Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0087, written 28 Mar 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 28 Mar 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0087 |
| Deceased | Nicholas Rousseau |
| Coroner | Dr Sean Cummings |
| Coroner area | Milton Keynes |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
IN THE MILTON KEYNES CORONER’S COURT INQUEST into the death Of Nicholas Rousseau REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Chief Executive Milton Keynes University Hospital 1 CORONER I am Dr Séan Cummings Assistant Coroner for the Coroner Area of Milton Keynes 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 14th October 2019 an Investigation was opened into the death of Mr Nicholas Rousseau who died on the 9th October 2019. The medical cause of death was given as 1a) Acute Bowel Ischaemia 2 Duodenal Ulcer; Ischaemic Heart Disease and the Inquest was held on the 2nd February 2021. The Inquest Conclusion was one of natural causes. 1 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Rousseau attend the Milton Keynes University Hospital on two occasions on the 3rd and 5th October 2019 and died at home on the 9th October 2019. He was aged 47 years of age. On the 3rd October 2019 when assessed in the Accident and Emergency he was found to have a venous blood gas lactate level of 3.9. Lactate is one of the measures of sepsis. Mr Rousseau was discharged. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) In the course of oral evidence Dr and , both Consultants in Accident and Emergency Medicine at the hospital gave conflicting accounts of how much importance they would ascribe to the lactate level which was nearly twice the upper limit of normal and whether they would repeat it before discharge. told me he would not repeat it because he saw lots of patients with elevated lactate and with the resources he had available he would be spending a disproportionate amount of time checking lactate levels in patients who ultimately would be fine. We spent some time on the point and with reference to the NICE Sepsis Risk Stratification Tools. The Guideline is clear that if a lactate is above 2 then the patient should be escalated to high was challenged several times on his position that risk. irrespective of the guidelines he would not routinely repeat the lactate level dismissing it as an unnecessary burden. He maintained that position. Dr irrespective of the burden of work it may generate. took a flatly contrary view and said that she would repeat it These contrasting opinions indicate a degree of confusion amongst the senior staff at Milton Keynes University Hospital Accident and Emergency Department which in my view poses a threat to patients with sepsis and with elevated lactate levels. The disregarding of the NICE Guidelines simply because it is inconvenient is disturbing. 2 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (1) , The Chief Executive the Milton Keynes University Hospital have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 24rd May 2021. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons (1) The Rousseau family (2) The Milton Keynes University Hospital. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 3 form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 28th March 2021 Dr Séan Cummings Assistant Coroner Milton 9 Keynes 4
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
eMKWay NHS CARE. COMMUNICATE. Milton Keynes COMARORETE CONTRGUTE University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Our ref: Date: 29 April 2021 Private and Confidential Dr Séan Cummings Assistant Coroner for Milton Keynes The Coroner's Office Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ Dear Dr Cummings Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths | am writing to you following receipt of a Regulation 28 report dated 28 March, subsequent to the Inquest held by you on 02 February into the death of Mr Nicholas Rousseau who died in October 2019. Mr Rousseau died from acute bowel ischaemia. He had attended the Emergency Department at the hospital on two occasions in the week prior to his death. On the first attendance, a venous blood gas had been taken which demonstrated that Mr Rousseau had a blood lactate level of 3.9 mmol/L. The Regulation 28 report highlights conflicting accounts given by two senior members of the medical staff in relation to the importance that should have been placed upon this result and the actions, if any, that it should have prompted. Specifically, you assert that an elevated blood lactate level on presentation should have been repeated (referencing NICE Sepsis Risk Stratification Tools). Before coming to the substantive matter of blood lactate levels, | would like to take this opportunity to extend my condolences and sympathies to Mr Rousseau’s family. | am conscious that any sense of divergence in view, at Inquest, between HM Coroner and attending physicians will have added to the family’s distress. | am not clear from the Regulation 28 report whether you consider that an alternative course of action regarding the measurement of blood lactate might have afforded an opportunity to alter the subsequent clinical course and Mr Rousseau’s untimely death. For avoidance of doubt, we do not consider this likely. As a teaching hospital, we conduct education and research to improve healthcare for our patients. During your visit students may be involved in your care, or you may be asked fo participate in a clinical trial. Please speak to your doctor or nurse if you have any concerns. TheMKWa INHS CARE COMMUNICATE Milton Keynes ia University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust There are several pertinent points in relation to the issues that you raise: e Ultimately it has been determined that Mr Rousseau died from ischaemic bowel and therefore it might be postulated that his presentations on 03 and 05 October were related. Mr Rousseau did not have risk factors for either acute or chronic mesenteric ischaemia. The predominant symptom on 03 October was vomiting and on 05 October, it was vomiting and diarrhoea with abdominal pain. Had his blood lactate level been rechecked on 03 October, it seems likely (given the normal levels on 05 October) that it would have been improving. In the absence of abdominal pain, it is very unlikely that the attending physician would have considered that a CT scan of the abdomen would have been indicated, still less a mesenteric angiogram. e Whilst it is taught that ischaemic bowel can be a cause of elevated blood lactate levels, this is a non-specific marker. Elevations in blood lactate level may also occur in association with dehydration. e It is important to note that Mr Rousseau did not have sepsis at the time of either of his presentations to the Emergency Department. Whilst | was not present at the Inquest and have not been privy to a detailed account of discussions, | wonder if clinical colleagues were surprised by a granular discussion on ‘blood lactate