Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Barbara Howard

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0420, written 27 Nov 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Nov 2017
Reference2017-0420
DeceasedBarbara Howard
CoronerJoanne Andrews
Coroner areaWest Sussex
CategoryCommunity health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANNEX A

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Daren Mochrie — Chief Executive South East Coast
Ambulance Service of Nexus House, 4 Gatwick Road,
Crawley, RH10 9BG

1 | CORONER

| am Joanne Andrews, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of West

Sussex.
——|

2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and
Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners
(Investigations) Regulations 2013.

/3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 1 August 2017 | commenced an investigation into the death of
Barbara Howard, 68. The investigation concluded at the end of the
inquest on 23 November 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was natural
causes.

4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Mrs Howard was found on the floor at her home on 19 July 2017 having
fallen. A neighbour rang for an ambulance at 1936hrs. The call was
graded as Green 2 requiring a 30 minute response time. At 2003hrs a
further call was made by the neighbour of Mrs Howard to establish when
an ambulance would arrive and was informed that they were working on
Demand Plan Level 4 (although at inquest it was established that this was
in fact level 2) as they were stacking more than 10 999 calls. At 2028hrs
a single response vehicle (SRV) was sent to Mrs Howard's address and
arrived at 2046hrs. The SRV then called for backup at 2050 and should
have arrived within 8 minutes of the request as per SECAMB's policy.
Backup was assigned at 2101hrs and chased at 2119hrs arriving on

| scene at 2126hrs. Mrs Howard was then transported to hospital and sadly |

died from the injuries sustained in the fall on 20 July 2017.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise
to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to
report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

(1) In evidence the Court was informed that on 19 July 2017 the
Chichester and Worthing areas had 30-40 staff vacancies made up of
2 Paramedic Practitioner roles and 25 paramedic roles. This equated
to being 2 ambulances and 1 car short. | was advised that the current
position is that the area is now 14 paramedics short which equates to
1 ambulance per day for the area.

(2) In evidence, | heard that when a call is not responded to within the
national target time, in this case, 30 minutes, then a Clinician should
ring the patient to ascertain the priority of the call within the category.
On 19 July 2017 this was not done and they were around 15
clinicians short within the Emergency Operation Centre. | was
informed that there are now 9 clinicians in training the Emergency
Operation Centre but this still means that there are 6 staff members
short.

(3) The evidence was that SECAMB policy is that 1300 calls per month
should be audited however the audit is only about 60% on target.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and |
believe your organisation] have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date
of this report, namely by 22 January 2018. |, the coroner, may extend the
period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain
why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following
Interested Persons:

L

| the family of Mrs Barbara Joan Howard

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your
response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
—

9

=
27 November 2017

O-FROUC WA

ne |

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Trust (PDF)
South East Coast Ambulance Service (NHS)

NHS Foundation Trust

| 26 JAN 2618 | South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS
a, Foundation Trust
Nexus House

Cid AEESTS Gatwick Road
Crawley
RH10 9BG
Ms J Andrews
HM Assistant Coroner for West Sussex Po
Centenary House
Crawley
RH10 8BF
18 January 2018
Dear Madam

Response to Regulation 28 report

| confirm receipt of the Regulation 28 report issued by you on 27 November 2017, arising from
the Inquest into the death of Barbara Howard.

| have instigated an investigation into the matters raised in the report, and | respond as follows:

Issue one — deficit of paramedics

There is a national shortage of paramedics, with a deficit of new entrants to the profession. All
ten ambulance services in the UK have vacancies which they are struggling to fill. Secamb’s
problem is compounded by a withdrawal of funding from Health Education England for
paramedic training, a change by the Home Office to the visa sponsorship scheme limiting our
ability to recruit internationally, due to a significant increase in visa costs to employers, and our
being in a high cost of living area but not qualifying for any weighting (apart from a small part
of our area within Surrey).

Despite these challenges, we are taking measures to try to improve our recruitment of crew.
The introduction of the Ambulance Response Programme (ARP) in November 2017 has led
discussions surrounding a different skill mix requirement in our crews and this is being
monitored at our workforce and business planning meetings, the first of which was in January
2018; this group will continue to meet over the next few months, using latest data to map out
what our requirements are against call volume, call categorisation and vacancy rates. This is
constantly evolving. We have also planned, for later this month, a meeting between our
resourcing team and our Operating Unit Managers to work towards a new strategy to address
our resourcing deficit. We are exploring the possibility of recruiting IHCD qualified paramedics
— those who do not have a degree but qualified following an “on the job” training route. This is

+

Chairman: Richard Foster Chief Executive: Daren Mochrie QAM Your service, Hf

a new measure as we had been restricting our recruitment to degree qualified paramedics. We
are also increasing our Band 4/Technician workforce to meet demand.

