Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0164, written 26 Aug 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 26 Aug 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0164 |
| Deceased | Toby Nieland |
| Coroner | Timothy Brennand |
| Coroner area | Lincolnshire |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Community health care · Mental Health related deaths |
| Organisation named | Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. 2. 3. 4. Chief Operating Officer South Lincolnshire Clinical Commissioning Group Bridge House The Point Lions Way Sleaford Lincolnshire NG34 8GG Substance Misuse Lead Public Health Division Adult Care and Community Well Being Lincolnshire County Council Room 3A Orchard House Orchard Street Lincoln LN1 1BA Acting Chief Executive We are With You (Formerly Addaction) The New Avenue 26-30 Newland Lincoln LN1 1XG Chief Executive Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust St. George's Lincoln LN1 1FS 1. CORONER I am Timothy BRENNAND HM Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Lincolnshire, 4 Lindum Road, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN2 1NN. 2. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 1 3. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 21st May 2018, my predecessor Stuart Fisher commenced an investigation into the death of Toby Peter Edward Nieland, aged 29. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 13th September 2019. The medical cause of death was: 1a. Hanging 1b. 1c. 2. The narrative conclusion was: Toby Peter Edward Nieland died as a consequence of self-suspension by means of improvised ligature in circumstances where the issue of his intention remains unclear by reason of his Dual Diagnosis condition including mental dysfunction and disordered thinking exacerbated by on- going pain management by reason of alcohol induced Chronic Pancreatitis on a background of anxiety and low mood as to his personal circumstances. In March 2020 I received submissions from the Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. In August 2020 I received submissions from the Lincolnshire Clinical Commissioning Group. 4. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The deceased had a history that included a Dual Diagnosis with polysubstance misuse and Borderline Personality Disorder. Additionally, he had suffered episodic Anxiety and depressive Disorders and presumed Emotional Unstable Personality Disorder. In 2016 the deceased developed alcohol related Pancreatitis that had deteriorated into a chronic condition causing him to endure persistent significant pain. He was prescribed opiate based analgesia to which he had become addicted. There was a significant history of self-harm and previous attempts to take his life. In March 2018 the deceased had taken an intentional overdose and had received in-patient care but had subsequently self-discharged. In April 2018 he presented to the hospital in Grantham due to an exacerbation of his Pancreatitis and it was noted that that there was a further deterioration in his mental state with associated stressors including 2 Five social problems, hopelessness and suicidal ideation with intent. He was admitted as a voluntary inpatient at Cygnet Hospital Wyke, Bradford where his condition was actively treated, managed and monitored. By the 17th April 2018 the deceased had been assessed and approved for discharge despite warnings communicated by the family that the deceased presented as significant and continuing risk to himself – such warnings not having been communicated to the discharging clinician. He was assessed as presenting as low risk of self-harm and was placed into the care of the Grantham Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team. The deceased went to reside at temporary accommodation at Bells Public House, 79 Brook Street, Grantham, Lincolnshire. The facility was accepted to be sub-optimal. On the 2nd May 2018 the Crisis Team considered that the deceased had disengaged from the service and so he was discharged into the Community Mental Health Team. On the 17th May 2018, the deceased was discovered in a collapsed and unresponsive condition having self-suspended himself by a belt to an improvised point of suspension in his room at the Public House. Post mortem samples established an absence of alcohol, but confirmed the presence of a variety of the deceased's prescribed and non-prescribed medications but at therapeutic levels. Between the 17th April 2018 and 17th May 2018 the treatment and care within the community was managed conservatively and in a sub-optimal manner thereby resulting in accepted missed opportunities to monitor and appreciate any deterioration in the deceased that might require an escalation in potential treatment and care. Whilst it was possible that had there been some face to face meeting between the Crisis Team or the Community Mental Health Team this might have had a bearing upon the ultimate outcome, this factor and the consequences of missed opportunities to manage, supervise, treat or care could not be evaluated, even on a balance of probabilities. 5. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1. The concerns of the immediate family were not communicated to any of the agencies charged with the responsibility of caring for the deceased, 3 nor were their views sought (directly or indirectly) as to the suitability of the deceased's accommodation and/or circumstances and/or pathway of treatment and care; 2. Unequivocal evidence established that the deceased suffered from an advanced progressive addiction overlaid with a vulnerable personality amounting to a complex Dual Diagnosis – the significance of which was not appreciated and therefore not managed adequately or appropriately; 3. In any event, even on the basis upon which community care was deemed appropriate, there was an absence of any co-ordination between mental health service provision and addiction services; 4. There was an absence of any adequate "Care Programme Approach" (a package of care used to plan mental health care) resulting in no care coordinator being appointed to monitor the deceased within the auspices of an appropriate care plan; 5. Inadequate evaluation of the deceased's previous history; his purported non-concordance (repeated assertions of not wanting treatment/support that ought to have been interpreted as an increase in his risk); progression of his complex vulnerabilities; his personal circumstances (reaction to accommodation and relationships); events suggestive of on-going misuse of drugs - all gave rise to a missed opportunities to appreciate a series of ascertainable relapse signatures; 6. The absence of any "assertive outreach" to the deceased when discharged into the community (that is to say, no face to contact, no alternative welfare checks being organised, undue reliance being placed on the informal supervisory role of the landlord or other agencies) gave rise to a total disconnect between patient and healthcare provider, thereby creating a series of missed opportunities to assess the deceased, identify possible relapse signatures and potentially escalate care; 7. The circumstances of this case evidences a gap in the provision of care to a patient with a Dual Diagnosis in Lincolnshire by reason of there being no dedicated and/or commissioned drug and alcohol recovery team/service; 8. The Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Trust document – "Crisis Assessment and Home Team Protocol" (Exhibit reference IJ2) makes no adequate or appropriate provision for a patient with Dual Diagnosis; 9. