Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0384, written 12 Dec 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 12 Dec 2018 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2018-0384 |
| Deceased | Benjamin Williamson |
| Coroner | Andrew Cox |
| Coroner area | Cornwall and Isles of Scilly |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015), Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Benjamin Colin Williamson REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. CMHT Commissioners 2. Addaction 3. Chief Coroner CORONER | am Andrew Cox, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Cornwall and Isles of Scilly. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. [ INVESTIGATION and INQUEST An Investigation was opened into the death of Mr Benjamin Williamson on 11 April 2018 following his death on 4 April. This culminated in an inquest on 8 November 2018 where | found Mr Williamson had died from 1a) Asphyxia 1b) Hanging Il) Alcohol intoxication | recorded a Conclusion of Suicide. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Williamson had a long history of alcohol-related issues for which he had been receiving treatment from Addaction and Freshfield. He had regular contact with his GP and had appeared to be doing well. His death was a shock to all concerned. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — CMHT Commissioners At inquest, | heard from Fo a partner at Mullion and Constantine Grou Practice and the Locality Lead for Commissioning. Mr Williamson was his patient il told me that Mr Williamson had been referred twice to CMHT. On both Occasi e had been seen, assessed and discharged. ibid mniscs this as having a significant impact upon his patient who was left feeling he was not ill enough to be worthy of soo la OS ee his view that the system is not set up to serve the population. He said it was his experience that patients like Benjamin are bounced between the various mental health services seen) i one willing or able to accept responsibility for providing professional care said he anticipated CMHT had met the letter of its contractual commitments but he felt it had failed to meet the needs of his patient. identified that the problem was particularly acute for patients who have a mental health issue plus an alcohol (or drug) problem. He felt that while referring Benjamin to Addaction had addressed his alcohol-related concerns, there had been a total lack of consideration of any underlying mental health issue. This is not the first occasion on which observations of this nature have been made before me although in]! have rarely had a more articulate or well-placed witness. Addaction (010 me that after referring Benjamin to Addaction he had no communications or feedback from the service. | heard from NEEM in this regard. It was accepted that there should have been more liaison with the GP and that, in particular, a letter from the doctor in January 2018 was not answered and should have been. Upon further exploration, it emerged that Benjamin had not given full consent for disclosure to his GP. | was told that his Recovery Plan had been reviewed on 25/5/17, 16/8/17, 27/10/17 and 12/2/18. | was advised that the issue of consent should have been considered at ae that did not appear to have happened. Both Benjamin’s mother and were of the view that if this matter had been dealt with fully, consent for disclosure to the GP would have been provided. HE ft that the lack of feedback compromised his ability to provide care to his patient. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. CMHT Commissioners Please consider whether the system is sufficiently ‘joined up’ to meet adequately the needs of patients like Benjamin. If there are gaps please bring these to my attention so | may direct this concern to central government should that be appropriate. If you have had correspondence or other discussions with government on the point please bring this to my attention and provide disclosure on a confidential basis to me only. Please ensure that contact is made with | so that his experiences and insights may properly be taken into account. Addaction Please review the processes/procedures in place for dealing with consent and the sharing of information with primary care practitioners. Please involve] in your review to ensure any lessons from this incident are identified and learned. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 12 February 2019. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the family. | have also sent it (i and Ors Related Death Prevention Co-ordinator), who may find it useful or of interest. | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publicatipn of your response by the Chief Coroner. 12/12/18 ‘OX
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Addaction Cornwall Mr Andrew Cox Western House Coroner for Cornwall & Isles of Scilly Tabernacle Street The New Lodge Truro Newquay Road Cornwall TR1 2EJ Penmount TRURO TR4 9AA 13/02/2019 Dear Mr Cox Re: Regulation 28 letter (12° December 2018) ref AUC / KC Addaction recognises the importance of confidentiality which is essential to the effective running of our services. We recognise the right of individuals in having their personal information protected and as such operate strict practices to ensure that personal information is held securely and shared appropriately. We seek consent from clients in order to share this information with other organisations and people, including their General Practitioner and we have a duty to inform our clients and service users of how we process, store and share this data under the GDPR 2016. Many people are apprehensive about engaging with addiction services and there is a real concern within the field that routine information sharing with GPs could create a barrier to accessing treatment for some individuals. People who use our services have a right to expect that information about them will be held in confidence by their workers and that they will be treated with discretion and sensitivity when accessing Addaction’s services. Our Confidentiality and Consent policy is based on the principle that the client's wishes and rights are of fundamental importance and draws upon guidance produced