Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0500, written 9 Oct 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 9 Oct 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0500 |
| Deceased | Derek Crowther |
| Coroner | Chris Morris |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Chief Executive, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust
CORONER
I am Chris Morris, Area Coroner for Greater Manchester (South).
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 1st May 2025, an inquest was opened into the death of Derek Crowther who died on the
Saffron Unit, The Meadows, Stockport on 16th December 2024, aged 86 years. The investigation
concluded with an inquest which I heard on 7th – 8th October 2025.
A post mortem examination determined Mr Crowther died as a consequence of:
1)a) Intracranial Haemorrhage
b) Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
At the end of the inquest, I recorded a conclusion of Natural Causes.
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Mr Crowther died on 16th December 2024 on the Saffron Unit, The Meadows, Stockport as a
consequence of complications arising from Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy. Mr Crowther had
been admitted to the Unit for a period of assessment following a profound deterioration in his
dementia.
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my
statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
1. The Court heard evidence that a registered nurse working on the Unit at the (cid:415)me of Mr
Crowther’s death was not up to date with Intermediate Life Support (‘ILS’) training, despite
this being termed ‘mandatory’. Having heard evidence from the Trust’s Clinical Excellence
Lead for Older Peoples’ Services, I am concerned that instances con(cid:415)nue to arise across the
Trust whereby clinical staff are undertaking shi(cid:332)s despite not being up to date with the
required level of Life Support training.
2. Whilst the Court heard evidence as to relevant changes made to the Trust’s Observa(cid:415)ons
Policy since Mr Crowther’s death, I am concerned that despite having an Electronic Pa(cid:415)ent
Records system, there is currently no mechanism in use on the wards for contemporaneous
digital recording of observa(cid:415)ons. I am concerned that an ongoing risk of future deaths arises
from this posi(cid:415)on, in the view of the poten(cid:415)al for such systems to accurately record (cid:415)mings
of observa(cid:415)ons, facilitate trend analysis (par(cid:415)cularly in the context of a deteriora(cid:415)ng
pa(cid:415)ent), and reduce the poten(cid:415)al for errors, either arising from incorrect / unclear manual
recording of observa(cid:415)ons
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your
organisation have the power to take such action.
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely
by 4th December 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, together with members of Mr Crowther’s
family and the Care Quality Commission who may find the report to be useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. She
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
Dated:
9th October 2025
Signature:
, Area Coroner, Manchester South.
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Corporate Legal Services Trust Headquarters 225 Old Street Ashton Under Lyne Lancashire OL6 7SF 3 December 2025 Private & Confidential Christopher Morris HM Area Coroner HM Coroner's Court 1 Mount Tabor Street Stockport SK1 3AG Dear Mr Morris, RE: Inquest touching on the death of Derek Crowther I set out below the Trust’s response to your letter to Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (PCFT) and the issuing of a Prevention of Future Deaths Notice (Regulation 28), arising from the inquest into the death of Derek Crowther. May I take this opportunity to extend my own condolences to the family of Mr Crowther and apologise that you had to raise concerns relating to the services he accessed prior to his sad death. The Trust sets out its response to the points below raised by HMC’s as areas of concern: 1. The Court heard evidence that a registered nurse working on the Unit at the time of Mr Crowther’s death was not up to date with Immediate Life Support (‘ILS’) training, despite this being termed ‘mandatory’. Having heard evidence from the Trust’s Clinical Excellence Lead for Older Peoples’ Services, I am concerned that instances continue to arise across the Trust whereby clinical staff are undertaking shifts despite not being up to date with the required level of Life Support training. At Mr Crowther’s inquest you heard evidence from the Trust’s Clinical Excellence Lead for Older People that staff member trained in Immediate Life Support (ILS) is present on all shifts. As you have noted, this forms part of the mandatory training requirements for staff working within all Healthcare settings. Ideally, staff would receive refresher training before the expiry of their existing competency, meaning that their compliance was continuous. It is recognised that this may not always be possible and so NHS organisations are able to agree a tolerance or target threshold. The Trust recognises the critical importance of ensuring staff are appropriately trained to respond to medical emergencies and has taken further action to mitigate risk and improve compliance rates. It also acknowledges the risk associated with non compliance and availability of training, which is overseen within our Resuscitation Committee but also reported as part of our management structures and governance meetings. The Trust has increased its Trust wide compliance target to 85%. This figure has been benchmarked against other NHS Trusts and is understood to be at the higher end of expectation for Mental Health organisations. To support reaching this increased compliance rate, training uptake is monitored via the mandatory training dashboard and reported through divisional governance