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline Scope document "Severe mental illness and substance misuse (dual diagnosis): community health and social care services stipulates that there should be a Dual Diagnosis protocol setting out specifically the roles of the mental health provider and the drug and alcohol service provider (no such protocol being in place at the material time) and that whilst it is apparent that some thought has been deployed to re-install a bridge between mental health provision and drug and alcohol services this does not address the needs of a patient suffering from a complex Dual Diagnosis in Lincolnshire due to: 4 a. The lack of interface between senior or experienced care providers to deal with multi-faceted or nuanced cases; b. The absence of specialist Dual Diagnosis workers to be deployed in complex cases; c. The absence of adequate and robust guidance and training, in particular for mental health practitioners to be aware of substance misuse issues and a patient suffering from Dual Diagnosis that impact on appropriate pathways of treatment and care; 6. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you AND/OR your organisation have the power to take such action. 7. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 19/10/2020. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons a) Dr b) Mrs I have also sent in to the following parties who may find it useful or helpful: Rt.Hon Matt Hancock MP Secretary of State for Health and Social Care House of Commons SW1A 0AA Director of Public Health Lincolnshire County Council County Offices Lincoln 5 LN1 1YL , Hospital Manager Cygnet Hospital Wyke Blankney Grange Huddersfield Road Wyke Bradford BD12 8LR Housing Department South Kesteven District Council Council Offices St. Peters Hill Grantham Lincolnshire NG31 6PZ I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Date: 26/08/2020 Timothy BRENNAND HM Senior Coroner 6
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Mr Paul Smith HM Senior Coroner County Of Lincolnshire 4 Lindum Road Lincoln LN2 1NN Your reference – 01388-2018 8 October 2020 Dear Mr Smith Regarding: Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths following the inquest of Toby Peter Edward Nieland Thank you for affording me the opportunity to respond to the areas of concern highlighted within Mr Brennand's regulation 28 report to prevent further deaths. I am responding to the report as the substance misuse lead for the Public Health Division a part of the Adult Care and Community Wellbeing Directorate at Lincolnshire County Council. My responsibilities encompass the programme management of substance misuse activity within the directorate including overseeing substance misuse treatment and recovery contracts with We Are With You and any commissioning activity on behalf of the Director of Public Health, Professor . 1. The concerns of the immediate family were not communicated to any of the agencies charged with the responsibility of caring for the deceased, nor were their views sought (directly or indirectly) as to the suitability of the deceased's accommodation and/or circumstances and/or pathway of treatment and care; Mr Nieland was not receiving structured treatment with We Are With You at the time of his death but was accessing the Needle Syringe Programme (NSP). Public Health commission the NSP using NICE guidelines PH52 Needle and Syringe Programmes which details the provision required including: Advice on minimising the harms caused by drugs Help to stop using drugs by providing access to drug treatment (for example, opioid substitution therapy) Access to other health and welfare services For those receiving structured treatment it would be good practice to involve the family (if appropriate to do so). However the NSP is designed to attract those undertaking high risk behaviour so they can be accessed anonymously and only basic information is gathered for reporting purposes. This encourages those reluctant to access service to obtain clean equipment and minimise the spread of blood borne viruses such as hepatitis C and HIV. During the period Mr Nieland was struggling with his illnesses the family may have benefitted from accessing the carers support service commissioned by the council. This service has a substance misuse provision to support families and carers of those suffering from drug or alcohol misuse. It is recognised this did not take place and many people in this situation do not see themselves as carers and may not access the service, this situation is being addressed by the current service and will form part of the considerations when re-commissioning. Future commissioning considerations and actions i. The NSP is commissioned in line with NICE PH52 guidelines. Public Health will continue to undertake this responsibility and family members will be engaged as part of the pre-procurement work that builds the service specification and future delivery model Timeframe October 2023 ii. The council will consider commissioning a specific substance misuse family service to offer specialised support to the families and carers of people with drug and alcohol problems Timeframe June 2022 2. Unequivocal evidence established that the deceased suffered from an advanced progressive addiction overlaid with a vulnerable personality amounting to a complex Dual Diagnosis – the significance of which was not appreciated and therefore not managed adequately or appropriately; The substance misuse services commissioned by Public Health with We Are with You are voluntary. I believe numerous attempts were made to encourage Mr Nieland in to the service but this was unsuccessful. NICE guidelines PH52 state NSP services should Offer (or help people to access): secondary care services (for example, mental health services) This is dependent on the client wanting to access the support. Engagement cannot be forced as this can have a profound effect on long term outcomes. We Are With You are commissioned to work in partnership with other agencies including mental health services, and should a referral be received from mental health services it is expected that holistic joint working is undertaken and clear pathways should be in place for joint working. Future commissioning considerations and actions i. A joint working protocol is in place but has not been widely implemented across all services. The CCG, LPFT, We Are With You and Public Health should work together to review this protocol and implement a more robust referral pathway between services to ensure timely and appropriate services can be accessed by all. Timeframe – Review to commence October 2020 3. In any event, even on the basis upon which community