME CARE ASSOCIATION —$———— —_ . a The City Courts Bradford BD1 1LA 7 August 2018 Pauline Taylor, deceased, Repor' revent further dea Thank you for your contact with this office regarding the above. This organisation is aware of the circumstances of Pauline Taylor’s death and would like to extend our condolences to members of her family. I can confirm that United Kingdom Homecare Association has made the following information available to homecare providers (most recent first): 1. A fact sheet, “UKHCA Guidance: Emollient Products - Guidance for homecare providers”, was prepared for UKHCA by London Fire Brigade and published in January 2018. It can be downloaded from http://www.ukhea.co.uk/downloads,aspx?ID=565. A copy is enclosed. 2. Anarticle, “Fire Chiefs issue warning on dangers of emollient creams”, was published in the November 2017 issue of our bi-monthly magazine, “Homecarer”. The magazine has a print circulation of around 3,000 copies and a further 4,000 copies are send in PDF format. A copy is enclosed (please see pages 8 and 9). 3. An e-mail briefing was sent to around 2,000 of our member organisations entitled “Fatality highlights fire risks of using paraffin-based emollient” in June 2016. The text of this briefing is reproduced at the end of this letter. Page 1 Sa UKHCA, \ 020 8661 8188 @ enquiries@ukitca.co.uik W @ukhca Sutton Business Centre, Restmor Way, Wallington, a Surrey Ne Lee 3 * 020 8669 7100 Gi) membership@ukhca.co.uk @® www.ukhce.co.uk ee oat United Kingdom Homecare Association Limited Registered in England under number: 03083104 i: i ANG ont Registered Office: Sutton Business Centre, Restmor Way, Wallington, Surrey SM6 7AH toe 8 G 3 i : Text of e-maii aiert sent to UKHCA members, June 2016 Fatality highlights fire risks of using paraffin-based emollient A coroner's accidental death review has highlighted the dangers of using E45 emollient, which is highly flammable (although this is not displayed on the packaging). In the case in question, the deceased was smoking in bed and the Fire Officer considered that, as the bedding and clothing were covered in E45 residue, the emollient acted as an accelerant, increasing the intensity and speed with which the fire took hold. NHS England's helpful note on the coroner's review includes key points for action and learning for professional staff involved in patient or client care. (Thank you to Westminster Homecare for drawing this to our attention.) We suggest that homecare providers caring for service users who use E45 or another paraffin-based emollient (prescribed or not) risk assess and discuss switching to a non-inflammable alternative with their community pharmacist, where appropriate. More about emollients: http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/emollients/Pages/Introduction.aspx Page 3
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.