Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

Liane Davenport

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0136, written 10 Oct 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report10 Oct 2019
Reference2020-0136
DeceasedLiane Davenport
CoronerKally Cheema
Coroner areaCumbria
CategoryMental Health related deaths · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Organisation namedNorth Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust · Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Kally CHEEMA LLB
HER MAJESTY’S SENIOR CORONER
COUNTY OF CUMBRIA

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

Steven Eames, chief executive, North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust
Chief executive, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency
CORONER

| am Dr Nicholas Shaw Assistant Coroner for County of Cumbria
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations
28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/S/paragraph/7

http://www. legislation. gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 19/02/2019 | commenced an investigation into the death of Liane Davenport. The investigation
concluded at the end of the inquest 4th October 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was Liane
Davenport was on high doses of two anti-psychotic medications to control symptoms of chronic
schizophrenia, she also had significant coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. It is most
likely that her death at home, [A Cumbria on December 4th 2019 was due to
a combination of her heart disease and the high blood level of Amisulpride needed to control her
schizophrenia.
1a Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis
2 Amisulpride toxici
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Liane had a 45 year history of Schizophrenia, and a 10 year history of Lupus with associated arthritic
problems. Over the last year of her life she had had hospital admissions for sepsis associated with
pneumonia and endocarditis, for which she had prolonged but successful treatment. She had however
become physically frail and lost up to 10Kg weight over her final year. She had been on long term
antipsychotic treatment requiring high doses of Quetiapine and Amisulpride -800mg daily of each drug —
to control her mental state. It was acknowledged at inquest that the Amisulpride dose was significantly
higher than the 300mg suggested by BNF but at review shortly before her death her consultant felt it was
safe to continue as there had been no physical problems and her blood chemistry and ECG were within
normal limits. There was no evidence to suggest she had taken more than her prescribed doses. At post
mortem toxicology her plain blood Quetiapine level was 433ng/ml -within the quoted therapeutic range
but her Amisulpride level was 10698ng/ml —against a suggested therapeutic upper range of 400n¢/mI.
at Leicester comments on the the large volume of distribution for Amisulpride which may raise
the level somewhat. He tells me he could not find any quoted toxic or lethal ranges but points to a
reported case where a level of 9600 was survived with treatment whereas 2 fatal cases involved levels of
over 40,000.
CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory
duty to report to you.

Fairfield, Station Road, Cockermouth, Cumbria. CA13 9PT email hmcoroner@cumbria.gov.uk Tel 0300 303 3180 Fax 01900 706915

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN]
(1) Should monitoring of blood levels of powerful antipsychotics be considered and recommended for

patients on long term high dose treatment, particularly as they become older & more frail?
{2)pmnmananennnnnnnnn

(3)

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your trust/agency has the
power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 17"
| December 2019. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

| Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION |
| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Person,

| have also sent it to Duncan Selbie, chief executive, Public Health England and Jim Mackey,
chief executive, Northumbria NHS Trust who may find it useful or of interest.
| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of
your response by the Chief Coroner.

10/10/2019

Or Nicholas Shaw Assistant Coroner County of Cumbria

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from St Nicholas Hospital (PDF)
26th January 2021  

Dr N Shaw 
HM Coroner for County of Cumbria 
Fairfield  
Station Road 
Cockermouth 
Cumbria 
CA13 9PT 

Executive Suite 
1st Floor  
St Nicholas Hospital 
Jubilee Road 
Gosforth 
Newcastle upon Tyne 
NE3 3XT 

Dear Dr Shaw 

RE: 

Inquest into the death of Liane Davenport 
Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths Response 

We write in response to your Regulation 28 Report dated 10th October 2019 following your 
investigation into the death of Liane Davenport. This response has been prepared by 
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (“The Trust”) and 
addresses the concerns as set out by you.  

As you are aware Mental Health Services at the time of Ms Davenport’s death were provided 
by Cumbria Partnership NHSFT. As of 1st October 2019, those services are now provided by 
the Trust.  

Please note that we have only recently been made aware of this Regulation 28 Report as it 
was not addressed to the Trust (this was initially sent to Cumbria Partnership NHS 
Foundation Trust (‘CPFT’) and has recently been sent to the Trust) which is why there has 
been a significant delay in providing a response.  

