Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0027, written 17 Feb 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 17 Feb 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0027 |
| Deceased | Joseph Gingell |
| Coroner | Caroline Beasley-Murray |
| Coroner area | Essex |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Professor Stephen Powis National Medical Director NHS England 1 CORONER I am Caroline Beasley-Murray, senior coroner, for the coroner area of Essex 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. [HYPERLINKS] 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 3 January 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Joseph James Gingell. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 3 January 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was that Joseph James Gingell killed himself. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Joseph James Gingell had suffered from mental illness for a long time and he was well known to Mental Health services in Avon and Somerset. He had a fascination with the Dartford Crossing and he had travelled there at the time of his birthday. He was found deceased in a Premier Inn hotel nearby. The cause of death was mixed drug toxicity with alcohol. It became clear that the deceased had been obtaining drugs without prescription online. He was known to have a history of opioid and benzodiazepine dependence. CORONER’S CONCERNS 4 5 During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) The drugs found in Mr Gingell’s system are known to have toxic effects when taken in excessive amounts in conjunction with other medication. (2) Permitting the patient to “self certify” without any checks can allow abuse of the system by those most vulnerable who have addiction problems. (3) Permitting the patient the option of not having a GP informed removes an otherwise effective safeguard. 1 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 2nd April 2020. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons – Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 17 February 2020 Caroline Beasley-Murray 2
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Ms Caroline Beasley-Murray,
Senior coroner,
Essex and Thurrock Coroner’s Service,
Essex County Council,
County Hall,
Chelmsford
CM1 1QH
Sent by e-mail:
National Medical Director
Skipton House
80 London Road
SE1 6LH
7th May 2021
Dear Ms Caroline Beasley-Murray
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Joseph James Gingell.
24th May 2019
Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report dated 17th February 2020 concerning the
death of James Joseph Gingell on 24th May 2019. Firstly, I would like to express my
deep condolences to Mr Gingell’s family.
The regulation 28 report concludes Joseph James Gingell’s death was a result of
mixed drug toxicity with alcohol. Following the inquest, you raised concerns in your
Regulation 28 Report to NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSE&I) regarding:
The drugs found in Mr Gingell’s system are known to have toxic effects when
(1)
taken in excessive amounts in conjunction with other medication.
Permitting the patient to “self certify” without any checks can allow abuse of
(2)
the system by those most vulnerable who have addiction problems.
Permitting the patient the option of not having a GP informed removes an
(3)
otherwise effective safeguard.
We are grateful you have brought this to our attention and we also share these
concerns. Firstly, it is important to set out that providers of controlled drugs based in
England must comply with legislation which is enforced by healthcare regulators
such as Care Quality Commission (CQC), the Medicines and Healthcare products
Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC). In
addition, all healthcare professionals are subject to their respective codes of
professional conduct and these are enforced by, for example, the General Medical
Council (GMC) for doctors.
With regards to NHSE&I’s role, we have a clear responsibility in providing systems
oversight for the management and use of controlled drugs, including tramadol. NHS
NHS England and NHS Improvement
E&I’s Controlled Drugs Accountable Officers (CDAOs)1 undertake this role within
each geographical region across England. They provide assurance that all
healthcare organisations, including pharmacies, adopt a safe practice for appropriate
clinical use, prescribing, storage, destruction and monitoring of controlled drugs.
CDAOs facilitate the routes to share concerns, report incidents, and take remedial
action as well as highlighting good practice. This is shared with wider partners such
as Clinical Commissioning Groups and the Police through the Controlled Drugs
Local Intelligence Networks (CD LINs). Details of all CDAOs in England are held on
a national register, which is owned and published by the CQC:
www.cqc.org.uk/content/controlled-drugs-accountable-officers.
The sale or supply of controlled drugs outside of the legislative framework is the
responsibility of the Home Office, and NHSE&I does not have powers to stop illegal
supply of dependence forming drugs with toxic potential. However, we can and do
take this into account in the provision of NHS services. NHSE&I expects all NHS
providers to follow the NICE guidance on Coexisting severe mental illness
(psychosis) and substance misuse: assessment and management in healthcare
settings2 which directs people to consider the use of drugs, prescribed or otherwise
when providing clinical care.
