Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0422, written 10 Dec 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 10 Dec 2019 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2019-0422 |
| Deceased | Frances Gibb |
| Coroner | Veronica Hamilton-Deeley |
| Coroner area | Brighton and Hove |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
VERONICA HAMILTON-DEELEY DL, : THE CORONER’S OFFICE LL.B. WOODVALE, LEWES ROAD Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner BRIGHTON for the City of Brighton & Hove BN2 3QB Assistant Coroners Telephone: Brighton (01273) 292046 CATHARINE PALMER LL.B (HONS) Fax: Brighton (01273) 292047 GILVA D.J.TISSHAW, BA(LAW)HONS CORONERS SOCIETY OF ENGLAND AND WALES ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Officer of Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust hief Nurse Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS 1. 2. 3 rust 1 | CORONER | am Veronica HAMILTON-DEELEY, Senior Coroner, for the City of Brighton and Hove 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 29" July 2019 | commenced an investigation into the death of Mrs Frances Jean Gibb. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27" November 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative Conclusion as per the attached sheet. 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH See record of inquest 5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my Statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (1) Once again | must write concerning the serious failings in the use of NEWS. Please see the Record of Inquest for details. When you respond to this Regulation 28 report will you please explain why it is that | 1 VERONICA HAMILTON-DEELEY DL, "THE CORONER’S OFFICE LL.B. WOODVALE, LEWES ROAD Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner BRIGHTON for the City of Brighton & Hove BN2 3QB Assistant Coroners : Telephone: Brighton (01273) 292046 CATHARINE PALMER LL.B (HONS) Fax: Brighton (01273) 292047 GILVA D.J.,TISSHAW, BA(LAW)HONS regularly send you reports on the misuse of NEWS. Am | to assume that no lessons are being learnt? . (2) There was a failure to identify a mesenteric thrombus (see Record of Inquest) This appears to have occurred when the junior radiologist was working overnight and under pressures. What lessons have been learned from this? 6 | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you AND your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 | YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 26" February 2019 I, the coroner may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 | COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: . 1. 2. Local CCG 3. Secretary of State for Health, Department of Health 4. Simon Stevens, Chief Executive, NHS England Who may find it useful or of interest. | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both ina complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 | Date: 10 December 2019 SIGNED BY: / Senior Coroner Brighton and Hove——_
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
INAS) Brighton and Sussex 21 February 2020 University Hospitals NHS Trust Our ref: C9/19/95 Miss Veronica Hamiiton-Deeley Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust HM Senior Coroner for Brighton and Hove Level 6, Trust HQ The Coroner's Office Royal Sussex County Hospital Woodvale Eastern Road Lewes Road Brighton Brighton . BN2 5BE BN2 3QB Tel: EK Senior Executive Assistant) Dear Miss Hamilton-Deeley The late Mrs Frances Gibb Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 10 December 2019, and for sending your Record of Inquest. May | begin my expressing my sympathy and condolences to the family of Mrs Gibb at this difficult time. We cannot agree that lessons have not been learnt in relation to NEWS within the Trust. During his evidence at the inquest, HE described how electronic patient observations (Patientrack) are now embedded in the Trust and are working very well. The roil out of electronic patient observations began in July 2019 and to date, all Adult and Paediatric inpatient areas now have the system in place. Later this month the system will be put into the Maternity Department and then to the Emergency Department in May (following other digital changes we are making). Level 9A ward, the ward on which Mrs Gibb was a patient, introduced the system in October 2019 and, as Mimi stated in his evidence, it is used effectively by all clinical staff. The Matron for Abdominal Medicine and Surgery has conducted a review and can confirm that: 1. 100% of the staff on Level 9A have been trained to use Patientrack. 2. The system automatically calculates the NEWS score and prompts staff with regard to the frequency of required observations — defined by the previous observations results. 3. Monitors at the Nurse Stations give the Team Leaders visibility of the NEWS scores of all the patients live. 4. |-Pads are taken on the Ward Rounds so the doctors have up to date NEWS scores at all times. 5. This system also incorporates the Sepsis 6 Tool and other triggers to prompt staff if patients score in one parameter. 