Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

Darren Dickson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0151, written 16 Mar 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report16 Mar 2026
Reference2026-0151
DeceasedDarren Dickson
CoronerAndrew Cousins
Coroner areaCumbria
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Organisation namedCumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANDREW COUSINS  
HM ASSISTANT CORONER 

County of Cumbria  

Allerdale House 
New Bridge Road 
Workington, CA14 3YJ 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

DARREN ROBERT DICKSON  

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Recovery Steps of 6 Finkle Street, Workington, CA14 2AY 

1 

CORONER 

I am Mr Andrew Cousins HM Assistant Coroner for the County of Cumbria 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 

2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013: 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/contents 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/contents 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  10  and  11  March  2026,  I  heard  the  inquest  into  the  death  of  Mr  Darren  Robert 

Dickson, aged 35 years, at the time of his death on 6 February 2025. The investigation 

concluded at the end of the inquest, where I returned a narrative conclusion, and found 

the cause of death to be 1(a) Toxic effects of alcohol and benzodiazepine II Ischaemic 

heart disease and possible hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.  

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

I  found  that  Darren  Robert  Dixon  resided  at  35  Gote  Road,  Cockermouth,  Cumbria. 

Darren was employed as a mental health adviser at Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne 

and Wear NHS Foundation Trust.  

Mr Dickson had been experiencing a period of mental ill health following witnessing an 

extremely  traumatic  incident  at  his  place  of  work.  Mr  Dickson  had  sought  medical 

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 treatment for this mental health condition. Independent to this, Mr Dickson had started 

to take benzodiazepine to assist his condition. Mr Dickson had sought assistance from 

his employer, his GP and Recovery Steps in relation to his mental health condition and 

use of benzodiazepine. 

It is not possible on the balance of probabilities to determine the exact extent of the 

advice provided to Mr Dickson in relation to the ongoing use of benzodiazepine after 24 

January 2025.  

Having last been seen at approximately 9pm on 5 February 2025, Mr Dickson was found 

unresponsive at 35 Gote Road. Mr Dickson was taken to West Cumberland Hospital 

where, despite treatment, he died on 6 February 2025. Toxicology analysis showed the 

presence of benzodiazepine and alcohol in Mr Dickson’s body, at levels that, on the 

balance of probabilities, led to his death.  

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During  the  course  of  the  inquest  the  evidence  revealed  two  matters  giving  rise  to 

concern.  In  my  opinion  there  is  a  risk  that  future  deaths  will  occur  unless  action  is 

taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF 

CONCERN are as follows:  

(1)  At the appointment on 27 January 2025, Mr Dickson was seen by a Recovery 

Co-Ordinator  in  relation  to  his  use  of  benzodiazepine.  It  could  not  be 

ascertained from the records what information regarding signposting to other 

services that could have assisted Mr Dickson with treatment, was provided to 

him.  I  was  concerned  that  the  records  did  not  allow  a  full  and  verifiable 

understanding  of  the  information  and  assistance  provided  to  Mr  Dickson  at 

this appointment.  

(2)  At  the  appointment  on  27  January  2025,  Mr  Dickson  was  given  advice  to 

prepare  a  ‘drugs  diary’.  This  was  required  so  that,  at  his  follow  up 

appointment,  it  could  be  ascertained  what  his  usage  of  benzodiazepine  he 

was,  so  that  a  better-informed  treatment  plan  could  be  prepared.  I  was 

conscious of the need your staff have for accurate information as to the extent 

of the drug use so that a well informed and coherent plan could be put in place. 

The  concern  I  had  was  that  Mr  Dickson  had  seen  his  GP  prior  to  the 

appointment on 27 January 2025 and had been told that if he was to take any 

benzodiazepine,  it  should  be  less  than  what  he  had  previously  taken.  I  was 

concerned  that  there  was  scope  for  confusion  as  to  the  information  being 

 
 
 
 
 
 given to Mr Dickson, and the level of communication that Recovery Steps has 

with the GP services in relation to the issue of ongoing use and doses of drugs.  

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe that  

Recovery Steps  

has the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 

namely by 11 May 2026. 

I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting 

out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 

Persons: 

Castlegate & Derwent Surgery  

Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust. 

I have also sent a copy to:  

DAC Beachcroft – legal representative for CNTW 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 

form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it 

useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief 

Coroner. 