However, we are aware of cases where coroners have highlighted an online
consultation with a doctor, issue of a prescription and supply of medicines, as having
contributed to a death. We recognise further work is needed to ensure patient safety
where consultations are given online.
As a result, in April 2017, the National Quality Board3 - jointly chaired by NHS
England and CQC - held a workshop focusing on online providers of primary care
services and online prescribing. The workshop identified a number of challenges for
the system including gaps in the current regulatory framework to protect patients
from harmful practice. Following the workshop, the CQC established a UK-wide
forum to review the regulatory landscape for online prescribing. As well as CQC, the
group includes Healthcare Inspectorate Wales (HIW), Healthcare Improvement
Scotland (HIS), The Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority (RQIA) (Northern
Ireland), Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the
General Medical Council (GMC), General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) and
Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). This group now meets regularly. The CQC
remains concerned that citizens are able to source medicines with the potential for
harm from providers who structure their business in such a way as to be outside the
scope of registration with the CQC or GPhC.
We are working with other health regulators who have a greater role in responding to
this challenge. Relevant UK agencies, such as the CQC and MRHA, have worked
collaboratively to review the healthcare framework and, importantly, identify gaps to
1 https://www.england.nhs.uk/contact-us/privacy-notice/how-we-use-your-information/safety-and-quality/controlled-drugs-
accountable-officer-alerts-etc/
2 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg120
3The National Quality Board is a national cross organizational board comprising the clinical leaders of national arms-length
bodies across health care, social care and public health. It is jointly chaired by NHS England and Care Quality Commission
NHS England and NHS Improvement
ensure patients are protected from loopholes – notably, for example, where some
companies have deliberately configured themselves to avoid regulation by CQC -
within and outside the UK system.
Linked to this, the CQC inspected every company in England that provided non-NHS
online primary care services. Its findings were published in March 2018 in ‘The state
of care in independent online primary health services’4. Providers were assessed
against five key areas: whether they were safe, caring, effective, responsive to
people’s needs and well-led. The CQC also reviewed the provider’s registered
location, its systems and policies, examined how it delivered care, and analysed
information it held against the provider including, where available, feedback from
people who have used or have come into contact with the service.
One of the questions CQCs inspectors asked during these inspections included how
the service makes sure the identity of the patient is authenticated and requested that
where a treatment might have the potential to affect safe care or decrease the ability
of the patient’s GP to provide safe and effective care that the patient’s NHS GP is
kept informed of any treatment, with the exception of sexual health services. These
issues are important for NHSE&I and we will ensure that NHS online consultations
provide a safe and secure way for patients to discuss their health concerns with an
appropriate clinician connected to their own GP practice and place centred around
their needs. NHSE&I has adopted a robust system of quality assurance, safety and
security standards so that patients and clinicians can feel confident in using online
consultations.
These services will continue to be regulated by CQC and we understand that they
are progressing plans to help increase public understanding of the quality and safety
of online services in England by rating providers as ‘outstanding’, ‘good’, ‘requires
improvement’ or ‘inadequate’, as used on other healthcare services.
In the UK, the MHRA are responsible for the legal provisions relating to the supply of
medicines online which include;
All categories of medicines (GSL, P and POMs) may be sold online –
•
provided all other legal requirements in medicines regulations are met – for example,
Prescription Only (POM) and Pharmacy (P) medicines may only be legally sold or
supplied to the public through registered pharmacy premises, by or under the
supervision of a pharmacist and POMs may only be sold or supplied in response to a
prescription from an authorised healthcare professional (such as a doctor, dentist, or
certain trained nurses and pharmacists). [Doctors may also supply medicines direct
to patients – for example, where they personally administer a medicine such as a
vaccine or where they are able under specific NHS arrangements to supply
prescribed medicines to their patients as part of an NHS dispensing service].
