Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0100, written 3 Apr 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 3 Apr 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0100 |
| Deceased | Mandy Dickerson |
| Coroner | Dr Sean Cummings |
| Coroner area | Bedfordshire and Luton |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: , CEO Atrumed Ltd , Chief Executive Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 1 2 3 Nurse 1 CORONER I am Dr Sean Cummings, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Bedfordshire and Luton 2 CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 06 May 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mandy Jane DICKERSON aged 51. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 01 December 2021. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Mandy Jane Dickerson died at home on the 30th April 2020 from sepsis. She had attended the Urgent GP Care Centre at the Luton and Dunstable Hospital on the 26th April 2020. The medical registrar declined to assess her and thus she was not treated. This was an avoidable death. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 1. Mandy Dickerson had presented to her GP via telephone consultation with a reported abnormal bruising on the 23rd April 2020. 2. She spoke with a different GP at the same practice the next day and complained of a 4 day history of diarrhoea and vomiting. The diarrhoea was profuse and frequent. She had not mentioned this the day before. 3. She attended the Luton and Dunstable Hospital ED on the 26th April 2020 and was "streamed" to the Urgent GP Care Centre by the streamlining nurse. 4. She had a wait of nearly one hour in the Urgent GP Centre reception before seeing the nurse practitioner. 5. Urine was taken and was abnormal. 6. When she saw the nurse practitioner she was noted to be extremely breathless which was attributed to her having rushed from the car park. Ms Dickerson is reported to have offered that as an explanation. However, as above, she had been waiting in reception for one hour. 7. At assessment she was pyrexial and tachycardic. 8. The nurse practitioner diligently recorded the observations and the consultation but did not record the oxygen saturations or the physical examination of the chest or Regulation28- AfterInquestDocumentTemplateUpdate d30/07/2021 abdomen which he later referred to in his statement presented to the Court on the eve of the hearing. 9. The nurse practitioner reportedly spoke with the medical registrar on duty and the advice received was that because Ms Dickerson was tolerating oral fluids she did not need to be admitted and could be discharged home. The medical registrar could not be traced for statement or to attend the Inquest having apparently relocated to Sri Lanka. 10. Ms Dickerson was then sent home. 11. She had a further telephone consultation with her GP on the 28th April 2020 at which she reported an improvement. Her temperature was reported as being lower but she complained of exhaustion. 12. She died on the 30th April 2020 in the early hours of the morning. I made the following findings: 1. I acknowledge that the Consultant Pathologist gave the medical cause of death as 1a Unascertained. However, having heard all the evidence I consider it overwhelmingly likely that Mandy Dickerson died of sepsis and so the MCCD will reflect that. 2. While the nurse practitioner stated in his statement and in oral evidence that he had taken the oxygen saturation measurements and also examined the chest and abdomen I the rest of the contemporaneous note made was detailed and I find it implausible that if the additional examinations had been carried out that they would not have been recorded in the same diligent manner as the remainder. find that he did not make those examinations. I say this partly because 3. Nonetheless he was worried and phoned the medical registrar for advice. The medical registrar did not have the benefit of seeing and examining Ms Dickerson and wrongly declined to see her. As Dr persuaded the nurse practitioner out of his worries allowing him to discharge Ms Dickerson home. put it rather aptly, the medical registrar is likely to have 4. I find that the advice given by the medical registrar was inadequate and that Mandy Dickerson should have been seen and examined by a member of the medical team on the 26th April 2020. I note that the nurse practitioner was not asking for Ms Dickerson to be admitted but to be seen and assessed. Dr agreement that she should have been seen and assessed and that sending her home was the wrong course. , my expert, were in and Dr 5. Had Ms Dickerson been seen and assessed on the 26th April 2020 by the medical team I consider it overwhelmingly likely that she would have been treated with fluids and antibiotics and also that she would have survived this illness. 5 CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. In the The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) Regulation28- AfterInquestDocumentTemplateUpdate d30/07/2021 To the Chief Executive, Atrumed Ltd, provider of Urgent GP Care (UGPC) services on the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital site: 1. In my view there was considerable reluctance on the part of Atrumed Ltd, led by CEO , to engage properly with my investigation. This resulted in the issue of a Schedule 5 Notice to , to attend a special court session, so that I did secure his attention and to impress on him the significance of a Coroner's investigation and that his co operation was not optional, in large part to ensure future learning. The computer system in use at the Urgent GP Care Centre was prone at the time (April 2. 2020) to glitches which rendered the use of the "Sepsis template" to be "advised" rather than mandatory. Sometimes it would display and other times not. It is my view that had the Sepsis template been fully operational and mandatory then the signs of sepsis shown by Mandy Dickerson would have likely altered the clinical decision making and resulted in prompt treatment for sepsis with probable survival. 