Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0430, written 17 Dec 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 17 Dec 2019 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2019-0430 |
| Deceased | Terence James |
| Coroner | Sonia Hayes |
| Coroner area | Central and South East Kent |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Director of Care and Operations Charing Healthcare CORONER 1 I am Sonia Hayes Assistant Coroner for Central and South East Kent 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 22nd May 2019 an investigation was commenced into the death of Terence Ewart JAMES. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 11th December 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was Died on 14th May 2019 at William Harvey Hospital. He sustained a neck of femur fracture either on 17th or 20th April when he fell at his care home. The doctor was not informed prior to his visit on 17th April of the first fall on 17th. He was able to mobilise for a short period but fell again on 20th April at 10:25 and was unable to mobilise and deteriorated. An ambulance was called at 19:18, he underwent surgery but post-operatively became delirious and did not thrive. He was placed on end of life care. 1a b c II Frailty, Neck of femur Fracture (operated), Cerebrovascular disease Bronchopneumonia 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr James, 85, male was living in an EMI residential home (Chippendayle Lodge). He was admitted to William Harvey Hospital in the early hours of 21st April 2019 with a history of an un-witnessed fall on 17th April and a further fall on 20th April 2019 and pain in his hip and unable to weight bear since. X-ray confirmed that he sustained right neck of Femur fracture . He had right hemi-arthroplasty on the following day. Post operatively he became delirious; he did not thrive at all. His swallow deteriorated and oral intake was poor. He did not improve in spite of supportive management and was too unwell to transfer to a nursing home and died on the ward. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) The GP was due to attend Mr James on 17th April and was not informed of his fall prior to his attendance. He had bruising and abrasion to his head and was on anticoagulation medication. The GP examined him and found no apparent neurological symptoms or fracture. He advised that if there was any deterioration to seek further urgent advice. The GP evidence was that he would have advised that Mr James be taken to hospital. (2) The history of the fall on 17th April was not handed over to care staff who had returned from leave on 20th April. (3) A chiropodist raised concerns on 18th April that Mr James was in pain and this was not escalated for further medical advice. (4) Mr James sustained a further unwitnessed fall at approximately 10:25 on 20th April. This fall was not escalated for further medical advice until after a change of shift at 19:00 when his deterioration was immediately noted and escalated. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 11th February 2020. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons , (Daughter on behalf of the family). I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 17th December 2019 Signature: Sonia Hayes Assistant Coroner Central and South East Kent
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Head Office
C/O Charing House, Canterbury Street, Gillingham. Kent. ME7 5AY
Telephone 01634 584600 Fax 01634 584650
Central & South East Kent Coroners
Cantium House
2nd Floor
Maidstone
Kent
ME14 1XD
By Email and Special Delivery:
kentandmedwaycoroners@kent.gov.uk
Dear Sirs
28 January 2020
Regulation 29 Response, following inquest touching on the death of Mr Terrance Ewart James
I am the Director for Care and Operations for Charing Healthcare, a group of Care Homes
within Kent and Medway. I have worked with the group for the past 11 years, previously
having worked with KCC for 20 years within the social care sector.
I attended the inquest into the death of Mr James and have also investigated the coroner’s
Regulation 28 report. I write to provide you with my response in this respect.
I have sought to address each issue raised below:
1. The GP was due to attend Mr James on 17 April and was not informed of his fall prior
to his attendance. He had bruising and abrasion to his head and was on
anticoagulation medication. The GP examined him and found no apparent
neurological symptoms or fracture. He advised that if there was any deterioration to
seek further urgent advice. The GP evidence was that he would have advised that Mr
James be taken to hospital
We have a clear process in place in relation to escalating matters to the GP. Essentially, the
senior on-duty in the morning calls the surgery every morning with a list of residents that
need to be seen. The GP then attends the home after his/her morning surgery usually after
1pm . This is normal practice, and the process used by most care homes in conjunction with
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
A member of Charing HealthCare Group
Company Registration No:5124236
Head Office
C/O Charing House, Canterbury Street, Gillingham. Kent. ME7 5AY
Telephone 01634 584600 Fax 01634 584650
their associated GP surgery. Furthermore, we are not able to unilaterally change this
process, as it is driven by national GP arrangements
On this particular occasion, Mr James was already on the list to be seen by the GP, for
another concern. Therefore, there was no reason to put him on the list following the fall, as
he was already on the list and there was no immediate concern at that time because he had
got himself up from the floor and back into bed. The GP would not come out earlier in these
circumstances, as the GP has to attend to the patients in the surgery before coming out to
the home. The only other option would have been to escalate the incident to an emergency
and call 999. This fall was not deemed to be an emergency, and the GP also confirmed that
Mr James did not require urgent intervention when he attended. As an organisation, we are
under a duty not to escalate the matter unnecessarily, as this inevitably places further
pressure on emergency services.
Number (1) quoted above refers to the GP advising that any deterioration required further
urgent advice. Our understanding of the advice is that this referred to a deterioration in Mr
James’ condition, however, there did not appear to be a deterioration in his condition,
rather Mr James had a further fall, which has been addressed below.
2. The history of the fall on 17 April was not handed over to care staff who had returned
from leave on 20 April.
In accordance with the court’s request, we did set out in detail our practices in relation to
handover, in our letter to the Coroner dated 12 December 2019, and this is summarised
below:
Prior to adopting an electronic system for care planning, monitoring and handovers, Charing
Dale Limited used paper based ‘handover sheets’. The paper based system used to be
standard practice in all of the Group’s Homes. This pro forma enables all staff to quickly see
any issues that have arisen, and which residents need extra monitoring.