9 

Dated this 16 day of March 2026 

Mr Andrew Cousins LLM MRes  
HM Assistant Coroner  
County of Cumbria

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Recovery Steps
Recovery Steps Cumbria  
Stocklund House 
Castle Street 
Carlisle 
CA3 8SY 

HM Coroner’s Office 
Allerdale House 
Workington 
Cumbria 
CA14 3JY 

8 May 2026 

Dear Mr Cousins 

Re: Waythrough's response in regard to the Regulation 28, following the Inquest into the late Darren 
Robert Dickson 

I  write  in  response  to  your  Regulation  28  Report  to  Prevent  Future  Deaths  dated  16  March  2026 
concerning the death of Darren Robert Dickson on 6 February 2025. I respond on behalf of Waythrough, 
which operates Recovery Steps Cumbria ("RSC"). 

Waythrough has carefully considered each of the matters of concern set out in your report. We wish to 
express  our  sincere  condolences  to  Mr  Dickson's  family  and  friends  for  their  loss.  The  death  of  any 
individual  known  to  our  services  is  treated  with  the  utmost  seriousness,  and  we  have  given  detailed 
consideration to the concerns you have raised. 

It is stated within your findings that: 

1.  At the appointment on 27 January 2025, it could not be ascertained from the records what 
information regarding signposting to other services was provided to Mr Dickson; and 

2.  There was scope for confusion between the GP's advice regarding benzodiazepine use and the 

instruction to keep a drugs diary. 

Context of Service 

Before addressing the specific concerns, it may assist the Court to understand the context of the 
service provided by RSC. 

RSC is a specialist drug and alcohol recovery service for adults over the age of 18 who have an alcohol 
or drug need and who reside in Cumbria. The service is wholly funded by the local authority through 

Registered address: Inspiration House, Unit 22, Bowburn North Industrial Estate DH6 5PF. 
Waythrough Charity (Waythrough) is a company registered in England (Registered Charity 
No. 515755 Registered Company No 182 0492, VAT 413 2088 32, Registered Provider 4713) 

                                                                          
 
 
 
 
 
          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 public health teams. RSC is delivered by Waythrough and operates a person-centred, recovery-
oriented model underpinned by trauma-informed practice, delivering inclusive support pathways 
tailored to individuals' specific needs and varied goals. 

RSC operates three primary treatment pathways: an opioid pathway, an alcohol pathway, and a non-
opioid and non-dependent alcohol pathway. Mr Dickson presented seeking support with illicit 
benzodiazepine use and would have been supported on the non-opioid pathway. Under this pathway, 
the prescribed intervention follows a structured programme of approximately 12 sessions, progressing 
through engagement and building motivation for change, to addressing triggers, high-risk situations and 
coping skills, and then to lapse/relapse prevention and forward planning. Harm reduction information 
and psychosocial interventions, delivered with a trauma-informed approach, are provided throughout 
the treatment journey. 

The Purpose of an Initial Assessment 

The appointment on 27 January 2025 was Mr Dickson's first contact with RSC. He had self-referred on 
24 January 2025 following a hospital admission. He had not previously accessed a structured drug and 
alcohol service. 

Within Waythrough's delivery model, the treatment journey follows a staged pathway: from initial 
assessment, through engagement and building motivation, into structured treatment, and onward to 
sustained recovery. The initial assessment sits at the very beginning of this journey. Its primary function 
is information gathering - establishing the individual's circumstances, substance use, physical and 
mental health, and broader social context - whilst beginning to discuss treatment options and goals. It 
is the gateway into structured support, not a comprehensive treatment intervention. 

Had Mr Dickson attended his follow-up appointment on 17 February 2025, the next steps would have 
included a review of his drugs diary, further assessment of his mental health, and once sufficient 
information had been gathered, an appointment would be made with RSC’s clinical team to develop a 
tailored reduction plan. The initial assessment was the first step in an ongoing process, not its 
conclusion. 

It is within this context, of a first contact at the earliest stage of the treatment pathway, that both 
matters of concern should be understood. 

The Support Provided to Mr Dickson 

To provide context for the Coroner's concerns, it is relevant to set out the nature and extent of RSC's 
involvement with Mr Dickson. 