care was deemed appropriate, there was an absence of any co-ordination between mental health service provision and addiction services; Mr Nieland was not in structured treatment with substance misuse services. If he had been, the substance misuse provider is commissioned to work in partnership with mental health treatment services to ensure that a comprehensive package of care is delivered. This process is not currently working universally across all services which needs to be addressed by both commissioners and providers to ensure everyone with coexisting mental health and substance misuse issues receives timely and appropriate care packages. Future commissioning considerations and actions i. There needs to be greater strategic and operational coordination between commissioners and providers. A group led by mental health commissioners should review and revise the existing protocol to ensure all managers and staff have clear pathways to follow within mental health and substance misuse services Timeframe – Review commenced October 2020 ii. The council and the CCG should consider different approaches to commissioning services that cater for those with dual diagnosis, this should form part of the commissioning cycle and include alternative models and joint commissioning opportunities Timeframe - October 2023 4. There was an absence of any adequate "Care Programme Approach" (a package of care used to plan mental health care) resulting in no care coordinator being appointed to monitor the deceased within the auspices of an appropriate care plan; This concern is linked to the services commissioned by the Clinical Commissioning Group and provided by Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Trust. If Care coordination is in place it is imperative that the substance misuse services work in partnership with the mental health team to provide a comprehensive individually tailored care package. 5. Inadequate evaluation of the deceased's previous history; his purported non-concordance (repeated assertions of not wanting treatment/support that ought to have been interpreted as an increase in his risk); progression of his complex vulnerabilities; his personal circumstances (reaction to accommodation and relationships); events suggestive of on-going misuse of drugs - all gave rise to a missed opportunities to appreciate a series of ascertainable relapse signatures; The services commissioned for substance misuse treatment have embedded assessment processes and re-engagement polices that all staff are expected to work to. Unfortunately in this case Mr Nieland was not in structured treatment and the needle syringe programmes are designed to attract those reluctant to access main stream services to ensure people do not feel pressured while doing so. Service users may use many different NSP sites. The specialist sites such as the one commissioned with We Are With You in Grantham offer a wider choice of services including more in depth harm minimisation and onward referral to any agency including mental health services. Future commissioning considerations and actions i. Services will continue to be commissioned in line with NICE guidelines PH52 Needle and syringe programmes. That said, We Are With You are looking to enhance the questions asked when people attend NSP's with immediate effect. These changes will be considered when developing future commissioning models to ensure service match the needs specific to Lincolnshire. This process will apply to both NSP and the wider treatment service Timeframe – October 2020 for the changes to questionnaire and October 2023 for re-commissioning 6. The absence of any "assertive outreach" to the deceased when discharged into the community (that is to say, no face to contact, no alternative welfare checks being organised, undue reliance being placed on the informal supervisory role of the landlord or other agencies) gave rise to a total disconnect between patient and healthcare provider, thereby creating a series of missed opportunities to assess the deceased, identify possible relapse signatures and potentially escalate care; This concern is linked to the services commissioned by the Clinical Commissioning Group and provided by Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Trust. 7. The circumstances of this case evidences a gap in the provision of care to a patient with a Dual Diagnosis in Lincolnshire by reason of there being no dedicated and/or commissioned drug and alcohol recovery team/service; Substance misuse dual diagnosis provision is not commissioned as a separate service but is included within the main treatment contract with We Are With You. Within the current contract the service is asked to: Work in partnership with mental health teams and other Providers of mental health services to provide the best co-ordinated care possible to manage Service Users with dual diagnosis Develop strong partnerships and where appropriate joint working arrangements with mental health services to ensure that all clients requiring support and treatment for any identified mental health needs can access and are engaged in appropriate services Involvement in the writing and delivery of training to generic and specialist staff regarding mental health and dual diagnosis Ensuring staff have appropriate training and competencies, which are appropriately recorded, to enable them to address dual diagnosis To achieve this We Are With You have developed their staffing model to include a mental health trained nurse and specialist recovery worker who is allocated any dual diagnosis cases. This process has worked well within inpatient settings but is still developing across community mental health services. Future commissioning considerations and actions i. All commissioners and providers should review current models and revise the joint working protocol Timeframe – To commence October 2020 – to be completed by April 2021 dependent on Covid 19 impacts ii. The substance misuse provision for dual diagnosis will be a central point of the next service evaluation; this inspection should determine if current provision is adequate and appropriate to meet the needs of those accessing the service and make recommendations to the provider and commissioner regarding provision and future commissioning potential. Timeframe - September 2021 to complete the review (Covid 19 restrictions may delay this action) 8. The Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Trust document – "Crisis Assessment and Home Team Protocol" (Exhibit reference IJ2) makes no adequate or appropriate provision for a patient with Dual Diagnosis; This concern is linked to the services commissioned by the Clinical Commissioning Group and provided by Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Trust. 9. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline Scope document "Severe mental illness and substance misuse (dual diagnosis): community health and social care services stipulates that there should be a Dual Diagnosis protocol setting out specifically the roles of the mental health provider and the drug and alcohol service provider (no such protocol being in place at the material time) and that whilst it is apparent that some thought has been deployed to re-install a bridge between mental health provision and drug and alcohol services this does not address the needs of a patient suffering from a complex Dual Diagnosis in Lincolnshire due to: a. The lack of interface between senior or experienced care providers to deal with multi-faceted or nuanced cases; The current protocol was developed between Public Health, Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Trust and We Are With You (previously Addaction) in December 2016 (included as a separate attachment to this letter titled; 2016-12 DD Protocol V1.3.docx) This protocol takes a 'no wrong door' approach to engaging with dual diagnosis patients and places an expectation on both providers to work together and develop integrated care pathways. The Regulation 28 report has allowed all parties involved to review and reflect on previous shortfalls in delivery and a new impetus to resolve the remaining delivery gaps is now evident. Work has commenced in October 2020 to review and revise the protocol and look at a system wide approach to improve provision even further. Future commissioning considerations and actions i. There needs to be greater strategic and operational coordination between commissioners and providers. The existing protocol will be reviewed and revised to ensure all managers and staff have clear pathways to follow within mental health and substance misuse services Timeframe – Review commenced October 2020 to be completed by April 2021 dependent on Covid 19 impacts b. The absence of specialist Dual Diagnosis workers to be deployed in complex cases; The response to question 7 details the provision in place from We Are With You. The specification for the service is outcome focussed and expects the provider to meet all relevant guidance and provide the support and care appropriate for those using the service to make a full and sustainable recovery. This includes dual diagnosis. The current provision is sufficient to manage need however if joint working grows significantly this will be reviewed as part of the on-going management of the contract between Public Health and We Are with You. Future commissioning considerations and actions i. Consider different approaches to commissioning substance misuse services including more joined up initiatives with the CCG's and other key partners Timeframe – October 2023 c. The absence of adequate and robust guidance and training, in particular for mental health practitioners to be aware of substance misuse issues and a patient suffering from Dual Diagnosis that impact on appropriate pathways of treatment and care; The substance misuse treatment specification states: Providing advice, support, training and skills transfer to the wider workforce in identification, brief advice, early intervention and to prevention, relation appropriate referral into specialist treatment.' This provision is in place and available for Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Trust to access. In addition to the training available through We Are With You, Public Health in partnership with We Are With You run four Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) accredited courses per annum on Understanding Substance Misuse and Understanding Alcohol Misuse. These courses are open to anyone interested in raising their awareness of alcohol or drug issues. Unfortunately due to the Covid 19 Pandemic these courses are currently suspended but will be resumed as soon as possible. Conclusion and future considerations The provision to support those with a dual diagnosis has improved over the last 18 months with many organisations working closely together and joint meetings taking place. However this is not currently uniform and work still remains to embed dual diagnosis best practice across all service areas Public Health see the following as the main points for action going forward i. Ensure any engagement work which informs future commissioning includes dual diagnosis support and fully involves clients and their families ii. Consider redesigning the support service for families of those suffering from substance misuse issues so they can access support to help cope with and aid the recovery of their loved one iii. Participate in a joint working group to review and implement a new working protocol led by mental health services and incorporating all aspects of substance misuse and mental health iv. Continue to take into account current local and national best practice for joint working across mental health and substance misuse services when re- commissioning future drug and alcohol services v. Undertake an operational level review of dual diagnosis provision within substance misuse services as part of the next annual inspection vi. Consider different approaches to commissioning substance misuse services including more partnership commissioning with the CCG and other key partners The Coexisting Severe Mental Illness and Substance Misuse: Community Health and Social Care Services guidance acknowledges there is a national system wide issue with the commissioning of services that cater for dual diagnosis, It states: In the UK, service configurations, treatment philosophies and funding streams act as barriers to providing coordinated care. Separate mental health and substance misuse services are usually provided by different organisations, have different organisational and managerial structures, and staff within each service often lack the knowledge and skills needed to work effectively with people from another organisation. We recognise this is a national issue and Public Health is not complacent in trying to navigate complex systems to support those who are vulnerable I hope the above has provided some reassurance that Public Health take its responsibility to commission substance misuse services very seriously and that a stronger emphasis on dual diagnosis has a part to play in current and future commissioning. We will work with all partners to develop services further and embed best practice in areas where this is not yet fully implemented. Yours sincerely Programme Manager Public Health Division Adult Care and Community Wellbeing Lincolnshire County Council
Our ref: SC/DC/HMC/2020
Mr Paul Smith
HM Senior Coroner – Lincolnshire
4 Lindum Road
Lincoln
LN2 1NN
Office of the Chair and CEO
Trust Headquarters
St George’s
Long Leys Road
Lincoln
LN1 1FS
Email:
Tel: 01522 309200
@nhs.net
15 October 2020
Dear Mr Smith
In the matter of Toby Nieland deceased - REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT
FUTURE DEATHS - Response of Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
The Trust wishes to express, once again its sincere condolences to Mr Toby Nieland’s
family and loved ones on his untimely death. Owing to the seriousness of the concerns
raised by both HM Senior Coroner and the deceased’s family at the inquest hearing, the
Trust immediately began communicating with its commissioning and provider partners to
highlight the matters raised. The Trust is grateful to HM Senior Coroner, Mr Timothy
Brennand, for his report of 26 August 2020.