to the Care Quality Oversight Group. The ILS training compliance for inpatient ward staff is currently between 73 and 74%. While we acknowledge this is below our revised target, we continue to work hard to improve this, with the oversight of our Trust Board. Increased training capacity has been created by ensuring additional ILS training sessions have been made available. This has increased capacity and reduced waiting times for staff who need to book onto available training. Timetabling of training has been adjusted to improve access for ward-based staff. The Trust is also addressing non-attendance on ILS training, which is recognised to impact on compliance rates. Non-attendance on a booked courses is escalated to Ward Managers and Network Quality Leads to support awareness but also understanding of the underlying causes or reasons why staff could not attend as planned. ILS compliance is being incorporated into ward rota planning to ensure wards are appropriately staffed whilst simultaneously releasing those staff who require refresher training, which will in turn lead to an increase in compliance. The Trust is extending ILS training to additional clinical staff groups such as Bank staff and trainee doctors to increase resilience and the number of ILS trained staff present on the ward on a shift. Each ward is required to have at least one ILS trained member of nursing staff on every shift, including nights and weekends. Compliance with this requirement is monitored daily through Safer Staffing meetings, with escalation where gaps arise to ensure an ILS trained staff member is available for all shits on every inpatient ward across the Trust. The Trust acknowledges your concerns and is committed to ensuring safe staffing and prompt emergency response capability across all inpatient settings. The actions set out above provide immediate mitigation whilst longer-term improvements continue to strengthen the ILS cover on the wards. 2. Whilst the Court heard evidence as to relevant changes made to the Trust’s Observations Policy since Mr Crowther’s death, I am concerned that despite having an Electronic Patient Records system, there is currently no mechanism in use on the wards for contemporaneous digital recording of observations. I am concerned that an ongoing risk of future deaths arises from this position, in the view of the potential for such systems to accurately record timings of observations, facilitate trend analysis (particularly in the context of a deteriorating patient), and reduce the potential for errors, either arising from incorrect / unclear manual recording of observations The Trust has undertaken some focused improvement work on therapeutic observations of care, from December 2024 into the spring of 2025. This was led by our Deputy Director of Nursing, Quality and AHP’s and informed by nationally indicated best practice and published guidance. This included the creation of a policy, and the development of a targeted training course which was supported by an implementation plan for staff to deliver this at scale and pace, within the individual care areas. This method of delivery was intended to maximise staff attendance and was coordinated as part of a ‘focus week’, in which there was increased communications about the policy, requirements and methodology. This approach also allowed for our temporary workforce to be included in this. The Trust also established an Enhanced Therapeutic Observations of Care (ETOC) Task and Finish Group in March 2025. One of the workstreams within that group is the development of an electronic observations (eObs) app. This response will provide additional information pertaining to that workstream in addition to the information provided previously regarding the broader work of the group around, policy, training, culture and improvement. The development of an eobs app is just one element of that workplan. The build and configuration work has began on the app. This will be ready for testing by March 2026 and pilot of the app commenced in April 2026. At this stage we are unable to give a full implementation go live date Trust wide but can update you in our progress as the pilot progresses and concludes. I was sorry to learn that the Clinical Excellence Lead attending Mr Crowther’s inquest was not aware of these developments whilst he gave evidence, as this may have provided you with the assurance of action that you were seeking. I understand that steps have been taken to ensure this is communicated effectively to them directly, but also reviewing the ways in which this progress can be shared with staff more broadly as we approach the testing phase of this process. We are working with our digital team we have set April ’26 as a realistic date that we can deliver a pilot on eObs. We understand a question was asked in relation to the eObs app in place at Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GMMH) and the ability for the Trust to adopt this. Whilst GMMH has been able to implement therapeutic observations on some of their wards, which had Wi-Fi upgrades, there are challenges still with their coverage. GMMH are currently not utilising 'offline' capability, which has been identified as key requirement for our e-Obs solution, given feedback to date and the lessons that have been learnt at GMMH. Without 'offline' capability we cannot guarantee that should there be a drop in Wi-Fi connection; data integrity would be maintained. We are working closely with colleagues at GMMH, sharing learning and progress to inform our project and ensure we are able to implement an effective system at PCFT. I hope that the information within this response has provided you with the assurance that you were seeking in relation to learning from these events. Should you require any further information or clarification on the details within this letter, please do not hesitate to get in touch with me again.
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.