Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018

Neville Welton

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0150, written 17 May 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report17 May 2018
Reference2018-0150
DeceasedNeville Welton
CoronerJohn Gittins
Coroner areaNorth Wales (East & Central)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

John Adrian Gittins
Senior Coroner for North Wales (East and Central)

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

BCUBHB, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2PW

1 CORONER

| am JOHN ADRIAN GITTINS, senior coroner, for the coroner area of North Wales (East
and Central)]

2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On the 18" of December 2017 | commenced an investigation into the death of Neville
Welton. The investigation has not yet concluded and the inquest has not yet been heard.

4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

On the evening of the 12!" of December 2017 the Deceased attended the Emergency
Department at Wrexham Maelor Hospital following a referral from his GP. Due to a
combination of factors including (but not exclusively) capacity and patient flow problems,
staffing issues and administrative/escalation failures, there was a delay in him being
assessed and treated, his condition deteriorated and he passed away in the early hours
of the following morning.

5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to
concern, In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken.
In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows :-

The various factors referred to in paragraph 4 will be further considered at the inquest
hearing, however | am concerned firstly by the length of time taken by the Health Board
to conclude its Confidential Investigation and to formulate an Action Plan as this was not
completed until the 27" of April 2018, some four and a half months after Mr Welton’s
death.

| am further concerned that notwithstanding that an Action Plan had been established
with agreed timescales for implementation of actions, these timescales have not been
met and matters remain outstanding at the present time.

Whilst this investigation and report relates to the death of Mr Welton, | am concerned
generally by the length of time which is taken by the Health Board to conclude its
Serious Incident Reviews and thereafter to formulate and implement Action Plans.

Coroner's Office, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LL15 1YN
Tel 01824 708047 | Fax 01824 708048

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your
organisations have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by12" July 2018 |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Person — The Family of the Deceased

lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Dated 17 May 2018

Signature Hn Cot A een \
Senior Coroner for North Wales (East and Central)

Coroner's Office, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LL1S LYN
Tel 01824 708047 | Fax 01824 708048

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from University Health Board (PDF)
Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Ysbyty Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor,

Betsi Cadwaladr Gwynedd, LL57 2PW

oo University Health Board (seen neenennenn enn
WALES

Ein cyf/Ourref: = INC142329

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Eich cyf/ Your ref:
Rhif Ysbyty / Hospital Number:

Mr John Gittins Rhif GIG / NHS Number:

H.M. Coroner North Wales

(East and Central) @: 01745 586390 x 6360

County Hall Gofynnwch am/ Ask for:
Wynnstay Road Ffacs / Fax: 01248 385318

Ruthin, Denbighshire ;

LL15 1YN E-bost / Email: concernsteam.bcu@wales.nhs.uk

Dyddiad / Date: 12 July 2018

Dear Mr Gittins
Re: Regulation 28 relating to Mr Neville Welton

Further to the recent Regulation 28 issued by yourself in relation to the death of Mr Neville
Welton. Please find below the Health Board response to your concerns which | trust will
provide you with assurance about how we intend to strengthen our processes to avoid a
reoccurrence of the issues you have identified.

The concerns you raised were:

“lam concerned firstly by the length of time taken by the Health Board to conclude its
Confidential Investigation and to formulate an Action Plan as this was not completed until the
27" April 2018, some four months after Mr Welton’s death.

| am further concerned that notwithstanding that an Action Plan had been established with
agreed timescales for implementation of actions, these timescales have not been met and
matters remain outstanding at the present time.

Whilst this investigation and report relates to the death of Mr Welton, | am concerned
generally by the length of time which is taken by the Health Board to conclude its Serious
Incident Reviews and thereafter to formulate and implement Action Plans.”

The current process

The Concerns Procedure (PTRO1a) outlines and guides staff in the management of incident
investigation. Once an incident is identified staff should take immediate action to ensure the
safety of the persons involved, restore a safe environment, preserve evidence and ensure the
incident is reported. Where an incident is categorised as either major or catastrophic (where
serious alleged harm has occurred) the circumstances surrounding the incident are escalated
to senior staff.

Cyfeiriad Gohebiaeth ar gyfer y Cadeirydd a'r Prif Weithredwr / Correspondence address for Chairman and Chief Executive:
Swyddfa'r Gweithredwyr / Executives’ Office,
Ysbyty Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd
Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2PW Gwefan: www.pbc.cymru.nhs.uk / Web: www.bcu.wales.nhs.uk

Within 72hrs of the incident being reported an initial review is instigated by the divisional
governance teams and includes relevant clinical staff. Remedial actions are re-affirmed
and/or further identified and the terms of reference for a comprehensive investigation ‘serious
incident review are outlined.