•
requirements of legislation apply equally to sales from bricks-and-mortar premises
and sales online.Medicines legislation does not prohibit the remote prescribing of
POMs by a qualified prescriber however prescriptions must meet the usual
requirements set down in medicines legislation.
A UK registered pharmacy may have a presence on the internet however, the
NHS England and NHS Improvement
•
Some POMs are Controlled drugs (such as benzodiazepines) and their
availability to patients can be subject to additional control under the Misuse of Drugs
Act 1971 which is administered by the Home Office.
The EU’s Falsified Medicines Directive (FMD), introduced national arrangements to
register suppliers of medicines at a distance. This required Member States to
establish a national website and adopt the EU Common logo. The Human Medicines
Regulations 2012 were amended and MHRA was responsible for managing the UK
list of online retailers that registered to sell medicines to the public remotely. The
scheme was disapplied in GB from 1 January 2021 and powers sought in the
Medicines and Medical Devices Bill to introduce a new system. The Bill has since
been granted Royal Assent and MHRA plan to consult with stakeholders on what
system would best suit UK market.
The MHRA is working with partner healthcare regulators including the Care Quality
Commission, the General Pharmaceutical Council, the General Medical Council,
Public Health England, NHS England and partners in Scotland, Wales and N Ireland
to review the UK legislative framework on digital healthcare provision and,
importantly, identify gaps.
In addition to action to remove illegally trading websites and seizing products, the
MHRA recognises that reacting to threats also involves alerting patients and has run
a number of public awareness campaigns including a targeted and sustained
campaign named #Fakemeds which was developed with the assistance of
supporting research and was run online and through social media for maximum
coverage.
The Yellow Card Scheme is the UK system for collecting and monitoring information
on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The Scheme is run by the MHRA and
relies on voluntary reporting of suspected ADRs by health professionals and
patients. There is also a legal obligation for pharmaceutical companies to report
serious ADR reports to their drugs. The purpose of the Scheme is to provide an early
warning that the safety of a product may require further investigation.
In addition to this:
The GMC has issued guidance5 for all healthcare professionals with
•
prescribing responsibilities. It sets out the shared high level principles of good
practice expected of everyone when consulting and or prescribing remotely from the
patient.
NHSE&I provides advice6 to patients on the dangers of buying medicines on-
•
line.
•
The GPhC provides guidance to GB internet based pharmacies on providing
pharmacy services online and operates a voluntary internet pharmacy logo scheme
5 https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/prescribing-and-managing-medicines-and-
devices/remote-prescribing-via-telephone-video-link-or-online
6 https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/prescriptions-and-pharmacies/pharmacies/dangers-of-buying-medicines-online/
NHS England and NHS Improvement
to provide reassurance to patients and the public that they are purchasing medicines
online from registered pharmacies who have to meet GPhC standards.
In the wider context of this issue, Public Health England published in 2019 a
Prescribed medicines review7. This reported on the evidence for dependence on,
and withdrawal from, prescribed medicines with the aim of making sure that local
healthcare systems build awareness and support to enhance clinician and patient
decision making. In support of this NHSE&I are co-ordinating a programme to
implement the review recommendations working closely with relevant Arm's Length
Bodies (ALBs) to ensure cross system improvements. The programme covers five
classes of medicines including:
•
•
•
•
•
Benzodiazepines;
Z-drugs;
Gabapentinoids;
Opioids, for chronic non-cancer pain; and
Antidepressants.
With regard to this case, and based on the information provided within the
Regulation 28, it appears that this death was not the result of services provided by
NHS, but from services outside of the NHS. It is unclear where this doctor or
company were registered and the site from which the deceased obtained the
consultation, prescription and medication. Nevertheless, the provision of remote
consultations and the supply of medicines through distance selling remains a
concern.
NHSE&I remains committed to improving the safety of controlled drugs and online
prescribing. We will continue to work across the system with key partners nationally,
regionally and locally to ensure patient safety. We would also suggest that contact is
made directly with the CQC and MRHA who would be better placed should you wish
to understand their work in this area further.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and
please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
NHS England and NHS Improvement
7 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prescribed-medicines-review-report
NHS England and NHS Improvement
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.