The Clinical Commissioning Group, as the commissioning body, is submitting a coordinated
response; this letter will be included as an appendix.
Following consultation with the Trust’s Executive Directors, I respond to each of the points
raised in Mr Brennand’s report as stated below. I have further summarised our actions at
the end of this response, with the responsible leads for each action.
1. The concerns of the immediate family were not communicated to any of the
agencies charged with the responsibility of caring for the deceased, nor were
their views sought (directly or indirectly) as to the suitability of the deceased's
accommodation and/or circumstances and/or pathway of treatment and care.
Trust Response:
The Trust appreciates the importance and benefits of understanding the views of
patients’ families and carers. It is also recognised that concerted efforts need to be
made to support staff to consider the voice of carers. To address this, the Board of
Directors and Council of Governors have given a clear message of expectation that
carers are seen as a priority and that their needs are considered. The Trust has put in
place a range of services that support carers and provide helpful information on a
routine basis:-
Upon inpatient admission, the Trust provides information to a patient’s family and/or
carer. The information document is also publically available to view and download
from the Trust’s website https://www.lpft.nhs.uk/download_file/1876/0
Chair:
Chief Executive:
www.lpft.nhs.uk
The Trust offers a dedicated email address for family and carers to communicate
with the patient’s clinical team. lpft.carers@nhs.net
A carers’ newsletter is produced and circulated on a monthly basis.
At the time of writing, 93 trust staff are trained in Meriden Behavioural Family therapy
and a further 50 staff members are scheduled to receive this specialist training by the
end of January 2021. This is a dynamic training programme that educates staff
regarding the importance of involving families and carers; it also teaches ways in
which family and carers members can be supported.
The Trust has introduced a dedicated member of staff as a ‘Carer Lead’ for each of
its inpatient units across Lincolnshire. The Carer Lead is available on the ward to
patients, families and carers and is identified through the wearing of an orange
lanyard.
The Trust offers specialist individual support to carers and families in times of crisis.
The referral for this level of support is received via the patient’s clinical team.
The Trust offers fortnightly education and support groups based in both Lincoln and
Boston. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the groups continue to operate temporarily
via virtual meetings.
Dedicated ‘Family and Carers’ notice boards have been introduced on every
inpatient ward offering a wide range of information.
A smartphone ‘WhatsApp’ group has been set up to provide another source of
information sharing and communication.
Accreditation under the Triangle of Care initiative, with the Trust having been
awarded two stars under this national scheme.
A Carers Strategy that has been co-produced with carers and with Trust Governors.
An Executive Director sponsor who has executive oversight and is a member of the
Board of Directors.
In cases where explicit consent has not been given by a patient to share their sensitive
personal information; the Trust has taken action to remind clinicians that information
from families and carers can still be received. The Carers Lead for the Trust continues
to work with the Divisional Leads; Learning and Development and also
the
Communications Team to reinforce the message to staff that they can still receive
information from Carers and Families even when consent is not given from the patient
to share information. In Mr Nieland’s case it was unfortunate the Trust were not made
aware of any concerns held by the family, however there is the clear commitment to
learn from this and to consider what needs to be in place to strengthen communication
and to actively encourage feedback.
2
As a provider of specialist mental healthcare, the Trust recognises the role of
appropriate accommodation in a patient’s recovery, although was not aware of the
details of Mr Nieland’s accommodation to which he was discharged in 2018.
The Trust recognises the need for appropriate communication between partner
agencies to provide collaborative health and social care and support to patients and is
committed to continuously reinforce this message to all staff. The Trust now works
closely with a number of partners from the Voluntary, Community and Social Enterprise
sector in Lincolnshire including Carers First and Everyone, and has developed good
working relationships, which have led to identified placement options for patients being
discharged from hospital.
The Trust is working with Local Authority, District Councils, Commissioners and NHS
England/Improvement on a joint accommodation strategy for those with mental health
and social care needs, to ensure the system is working together on more responsive
and effective housing solutions for our service users.
2. Unequivocal evidence established that the deceased suffered from an advanced
progressive addiction overlaid with a vulnerable personality amounting to a
complex Dual Diagnosis – the significance of which was not appreciated and
therefore not managed adequately or appropriately.
Trust Response:
The term dual diagnosis can be used to cover a broad range of coexisting mental
health conditions alongside problems with drug or alcohol use, the common theme
being the presence of both drug/alcohol and mental health conditions at the same time.
This means that a person’s presenting needs can vary significantly. There are
recognised challenges in providing effective treatment for this group of patients; most
notably, the individuals’ willingness and ability to engage.