3. There was fundamental confusion with regard to the management of patients, out of hours, who the treating UGPC clinician felt should be assessed by a relevant speciality, in this case medical, and where the relevant speciality felt assessment was unnecessary. It was understood by and by the treating UGPC nurse that once the speciality registrar had made a decision then that decision was final and the only option was to discharge the patient, unless they were in extremis, when a 222 call could be made for emergency assistance from the nearby hospital. I was told that if the patient was returned to the ED then the streaming nurse would simply refer them back. That view was flatly contradicted by Dr Dunstable University Hospital and Deputy Medical Director. He told me it was entirely open to the UGPC staff to refer back to ED if there was difficulty. He did not accept that the ED would refuse to see patients referred back, saying it happened all the time. , Consultant in Emergency Medicine at the Luton and There was in my view a failure to record and then to convey key information to the medical 4. registrar who consequently may have given advice which was ill-informed. The nurse practitioner told me, in oral evidence and in a statement provided at the eleventh hour the night before the Inquest, that the measurements had been performed but simply not recorded. However, the remainder of the note was particularly and contemporaneously detailed with these critical observations being conspicuous by their absence. I found that the observations had not been made. In addition, no record was made of the name of the medical registrar making investigation of this element difficult. To the Chief Executive, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: 1. I heard detailed evidence of the "streaming" service where patients attending the ED were directed to the UGPC on the basis of very little information gained from their presenting complaint and basic "eyeballing" of the patient. I understood that there is a difference between streaming to UGPC and triage for entry into the ED. I also understood the impact of the pandemic on the provision of services. However, it was apparent that very little documentation of the process with regard to each patient is made, kept or conveyed. I have referred in (3) above to the situation with respect to the referrals to the speciality 2. registrars out of hours. I was provided with information about many different policies and procedures but I did not hear evidence as to any policy directing how a speciality registrar should respond to a request for assessment when even allowing for the missing important observations, enough information was conveyed to mandate (in Dr assessment. opinions) a medical and Dr 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN Regulation 28-AfterInquest DocumentTemplateUpdated30/07/2021 In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by May 30, 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise ou must ex lain wh no action is ro osed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to Ms Dickerson's partner and her son . I have also sent it to , Consultant in Emergency Medicine The Care Dr Quality Commission Dr , Chair of the Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes CCG who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Regulation 28-AfterInquest DocumentTemplateUpdated30/07/2021
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Atrumed Healthcare C/o Luton Urgent GP Clinic LU4 0DZ UK – Reference Number: ATR03 Date: 30th May 2022 Her Majesty’s Assistant Coroner for Bedfordshire and Luton Dr Sean Cummings The Court House Woburn Street Ampthill Bedfordshire MK45 2HX 30 May 2022 Dear Sir The inquest touching upon the death of Mandy Jane Dickerson Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths issued pursuant to Regulation 28 Coroner (Investigations) Regulations 2013, dated 3 April 2022 and following the inquest touching the death of Mandy Jane Dickerson who sadly passed away on 30 April 2020. I would like to take the opportunity on behalf of Atrumed Ltd to offer my sincere condolences to Mrs Dickerson’s family and friends for their loss. London Office Atrumed Ltd, International House, 142 Cromwell Road, Kensington, SW7 4EF Luton Office Urgent GP Clinic, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0DZ A list of directors is available at the registered office. Atrumed Limited is a company registered in England & Wales. Company No: 10636369 Matters of Concern in respect of Atrumed Ltd “1. In my view there was considerable reluctance on the part of Atrumed Ltd, led by CEO , to engage properly with my investigation. This resulted in the issue of a Schedule 5 Notice to , to attend a special court session, so that I did secure his attention and to impress on him the significance of a Coroner's investigation and that his cooperation was not optional, in large part to ensure future learning. 2. The computer system in use at the Urgent GP Care Centre was prone at the time (April 2020) to glitches which rendered the use of the "Sepsis template" to be "advised" rather than mandatory. Sometimes it would display and other times not. It is my view that had the Sepsis template been fully operational and mandatory then the signs of sepsis shown by Mandy Dickerson would have likely altered the clinical decision making and resulted in prompt treatment for sepsis with probable survival. 