and sepsis guidelines’ in relation to the case of a patient who was not thought to have had sepsis and who subsequently died from bowel ischaemia. e The NICE guideline Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis, and early management (NG51, 13 September 2017) defines several markers of high risk in those presenting with suspected sepsis (‘high risk criteria’). These include: altered mental state; respiratory rate >25 per minute; systolic BP <90mmbHg; and, HR > 130bpm. There are paired risk stratification tools (flowcharts) accompanying this guidance, to which you refer. The guideline notes that an elevated blood lactate level can be a marker of the severity of sepsis and is associated with poor outcome. It is therefore an important test to be undertaken on patients presenting with suspected sepsis and can influence subsequent assessment, treatment, and monitoring. The NICE guideline describes a lactate over Ammol/L as being of heightened concern in a patient presenting with suspected sepsis. A lactate of between 2 and 4mmol/L is regarded as an intermediate ievei. The NICE guideline does not make any specific reference to repeated or serial measurements other than implicitly — if a person with suspected sepsis and any high-risk criteria fails to respond within an hour of initial treatment, it is recommended that a consultant is As a teaching hospital, we conduct education and research to improve healthcare for our patients, During your visit students may be involved in your care, or you moy be asked to ines clinical trial. Please speak to vour doctor or nurse if you have any concerns. TheMKWas INHS CARE. COMMUNICATE. Milton Keynes COLLABORATE. CONTRIBUTE. University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust alerted. A failure of the blood lactate to fall by >20% from the initial value over the first hour is specified as a marker of failure to respond. Mr Rousseau presented on 03 October with a history of diarrhoea and vomiting. The clinical impression was one of mild gastroenteritis associated with a slight tachycardia. Mr Rousseau was not suspected of having sepsis on this attendance. His blood tests formed part of a baseline assessment of a patient presenting through the ‘majors’ pathway (as opposed to the ambulatory / ‘minors’ pathway) with undifferentiated illness. They were not triggered by a specific suspicion of sepsis. Even if sepsis had been suspected, Mr Rousseau would have been presenting without any high-risk criteria, meeting just one ‘moderate to high risk’ criterion (tachycardia — 91 to 130 beats per minute). In these circumstances, blood tests are not mandated by guidelines. In the absence of high-risk criteria, the reference to a 20% reduction in an initial blood lactate does not arise. Mr Rousseau was given intravenous fluids and monitored. His vital signs were checked on two further occasions and were normal aside from persistence of tachycardia (improved from 114 to 103 bpm). He was then discharged. Approach to the identification and management of sepsis in the Emergency Department As above, it was not considered that Mr Rousseau was presenting with sepsis at the time of his attendances and therefore the relevance of compliance with sepsis guidelines is perhaps limited. However, we fully agree that the early recognition, assessment, and management of sepsis is a core function of an Emergency Department. in this regard, the Emergency Department: e Maintains a local MKUH policy that is consistent with national guidance (including NG51). The current policy is due for scheduled review in November 2021. e Operates an induction and weekly teaching programme, led by consultants, to ensure that each cohort of junior and middle grade medical staff is fully aware of the importance of this topic and the local management guidelines. e Makes full use of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) as part of the triage / monitoring process in patients attending the department. Heavy investment in our IT infrastructure (Cerner eCare) means that measurement, calculation, and display is automated. As a teaching hospital, we conduct education and research to improve healthcare for our patients. During your visit students may be involved in your care, or you may be asked to Participate in a clinical rial, Please speak to your doctor or nurse if you have any concerns, TheMK INHS| CARE. COMMUNICATE Milton Keynes LABORER: CONTRIOAITE. University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust e Uses a model of Rapid Assessment and Triage (RAT) whereby ‘majors’ patients are seen by a more senior clinician at the outset of their time in the department, and appropriate investigations are ordered (and the results reviewed) promptly. Near patient testing (with its shorter turnaround time) is available and used. e Participates in Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) national audits, including the audit on sepsis in 2016-17. This audit examined performance in relation to 8 standards and the Trust performed at / above the peer median. The profile of sepsis is also high across the wider Trust. Proposed Actions Whilst these actions are not specifically prompted by Mr Rousseau’s case, the Trust will continue with existing measures as described above and: 1. Ensure that the MKUH sepsis policy is updated for November 2021 2. Repeat an audit locally of the management of patients with suspected sepsis against the eight RCEM standards. 3. Consider the case for the designation of a sepsis lead within the department with specific responsibilities for ensuring that the profile of sepsis remains high. We shall also ensure that the Regulation 28 report, this response and a summary of Mr Rousseau’s case are discussed at an appropriate departmental forum in order to ensure that there is a wide understanding of the issues raised and that clinicians are reminded of the particular challenges in making a positive diagnosis of bowel ischaemia. | hope that this response is helpful. Yours sincerely Chief Executive Officer As a teaching hospital, we conduct education and research to improve healthcare for our patients. During your visit students may be involved in your care, or you may be asked to participate in a clinical trial. Please speak to your docior or nurse ifyou have any concems. ThemMkw\ INHS. CARE COMMUNICATE. Milton Keynes CALABRO University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Copies (parents of the late Mr Nicholas Rousseau) Clinical Director, Emergency Department, MKUH es Viedical Director, MKUH Clinical Chair, BLMK Clinical Commissioning Group ES Inspector, CQC MKUH Quality and Clinical Risk Committee (sub-Committee of Trust Board) ‘Asa teaching hospital, we conduct education and research to improve healthcare for our patients. During your visit students may be involved in your care, or you May be asked to participate in a clinical trial. Piease speak to your doctor or nurse if you have any concerns.
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.