Due to Mr Nieland’s fluctuating mental health needs and the fact that he was deemed to
have capacity to make his own life choices, there were times when he was not engaged
with mental health services and the Trust was not legally able to enforce any treatment
upon him. When Mr Nieland was engaged with the Trust’s services, there is evidence
that his drug and alcohol issues were being appropriately considered and advice was
being given. However, successful treatment for drug and alcohol addiction requires
continued engagement, and in Mr Nieland’s case unfortunately the Trust was limited in
its powers to enforce any treatment.
3.
In any event, even on the basis upon which community care was deemed
appropriate, there was an absence of any co-ordination between mental health
service provision and addiction services.
Trust response:
There is evidence from the clinical record that Trust staff believed Mr Nieland was
effectively engaging with Addaction (as it was known then) and that he was happy with
the support he was receiving. Based upon information available at the time there was
3
no known need for the Trust to pursue any additional support for his drug and alcohol
problems.
Upon reflection, subject to explicit consent, the Trust accepts that it would have been
best practice for the Trust to have proactively contacted Addaction to ascertain Mr
Nieland’s level of engagement as it is evident from the subsequent information provided
by Addaction that Mr Nieland was not engaged in the level of structured treatment that
the Trust staff believed he was. More proactive contact with Addaction would have
identified this mismatch between what Mr Nieland was reporting and his actual level of
engagement. In turn, this would have enabled Trust staff to challenge Mr Nieland’s
claims about his drug and alcohol treatment and provide an opportunity for further
encouragement to seek out appropriate support, although it would not have been able
to enforce or change any such treatment without Mr Nieland’s engagement.
The Trust has in place a policy which provides guidance in cases where patients
present with high severity of mental health and substance misuse…
“…Service users should be engaged with secondary mental health services. This
would include Integrated Community Teams, forensic, rehabilitation and acute services.
Case management/care coordination would rest with these services with additional
support from substance misuse services. This support can include consultation, advice
or direct intervention to the service user and their care network”.
The Trust and ‘We Are With You’ (as Addaction is now called) will work together to
ensure the implementation of robust communication systems; agree appropriate
information sharing arrangements and ensure alignment of clinical pathways and
protocols, with the aim to make collaborative working between the two organisations
standard practice. The Trust confirms this is part of its work plan over the next six
months, led by the Clinical Director for the Community Services Division working with
the Quality lead for the Division.
4. There was an absence of any adequate "Care Programme Approach" (a package
of care used to plan mental health care) resulting in no care coordinator being
appointed to monitor the deceased within the auspices of an appropriate care
plan.
Trust Response:
The Trust has in place a comprehensive clinical care policy which sets out the criteria
and process for assessing and putting in place care arrangements. In Mr Nieland’s
case, following his discharge from inpatient services, in accordance with Trust policy
and national guidance, the Trust made arrangements with Mr Nieland to meet with him
to assess his needs. It is possible that Mr Nieland could have been placed on a Care
Programme Approach, however he did not attend and sadly the opportunity to assess
his needs in this regard did not take place. Whilst he was not managed on the Care
Programme Approach framework, a lead professional was assigned to Mr Nieland and
risk assessment was formulated together with a care plan.
Learning from the death of Mr Nieland, the Trust will strengthen the policy in
accordance with the guidance issued by the Department of Health, to ensure where
patients identify as having a dual diagnosis, they are provided with an enhanced Care
4
Programme Approach. Clear guidance will be given to staff regarding procedure in the
case of persons with dual diagnosis. The Head of Quality and Safety will lead on the
review and strengthening of the policy, working towards the policy update being
approved by the Trust’s Quality Committee, within the next 6 months.
5.
Inadequate evaluation of the deceased's previous history; his purported non-
concordance (repeated assertions of not wanting treatment/support that ought to
have been interpreted as an increase in his risk); progression of his complex
vulnerabilities; his personal circumstances (reaction to accommodation and
relationships); events suggestive of on-going misuse of drugs - all gave rise to
missed opportunities to appreciate a series of ascertainable relapse signatures.
Trust response:
factors mentioned above
Learning from the tragic death of Mr Nieland, the Trust has taken steps to enhance the
training offered to staff about assessing risk of suicide to reinforce the complex interplay
of
including previous history, accommodation and
employment needs, substance and alcohol misuse patterns and relationships. This
revised suicide prevention training will be rolled out to all staff commensurate with their
role and clinical responsibility, within the next 6-12 months.
The Divisional leads are working closely with the Learning and Development Lead to
develop a time table and identify appropriate staff for training.
6. The absence of any "assertive outreach" to the deceased when discharged into
the community (that is to say, no face to contact, no alternative welfare checks
being organised, undue reliance being placed on the informal supervisory role of
the landlord or other agencies) gave rise to a total disconnect between patient
and healthcare provider, thereby creating a series of missed opportunities to
assess the deceased, identify possible relapse signatures and potentially
escalate care.
Trust response:
The Trust was informed by the out of area inpatient unit that Mr Nieland had been
discharged into the community. In accordance with Trust policy and national guidance,
the Trust’s Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team offered timely follow-up
appointments with Mr Nieland to assess his risk and care arrangements. Based upon
the information available at the time, a clinical decision to request a police welfare
check was not considered necessary. The Trust appreciate the importance the views
of family and carers has in formulating appropriate care arrangements for patients.