The investigation is undertaken, lead by the Chair and driven by the Investigating Officer,
working with a small group of relevant expert staff not associated with the care of the
individual. Statements from the staff involved in the care/incident inform the investigation and
they also have an opportunity to comment on the draft report.

Currently the Investigation Officers into catastrophic incidents (resulting in death) are drawn
from the corporate concerns team. Whilst this has afforded a degree of independence into
the investigation process, it has also lead to some disconnect between the service and the
investigation team and in some cases, delayed the development of the action plan.

The patient/family are involved to the degree they indicate in line with the Being Open policy.
The comprehensive investigation report is approved by the Chair of the panel and the
relevant service leads are responsible for developing, implementing, monitoring and
evaluating the actions to address the recommendations of the report. The relevant senior
manager (likely to be at Director level) would approve the action plan.

The finalised report and action plan is presented to the relevant divisional Quality & Safety
Meeting (reporting via the Quality and Safety Group to the Quality, Safety and Experience
Board Committee). The local Quality Safety meeting will oversee the implementation,
monitoring and efficacy of the actions.

The timescales for the whole process should be no more than 60 working days.

Individual case
In relation to the case of Mr Neville Welton, on reviewing the timeline of
investigations/incident reviews the issues that resulted in delays were:

e Chair/panel members did not respond in a timely manner to enable sign off of the draft
report

e Legal advice in relation to breach of duty, qualifying liability and causation was required
and it was assessed that the report could not be signed off by the Chair until this was
received.

e The action plan is developed by the division from the recommendations within the report
was delayed

Moving forward
In terms of moving forward a number of actions are being implemented to improve the
timeliness of our processes and the development of the action plans:

1. The Health Board is revising the model for the investigation of serious incidents to support
the divisions to investigate all incidents including catastrophic incidents. This will create
capacity within the Corporate Concerns Teams in order for them to support and train staff
in incident management. Each investigating officer for a catastrophic incident would have
a member of the Corporate Concerns Team working alongside them to ensure a timely

and robust investigation, that addresses qualifying liability for the start of the process and
will also ensure the action pans begins to be developed at the start of the process not
towards the end.

The corporate teams would also have the capacity to offer wider training to staff in the
investigation process and the management of incidents. The Corporate Concerns Teams
would retain the coordination role of the inquests work as is now in order to ensure robust
monitoring is in place.

This change will need to be managed over a period of transition but will formally
commence as of 1%t September 2018.

2, The Health Board is to introduce a weekly Incident Review Meeting (Scoping document
Appendix 1) to review on a regular basis all incidents reported on Datix in the previous 7
days. The meeting will be chaired by the Associate Director of Quality Assurance and

attended by the senior staff with a specific responsibility for quality and patient safety from
each division.

The standing agenda will review:

e All new catastrophic and major incidents reported in previous 7 days

e Update on the previous weeks serious incidents

e Performance management of incidents which are delayed

e Inquest scheduled for the coming month (monthly timescale used as need time to
ensure preparations are in place in good time)

The benefit of this approach is to ensure that incidents are classified accurately and that
teams allocated to undertaken the review are appropriate, it will also provide senior review
of high level incidents. The meeting will require senior managers to provide a summary of
all incidents, progress to date in terms of the investigation, learning identified and actions
taken to develop, and implement the action plan. The meeting will drive all investigations
to completion within the timescales and provide support to manage any challenges that
might hamper the progress of the investigation.

The meeting will be held on a Thursday afternoon commencing July 12 2018

3. A project management approach to be used when conducting a comprehensive
investigation with milestones for completion signed up to by the designated Chair (see

appendix 2). This approach is not yet in place and will be implemented as part of the
revised model described above.

The Health Board is committed to improving the learning from incidents and a timely and
robust investigation is key to this. We believe that the implementation of the actions above
will lead to significant improvement. These measures will take time to fully embed and the
actions will be closely monitored at both the weekly review meetings and reported monthly to
the Executive led Quality and Safety Group.

If you require any further information or wish to discuss this please do not hesitate to contact
me.

Yours sincerely

Mrs Gill Harris
Executive Director of Nursing and Midwifery on behalf of the Chief Executive

Related reports

Other reports by John Gittins

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.