The issue you raised within your regulation 28 report is as follows:  

Should monitoring of blood levels of powerful antipsychotics be considered and 
recommended for patients on long term high dose treatment, particularly as they 
become older and more frail.  

As far as we are aware, there was no indication during the course of the inquest that you 
were considering a Regulation 28 report in relation to the above and the evidence given by 

confirmed that Ms Davenport was being monitored by the physical health team 

within the CMHART in response to the high doses of medications that she was taking.   

Response  

The Trust recognises the concerns that have been raised with regards to the monitoring of 
blood levels of patients on long term high dose treatment and in particular, powerful 
antipsychotic medication.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 An investigation was carried out by CPFT (prior to its merger with the Trust) which we 
understand was provided to HM Coroner in advance of the inquest hearing. This 
investigation evidenced that Ms Davenport’s physical health was monitored in accordance 
CPFT guidance at the time i.e. Ms Davenport attended CPFT for regular monitoring to 
identify any adverse physical health effects from the antipsychotic medication she was 
prescribed. This basic physical health monitoring included:  

1.  Monitoring and recording any side effects of treatment;  
2.  Monitoring weight;  
3.  Measuring weight circumference annually;  
4.  Taking pulse and blood pressure annually;  
5.  Fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c and blood lipid levels annually;  
6.  ECG conducted annually;  
7.  Advice provided on healthy lifestyle intervention; and  
8.  Ms Davenport to attend annual physical health review with the CMHART Physical 

Health Clinic.  

It is also noted in the investigation report that there was evidence of good communication 
with Ms Davenport’s GP between 2008 and December 2019 with regard to physical health 
monitoring and high dose antipsychotic treatment (‘HDAT’) and CPFT CMHART staff 
proactively chased up missed physical health clinic appointments by conducting home visits 
and escorting the patient to the appointments.  

Whilst Ms Davenport’s physical health was monitored as specified above, we note that she 
could have qualified for more regular monitoring of her physical health as she was on HDAT, 
in line with RCPsych guidance. We do, however, understand that the HDAT policy was not 
approved in CPFT until approximately 4 months after Ms Davenport’s death (1st March 2019) 
and as such, the relevant clinicians were acting in accordance with CPFT guidance at the 
time. In addition, we note that, in any event, neither basic nor HDAT monitoring would have 
involved the monitoring of plasma levels of the specific antipsychotic medication that Ms 
Davenport was on (Quetiapine and Amusulpiride) and this mode of investigation is not 
recommended in routine clinical practice by NICE, RCPsych or by the British Association of 
Psychopharmacology as the assessment of antipsychotic intolerance (or ‘toxicity’) is a 
clinical finding primarily associated with worsening side effects such as extrapyramidal 
effects, sedation, confusion and ECG changes. 

In light of the above, the Trust considers that the care provided to Ms Davenport particularly 
in relation to her physical health monitoring was appropriate in the circumstances. However, 
to provide assurances to HM Coroner, the Trust has reviewed the measures which are in 
place to ensure that a patient’s physical health is sufficiently monitored when they are on 
HDAT for prolonged periods of time.  

We have attached the Trust policy on HDAT monitoring (alongside the Trust Guidance to be 
read alongside this policy) for ease of reference which details the additional monitoring 
requirements for adult patients prescribed HDAT.  

To summarise, the additional monitoring requirements/tests/measurements are as follows: 

•  ECG; 
•  Urea and electrolytes; 
•  Liver function;  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •  Prolactin;  
•  Blood pressure and pulse (sitting/lying/standing);  
•  Temperature;  
•  Clinical signs of hydration;  
•  Glucose regulation;  
•  Review of side effects including a specific review for movement disorder; and  
•  Review of PRN medication.  

The Trust policy sets out the importance of each investigation/test and the frequency for 
conducting each investigation/test. You will note that the additional monitoring requirements 
do not include the monitoring of blood levels in accordance with the relevant national 
guidance as set out above.  

We hope that the information provided offers you the necessary assurances that the Trust 
have invested time, effort and resource into investigating the issues you have highlighted 
with a view to improving patient care and safety and reducing the risk of any adverse 
incidents or outcome in the future.  

Should you wish to discuss any of the above further, please contact 

Yours sincerely 

Executive Director of Nursing and Chief Operating Officer

Related reports

Other reports by Kally Cheema

See all →

More reports categorised “Mental Health related deaths”

See all →

Track North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.