With the benefit of hindsight, it is accepted that the knowledge and concerns of Mr
Nieland’s family would have better informed assessment of risk. The Trust is continuing
to support staff and to emphasise the importance of working and supporting patients to
include family and carers in their care. The response under section 1 of this letter
outlines the initiatives behind this.
5
7. The circumstances of this case evidences a gap in the provision of care to a
patient with a Dual Diagnosis in Lincolnshire by reason of there being no
dedicated and/or commissioned drug and alcohol recovery team/service.
Trust response:
The Trust recognises there is currently a commissioning gap in the provision of care to
patients identified as having a dual diagnosis. Currently mental health services and
substance misuse services are commissioned separately in Lincolnshire with the
services provided by two organisations. The Trust is a provider of specialist mental
health services and is not commissioned to provide substance misuse services. The
local Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG) and the Local Authority’s Public Health
department commission ‘We Are With You’ (formerly ‘Addaction’) to provide substance
misuse services.
Learning from the death of Mr Nieland, as stated above, the Trust commits to the
strengthening of its policy in accordance with the guidance issued by the Department of
Health, to ensure where patients identify as having a dual diagnosis, they are provided
with an enhanced Care Programme Approach which will include working together with
‘We Are with You’. Clear guidance will be given to staff regarding policy and
procedures in the case of persons with dual diagnosis. Further, the Trust commits to
working with its partner agency ‘We Are With You’, to review and strengthen working
arrangements.
Further, as stated above, the Trust and ‘We Are With You’ commit to working together
to ensure the implementation of robust communication systems; agree appropriate
information sharing arrangements and ensure alignment of clinical pathways, with the
aim to make collaborative working between the two organisations, standard and
practice. The Trust confirms this will be part of its work plan within the next six months,
led by the Clinical Director for the Community Services Division working with the Quality
lead for the Division
8. The Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Trust document – "Crisis Assessment and
Home Team Protocol" (Exhibit reference IJ2) makes no adequate or appropriate
provision for a patient with Dual Diagnosis.
Trust response
The Trust confirms, as stated above, that it will review its clinical policies and protocols
relating to dual diagnosis and that it will continue to work with its partner agency, ‘We
Are With You’ to review and strengthen robust communication systems; to agree
appropriate information sharing arrangements and ensure alignment of clinical
pathways through the use of a jointly agreed protocol. The aim is to make
collaborative, integrated working between the two organisations standard practice. This
will be part of its work plan within the next six months, led by the Clinical Director for the
Community Services Division working with the Quality lead for the Division. The policies
and protocols will equally apply to patients being treated within its inpatients and crisis
and home treatment services too.
6
9. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline Scope
document "Severe mental illness and substance misuse (dual diagnosis):
community health and social care services stipulates that there should be a Dual
Diagnosis protocol setting out specifically the roles of the mental health provider
and the drug and alcohol service provider (no such protocol being in place at the
material time) and that whilst it is apparent that some thought has been deployed
to re-install a bridge between mental health provision and drug and alcohol
services this does not address the needs of a patient suffering from a complex
Dual Diagnosis in Lincolnshire due to;
a. The lack of interface between senior or experienced care providers to deal with
multi-faceted or nuanced cases.
b. The absence of specialist Dual Diagnosis workers to be deployed in complex
cases.
c. The absence of adequate and robust guidance and training, in particular for
mental health practitioners to be aware of substance misuse issues and a
patient suffering from Dual Diagnosis that impact on appropriate pathways of
treatment and care.
Trust response:
Learning from the death of Mr Nieland, as stated above, the Trust is committed to the
strengthening of its policies and protocols in accordance with the guidance issued by
NICE and the Department of Health, to ensure where patients identify as having a dual
diagnosis, they are provided with an enhanced Care Programme Approach which will
have joint working with We Are with You’, utilising expertise of workers from both
services in a collaborative manner. The Trust has already begun conversations with its
Commissioning partners and We Are With You, to identify commissioning gaps and
ways of ensuring workers with the right skills are deployed in both agencies.
The Trust is committed to a review of the training provided to staff to ensure they are
appropriately equipped with the knowledge and ability to care for patients with dual
diagnosis. The Learning and Development Lead is working with Divisional staff to
develop the appropriate training package, over the next 6-12 months.
We have summarised below the actions the Trust will take to learn from Mr Nieland’s death
and enhance services for patients with a complex dual diagnosis presentation: To review
internal policies and protocols as well as work together with “We Are With You” to embed
care pathways between the two organisations to address gaps in services. (Leads: Clinical
Director for Community Division and Quality Lead for the Community Division)
i. To embed care pathways between the Trust and “We Are With You” to address gaps
in services. This will also be accompanied by a discussion with the Commissioners
to advocate for the right level of investment in the system to meet the needs of
people with a dual diagnosis. Leads: Quality Lead for the Community Division and
Clinical Director for Community Division – by 31 April 2021.
