Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020

Joseph Gingell

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0027, written 17 Feb 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report17 Feb 2020
Reference2020-0027
DeceasedJoseph Gingell
CoronerCaroline Beasley-Murray
Coroner areaEssex
CategorySuicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANNEX A 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Professor Stephen Powis National Medical Director NHS England  

1 

CORONER 

I am Caroline Beasley-Murray, senior coroner, for the coroner area of Essex 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
[HYPERLINKS] 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 3 January 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Joseph James 
Gingell.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 3 January 2019. The 
conclusion of the inquest was that Joseph James Gingell killed himself.  
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Joseph James Gingell had suffered from mental illness for a long time and he was well 
known to Mental Health services in Avon and Somerset. He had a fascination with the 
Dartford Crossing and he had travelled there at the time of his birthday. He was found 
deceased in a Premier Inn hotel nearby. The cause of death was mixed drug toxicity 
with alcohol. It became clear that the deceased had been obtaining drugs without 
prescription online. He was known to have a history of opioid and benzodiazepine 
dependence. 
CORONER’S CONCERNS 

4 

5 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances, it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

(1)  The drugs found in Mr Gingell’s system are known to have toxic effects when taken 

in excessive amounts in conjunction with other medication. 

(2)  Permitting the patient to “self certify” without any checks can allow abuse of the 

system by those most vulnerable who have addiction problems.  

(3)  Permitting the patient the option of not having a GP informed removes an otherwise 

effective safeguard. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your 
organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 2nd April 2020.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons –  

Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

17 February 2020                                            Caroline Beasley-Murray 

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England (PDF)
Ms Caroline Beasley-Murray, 
Senior coroner,  
Essex and Thurrock Coroner’s Service,  
Essex County Council,  
County Hall,  
Chelmsford  
CM1 1QH 

Sent by e-mail: 

                          National Medical Director 
                                           Skipton House 
                                         80 London Road 
                                                     SE1 6LH 

7th May 2021 

Dear Ms Caroline Beasley-Murray 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Joseph James Gingell. 
24th May 2019  

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report dated 17th February 2020 concerning the 
death of James Joseph Gingell on 24th May 2019. Firstly, I would like to express my 
deep condolences to Mr Gingell’s family.  

The regulation 28 report concludes Joseph James Gingell’s death was a result of 
mixed drug toxicity with alcohol. Following the inquest, you raised concerns in your 
Regulation 28 Report to NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSE&I) regarding:  

The drugs found in Mr Gingell’s system are known to have toxic effects when 

(1) 
taken in excessive amounts in conjunction with other medication. 

Permitting the patient to “self certify” without any checks can allow abuse of 

(2) 
the system by those most vulnerable who have addiction problems.  

Permitting the patient the option of not having a GP informed removes an 

(3) 
otherwise effective safeguard.  

We are grateful you have brought this to our attention and we also share these 
concerns. Firstly, it is important to set out that providers of controlled drugs based in 
England must comply with legislation which is enforced by healthcare regulators 
such as Care Quality Commission (CQC), the Medicines and Healthcare products 
Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC). In 
addition, all healthcare professionals are subject to their respective codes of 
professional conduct and these are enforced by, for example, the General Medical 
Council (GMC) for doctors. 

With regards to NHSE&I’s role, we have a clear responsibility in providing systems 
oversight for the management and use of controlled drugs, including tramadol. NHS 

                                            NHS England and NHS Improvement 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                         
 
 
                                                        
 E&I’s Controlled Drugs Accountable Officers (CDAOs)1 undertake this role within 
each geographical region across England. They provide assurance that all 
healthcare organisations, including pharmacies, adopt a safe practice for appropriate 
clinical use, prescribing, storage, destruction and monitoring of controlled drugs.  

CDAOs facilitate the routes to share concerns, report incidents, and take remedial 
action as well as highlighting good practice. This is shared with wider partners such 
as Clinical Commissioning Groups and the Police through the Controlled Drugs 
Local Intelligence Networks (CD LINs). Details of all CDAOs in England are held on 
a national register, which is owned and published by the CQC: 
www.cqc.org.uk/content/controlled-drugs-accountable-officers. 

