Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

Sam Grant

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0285, written 26 Jul 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report26 Jul 2019
Reference2019-0285
DeceasedSam Grant
CoronerElizabeth Gray
Coroner areaMilton Keynes
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Child Death (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NOTE: This from is to be used after an inquest.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1 Chief Operating Officer, NHS Milton Keynes Clinical

Commissioning Group

2 Chief Executive, Public Health England

1 CORONER

I am Elizabeth GRAY,

for the area of Milton Keynes

2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 13/11/2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of aged Sam Michael Carl Grant
aged 16.

The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 28/06/2019. The medical cause of death
was:

1a Hanging from ligature around the neck

4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Sam died on 09/11/2018 at home
hanging by the neck by his sister on her return from school. Sam had been engaged with
COMPASS services through a school referral. He had been referred to CAMHS in May 2018 but
did not meet the threshold for engagement. His GP suggested other organisations who Sam
could approach voluntarily for support, but he did not take up these suggestions.

Milton Keynes having been found

5 CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.
opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken.
it is my statutory duty to report to you.

In the circumstances,

In my

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
1) Sam’s GP referred Sam to CAMHS when he presented to the GP with irritability, anger and a
report that he was close to being excluded from school. CAMHS rejected the referral because
Sam did not meet their threshold of moderate to severe mental health issues. CAMHS did not
suggest any alternative assistance. The GP did follow up with Sam to sign post him to two
independent organisations who Sam would have to approach independently for help. The GP
made it clear in his evidence that there is a lack of lower level assistance for young people who
present with ‘life issues’ such as low mood, irritability and anger issues, but who nonetheless
need help and assistance but do not meet the criteria for access to CAMHS services.

2) Sam had been referred to, and was receiving the services of COMPASS having been referred
by his School. The GP was not made aware of this engagement and was unable to take this into

 account at the time when Sam did present himself to the GP. The evidence from COMPASS is
that they maintain the confidentiality of patients even minors using their services unless they
have express consent to disclose that information from the patient themselves. Without all
relevant information neither the GP nor CAMHS was in a position to make a fully informed
decision about the Sam’s needs. Sharing of information between relevant health agencies to
ensure fully informed decisions are made as regards the healthcare needs of an individual
should be a priority.

3) Evidence at the inquest from the GP also indicated that a reduction in healthcare provision at
Sam’s school and in particular the removal of a medically qualified person(s) has meant that
confidential health information is no longer shared between the school and the GP surgery. The
school now only engages First Aiders, who are not medically qualified, and who do not therefore
exchange information which in the past has proved essential in flagging concerns between the
GP and the School. This is another route which has been closed and which would have allowed
a potential flag to have been raised in respect of concerns around Sam and his wellbeing to be
shared confidentially between GP and school.

6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your
organisation) have the power to take such action.

7 YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 20th September 2019. I, the Assistant Coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8 COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons:
The family of Sam Grant
Central Northwest London NHS Foundation Trust

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

Elizabeth GRAY
for
Milton Keynes
Dated: 26 July 2019

Related reports

Other reports by Elizabeth Gray

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.