Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0265, written 26 Nov 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 26 Nov 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0265 |
| Deceased | Lee Elliott |
| Coroner | Dr Nicholas Shaw |
| Coroner area | County of Cumbria |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths · Product related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
HM Coroner County of Cumbria Regulation 28 REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Secretary of State for Health Matt Hancock CORONER 1 I am Dr Nicholas Shaw Assistant Coroner for County of Cumbria 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 08/09/2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lee ELLIOTT. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 25th November 2020. The short form conclusion recorded was Suicide and the record of inquest was as follows: “Lee Elliott died at his residence Workington on 6th February 2020. He had been troubled by mental health symptoms for a few months, had previously expressed suicidal ideation, and was being treated for depression by his general practitioner. He purchased 50 grams of causing his death”. from an internet supplier which he ingested , Medical Cause of death was 1a Poisoning 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Lee Elliott had appeared to have been struggling with his mental health for a few months, he had admitted to an attempt to hang himself late in 2019, was reported at times to have had some possibly psychotic symptoms and received a severe head injury which he declined to explain. He was seeing his GP regularly and being treated with antidepressant medication. At his last GP appointment shortly before he died he denied ongoing suicidal ideation. However on 6th February 2020 he was found deceased in his bedroom. Two glasses were found, one empty and the other half full of a pale yellow liquid. There was a handwritten note next to the glass which read, 'DON’T DRINK, POISON SORRY LOVE YOU ALL'. There was an arrow on the note pointing to the fluid in the glass. An empty packet labelled “ ” along with packaging indicating a purchase using EBay from a company in the south of England was recovered by the police who attended. A further consignment of this chemical was delivered to Lee’s home the following day from Poland. Examination of Lee’s computer revealed a number of websites and search terms relating to various suicide methods including chemical poisoning. THE ABOVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE POLICE CORONER’S CONCERNS 5 During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – HM Coroner’s Office, Cockermouth, Cumbria Tel: 0300 303 3180 | Email: hmcoroner@cumbria.gov.uk is being advocated by several websites easily found on the internet as a reliable and [BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) pain free way of taking one’s life. Often advice is given on the use of prescription medications to take to minimise any nausea caused when a solution of this substance is drunk. Links can be found to discussion groups which may encourage vulnerable and sick people to attempt to take their lives. (2) internet purchase with no safeguards. (3) I am aware the senior coroner for West Yorkshire [East] issued a regulation 28 report to you in September referring to the death of Joseph Nihill who died in similar circumstances. I wish to echo all the concerns raised in that report, and also advise that I am to hear an inquest in the new year touching on the death of a young female student who whose medical cause of death has also been given as [and other toxic substances] are easily and cheaply obtainable in small amounts by Toxicity. HM Coroner’s Office, Cockermouth, Cumbria Tel: 0300 303 3180 | Email: hmcoroner@cumbria.gov.uk 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 14th January 2021 . I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons , Lee’s parents 1. 2. Mr Kevin McLoughlin, senior coroner for West Yorkshire (East) 3. Ms Nadia Persaud, senior coroner for East London 4. Mr , Metalchem Ltd, 492 Falmer Road, Brighton BN2 6LH I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 26/11/2020 Dr Nicholas Shaw Assistant Coroner County of Cumbria HM Coroner’s Office, Cockermouth, Cumbria Tel: 0300 303 3180 | Email: hmcoroner@cumbria.gov.uk
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
From Nadine Dorries MP
Minister of State for Patient Safety,
Suicide Prevention and Mental Health
39 Victoria Street
London
SW1H 0EU
15 February 2021
Our Ref:
Dr Nicholas Shaw
HM Assistant Coroner, County of Cumbria
HM Coroner's Office
Fairfield
Station Road
Cockermouth CA13 9PT
Dear Dr Shaw
Thank you for your letter of 26 November 2020 to Matt Hancock concerning the death of
Lee Elliott, which was brought to the Department’s attention on 28 January 2021. I am
responding as Minister with responsibility for mental health and suicide prevention.
Firstly, I would like to say how deeply saddened I was to read of the troubling
circumstances surrounding Mr Elliott’s death and I offer my heartfelt condolences to his
family and loved ones at this difficult time.
I note your concerns that information about suicide methods is so readily available on the
Internet and that the means to assist suicide with this substance can be easily sourced
and bought online.
I wish to assure you that suicide prevention is a priority for this Government, and we are
working across local and national government to reduce suicide rates so that fewer such
tragedies occur each year.