3. There was fundamental confusion with regard to the management of patients, out of hours, who the treating UGPC clinician felt should be assessed by a relevant speciality, in this case medical, and where the relevant speciality felt assessment was unnecessary. It was understood by Mr and by the treating UGPC nurse that once the speciality registrar had made a decision then that decision was final and the only option was to discharge the patient, unless they were in extremis, when a 222 call could be made for emergency assistance from the nearby hospital. I was told that if the patient was returned to the ED, then the streaming nurse would simply refer them back. London Office Atrumed Ltd, International House, 142 Cromwell Road, Kensington, SW7 4EF Luton Office Urgent GP Clinic, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0DZ A list of directors is available at the registered office. Atrumed Limited is a company registered in England & Wales. Company No: 10636369 4. That view was flatly contradicted by Dr , Consultant in Emergency Medicine at the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital and Deputy Medical Director. He told me it was entirely open to the UGPC staff to refer to ED if there was difficulty. He did not accept that the ED would refuse to see patients referred back, saying it happened all the time. 5. There was in my view a failure to record and then to convey key information to the medical registrar who consequently may have given advice which was ill-informed. The nurse practitioner told me, in oral evidence and in a statement provided at the eleventh hour the night before the Inquest, that the measurements had been performed but simply not recorded. However, the remainder of the note was particularly and contemporaneously detailed with these critical observations being conspicuous by their absence. I found that the observations had not been made. In addition, no record was made of the name of the medical registrar making investigation of this element difficult.” Response 1. I am sorry that you formed the view that there was reluctance on the part of either Atrumed Ltd and / or myself to engage with your investigation. I can assure you that this was not the case. As you are aware, Atrumed Ltd is closely aligned with Luton and Dunstable Hospital (run by Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust – “the Trust”) in terms of the provision of the Urgent GP Care Centre. I have not previously been involved in inquest proceedings and I was initially under the impression that the Trust would co - ordinate with your office on both its own and our behalf . Immediately I became aware that you required assistance and information from Atrumed Ltd specifically, I provided it to you. London Office Atrumed Ltd, International House, 142 Cromwell Road, Kensington, SW7 4EF Luton Office Urgent GP Clinic, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0DZ A list of directors is available at the registered office. Atrumed Limited is a company registered in England & Wales. Company No: 10636369 2. The sepsis template and how it operates is part of the System One software. System One is a nationally used software and the function of its templates is outside the control of Atrumed Ltd. However, Atrumed Ltd has recently (1) changed the software module to an Urgent Care Module and (2) added a Sepsis Screening tool as a bolt on. This means that if a patient’s observations are abnormal such that there is a risk of sepsis, this will be flagged up on the system. It is Atrumed’s local policy (attached) that this tool is to be used by its clinical practitioners. 3. This paragraph addresses both paragraphs 3 and 4 of your concerns. Following the inquest and in conjunction with one another, Atrumed Ltd and the Trust reviewed the protocol that was in place for referrals between the hospital and the Urgent GP Care Centre and have revised it. The protocol now makes clear that the Urgent GP Care Centre can refer any patient back to the hospital for further assessment, whether or not it has the agreement of a speciality doctor. As a result, there is no longer any confusion between the Urgent GP Care Centre and the Trust in this regard. Protocol attached. The protocol has been shared with all clinicians and is available in all the consultation rooms and provided at induction. 4. As to paragraph 5 of your concerns, it is of course for each individual practitioner (in accordance with their relevant regulatory body and their professional obligations) to ensure that they record the key information about a patient and the patient’s presentation and that they accurately report the same to any other practitioner that they may contact in respect of a patient. It is now, however, part of Atrumed’s policy that practitioners must record (in a patient’s records) the name and times of any specialty clinicians that they speak to (please see attached) We carry out monthly audits of the records to ensure that this is happening and any issues that are identified are discussed with the Trust out our joint clinical governance meetings. London Office Atrumed Ltd, International House, 142 Cromwell Road, Kensington, SW7 4EF Luton Office Urgent GP Clinic, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0DZ A list of directors is available at the registered office. Atrumed Limited is a company registered in England & Wales. Company No: 10636369 I hope that the above information provides you with the reassurance that action has been taken by Atrumed Ltd in respect of the concerns that you raised during the course of the inquest and in your Regulation 28 report. Atrumed Ltd is committed to ensuring the high-quality provision of urgent GP care services and we will ensure that the lessons learnt as a result of this inquest continue to be implemented and monitored across our service. Yours sincerely, Chief Executive Officer London Office Atrumed Ltd, International House, 142 Cromwell Road, Kensington, SW7 4EF Luton Office Urgent GP Clinic, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Lewsey Road, Luton, LU4 0D A list of directors is available at the registered office. Atrumed Limited is a company registered in England & Wales. Company No: 10636369
ri!1:~1
Bedfordshire Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust
Luton & Dunstable University Hospital
Lewsey Road
Luton
Bedfordshire
LU4 ODZ
25 May 2022
Dr Sean Cummings
The Bedfordshire and Luton Coroner
Service
The Court House
Woburn Street
Ampthill
MK45 2HK
Dear Dr Cummings
Re: Mandy Dickerson - Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths
I am writing in response to your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths, issued on 3rd April
2022, following the Inquest into the death of Mandy Dickerson which concluded on 1st December
2021.
I would like to begin by extending my sincere condolences to the family of Ms Dickerson for their
loss. I appreciate this will still be a very difficult time for the family.
