Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

Lindsey Bailey

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0235, written 11 Jul 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report11 Jul 2019
Reference2019-0235
DeceasedLindsey Bailey
CoronerAndrew Haigh
Coroner areaStaffordshire (South)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

Chief Executive

Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Mr Neil Carr

Trust Headquarters

St. George's Hospital

Corporation Street

Stafford

ST16 3SR

| 5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS

CORONER
| am Mr Andrew Haigh senior coroner for the coroner area of Staffordshire South
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act
2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 15 January 2019 | commenced an investigation into the death of Lindsey Bailey
aged 35 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 21 May
2019. The conclusion of the inquest was ‘suicide while mentally unwell’ with the
cause of death being ‘hanging’.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Lindsey Bailey was living with her parents and her father found her dead in the
garage of their home on 14th January 2019. She had hanged herself. She had
recent engagement with psychiatric services and some risk of self-harm had been
assessed but her death was not expected.

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to
concern. Since the conclusion of the inquest the final version of the Serious Incident
Review carried out by your Trust has come through but not all concerns have been
covered. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is
taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The REMAINING MATTER OF CONCERN is as follows. —

At relevant times Ms Bailey did have mental capacity and was in agreement with
information being shared with her parents. Reference was made to the Care

Engagement Charter promulgated by the Trust. Despite this it appears that there

was a significant lack in relevant information being shared with Ms Bailey’s parents.
While this may not have necessarily have prevented the death it could have
assisted in the treatment path and certainly may be relevant in other cases.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and
your organisation have the power to take such action.

7 | YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this
report, namely by 5" September. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting
out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

©)

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Person -§EENe father of the deceased. | have also sent it to Chase
Emotional Wellbeing who may find it useful or of interest.

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time
of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.

Date !!@ July 2019

Andrew A Haigh

HM Senior Coroner for Staffordshire (South)
Coroner's Office

No 1 Staffordshire Place

Stafford

ST16 2LP

Tel No: 01785 276127
sscor@staffordshire.gov.uk

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Midland Partnership NHS Trust (PDF)
ote MPFT

x

NHS
Midlands Partnership
WHS Foundation Trust

A Keele University Teaching Trust

St Georges Hospital
Corporation Street
Stafford

ST16 3SR

5” August 2019

Dear Mr Haigh,
RE: Li Bai

Report to prevent future deaths

Thank you for your letter, dated 11 July, reporting a matter to us in accordance with the
Regulation 28 of the Coroner's (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

Following discussions with the teams involved, | am now in a position to respond to your
concerns stated in your letter around a significant lack of information being shared with
Miss Bailey's parents.

Following Lindsey’s death, can | assure you we have undertaken a thorough investigation
into the care delivered by the Trust.

We have considered carefully the difference between confidentiality whilst a patient has
capacity versus the engagement of families or carers where the patient has declined for
their information to be shared. We acknowledge that as a Trust we need to ensure all our
staff are actively embedding family involvement within their daily practice whilst
maintaining confidentiality. Whilst carer / family involvement (including gaining informed
consent to share information with families) is written into all of our Standard Operating
Procedures for assessment, we have identified that clear guidance and advice in engaging
with families where the patient has declined for information to be shared is required.

There is evidence from our electronic patient record system (RIO) that Lindsey had
requested appointments away from the family home as she wanted some privacy and didn’t
want information shared. A review of the notes confirms that Lindsey wanted privacy and

whilst there were appointments where she was happy for her family to be present and
involved, she had requested that she didn’t want her family to know all the detail around
what had been discussed. At times, Lindsey disclosed some delicate information which she
wanted kept in confidence, the notes state that this was troubling her and she found it
difficult talking to the team when the family were at home. From the notes, it is recorded
that Lindsey did not want to worry her family.

There is evidence that a carer’s pack was given to the family to support them throughout
Lindsey’s treatment and that both her mother and father utilised support from the CRHT
team via our client support line and issues were discussed and resolved by the team.
However there is no evidence in the notes to confirm that discharge plans and next steps
were discussed with the family prior to discharge.

Below is an outline of the actions implemented from this investigation alongside updates on
existing pieces of work related to improving the quality of interventions which families and
carers receive across our Trust.

1) To develop a standard letter template which is sent out to families and carers whose
family member have agreed for contact to be made. The letter will form part of our
Standard Operating Procedures for assessment across our Mental Health Pathways
and each letter will be modified to reflect the individual needs of the patient and
their family member.

The letter whilst respecting patient confidentiality will offer family members / carers
an opportunity to engage with services and receive support around their needs. This
maybe by providing information to aid care plan development and /or offer
education and reassurance to family members of the interventions that are planned
where sharing of information has been agreed and offer a contact point should any
concerns arise.

This development is being supported by the Trust Involvement and Experience
Team. Once agreed this letter will be included in all mental health pathways
Standard Operating Procedures. This will be implemented by November 2019.

2) As part of the work to improve Carer Engagement the Trust is in the process of
developing a Carer Engagement Standard Operating Procedure for Crisis Response
Home Treatment Services which details the standards expected in respect of holding
conversations with patients around family and carer involvement at first contact,
and this then to be re-visited at every future appointment with the patient to ensure
opportunities are not missed. Once developed this will be rolled out across all

Mental Health Pathways. This will be completed and implemented by December
2019.

3) A bespoke training programme to be introduced to staff around engaging with
families and carers. The programme is currently be developed and led by our
Involvement and Experience Team. A Steering Group has been established, first
meeting on 237 August 2019, with service users and carers to plan for workshops
that will be held in October to design and develop the training package. This will be
delivered via face-to-face training for teams but also an e-learning package. We plan
to involve carer leads in the organisation, external carers’ organisations, Information
Management and Technology, Quality Improvement Team and the Information
Governance Team. Once the workshops are complete, we plan to roll the training
out from 1° January 2020 onwards organisation-wide.

4) All these actions will be monitored through the Performance Plus electronic action
tracking system and will be discussed at local Governance team meetings and where

appropriate escalated to the monthly Quality Governance Sub-committee.

| hope this response helps address your concerns however if you require any further
information please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours Sincerely

Related reports

Other reports by Andrew Haigh

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.