Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0399, written 16 Nov 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 16 Nov 2017 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2017-0399 |
| Deceased | Doreen Wilkins |
| Coroner | Chris Morris |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Mr James Thorburn-Muirhead, Chief Executive Officer, Comfort Call Ltd., 24 Floor, Olympic House, 3 Olympic Way, Wembley, Middlesex, HA9 ONP. CORONER tam Chris Morris, Area Coroner for Manchester South. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 4" July 2017, Alison Mutch OBE, Senior Coroner for Manchester South, opened an inquest into the death of Doreen Wilkins who was aged 78 when she died in hospital. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest which | heard on 10" November 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was that Mrs Wilkins died as a consequence of a choking incident at home, following a routine care visit which did not last for its full duration. The evidence heard at the inquest did not establish whether or not Mrs Wilkins’s death would have been avoided had the care visit lasted for its intended duration. At the end of the inquest, | recorded a Narrative Conclusion to this effect. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mrs Wilkins had been in receipt of a home care package provided by Comfort Care and commissioned by Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council since 2014. In summary, the care package consisted of 4 daily visits by a carer to provide assistance with personal care, monitoring of medication use and food and fluid intake, and encouragement with eating and drinking. Whilst these visits originally were each intended to last for 15 minutes, Mrs Wilkins’s care package was increased so as to include 30 minute care visits at breakfast, lunch, and teatime, with a 15 minute evening attendance. The evidence before the court was that whilst concerns subsisted about the adequacy of Mrs Wilkins’s calorific intake, there were no previous documented problems with her ability to swallow food safely. On 23 June 2017, the teatime visit was undertaken by the Comfort Call carer who habitually visited Mrs Wilkins at that point in the day. The carer prepared food for Mrs Wilkins, but did not remain with her for the full 30 minutes duration of the care visit commissioned for her. According to her evidence, the carer stayed for around 20 minutes. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. In the course of the inquest ! heard evidence to the effect that Comfort Call carers’ visits are scheduled in blocks via rotas which do not always allow for travel time between scheduled visits. The matters of concern arising from this are as follows: 1. An absence of any travel time allowance in such circumstances may cause a carer to arrive late for a time critical care visit (such as one where a client is to be supported with regular medication); or 2. Acarer may cut short his / her visit to one client to enable them to arrive to their next scheduled appointment on time; 3. In circumstances where a carer is cutting short a visit, the client in question does not receive the duration of care they have been assessed as requiring (or indeed which Comfort Call Ltd has been paid to provide). It is observed that Comfort Call Limited’s registration with the Care Quality Commission is contingent inter alia upon a requirement that the registered person must submit on the first day of every month to CQC a report showing: “The actions that have been taken to ensure staff rotas are meeting the needs of Service users including time critical calls and travel time between visits”. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 11" January 2018. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 1. EE aucnter of Mrs Wilkins. | have also sent it to Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council, and the Care Quality Commission who may find it of interest. 1am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 16/11/2017 “9 Signature_,.-~ “t7_ or, Chris Morris HM Area Coroner Manchester South
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Olympic House 3 Olympic Way Wembley, HAS ONP T: 020 8795 6500 F: 020 8900 0277 W: www.candcheaithcare.co.uk Christopher Morris HM Area Coroner Manchester South 1 Mottram St Mount Tabor Stockport SK1 3PA 7 February 2018 Dear Mr Morris Doreen Wilkins You wrote to our Chief Executive, James Thorburn, on 16" November 2017 enclosing a Regulation 28 report arising from the inquest into the very sad death of a user of our services, Doreen Wilkins. Our thoughts remain with Mrs Wilkins’s family at this difficult time and we would like to thank you for affording us the opportunity to take valuable learning from the incident for the benefit of those that use our services now and in the future. We are also grateful for your agreement to grant an extension to the deadline for our response. Amongst my duties, | have oversight of health and safety, insurance and range of legal matters and | have accordingly been asked to respond to your report on behalf of Mr Thorburn. | have addressed the substantive matters below. A clarification Firstly, however, as a point of clarification, we would like to draw your attention to the registration requirement identified in your report that Comfort Call was required to submit monthly reports to the CQC showing “the actions that have been taken to ensure staff rotas are meeting the needs of service users including time critical calls and travel time between visits’. The requirement above was extracted from Comfort Call’s certificate of registration with the CQC. The way in which the certificate was formatted in its original version was misleading in that it appeared to present the