Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021

Daniel Mervis

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0027, written 3 Feb 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report3 Feb 2021
Reference2021-0027
DeceasedDaniel Mervis
CoronerProfessor Fiona Wilcox
Coroner areaLondon Inner (West)
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

St John’s College, 
Oxford University  
c/o 

, Solicitor  

1 

CORONER 

I am Professor Fiona J Wilcox, HM Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Inner West 
London 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 16th September 2020, evidence was heard touching the death of Daniel Brian 
Mervis. Mr Mervis had died as result of a mixed drug overdose on 25th October 2019 
aged 23 years. 

Medical Cause of Death 

I (a) Mixed drug toxicity 

How, when, where Mr Mervis came by his death: 

Daniel had misused drugs from his teens and this progressed to addiction and IV drug 
use. His addiction relapsed and remitted and required multiple rehabilitations. He also 
suffered with anxiety, depression and ADHD. In 2019 he was drug free for around 8 
months but relapsed again in the last 2 months of his life. This progressed and on 
24/10/2019 he arrested following drug misuse. He was resuscitated but self-discharged 
form hospital. Sadly, he took more illicit substances. He was found deceased in the flat 
of a known drug dealer, likely to have been supplied drugs by person or persons present 
at the scene. He could not be resuscitated and was recognised as life extinct at 04:02 by 
the London Ambulance Service. 

Conclusion of the Coroner as to the death: 

Drug related misadventure. 

4 

Extensive evidence was taken in court. In summary, of relevance to this report: 

It was clear that Daniel was using drugs whilst at St John’s College. Concerns were 
, as part of submissions in relation the duty of the 
raised by Daniel’s father 
coroner to write a Regulation 28 report of the conflict between the College’s policy to 
deal with drug misuse severely, but also at the same time to offer support to individual’s 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 whose lives are blighted by drug misuse. There is no suggestion that the College should 
condone illegality, but since drug addiction is an illness, then support by the College may 
assist students with these issues to access appropriate care, perhaps early on in their 
addiction and thus help prevent future deaths. 

5 

Concerns of the Coroner: 

1.  That Oxford University has no overarching policy agreed by all colleges, and 

that St John’s should encourage the University to develop the same. 

2.  That there is an apparent conflict between St John’s stated policy to deal 
with utmost severity with those students who misuse or supply drugs, and 
the apparent support those students who suffer with drug addiction are 
offered. This conflict may discourage such students to seek help for their 
addiction out of fear of the consequences, either legal or disciplinary. A 
policy of the College which is well publicised and stresses the confidential 
nature of support offered may mitigate this risk. 

3.  That St John’s drug misuse policies should be more widely advertised for 

example at Fresher’s week. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
[AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report. I, 
the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons : 

, 

By email. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

3rd February 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Professor Fiona J Wilcox 

HM Senior Coroner Inner West London 

Westminster Coroner’s Court 
65, Horseferry Road 
London 
SW1P 2ED   

Honorary Professor QMUL School of Medicine and Dentistry

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from St Johns College Oxford (PDF)
Date 26 March 2021
Our Reference
Your Reference
Please ask for
Direct Dial
Facsimile
Email

Knights |

FOR THE ATTENTION OF PROFESSOR FIONA J WILCOX
HM Senior Coroner, Coroners Officer

Inner West London Coroner's Office

33 Tachbrook Street

London

SW1V 2JR
BY EMAIL.

Dear Madam

Response of St John’s College Oxford to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths
issued by the Coroner on 3 February 2021 arising out of the inquest into the Death of Daniel
Mervis, Ex-undergraduate.

The purpose of this communication Is to provide a Formal Response to the Coroners Regulation 28
Report outlined above,

In her Report, the Coroner raised the following;

Concerns of the Coroner:

4. That Oxford University has no overarching policy agreed by all colleges, and that St John’s
should encourage the University to develop the same.

2. That there is an apparent conflict between St John’s stated policy to deal with utmost
severity with those students who misuse or supply drugs, and the apparent support those
students who suffer with drug addiction are offered, This conflict may discourage such
students to seek help for their addiction out of fear of the consequences, either legal or
disciplinary. A policy of the College which is well publicised and stresses the confidential
nature of support offered may mitigate this risk.

3. That St John's drug misuse policies should be more widely advertised for example at
Freshers’ week,

In Response, St John's addresses these matters as follows;

Response to Concerns

1. The Conference of Colleges (a forum for the Colleges of the University of Oxford to deal
with matters of shared interest and common purpose) has set up a Task and Finish group,
to be led by the Master of Pembroke College. The intention is to set up a template policy
that all Colleges will be able to adopt. St John’s College will be represented on the working
group by the Principal Bursar and the Welfare Dean,

Kalghts ple
Midland House
West Way
Botley

Oxford

OX2 OPH

T 01868 811700
W knightspic.com

Knights ple ts the trading name of Knights Professional Service Limited which ls a timiled company registered In England and Wales, registered no. 08453376 and authorised and
ragulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authorily under number 620595, Reglstered office Is The Brampton, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, STE OQW. VAT na, 208 8271 04

ee
—

Knights:

2. St John’s will adopt the template policy outlined in response one. In addition to this it will be
rewriting the appropriate section of the student handbooks to make sure that there Is
greater clarity about the confidential support that students are able to receive without
worrying about any potential legal or disciplinary consequences.

3. St John's will make sure that this continues to be included fully in Fresher's week. In
addition, we will run a Welfare week (most likely In 5" week of the first term of the academic
year) where, amongst other matters, we will try and ralse a broader awareness of drugs,
the consequences of addiction and drug misuse, and the support available to students both
from within St John's and from external agencies. We will work with our student
representatives to make sure this is as meaningful as possible.

We would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this communication for our records,

Yours faithfully

Knigquas

Knights ple

Related reports

Other reports by Professor Fiona Wilcox

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.