Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Harold Wonfor

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0408, written 20 Nov 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report20 Nov 2017
Reference2017-0408
DeceasedHarold Wonfor
CoronerKate Thomas
Coroner areaKent (Central & South East)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust 
CORONER 

1 

I am Kate Thomas Assistant Coroner for Central and South East Kent 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I  make  this  report  under  paragraph  7,  Schedule  5,  of  the  Coroners  and  Justice  Act  2009  and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 12/06/2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of Harold Graham  WONFOR. The 
investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 14th September 2017. The conclusion of the 
inquest  was  Harold  Wonfor  was  admitted  to  the  William  Harvey  Hospital  on  the  22nd  of 
January 2017 with a history of falls which was not recognised. On the 24th of January he had an 
unwitnessed  fall  on  Cambridge  L  ward  sustaining  a  Subdural  Haematoma  from  which  he 
declined and subsequently died on the 30th January 2017.  
1a    
 b 
c   
II   

 Acute Subdural Haematoma 

 Asbestosis 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 
Following  his  admission  to  the  Kent  and  Canterbury  Hospital  on  the  21st  of  December  2016, 
Harold Wonfor sustained a number of falls whilst on the ward.   Clinical investigation concluded 
that there had been no subsequent injury although it was well documented that he was frail, 
HAD a number of co-morbities and presented a falls risk.  He was discharged on the 5th January 
2017  into the care of his family. 
On the 22nd of January he was admitted in the William Harvey Hospital where be presented as 
being confused with reduced mobility.  He was transferred to the CDU (Clinical Decisions Unit) 
for assessment. 
Hospital policy dictated that a falls assessment should be done within 6 hours of admission but 
such time should be abridged where the patient is vulnerable or a clear falls risk. 
Mr Wonfor was not assessed during the 24 hours he remained in the CDU in contravention of 
Hospital Policy.   
On the 24th of January he was transferred to Cambridge L Ward.  At the time of transfer no falls 
assessment had been done and there were no falls prevention measures in place. At the very 
least Mr Wonfor should have been met by a Nurse upon arriving on the Ward and placed in an 
observation bed.  This did not happen. 
Approximately 30 minutes after arriving on Cambridge L Ward, Mr Wonfor had an un-witnessed 
fall during which he struck his head on a sink and sustained a Subdural Haemotoma from which 
he subsequently declined and died on the 30th of January 2017.  

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence  revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances 
it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] 
(1) Between January 2017 and April 2017  five deaths occurred on Cambridge Wards at William 
Harvey Hospital. Common to each was the fact that the death was caused as a result of a fall on 
the  ward  in  circumstances  where  falls  risk  assessments  were  either  inadequate,  incomplete, 
not reviewed or not enforced. Inquests in respect of each the deaths have been held, the last in 
November 2017. The Trust was given an opportunity following the earlier inquests to provide 
evidence of changes to practice following the deaths. It is recognised that at the time of hearing 
the inquests much work has already been done to address these issues but that work is ongoing 
and  parts  of  that  work  have  not  yet  been  implemented/were  in  the  process  of  being 
implemented. It is for this reason that Regulation 28 reports arise from three of the deaths. 
(2)  That  the  policies  and  procedures  for  falls  risk  assessment  is  inadequate  especially  for  the 
vulnerable 
(3)  There  is  inadequate  monitoring  and  enforcement  of  the  falls  prevention  policies  and 
procedures in place  

 
 
 
 
 
 6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I  believe  you  East  Kent 
Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely 
by 16th January 2018. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be  taken,  setting  out  the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 
Next of Kin. I have also sent it to Care Quality Commission who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He 
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. 
You  may  make  representations  to  me,  the  coroner,  at  the  time  of  your  response,  about  the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

20/11/2017 

Signature:  

Kate Thomas Assistant Coroner Central and South East Kent

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from East Kent NHS Trust (PDF)
REC
17 JAN 2n1A

Ms K Thomas

Assistant Coroner Central and South East Kent
Cantium House

2" Floor

Sandling Road

Maidstone

ME14 1XD

Our Ref: SA/HG/hp
12 January 2018

From: Susan Acott, Interim Chief Executive

Dear Ms Thomas

Re — Mr Harold Graham Wonfor (deceased)

East Kent

Hospitals University
NHS Foundation Trust

Trust Offices

Kent & Canterbury Hospital
Ethelbert Road

Canterbury

Kent CT1 3NG

Tel: 01227 866379

Following the conclusion of the Inquest hearing into the death of Mr Harold Graham Wonfor on 14
September 2017 and your subsequent letter dated 20 November 2017 pursuant to paragraph 7,
Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners
(Investigations) Regulations 2013, | write to inform you of the actions and considerations taken by

East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust.