6. Both nurses who cared for Mrs Gibb engaged in an After Action Review (AAR) with the Ward Matron and have reflected a great deal on Mrs Gibb’s care. They have learnt and acknowledged where we could have done better. The nurse who was caring for Mrs Gibb when she deteriorated recognises that she should have put out a MET call at 21:00 hours due to the sudden change in Mrs Gibb’s NEWS score. 7. Mrs Gibb was being reviewed by a doctor at that time she deteriorated and the staff prioritised Mrs Gibb back to bed — believing that this may have been a vasovagal episode in the chair. She needed to be hoisted back to bed as she was too unwell to stand and the MET call was put out as soon as Mrs Gibb was safely returned to bed as her NEWS score did not improve. 8. The case has been discussed (anonymously) at Matron led teaching sessions for all the staff on Level 9A ward to ensure the important learning points have been shared widely. 9. We also now hold an AAR after all MET calls to ensure any learning is identified and shared, and that any issues are resolved. A robust governance process has been put in place in the Surgical Division to ensure shared learning. 10. All new staff to the ward have received training on both NEWS and the importance of escalation of care. 11. We have increased the number of Band 6 Nurses on night shifts on Level 9A ward from 1 to 2 so the junior staff have more support with clinically deteriorating patients. 12. The Trust now has a Critical Care Outreach service 24 hours a day (this began on 22 July 2019) and Patientrack can also be viewed remotely by the Critical Outreach team. Patientrack has greatly improved the process in the Trust for tecording and acting on patients’ observations as now the respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturations, inspired oxygen, temperature, conscious level and pain score are entered directly onto |-Pads. The system automatically calculates the NEWS score and then prompts a Low/ Medium/ High response which must be acknowledged by the staff caring for the patient. If a patient requires a review, response is escalated via the hospital bleep system to the appropriate person. Ifa patient has a high NEWS score (7 or more) the Patientrack prompt requires staff to consider whether a MET call is required. All clinical staff can log in and access Patientrack on any computer throughout the Trust. The latest NEWS score is also displayed within PANDA. You are welcome to visit Level 9A ward to see the system in use. Miss Stone, Head of Medico- legal Service would be happy to arrange this for you. Additional support The Critical Care Outreach team (CCOT) provide a 24 hour service at the Royal Sussex County Hospital (as well as the Princess Royal Hospital) and provide additional support to ward areas as part of the Medical Emergency Response Team (MET). CCOT lead the ACUTE course teaching for trained nursing staff and contribute learning on acute patient deterioration to the nurse induction programme and the annual clinical updates. Radiology . As confirmed i EE si2temen for the inquest, the initial CT report missed an embolus lodged in the superior mesenteric artery which was not causing radiological bowel changes at the time. confirmed that this was not an easy diagnosis to make and having shown the scans to some of his Consultant Radiological colleagues, not all of them identified the embolus on the imaging. As acknowledged by [Min his statement for the inquest, perception errors such as these unfortunately do occur in the field of radiology and any misses are discussed by the team in regular discrepancy meetings. did not state that he was under any particular pressure when he reported Mrs Gibb’s scan, and he could not recall any particular interruption or distraction that night. However, the Chief of Service for the Central Clinical Services Division has reviewed the case and has shared it within the Division for learning. | can confirm that junior radiologists working overnight have access on site to Consultant Radiologists up to 9pm with telephone contact available overnight from 9pm-8am. The team have been reminded of this and that they must seek assistance from a Consultant whenever they need extra support. The actions the department have taken include: Page 2 of 3 1. All Radiologists including trainees have been reminded to look specifically at the SMA when the request is for a queried ischemic bowel. 2. The Protocol has changed so the reconstructions are thinner in two plains to enable better visualisation of the region. 3. All overnight scans are reviewed by a Consultant the following morning for those reported by pre Fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists (FRCR) Part 2b trainees overnight. 4. Any scans reported by post FRCR Part 2b trainees can be reviewed the following morning by a Consultant at the trainee's discretion. 5. Mrs Gibb’s case has been re-presented in our REAL (Radiology Events and Learning through case review) meeting. Thank you again for raising your concerns following the inquest. We do listen, and we do act and make improvements to the systems in place at the Trust. Yours sincerely — —_ Chief Medical Officer and Deputy Chief Executive Page 3 of 3 .
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.