The sale or supply of controlled drugs outside of the legislative framework is the 
responsibility of the Home Office, and NHSE&I does not have powers to stop illegal 
supply of dependence forming drugs with toxic potential.  However, we can and do 
take this into account in the provision of NHS services. NHSE&I expects all NHS 
providers to follow the NICE guidance on Coexisting severe mental illness 
(psychosis) and substance misuse: assessment and management in healthcare 
settings2 which directs people to consider the use of drugs, prescribed or otherwise 
when providing clinical care. 

However, we are aware of cases where coroners have highlighted an online 
consultation with a doctor, issue of a prescription and supply of medicines, as having 
contributed to a death. We recognise further work is needed to ensure patient safety 
where consultations are given online.  

As a result, in April 2017, the National Quality Board3 - jointly chaired by NHS 
England and CQC - held a workshop focusing on online providers of primary care 
services and online prescribing. The workshop identified a number of challenges for 
the system including gaps in the current regulatory framework to protect patients 
from harmful practice. Following the workshop, the CQC established a UK-wide 
forum to review the regulatory landscape for online prescribing. As well as CQC, the 
group includes Healthcare Inspectorate Wales (HIW), Healthcare Improvement 
Scotland (HIS), The Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority (RQIA) (Northern 
Ireland), Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the 
General Medical Council (GMC), General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) and 
Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). This group now meets regularly. The CQC 
remains concerned that citizens are able to source medicines with the potential for 
harm from providers who structure their business in such a way as to be outside the 
scope of registration with the CQC or GPhC. 

We are working with other health regulators who have a greater role in responding to 
this challenge. Relevant UK agencies, such as the CQC and MRHA, have worked 
collaboratively to review the healthcare framework and, importantly, identify gaps to 

 1 https://www.england.nhs.uk/contact-us/privacy-notice/how-we-use-your-information/safety-and-quality/controlled-drugs-
accountable-officer-alerts-etc/ 

2 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg120 

3The National Quality Board is a national cross organizational board comprising the clinical leaders of national arms-length 
bodies across health care, social care and public health. It is jointly chaired by NHS England and Care Quality Commission    

                                            NHS England and NHS Improvement 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ensure patients are protected from loopholes – notably, for example, where some 
companies have deliberately configured themselves to avoid regulation by CQC - 
within and outside the UK system. 

Linked to this, the CQC inspected every company in England that provided non-NHS 
online primary care services. Its findings were published in March 2018 in ‘The state 
of care in independent online primary health services’4. Providers were assessed 
against five key areas: whether they were safe, caring, effective, responsive to 
people’s needs and well-led. The CQC also reviewed the provider’s registered 
location, its systems and policies, examined how it delivered care, and analysed 
information it held against the provider including, where available, feedback from 
people who have used or have come into contact with the service.  

One of the questions CQCs inspectors asked during these inspections included how 
the service makes sure the identity of the patient is authenticated and requested that 
where a treatment might have the potential to affect safe care or decrease the ability 
of the patient’s GP to provide safe and effective care that the patient’s NHS GP is 
kept informed of any treatment, with the exception of sexual health services. These 
issues are important for NHSE&I and we will ensure that NHS online consultations 
provide a safe and secure way for patients to discuss their health concerns with an 
appropriate clinician connected to their own GP practice and place centred around 
their needs. NHSE&I has adopted a robust system of quality assurance, safety and 
security standards so that patients and clinicians can feel confident in using online 
consultations. 

These services will continue to be regulated by CQC and we understand that they 
are progressing plans to help increase public understanding of the quality and safety 
of online services in England by rating providers as ‘outstanding’, ‘good’, ‘requires 
improvement’ or ‘inadequate’, as used on other healthcare services. 

In the UK, the MHRA are responsible for the legal provisions relating to the supply of 
medicines online which include; 

All categories of medicines (GSL, P and POMs) may be sold online – 
• 
provided all other legal requirements in medicines regulations are met – for example, 
Prescription Only (POM) and Pharmacy (P) medicines may only be legally sold or 
supplied to the public through registered pharmacy premises, by or under the 
supervision of a pharmacist and POMs may only be sold or supplied in response to a 
prescription from an authorised healthcare professional (such as a doctor, dentist, or 
certain trained nurses and pharmacists). [Doctors may also supply medicines direct 
to patients – for example, where they personally administer a medicine such as a 
vaccine or where they are able under specific NHS arrangements to supply 
prescribed medicines to their patients as part of an NHS dispensing service]. 
• 
requirements of legislation apply equally to sales from bricks-and-mortar premises 
and sales online.Medicines legislation does not prohibit the remote prescribing of 
POMs by a qualified prescriber however prescriptions must meet the usual 
requirements set down in medicines legislation. 