7
ii. To review Information sharing arrangements between the Trust and “We Are With
You” to remove barriers to information sharing while complying with legal guidance
Lead: Trust Caldicott Guardian – by 16 November 2020.
iii. Education and Training: The Trust commits to reviewing and updating its training and
competencies programme on offer to ensure a focus on dual diagnosis, including
clinical presentations, risk assessment and information sharing. We have recently
developed a refreshed suicide prevention training matrix which addresses risk
assessment but will work on the other areas. Leads: Learning and Development
lead, People Directorate – by 31 October 2021
iv. To reinforce and further embed the important role of carers and family members in
providing the right quality care to patients and to support carers in getting involved
with their loved ones’ care, including receiving information from carers and sharing
information with consent from patients. Lead: Service Manager for Carers and Peer
Support – Ongoing
v. To review the Care Programme Approach to ensure the right decisions are made
about allocating care coordinators to patients and also to ensure that all patients with
a dual diagnosis are allocated a care coordinator. Lead: The Trust Quality and
Safety Lead – by 31 April 2021.
vi. To continue to engage with Commissioners and all system partners including primary
care, acute care services, and housing partners (not named in the letter but we
recognise the importance of all partners in the system) to ensure the services
required for patient with dual diagnosis are appropriately funded – clinical,
management and leadership and administrative support. Lead: Director of Strategy,
Planning and Partnerships - on-going
vii. Promote appropriate data gathering, benchmarking with other services, opportunities
for research and learning from Serious Incidents as a system working in an open,
collaborative manner. Lead: Medical Director - on-going
Yours sincerely
Acting Chief Executive
8
Mr. Paul Smith HM Senior Coroner 4 Lindum Road Lincoln Lincolnshire LN2 1 NN LincsCoroner@lincolnshire.gcsx.gov.uk 14th October 2020 Dear Mr Smith REF: Mr Toby Peter Edward Nieland, Regulation 28 Report I am writing in response to the Regulation 28 report which Mr. Brennand sent to the South Lincolnshire Clinical Commissioning Group, Public Health Lincolnshire, Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (LPFT) and to (formally Addaction). , Deputy Chief Executive at We Are With You (Ref 01388-2018 dated 24th August - which has been In Mr. Brennand’s letter to Mr shared with us as the commissioned treatment service of substance misuse in Lincolnshire) he said that the report was designed to emphasise the need for collaborative services to meet the health and social care needs of those suffering from Dual Diagnosis. He indicated that he was anticipating a response that addressed the integrated approaches being considered involving statutory, community and voluntary sector mental health and substance misuse services, with agreed local pathways to meet wider social care needs. He said that he anticipated a response that confirmed the expectations that mental health services would be leading on, and helping with, access to other health and social care services (including primary healthcare, housing and employment as well as substance misuse services). I can confirm that we have participated in ‘Planned Dual Diagnosis Work” meetings with LPFT and our respective commissioners. And we have jointly agreed to review Dual Diagnosis pathways across the treatment system. The report outlines a number of concerns identified through the inquest and following further submissions from LPFT and the Lincolnshire Clinical Commissioning Group. I would like to provide you with a summary of actions undertaken to improve our overall effectiveness of joint working, engagement, and care of our service users:- 1 ● We understand that a balance regarding questioning people whilst encouraging them to continue to engage in NSP services is required. The potential risk of ‘over questioning' is that service users may decide to attend alternative NSP provision where such questions will not be asked, or even stop using services. In this case specialist service providers may lose the opportunity to monitor and assertively attempt to engage those individuals into structured treatment. ● Our staff now use a ‘prompt system’ at each visit. These include discussions around the persons initial presentation, mental and physical health, housing needs, harm reduction, more in depth substance use and clarifying and discussing referrals into structured treatment should it be required and consented to. ● We have introduced better identification of those with complex health issues. We have implemented an enhanced standard questionnaire for our NSP service users. It incorporates questions to ascertain concerns individuals may have on their own mental health and current engagement with mental health (or any other relevant) services. The aim is to enable the key-worker to make better informed decisions of any immediate concerns / risks surrounding an individual’s mental health, based on presentation and information disclosed. ● We have reviewed our staff structures and introduced specialist Dual Diagnosis roles. We have taken steps to employ staff who can lead on complex cases, including a dedicated Mental Health Nurse and a Recovery Worker who is allocated Dual Diagnosis cases. Our Clinical Lead is a registered (NMC) Mental Health Nurse and Independent Prescriber with MSc level qualifications in substance misuse, neuropsychiatry and trauma. These roles work in partnership with mental health providers to enhance the care provided service users. They also train and support the wider substance misuse team at LFPT in early identification of those individuals with complex health issues. ● We have enhanced our reciprocal training to LPFT and regularly attend interface meetings for Dual diagnosis patients and ensure we have input into community release plans. Additionally, we provide opportunities for staff from LPFT , the Police, Probation and Children's Services as well as housing providers. to spend time within our teams to further their experience of substance misuse interventions. We have commenced delivery of group work interventions within the Mental Health units in Lincoln (Discovery House and PHC) for those with a dual diagnosis. We recognise that there is further work to do between ourselves, LPFT and the wider partnership to enhance pathways and joint care for those with complex health issues. We are committed to achieving this through working collaboratively with our relevant partners and respective commissioners for Mental Health and Substance Misuse. Should you require any further information or clarification on any of the points included in this summary please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours Faithfully Director of Operations @wearewithyou.org.uk 2
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.