We note this Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths is one of three Inquests heard by the
Central and South East Coroners in September 2017 and the matters of concern relate to the
management of falls within the Trust. Acknowledgment by the Senior Coroner of the
improvements that have already been made by the Trust regarding timely and adequate falls risk
assessments is gratefully received and this work continues as outlined in my response.

The rate of patient falls and patient falls resulting in harm to patients are key patient safety
measures which the Trust monitors monthly as part of our quality indicators. They also form part of
the core patient safety component of the Board priorities for 2017/18. Reports are received
monthly to the Board of Directors and the Quality Committee on our performance against plan. We
have set ourselves challenging stretch targets to achieve as our patient falls prevention
programme is of a high priority. The latest confirmed results for October 2017 show the falls rate is
5.63 per 1,000 occupied bed days, which is below our target for the year. The confirmed falls
national rate from the 2015 National Falls Audit was 6.6 per 1,000 occupied bed days; the Trust
overall had a confirmed falls rate of 6.29 at the time of publication. This shows the falls rate for the

Trust overall is better than the national rate.

es

The National Falls Audit also reports a patient harm rate i.e. where the harm to the patient, as a
direct consequence of the fall is severe or death as with the patients concerned. The national rate
in the 2015 report was 0.18 per 1000 occupied bed days; this was the rate for the Trust overall in
this part of the National Falls Audit. This shows the rate of harm to be the same as the national
rate. The results of the 2015 National Falls Audit showed that the Trust had improvements to
make in all three of our bed-holding hospitals; this improvement programme has again been a
priority for the Trust.

There are no published studies of falls risk prediction tools that predicted risk at greater than 70%
sensitivity. The National Institute Health and Care Excellence (NICE) therefore concluded that all
inpatients aged 65 and older ‘should have their care managed as if they are at risk of falling’ on the
basis that these patients ‘often have newly acquired risk factors (such as acute illness, delirium,
cardiovascular disease, impaired mobility, medication or syncope syndrome) and are exposed to
unfamiliar surroundings, which puts them at increased risk of falling during their inpatient stay’.'
The current falls policy and risk assessment tool reflect NICE guidance and we have focused on
these areas specifically in order to action the factors that are known to reduce falls risk. We
therefore reviewed our Falls Risk Assessment and Care Plan (FRACP) to be explicit about how
incorporate this guidance. We also developed a quality improvement programme call “Fallstop”
which to prevent patients falls in our care.

Round 2 of the National Falls Audit took place in May 2017, after the three falls in question had
occurred; the audit results were published on 22 November 2017, two days after the Trust received
the three Regulation 28 reports. Table 1 demonstrates current performance and the
improvements seen across the three hospitals.

Table 1 —- Comparative data from the 2015 and the 2017 National Falis Audit

Site | Delirium | Continence; BP % | Medication | Vision % | Call bell | Mobility

% CP % | % % aid %
7 2017

K&CH 100 100 | 24 «OJ 95 | 88 78 92
/QEQMH| 100 | 93 "40 > 100 | #100 | «#95 | 8
[WHH | 92 93 | 38. 94 92 93 ~©~©100
| K&CH 60 65.2 88.2 91.7 | 667 84.6 92
| QEQMH 65 50 =| «(66.7 88 706 | 769 88.5
| WHH 37.9 455 | 45.8 0 36.4 18.2 55.6

The patient falls all occurred on the frailty Ward at the William Harvey Hospital; this ward often has
confused, wandering patients and this situation requires additional ‘eyes and ears’ to help provide
a safe environment for the patients. It is a challenge to ensure that there are always sufficient staff
on duty each shift to meet the ideal staff to patient ratio. Additional NHS Professionals Health Care
Assistants and Registered Nurses that are requested are sometimes unfilled. Where this situation
occurs, staff are redeployed from other clinical areas. We have in the past three month introduced
SafeCare across the Trust. SafeCare enables ward staff see if their staffing levels match the
demand and for staff to be moved across the site during each day. The nurse-in charge conducts

“4

a census three times per day of the number and acuity of the patients and inputs this onto the
system. SafeCare then calculates the number of nursing hours that are required during this
census period and compares it to the number of nursing hours available. This allows for the
Clinical Site Team to make informed decisions when moving the staff to the area of greatest risk
and allows for the efficient use of all available nursing time.

In June, 2017 a business case was approved to support a full time band 4 Associate Practitioner
(AP) for Falls Prevention and she joined the team in September 2017. She is actively supporting
the Fallstop programme.

| would like to take this opportunity of thanking you for your letter and can reassure you that we

have taken on board your comments and will continue our commitment to deliver a safe and
effective service to our patients.

Yours sincerely

Csta A

Susan Acott
Interim Chief Executive

1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Falls in older people: assessing risk and
prevention (CG161). Manchester: NICE, 2013. www.nice.org.uk/quidance/cg161

Related reports

Other reports by Kate Thomas

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.