Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0232, written 12 Nov 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 12 Nov 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0232 |
| Deceased | Amarbai Bhudia |
| Coroner | Graeme Irvine |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
East London Coroners MISS N PERSAUD SENIOR CORONER Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, £17 8QP Telephone 020 8496 5000 Email coroners@walthamforest.gov.uk REF: 111483 12" November 2020 REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. a «i: Executive, Barts Health, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1BB — Email: 2. Ministerial Correspondence and Public Enquiries Unit, Department of Health and Social Care, 39 Victoria Street, London, SW1H OEU 1 CORONER lam Mr Graeme Irvine Area Coroner for East London 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 20" September 2019 | opened an investigation touching the death of Amarbai Bhudia, aged 63 years old. | opened and inquest on the 14th October 2019. The inquest concluded on the 3 November 2020. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion, which | have utilised below to describe the circumstances of death. The medical cause of death was; 1a Aspiration of Gastro-intestinal Contents 1b Small Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction 1c Ulcerative Colitis treated with Colectomy 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH “Mrs Amarbai Bhudia was admitted to hospital with abdominal pains and vomiting on 16th September 2019. Mrs Bhudia was assessed to be suffering from a sub-acute small intestine obstruction and was admitted for ward-based, conservative management, incorporating; 1. Nil by mouth, 2. I/V Fluids, 3. Anaso-gastric tube to decompress her stomach. Temporary clamping of the tube to facilitate a contrast CT scan, followed thereafter with 2-3 hourly aspiration of the NG tube. 4. Catheterisation. The instruction to aspirate was not recorded in clinical notes. Mrs Bhudia's NG tube was not aspirated. On the morning of 17th September 2019 Mrs Bhudia collapsed and suffered a cardiac arrest caused by aspiration of gastro-intestinal contents.“ CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — 1. Instructions on the management of the NG tube were provided on a ward round by a consultant, the instructions were not clearly noted by the House Officer accompanying the consultant. 2. Nursing staff had no clinical instruction as to how to manage the NG tube. 3. Nursing staff dealing with the patient were agency staff without training or experience of NG tube management. 4. Concerns regarding the NG tube function were not properly escalated to clinical staff. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN in my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 7** January 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, to the family of Mrs Bhudia, the CQC, and to the Director of Public Health who may find this useful. 1am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 12/11/2020 Signature Mr Graeme Irvine Area CSrohex East London
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Our Ref:
Your Ref:
19 January 2021
Mr Graeme Irvine
Area Coroner – East London
Walthamstow Coroner’s Court
Queen’s Road
London
E17 8QP
Dear Mr Irvine
Trust Executive Office
Ground Floor
Pathology and Pharmacy Building
The Royal London Hospital
80 Newark Street
London E1 2ES
Telephone:
Chief Medical Officer
www.bartshealth.nhs.uk
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths
I write regarding your letter of 12 November 2020 regarding your concerns relating to the death of
Amarbai Bhudia at Newham University Hospital. I apologise for the length of time it has taken to get
this response to you, which was due to the necessity to respond to immediate challenges brought
about by the pandemic surge. I hope this letter will provide assurance to you of the steps that we are
taking to address the concerns you have outlined. I will respond to these concerns in turn.
1. Instructions on the management of the NG tube were provided on a ward round by a
consultant, the instructions were not clearly noted by the House Officer accompanying the
consultant.
In response to concerns in the department of surgery regarding the quality and content of
communications about clinical instructions, an audit was designed and implemented by the junior
surgery team. This identified that there was a need for a structured ward round template, and
showed that implementation of a structured ward round improved communication on the ward. This
audit was accepted for presentation at The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, though the
conference did not take place due to the pandemic.
2. Nursing staff had no clinical instruction as to how to manage the NG tube
A teaching session regarding Nasogastric Tube Placement was devised by the Barts Health Clinical
Skills Facilitators and delivered to the teams on the wards by the Ward Managers and Professional
Development nurse, and the slides used were shared by email with all staff. The teaching material
included:
Information about responsibilities of staff.
Indications for nasogastric tube insertion.
Contraindications for nasogastric tube insertion.
Information about high risk patients.
Complications associated with nasogastric tube insertion.
An overview of National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) guidance.
Equipment required.
NEX (nose to ear to xiphisternum) measurement.
Head positioning during placement.
Tube fixation.
Confirming tube placement.
Post procedure action.
Subsequent testing.
Use of a Ryles tube for drainage.
Removal of nasogastric drainage tubes.
Insertion procedure.
Furthermore, a new assurance template has been introduced to spot-check the presence of the
nursing team on ward rounds. The medical plans are entered into a diary by the nurses to ensure the
plans are communicated effectively. The Nurse in Charge checklist has now been introduced
including clear guidance regarding the roles and responsibilities of the person coordinating the ward
area.
We have introduced a Consultant Surgeon of the week model, with the same Consultant from
Monday to Friday, and one for the weekend. This provides consistency and continuity of cover and
helps to ensure good communication with all members of the multidisciplinary team; as the nursing
team, nurse in charge and AHPs have a single point of contact for questions and escalation. This
makes for better team working and safety culture.
The Trust’s nasogastric and orogastric policy has been revised, including the use of free drainage
and regular aspiration (suctioning). The Trust Corporate Policy: Nasogastric/ orogastric tube policy
(adults) was updated and approved on 24 July 2020 and includes information about the use of
nasogastric tubes for drainage of stomach contents.
3. Nursing staff dealing with the patient were agency staff without training or experience of
NG tube management
The Trust’s Induction Policy has been reviewed and revised (August 2020) to ensure that it includes
assurances that temporary staff are competent to carry out the care and treatment of the patients
they are allocated on the particular shift.
This policy included the Barts Health Local Induction Checklist for permanent staff and the Local
Induction Checklist for temporary non-medical clinical staff (for use on all Barts Health sites). The
booking system now records the specialist skills of temporary workers, both Bank and Agency, and
prevents the booking of a temporary worker who does not possess skills identified on the booking
request.
In order to ensure that all temporary workers have a robust induction to the clinical area, a
comprehensive local induction pack has been developed and is provided by the Ward Manager to all
new temporary workers.
Use of the induction pack ensures that the Nurse in Charge reviews the competency of the
temporary worker to provide safe and effective care to the patient or patients they have been
allocated prior to starting work, and allows learning to take place or for changes in the staffing
allocation to be made to safeguard patients. When possible the clinical areas strive to use staff that
have been assessed as competent in preference to a worker that is unfamiliar with the clinical area
or the conditions encountered in the clinical area.
Since the incident the Ward Manager on East Ham Ward, has led on improving the knowledge and
skills of the nursing workforce, and ensuring that the temporary workers allocated in Surgery meet
the requirements of the service and are safe to practice.
4. Concerns regarding the NG tube function were not properly escalated to clinical staff
A local induction guide has been produced which clearly outlines what is expected of staff working
on East Ham ward. Within it are multiple examples of the process of escalation, including the nursing
staff being empowered to escalate to Consultants if not getting a response from junior doctors.
Thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that you are assured that I have taken
them seriously, that the hospital has investigated them appropriately and is taking appropriate
action. Please let me know if you require clarity on any of the points above.
Yours sincerely
Chief Medical Officer
Barts Health NHS Trust
Encl:
Surgical ward round documentation: a quality improvement project
Correspondence from The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.