Mr Dickson was referred to RSC seeking support with illicit benzodiazepine use. At the initial 
assessment on 27 January 2025, five evidence-based screening tools were conducted: 

•  AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test) — scored 2, indicating low risk; 
•  GAD-7 (Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment) — scored 17, indicating severe anxiety; 
•  PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire 9) — scored 15, indicating moderately severe depression; 
•  SAD-Q (Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire) — scored 0, indicating no alcohol 

dependence; and 

Registered address: Inspiration House, Unit 22, Bowburn North Industrial Estate DH6 5PF. 
Waythrough Charity (Waythrough) is a company registered in England (Registered Charity 
No. 515755 Registered Company No 182 0492, VAT 413 2088 32, Registered Provider 4713) 

                                                                          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •  Blue Light Questionnaire (Activity Factor) — indicating no immediate safety concerns requiring 

emergency contact. 

An initial Recovery Plan and risk assessment were also completed. The risk assessment confirmed no 
suicidal ideation, and it is documented that Mr Dickson was made aware he could contact emergency 
services, his GP, the CRISIS Team, and the Samaritans if he required support. 

A drugs diary was also provided, as Mr Dickson was unable to provide a precise account of his 
benzodiazepine use at the initial assessment. As set out further below, this is standard practice in 
specialist substance use services where an individual's pattern of use is not yet established. 

Response to Concern 1: Record-Keeping and Signposting to Other Services 

The Coroner's concern is that it could not be ascertained from the records what information regarding 
signposting to other services was provided to Mr Dickson, and that the records did not allow a full and 
verifiable understanding of the information and assistance provided at the appointment. 

We have reflected carefully on this concern. The records from Mr Dickson’s initial assessment do 
document specific signposting. In particular, the risk assessment records that Mr Dickson was made 
aware he could contact emergency services, his GP, the CRISIS Team, and the Samaritans if he 
required support. An initial Recovery Plan was also completed, setting out Mr Dickson’s personal goals 
and the next steps in his treatment. A follow-up appointment was arranged and confirmed via text 
message. Signposting and referral is a core component of RSC’s assessment process under 
Waythrough’s delivery model. 

The information captured and documentation generated at this appointment, as set out above, reflects 
the scope and purpose of a first contact with a new service user. RSC's operating procedures provide 
for documentation to develop and deepen as the individual progresses through the treatment pathway. 
The Recovery Coordinator followed the established process for initial appointments, which includes 
completing the initial contact template, undertaking a risk assessment, producing a Recovery Plan, and 
booking the next appointment.  

We are satisfied that the approach taken was consistent with RSC's operating procedures, 
Waythrough's delivery model, and national treatment guidelines (Drug Misuse and Dependence: UK 
Guidelines on Clinical Management). Having reflected on the concern raised, we are confident that the 
initial assessment processes are robust and we remain committed to reviewing our practices regularly 
in line with our principles of ongoing and continuous improvement.  

Response to Concern 2: The Drugs Diary and Potential for Confusion with GP Advice 

The Drugs Diary 

The Coroner's concern is that Mr Dickson had been told by his GP to take less benzodiazepine, and that 
there was scope for confusion between this advice and the instruction to keep a drugs diary, as well as 
the level of communication between RSC and GP services. 

We have given careful thought to this concern and welcome the opportunity to explain the clinical 
rationale for the approach taken.  

Registered address: Inspiration House, Unit 22, Bowburn North Industrial Estate DH6 5PF. 
Waythrough Charity (Waythrough) is a company registered in England (Registered Charity 
No. 515755 Registered Company No 182 0492, VAT 413 2088 32, Registered Provider 4713) 

                                                                          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The drugs diary is not an instruction to take drugs. It is an established, evidence-based clinical 
recording tool, supported by Waythrough’s Benzodiazepines (including Z-Drugs) Prescribing Policy and 
consistent with national clinical guidelines. Its purpose is to enable the individual to document their 
existing pattern of use so that the service can understand its nature, frequency, and quantity. This is a 
prerequisite to any safe reduction plan. Without an accurate baseline of what an individual is actually 
using, it is not possible to formulate safe treatment options. This is particularly important in the context 
of illicit benzodiazepines, where content, potency, and effects are often unclear, and the risks 
associated with unsupervised benzodiazepine withdrawal, including seizures, can be serious.  

Under Waythrough's Benzodiazepines Prescribing Policy, before any prescribing or reduction 
intervention can be considered, benzodiazepine dependency must first be established (as opposed to 
binge use) through a comprehensive assessment of the person's history and clinical record. This 
includes at least two consecutive positive benzodiazepine screens in the preceding six weeks. The 
drugs diary forms part of this broader assessment process, alongside drug screening and validated 
clinical tools. 