above requirement as relating to Comfort Call as a whole, whereas it was in fact a requirement related specifically to the Bristol office (now closed) alone. Having realised this, we raised the matter with the CQC, who have since amended the certificate such that it is now clear that the requirement was not in respect of City & County Healthcare Group Ltd Registered Office: 2nd Floor, Olympic House, 3 Olympic Way Wembley HAD ONP. Registered in England and Wales, Registration Number 05456435. Comfort Call as a whole (and therefore not of our office in Tameside to which the inquest is related). A copy of the corrected certificate is attached for reference. This is not to say, of course, that the duty of Comfort Call's Tameside office to provide safe services (in accordance with reg.12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014) does not remain entirely pertinent and we therefore address the matters of concern in the context of that duty rather than in relation to any specific requirement of registration. Matters of concern Inadequate travel time is only one reason why a critical care visit might be late and it is appropriate therefore that we explain the general policies and processes that are in place to guard against critical care visits being missed (or late) to the extent that an individual's safety is compromised. When a referral is made to us by the local authority, any care needs will be identified. These would include time-critical elements of the care, such as the need to provide medication or food. These critical needs will be included in the care plan loaded on to our roster system and communicated to any care worker attending to the service user. It is therefore clear to those coordinating as well as those delivering the services that the timeliness of a particular call is of critical importance. At present, if a care worker in the field were to find themselves running sufficiently late for a critical care visit that the service user's safety might be put at risk (which could happen for a variety of reasons), they would be expected to notify the local office. The local management team would then take appropriate action, sending an alternative care worker if necessary to ensure that the required care is delivered on time. To further reinforce the robustness of these policies and processes, we are also introducing (during the coming weeks) new technology at the Tameside office that will track care worker activity in real time. The Road Runner app is a mobile-based technology which (amongst other things) allows care coordinators to flag critical care visits. The system will then alert the coordinating team in the local office (or, outside normal office hours, the out of hours coordinator) if a care worker fails to arrive for a critical call. This in turn allows the coordinator to make alternative arrangements as necessary in the manner already described above. In summary, whilst a lack of rostered travel time would be a potential reason for a critical care visit to be late, our systems are such that if a critical care visit were likely not to be delivered on time (for whatever reason), alternative arrangements could and would be made, mitigating the risk of harm. Furthermore, these failsafes are about to become more robust through the introduction of new technology. As well as the concerns around the delivery of critical care, your report also raised the issue of inadequate travel time and the related issue of care workers leaving assignments early to get to the next visit. It would of course be a concern were any individual's care needs not met on any particular occasion, but we would caution against assuming that the duration of call commissioned in Tameside is necessarily precisely aligned with the amount of care required in each instance. This is because care visits are commissioned by the Council in blocks of fifteen minutes. Very few calls of just fifteen minutes are commissioned, and where they are, these would tend to be for medication checks City & County Healthcare Group ttd Registered Office: 2nd Floor, Clympic House. 3 Olympic Way, Wembley HA9 ONP. Registered in England and wales, Registration Number 6991398 only. Any call entailing personal care (washing, providing food etc.) would therefore be likely to be commissioned for thirty minutes, even if the care tasks took, say, only twenty minutes to complete. It should be clear from this, then, that in any given instance, the fact that a call might have been curtailed by a few minutes is not inherently inconsistent with the delivery of adequate care. That said, this fact does not preclude the possibility that inadequate travel time in care worker rotas could risk an individual not having as much contact time with the care worker as they need. This fact had already been recognised by Tameside Borough Council and | am very pleased to report that following discussions with them, it has now been agreed that they will pay an additional sum for time spent travelling between care assignments under their contract, thereby allowing us to include travel time as a separate and discrete element in staff rotas, which we have now done. This effectively increases the amount of time care workers will be able to spend in direct contact with their service users, improving the quality of the service. We trust that these new arrangements will satisfy your expectations in relation to the prevention of future deaths, but if you do require further information, please do let me know. Yours sincerely sth Director of Policy and Communications City & County Healthcare Croup td Registered Office: 2nd Floor, Olympic House. 3 Olympic way. Wembley HAS ONP, Registered in England and Wales, Registravon Number 6991398
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.