and published by Public Health England (Confidentiality Toolkit v6.3). Following the inquest into the death of Mr Benjamin Colin Williamson on November 8" you wrote to , Operations Manager asking that Addaction review the processes/procedures in place for dealing with consent and the sharing of information with Primary Care providers. In addition you asked that we involve [Eso that lessons learned would be identified and shared. | am writing to confirm that we have internally reviewed and improved how we record confidentiality and consent reviews, shared copies of Addaction’s consent and confidentiality policy (DQ225) and met with land colleagues at the Mullion Health Centre on 30" January 2019 to identify lessons learned and agree any required improvements. Improvements to recording confidentiality and consent reviews within Addaction Since December 2018 we have introduced a monitoring function into our patient management system (Halo). This will ensure that the three monthly reviews are conducted and recorded in line with our policy requirements. We now have ability to run reports, identify where reviews are required and monitor this through line management/supervision processes. Review consent and information sharing procedures with Primary Care. In the Mullion Health Centre a Summary Care Record (SCR) is created for all patients that enables staff providing care for patients in an emergency, from anywhere in England, are made aware of any current medications or allergies the patient may suffer from. This information from every patient record is sent automatically. If patients wish their information to be withheld from the SCR, they can choose to stop this from being shared (i.e. Opt-out). At Addaction clients are asked for consent, usually by signing a consent form, detailing with whom information can be shared, what information will be shared and for what purpose (i.e. Opt-in). Consents should be reviewed and updated regularly, normally every three months for adult services as part of the client’s recovery plan review. In addition when Addaction provides a regulated activity, such as a home detoxification, a BBV vaccination or a treatment for hepatitis C this is conditional on information being routinely shared with the GP. Likewise the GP is required to provide Addaction with a SCR and regular updates. Some Addaction staff work from a number of GP practices across the county, including the Mullion Health Centre, to improve accessibility and to ‘normalise’ obtaining help from specialist services. However we recognise that there are a number of patients who prefer to be seen away from their local Health Centre and that barriers to treatment could be created were other provision not made available. Addaction encourages workers to gain consent to share information with GPs and generally most people do not object to this. We examine those who decline to share information with their GP to ensure that risks are identified, assessed and managed. However Addaction does not operate a policy of absolute confidentiality and there are a number of circumstances that legally or ethically override the need for confidentiality. Our colleagues in Primary Care recognise that some patients will be reluctant to allow information to be shared with their GPs or attend specialist provision within the practice, preferring to access help and support in other locations. In Benjamin’s case decisions around information sharing with his GP and where he accessed sessions may have been influenced as his mothe i worked at the Mullion Health Centre. Addaction is clear that the informal communication between a parent and their employer should not replace formal communication channels between those involved in a clients care and we have reinforced this with all our staff members. Whilst no policy changes were recommended through the review process, moving forward the following actions have been agreed 1. Addaction has agreed to provide the Health Centre with the numbers of clients registered at the practice who are accessing our services. 2. In order to improve communication our designated practice worker will attend the practice multi-disciplinary team meetings. They will also be able to access the patient management system (SystemOne) to improve information sharing between the services and update records as required. 3. Where consent to share information with a GP exists, Addaction will inform them at an earlier stage regarding plans to cease structured treatment / move to support that the client initiates (known as Recovery Support) In summary Addaction has reviewed the processes and procedure in place for dealing with consent and the sharing of information with primary care practitioners. Since December 2018 we have implemented a number of changes to improve the timely review and recording of client consent and information sharing permissions. We have shared our policies and improved awareness of our approaches with our Primary Care Colleagues and how they differ to those routinely implemented in General Practice. We have agreed a number of actions to improve information sharing particularly for clients like Benjamin who are not in receipt of a regulated activity. We hope that this response demonstrates the importance Addaction attaches to learning and continuous improvement. If you need any additional information please contact me. SM CLE Contract Manager Addaction Cornwall