The agreed plan was for Mr Dickson to complete the drugs diary for review at his next session, enabling 
an accurate pattern of use to be established. The next steps would then have been to arrange an 
appointment with RSC’s clinical team to develop a tailored reduction plan.  

Importantly, there is no contradiction between the drugs diary and Mr Dickson's GP's advice to reduce 
his benzodiazepine intake. Both are directed toward the same objective: the safe reduction of Mr 
Dickson's benzodiazepine use. The GP's advice addressed the direction of travel, that Mr Dickson 
should reduce his intake. The drugs diary addressed the clinical means by which that reduction could 
be achieved safely, by first establishing an accurate baseline, which is a prerequisite to any evidence-
based reduction plan. The diary does not invite continued use; it asks the individual to record what they 
are actually using so that clinical decisions can be properly informed. This approach is standard 
practice across specialist substance use services nationally.  

In addition to providing the drugs diary, harm reduction advice and safety information were provided to 
Mr Dickson at the initial assessment, including advice around the risks of purchasing substances from 
unregulated sources.  

The drugs diary is an established, evidence-based clinical tool, supported by Waythrough's 
Benzodiazepines Prescribing Policy and consistent with national clinical guidelines and we are 
satisfied that its use in Mr Dickson's case was appropriate. We recognise, however, the importance of 
ensuring that individuals understand the purpose of the diary at the point it is provided, and how it sits 
alongside any other advice they may have received. In line with our commitment to ongoing and 
continuous improvement, we will continue to reflect on how we communicate this in practice. 

Communication with Primary Care Services 

In relation to communication with GP services, RSC works collaboratively with primary care. When an 
individual is reviewed by a clinician (as distinct from the Recovery Coordinator who conducts the initial 
assessment), a summary letter is sent to their GP detailing the clinical review, any findings and 
recommendations, and confirming the initiation or continuation of prescribing by RSC where 

Registered address: Inspiration House, Unit 22, Bowburn North Industrial Estate DH6 5PF. 
Waythrough Charity (Waythrough) is a company registered in England (Registered Charity 
No. 515755 Registered Company No 182 0492, VAT 413 2088 32, Registered Provider 4713) 

                                                                          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 applicable. At the stage of Mr Dickson's initial assessment, no clinical review had yet taken place. 
Communication with Mr Dickson's GP would have followed as the treatment pathway progressed.  

In addition, within North Cumbria, the North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board (NENC 
ICB) launched the North Cumbria Health Pathways tool in 2022. This is a web-based clinical resource 
designed for use by GPs during primary care consultations, providing clear and concise guidance on 
assessing and managing patients with particular conditions and on making referrals to local specialist 
services. The content is developed collaboratively between general practitioners, hospital clinicians, 
and other health professionals. RSC contributed to a number of specialist pathways within the tool, 
including the pathway on Benzodiazepine Use and Dependence. This means that Mr Dickson's GP 
practice had access to a clear referral pathway and guidance on the specialist support available 
through RSC at the time of Mr Dickson's engagement with the service. RSC is committed to continuing 
to work with primary care partners to enhance mutual awareness of specialist services and 
communication pathways, particularly at the point of referral. 

Conclusion 

I hope that the above provides reassurance in respect of how Waythrough has considered the issues 
raised. The protocols in place at the time of Mr Dickson's initial assessment were appropriate, 
evidence-based, and followed correctly, consistent with our operating procedures and national 
guidelines. 

Tragically, Mr Dickson passed away on 6 February 2025, before his scheduled follow-up appointment 
on 17 February. The service did not have the opportunity to progress beyond the initial assessment 
stage. 

Reducing drug and alcohol related deaths within the country is a priority for Waythrough, and we are 
committed to working collaboratively with all partner agencies to learn from, and reduce, the number 
of such deaths in the area.  

On behalf of all staff at RSC, I would like to pass our sincere condolences to Mr Dickson's family and 
friends. 

Yours sincerely, 

Area Manager  

Registered address: Inspiration House, Unit 22, Bowburn North Industrial Estate DH6 5PF. 
Waythrough Charity (Waythrough) is a company registered in England (Registered Charity 
No. 515755 Registered Company No 182 0492, VAT 413 2088 32, Registered Provider 4713)

Related reports

Other reports by Andrew Cousins

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.