We moved to an electronic system in April 2019. We adopted the electronic system for a
number of reasons, including the Care Quality Commission’s guidance in relation to moving
forward with regards to technology. The benefit of the electronic system is that it is
completed at the time care is delivered and can incorporate a lot of information. It is
difficult to demonstrate this in court due to the fact that the system is designed to enable
access to the information electronically.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
A member of Charing HealthCare Group
Company Registration No:5124236
Head Office
C/O Charing House, Canterbury Street, Gillingham. Kent. ME7 5AY
Telephone 01634 584600 Fax 01634 584650
However, due to the concerns raised by the Coroner, we are conducting a full review of our
handover system. For the time being, we have reverted back to the paper based system for
handovers, across all of our homes as it is a visual tool that can be read straight away rather
than having to find the appropriate tab on a system to read back in the notes. The system
was put in place at Chippendayle Lodge immediately after the inquest on 11 December
2019. It was communicated to staff in internal meetings, and we are ensuring that all staff
understand the importance of ensuring the handover forms are completed in full. This is
being done through team meetings, which have taken place, for example, on 11 December
2019 and 13 December 2019.
With regards to the senior carers communicating between shifts, there is a book in place for
this purpose. In addition, we now have a full and comprehensive handover sheet that will
in the folder for two weeks for all staff to read to avoid any future
remain
miscommunications. All seniors sign the handover sheet over to the next shift senior as
evidence they have read it. We are ensuring that all staff appreciates the importance of
completing the paperwork fully and in a timely manner. This will be monitored closely and
any concerns addressed with the relevant staff on an on-going basis. As indicated above,
this was implemented straight after the inquest, on 11 December 2019.
A further staff meeting was held on Friday, 13 December 2019, and the manager shared the
details of the inquest to ensure that all staff understood the importance of following the
systems and protocols in place and to enforce expectations in this respect.
Furthermore, due to the concerns raised by the Coroner, we are implementing this paper
based system in all of our Homes. All managers were notified of the change on 13th
December by email. It was difficult to demonstrate how the electronic system worked in
court but it does have some helpful and positive additions. However, whilst we conduct a
comprehensive review of the handover system, we will ensure that all our Homes use the
traditional paper based approach. At present, we are using both methods for handover, and
it is likely this will remain a long term arrangement. We have a managers meeting on 29th
January and I will be asking managers for feedback on the current arrangements.
The outcome of the inquest has been shared with the managers at all of our Homes as a
learning opportunity. This took place on 13th December and we will also discuss it on 29th
January at the manager’s meeting.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
A member of Charing HealthCare Group
Company Registration No:5124236
Head Office
C/O Charing House, Canterbury Street, Gillingham. Kent. ME7 5AY
Telephone 01634 584600 Fax 01634 584650
3. A chiropodist raised concerns on 18 April that Mr James was in pain and this was not
escalated for further medical advice.
We do have processes in place in relation to professional visits. We have an electronic care
plan system where visits are logged. We have also retained some communication sheets so
that professionals are able to write the notes up for each person they visit.
We understand there is a factual dispute regarding whether the chiropodist did raise
concerns and who these concerns were raised with. Our records document the chiropodist’s
visit, but do not indicate concerns were raised and the chiropodist was not called to give
evidence at the inquest to ask further detail in this respect.
4. Mr James sustained a further unwitnessed fall at approximately 10:25 on 20 April.
This fall was not escalated for further medical advice until after a change of shift at
19:00 when his deterioration was immediately noted and escalated.
We have policies in place in relation to escalation. All staffs know that any concerns should
be escalated to either the relevant member of staff on-call or to the Care Home Manager,
who can be contacted at any time of day or night. This issue related to an individual
member of staff making an incorrect judgment call. The staff member on duty did seek to
address the matter, but relied too heavily on discussing the matter with the family, who had
a POA health and welfare, rather than using her professional judgment. The staff member
has received further training and the issues raised at the inquest have been discussed in
depth with her. She very much understands the importance of ensuring escalation is
immediate. In addition, as outlined above, the outcome of the inquest and concerns in this
respect have already been shared throughout the organisation.
Furthermore, all these processes and procedures have been recommunicated to staff in
team meetings and supervision sessions. These have taken place across the board, and
many had taken place before receipt of the Regulation 28 report, within hours of the inquest
taking place.
As an organisation, we also conduct regular audits. We have a schedule in place in this
respect. We are also in the process of introducing a specific audit relating to the handover
process, and this will be in place from 29 January 2020, after the managers’ meeting, where
it will be discussed. We have endeavoured to put robust systems in place to ensure that
errors do not occur again. The above being said, we had in fact put a great deal of thought
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
A member of Charing HealthCare Group
Company Registration No:5124236
Head Office
C/O Charing House, Canterbury Street, Gillingham. Kent. ME7 5AY
Telephone 01634 584600 Fax 01634 584650
into the processes in place before the inquest, and we do believe that where errors
occurred, they were individual judgment calls, rather than systemic errors.
We take these matters extremely seriously. For this reason, both the care home manager
and I (Director of Care and Operations) were present throughout the inquest in case there
were any systemic issues that needed to be addressed. However, despite our attendance,
no-one was asked to give evidence on behalf of the organisation, and we had no opportunity
to set out our processes in place in respect of these issues.
In any event, we are always keen to review and revise our policies and procedures where
appropriate and we do conduct systematic and rolling reviews as an organisation.
Therefore, we have ensured robust systems are in place and that these have been fully
reviewed, and updated accordingly.
Yours faithfully
Director of Care and Operations
On behalf of Charing Dale Limited
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
A member of Charing HealthCare Group
Company Registration No:5124236
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.