The Chichester and Worthing area currently has 14 vacancies, of which seven will be filled by
qualifying students in March/April 2018, leaving seven truly outstanding vacancies. We have
a live advert for newly qualified paramedics and have an assessment day planned for 3
February 2018.

Issue two — deficit of clinicians

The Trust has had a problem attracting and retaining clinicians to work in our Emergency
Operations Centres (EOCs) for a number of years. The problem has been compounded by a
re-grading decision made by NHS England, whereby clinicians working in the EOCs are now
the same pay band as paramedics on the road. As a result, some clinicians working in EOC
have chosen to go back onto the road as there is a perception amongst paramedics that
working in EOC is more stressful, due to it being harder to make clinical assessments over the
telephone and because they have multiple demands at any one time.

We have recruited 26 clinicians during 2017 but we have lost 20.

To address this issue, Secamb have created a project plan to address our EOC issues,
including the implementation of radical changes to the recruitment and retention of the EOC
clinicians. This plan is currently with the Director of Operations for sign-off and will then be
presented to the Trust's Executive for approval, after which it will be implemented. | attach a
summary of the plan. Our initiatives also include:

a. The creation of a new role — “Support Call Taker”. This is a non-clinical role designed
to alleviate the pressure on EOC clinicians. The Support Call Takers will work in the
EOC carrying out welfare call backs. This means that where we are not able to dispatch
an ambulance resource within the target time, the SCT will call the patient or the caller
to ensure that the patient has not got any worse and to offer advice on such matters as
keeping warm, staying hydrated and taking prescribed medication. The SCT will have
the power to escalate to a clinician any patient about whom there are clinical concerns.
We are recruiting and training for this role now.

b. A change to the way we forecast volumes of calls, together with a rota review, to try
better to align clinician capacity with demand.

c. Achange to the way we deal with situations where actual demand for our resources on
any shift exceeds forecast demand and therefore exceeds available resources. Fora
number of years, we have had in place a Demand Management Plan to cope with this
situation. This is no longer appropriate, since the introduction of the Ambulance
Response Programme (“ARP”). ARP is a national program instigated by NHS England
to address the inappropriate categorisation of 999 ambulance calls and dispatch of
resources to them. ARP has introduced a new set of nationally prescribed
categorisations and response times. | attach a chart summarising the new system. The
objective is to match the resource requirements. Secamb introduced ARP on 22
November 2017. The Demand Management Plan does not match ARP, so we have
created a replacement, called the Surge Management Plan, which will come into
operation imminently. This Plan imposes time parameters on the welfare process and

provides for an outstanding call to be allocated or escalated to ensure the most
appropriate resource is provided.

d. Our fleet is being remodelled in order to provide the most appropriate resources to meet
demand. We currently have a mix of approximately 70% Double Crewed Ambulances
(a “traditional” ambulance that can transport a patient to hospital) and 30% Single
Response Vehicles (an ambulance car, crewed by just one paramedic and not designed
for transporting patients to hospital). We are moving to 90% Double Crewed
Ambulances and 10% Single Response Vehicles. This will take around two years to roll
out.

We are considering further radical changes such as home working, and shared rotational

working with GPs; these possibilities are under discussion at the moment and will be subject
to viability assessments before a decision can be made as to whether to implement them.

Issue three — low call audit rate

We are aware of the current shortfall in compliance with NHS Pathways audit requirements,
this has been identified as a “CQC must do” and appears on the Trusts corporate risk
register. A structured plan has been created and is in progress to rectify this. The plan
involves:

e The provision of dedicated and time protected staffing resources to undertake the
audits;

e The introduction of new reporting and recording systems to monitor performance;

e The introduction of new technology based solutions to allow for a more streamlined
process; and

e More training for staff to support the audit function.

Please find attached a summary of the plan.
| am very sorry that we were not able to attend to Mrs Howard more quickly and for the
deficiencies in our resources and systems that were identified during your investigation. | hope
that it is clear from all that | set out above that | am acutely aware of the areas of our practice
that need improvement and that | am actively taking steps to have them resolved as soon as
possible. If | can assist you further, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

Daren Mochrie

Chief Executive
South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust.

Related reports

Other reports by Joanne Andrews

See all →

More reports categorised “Community health care and emergency services related deaths”

See all →

Track Community health care and emergency services related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.