A UK registered pharmacy may have a presence on the internet however, the 

                                            NHS England and NHS Improvement 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 • 
Some POMs are Controlled drugs (such as benzodiazepines) and their 
availability to patients can be subject to additional control under the Misuse of Drugs 
Act 1971 which is administered by the Home Office.  

The EU’s Falsified Medicines Directive (FMD), introduced national arrangements to 
register suppliers of medicines at a distance. This required Member States to 
establish a national website and adopt the EU Common logo. The Human Medicines 
Regulations 2012 were amended and MHRA was responsible for managing the UK 
list of online retailers that registered to sell medicines to the public remotely. The 
scheme was disapplied in GB from 1 January 2021 and powers sought in the 
Medicines and Medical Devices Bill to introduce a new system. The Bill has since 
been granted Royal Assent and MHRA plan to consult with stakeholders on what 
system would best suit UK market. 

The MHRA is working with partner healthcare regulators including the Care Quality 
Commission, the General Pharmaceutical Council, the General Medical Council, 
Public Health England, NHS England and partners in Scotland, Wales and N Ireland 
to review the UK legislative framework on digital healthcare provision and, 
importantly, identify gaps. 

In addition to action to remove illegally trading websites and seizing products, the 
MHRA recognises that reacting to threats also involves alerting patients and has run 
a number of public awareness campaigns including a targeted and sustained 
campaign named #Fakemeds which was developed with the assistance of 
supporting research and was run online and through social media for maximum 
coverage.  

The Yellow Card Scheme is the UK system for collecting and monitoring information 
on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The Scheme is run by the MHRA and 
relies on voluntary reporting of suspected ADRs by health professionals and 
patients. There is also a legal obligation for pharmaceutical companies to report 
serious ADR reports to their drugs. The purpose of the Scheme is to provide an early 
warning that the safety of a product may require further investigation. 

In addition to this:   

The GMC has issued guidance5 for all healthcare professionals with 

• 
prescribing responsibilities. It sets out the shared high level principles of good 
practice expected of everyone when consulting and or prescribing remotely from the 
patient.  

NHSE&I provides advice6 to patients on the dangers of buying medicines on-

• 
line. 

• 
The GPhC provides guidance to GB internet based pharmacies on providing 
pharmacy services online and operates a voluntary internet pharmacy logo scheme 

5 https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/prescribing-and-managing-medicines-and-
devices/remote-prescribing-via-telephone-video-link-or-online 

6 https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/prescriptions-and-pharmacies/pharmacies/dangers-of-buying-medicines-online/ 

                                            NHS England and NHS Improvement 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 to provide reassurance to patients and the public that they are purchasing medicines 
online from registered pharmacies who have to meet GPhC standards. 

In the wider context of this issue, Public Health England published in 2019 a 
Prescribed medicines review7. This reported on the evidence for dependence on, 
and withdrawal from, prescribed medicines with the aim of making sure that local 
healthcare systems build awareness and support to enhance clinician and patient 
decision making. In support of this NHSE&I are co-ordinating a programme to 
implement the review recommendations working closely with relevant Arm's Length 
Bodies (ALBs) to ensure cross system improvements. The programme covers five 
classes of medicines including: 

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Benzodiazepines;  
Z-drugs;  
Gabapentinoids; 
Opioids, for chronic non-cancer pain; and 
Antidepressants. 

With regard to this case, and based on the information provided within the 
Regulation 28, it appears that this death was not the result of services provided by 
NHS, but from services outside of the NHS. It is unclear where this doctor or 
company were registered and the site from which the deceased obtained the 
consultation, prescription and medication. Nevertheless, the provision of remote 
consultations and the supply of medicines through distance selling remains a 
concern. 

NHSE&I remains committed to improving the safety of controlled drugs and online 
prescribing. We will continue to work across the system with key partners nationally, 
regionally and locally to ensure patient safety. We would also suggest that contact is 
made directly with the CQC and MRHA who would be better placed should you wish 
to understand their work in this area further. 

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and 
please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information. 

Yours sincerely, 

National Medical Director   
NHS England and NHS Improvement  

7  https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prescribed-medicines-review-report 

                                            NHS England and NHS Improvement

Related reports

Other reports by Caroline Beasley-Murray

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.