NHS) Kernow Clinical Commissioning Group Private and Confidential Mr A Cox Chief Officer Her Majesty's Assistant Coroner for NHS Kernow Clinical Commissioning Group Cornwall & the isles of Scilly Sedgemoor Centre Cornwall Coroners’ Service Priory Road The New Lodge St Austell! Penmount Cornwall Newquay Road PL25 5AS Truro TR4 9AA Tel: clo 01726 627612 Email: By Email: cornwallcoroner@cornwall.gov.uk 4 February 2019 Dear Mr Cox, Prevention of future death report following inquest into the death of Mr Benjamin Colin — Williamson Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths pertaining to Mr Benjamin Colin Williamson. In your report you identify considerations to be taken by NHS Kernow'as joint commissioners of mental health in Cornwall, alongside Cornwall Council. Considerations have also been asked of Addaction which is a service commissioned by Cornwall Council. As commissioners of Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust you have asked NHS Kernow to consider whether the system is sufficiently ‘joined up’ to meet the needs of people like Mr Benjamin Williamson. You have asked NHS Kernow to bring any gaps in the system to your attention and to contact so that his experiences and insights can be taken into account. We have made contact with and noted his concerns. We can confirm there is a Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Dual Diagnosis Strategy for Adults covering the period 2016 - 2019. This is a multi-agency co-produced strategy that has been developed by members of Safer Cornwall and providers of services. Safer Cornwall is a partnership made up of statutory organisations and a wide range of other public sector, voluntary, community and private organisations. The responsible authorities include NHS Kernow, Cornwall Council, Devon and Cornwall Police, Cornwall Fire and Rescue Service, National Probation Service and Dorset, Devon and Cornwall Rehabilitation Company. The purpose of this strategy is to assist the delivery and experience of integrated and inclusive service delivery for people with co-existing mental health and substance misuse problems, and their associated complex needs through consistent collaborative working. Chair: Dr jain Chorlton Chief Officer: Jackie Pendleton Head office: 01726 627800 kecg.contactus@nhs.net www.kernowccg.nhs.uk eoe0 80 Sedgemoor Centre, Priory Road, St Austell, Cornwall, PL25 5AS /nhskernow NHS} Kernow Clinical Commissioning Group A wealth of evidence, both local and national, points to numerous challenges in engendering a culture of shared responsibility as well as integrated operational and clinical working which can leave people struggling to gain access to evidence based interventions as well as targeted support for substance misuse. Locally we have seen evidence of specialist services working in isolation and not adopting the principles set out in the strategy meaning individuals may not get access to the services they need. Whilst the local Mental Health Crisis Care Concordat has made some progress with implementing actions linked to the strategy, a formal implementation plan had not been developed to ensure the strategy was delivered and monitored in its entirety. The Crisis Care Concordat is coordinated and chaired by NHS Kernow and includes a multiagency group of system wide representatives. It is a national agreement between services and agencies involved in the care and support of people in crisis and sets out how organisations will work together better to make sure that people get the help they need when they are having a mental health crisis. NHS Kernow has met with relevant providers (including Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Valued Lives, Outlook South West; as well as those commissioned by Cornwall Council such as Addaction), partners and commissioners towards the end of 2018 and in January 2019. The aim of the meetings was to escalate concerns regarding gaps in provision where individual’s mental wellbeing is not always being seen as part of ‘everyone’s business’ and is often considered the domain of highly specialised and often medicalised approaches which comes at the expense of emotional and shared support of the whole person. An exceptional Crisis Care Concordat meeting was held on the 22 January 2019. The meeting was well-attended by the relevant statutory organisations and providers. The purpose of this meeting was for providers to agree a way forward and specific actions have been identified to review the Dual Diagnosis Strategy and implement a robust multi-agency implementation plan. A draft implementation strategy completed by NHS Kernow provided the focus of the meeting. The providers of services will chair a monthly Implementation Steering Group in order to develop the draft implementation plan. The chair will rotate quarterly between the various providers ensuring a sharing of responsibilities and commitment to improving integrated working. It is expected that the review of the strategy and comprehensive development of the implementation plan will be completed in six months. Whilst this is being undertaken priority will be given to actions that can be undertaken immediately and will support individuals with a dual diagnosis. For example, the development of a dynamic risk register so that people at risk can be identified and reviewed collaboratively. A similar register has been implemented for another group of people who have specific needs and has provided positive outcomes. The progress of the Multiagency Implementation Steering Group will be reported to the Crisis Care Concordat in April 2019 with a future proposal to establish this reporting line to Safer Cornwall. NHS Kernow is reviewing the contract requirements for new contract commencing April 2019, in relation to providers supporting individuals with a dual diagnosis. Whilst current contracts and the multi-agency strategy already specify how providers should meet the needs of people Page 2 INHS Kernow Clinical Commissioning Group with a dual diagnosis, any contractual amendments will strengthen the monitoring of engagement with the implementation plan. | hope that this response provides you with satisfactory information that we are committed to and are already working closely with all partner agencies to take measures to prevent future deaths as set out in the Regulation 28 Report. We have sent a letter to the Coroner's officer to share with the family to invite them to be involved should they wish to be. We have-not been contacted by the family at the time of sending this letter. We are aware that this response may be shared with them and | do hope that this information will provide them with assurance that actions are being taken in relation to the concerns’ identified in relation to Mr Williamson's death. We would like to extend our sincere condolences to the family. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require anything further in relation to this case. Yours sincerely Vesuclicloe Chief Officer Page 3
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.