We continue to take action to reduce suicide rates through the Suicide Prevention Strategy
for England1 and the first Cross-Government Suicide Prevention Workplan2, which sets out
an ambitious programme across national and local government and the NHS. The
Workplan includes actions to reduce access to the means of suicide, including through
harmful online content.
1 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/suicide-prevention-strategy-for-england
2
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/772210/n
ational-suicide-prevention-strategy-workplan.pdf
I am advised that suicide prevention policy leads in the health system, at the Department
of Health and Social Care, Public Health England (PHE), and NHS England and NHS
Improvement (NHSEI), are alert to the risk posed by websites promoting suicide methods,
and their direction on the use of certain chemicals in completing suicide, including the
substance taken by Mr Elliott. These organisations, along with key stakeholders and
academics, are looking at what data is available on suicides by this method and at what
steps we can take to stop further loss of life by this method.
The concerns that Mr Elliott’s death raises sit within the policy remits of a range of
Government departments, including the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sports
(DCMS) for its work on online harms; and the Home Office (HO) for its work on the sale of
reportable substances3. Officials have shared your concerns with those Departments and
are working with officials from those and other Government departments to explore what
further steps we can take to prevent further tragedies, both for this chemical, and any other
emerging methods.
There is work already taking place that directly and indirectly impacts some areas of
concern. As you may be aware, in 2019, DCMS published its Online Harms White Paper4,
which set out a range of legislative and non-legislative measures detailing how the
Government is planning to tackle online harms, including harmful materials on self-harm
and suicide.
On 15 December 2020, DCMS published its response to the White Paper consultation,
setting out how the proposed legal duty of care on online companies will work in practice
and gives them new responsibilities towards their users. DCMS also announced that the
Government has asked the Law Commission to examine how criminal law will address the
encouragement, assistance and incitement of self-harm.
In relation to your concerns about the chemical that Mr Elliott procured online, I understand
that the HO has produced guidance for businesses on the sale of explosives precursors
and poisons5. This includes the substance used in this case, which is a reportable poison
under the Poisons Act 19726. This means that it is generally available to members of the
public without the need for a licence, but sellers, including online sellers, are obligated to
make suspicious transaction reports where they have grounds to believe that the sale is
for an illicit use.
The HO regularly engages with suppliers to help them meet their requirements under the
Poisons Act and provide detailed guidance in relation to any additional safeguarding steps
they may wish to take. Generally online marketplaces maintain their own policies on
3 Guidance: supplying explosives precursors and posions
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supplying-explosives-precursors/supplying-explosives-
precursors-and-poison
4 https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paper
5 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supplying-explosives-precursors/supplying-explosives-
precursors-and-poison
6 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1972/66
prohibited items, many of which will include a prohibition on the sale of poisons. It is the
seller’s obligation to check that items they are listing are permitted by their own policies
and to take any action where it is appropriate.
In addition to the cross-Government group set up to put in place steps to tackle emerging
methods of suicide, officials at the Department of Health and Social Care have also invited
HO officials to brief partners in NHSEI, PHE and suicide prevention stakeholders on what
HO can do to ensure that sellers of these chemicals are aware of their potential use in
suicide, and what can be done to get specialist support to those who might be at risk.
More generally, from 2019/20, we are investing £57million in suicide prevention through
the NHS Long Term Plan7. This will see investment in all areas of the country by 2023/24
to support local suicide prevention plans and establish suicide bereavement support
services.
In addition, every local authority now has a multi-agency suicide prevention plan in place.
We are working with local government to assure the effectiveness of those plans, and we
invested almost £600,000 in 2019/20 to support local authorities to strengthen their plans.
Furthermore, PHE is piloting a national real-time surveillance system to monitor suspected
suicide, by collecting early real time data which can be used to identify patterns of risk and
causal factors, to inform national and local responses. HM Treasury has announced
£1.2million funding to help support the development of the national system.
Finally, we know how crucial it is that information about a suicide is treated with the utmost
sensitivity it deserves, not only for the bereaved families and communities, but also
because reporting on the particulars of an individual suicide can lead to other people
taking their life in similar ways, be that in the same location or by the same method. With
this in mind, and with due respect to the Chief Coroner’s rights under the Coroners
(Investigations) Regulations 2013 to publish this response, I wish to reiterate the need for
us, as far as possible, to ensure the media practice caution when making public any facts
or details relating to this method.
I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.
15 February 2021
NADINE DORRIES
MINISTER OF STATE FOR PATIENT SAFETY, SUICIDE PREVENTION AND MENTAL
HEALTH
7 https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.