In response to evidence heard at the Inquest you raised some concerns in relation to the care and
treatment provided by Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust's ("the Trust"), specifically
around the streaming process carried out on arrival at the Emergency Department.
This letter sets out the Trust's formal response.
Regulation 28 Concern
Matters of concern were raised and are responded to as follows:
1.
"I heard detailed evidence of the "streaming" service where patients attending the ED were
directed to the UGPC on the basis of very little information gained from their presenting
complaint and basic "eyeballing" of the patient. f understood that there is a difference
between streaming to UGPC and triage for entry into the ED. I also understood the impact of
the pandemic on the provision of services. However, it was apparent that very little
documentation of the process with regard to each patient is made, kept or conveyed."
Streaming has been implemented within primary care to assist on arrival at the Trust Emergency
Department (ED) in deciding whether a patient will be seen in ED or in the Urgent GP Clinic (UGPC)
which is run by Atrumed Healthcare. Streaming is undertaken by a designated nurse who is
employed by the Trust.
The role of the streaming service is to visually assess patients presenting at the ED to allow for a
quick decision as to whether they can best be supported by urgent or acute care services.
Streaming is an initial allocation assessment. The streaming nurse records a brief summary on a slip
of paper of the 1 minute consultation that is carried out. This slip is handed to the ED receptionist.
Where the patient is streamed to UGPC, the receptionist enters details onto SystmOne, UGPC's
patient management software. The clinical information on the slip of paper is also added to
SystmOne.
Since this Inquest, the Trust are now able to access SystmOne. It could previously only be accessed
by UGPC and the patient's own GP. The streaming information is therefore now available for all to
access and review.
A fully documented hands-on initial assessment is then carried out by triage in ED or at UGPC, the
streaming system does not replace this as the first substantive assessment.
2.
11
/ have referred in {3) above [concerns raised to Atrumed Healthcare] to the situation with
respect to the referrals to the speciality registrars out of hours. I was provided with
information about many different policies and procedures but I did not hear evidence as to
any policy directing how a speciality registrar should respond to a request for assessment
when even allowing for the missing important observations, enough information was
conveyed to mandate (in
opinions) a medical assessment."
On arrival at the Trust, Ms Dickerson was streamed to the UGPC by the streaming nurse. When she
was seen in UGPC, the assessing clinician felt she required further acute assessment. Given the time
of day, a referral was sent to the Speciality Registrar in accordance with the UGPC guidelines. Based
on the information provided to him, the Specialty Registrar concluded no acute assessment was
required and Ms Dickerson was sent home. At the Inquest, you heard evidence that the option was
always open to the UGPC clinician to refer a patient back to ED if they remained concerned.
However, it became clear that UGPC clinicians did not consider this as an option and considered the
Speciality Registrar's opinion to be final.
The Trust has worked with Atrumed Healthcare to update the 'Streaming Guidelines for the Urgent
GP Clinic (UGPC)' (appendix 1) to ensure more clarity in the system for referral from UGPC to the
Hospital.
As was previously the case, where the UGPC clinician identifies that further acute assessment is
required, they refer to the GP Liaison or the Specialty Registrar if out of hours, as in Ms Dickerson's
case. The Specialty Registrar then uses their own judgement to consider the information provided
and advise on the next steps for the patient's care, as they would with any patient they are asked to
review. The plan for next steps is to be agreed with the UGPC clinician.
T e update to this policy emphasises that the UGPC clinician and the Speciality registrar must be in
agreement that the proposed action is acceptable and clinically appropriate. It then adds a written
step that if agreement cannot be reached, the UGPC clinician must record this in the notes before
immediately sending the patient to ED. Although this step is new in the sense that it has been newly
written into the policy, this option for UGPC clinicians to refer to ED has always been available in
practice. The policy has been updated to give a clear written pathway for clinicians to refer to.
This addition is to be known as 'Mandy's Rule'. It clarifies that UGPC clinicians should act and seek
the further assessment when they feel it is required, regardless of the view of the speciality
registrar. When recording the lack of agreement in preparation to send the patient to the ED,
Mandy's Rule can be quoted and the patient must then be accepted by ED. This will ensure that
UGPC clinicians feel confident in referring patients to ED so that no patient misses out on further
assessment where a clinician believes this to be necessary.
The updated policy is joined by an addendum (appendix 2) setting out this rule in detail. It is made
clear that a patient must not be sent home where the clinician feels they need immediate hospital
attention.
In all cases where a patient is referred to ED under this rule, an investigation will be carried and
cases will be discussed at the regular UGPC/ED Joint Clinical Governance meetings to ensure learning
and the continuous improvement of this system.
We have reached out to the family regarding the naming of this rule after Ms Dickerson, who
responded on 23rd May 2020 giving their permission to name the rule after her.
I hope that this response provides assurance to Ms Dickerson's family and yourself that the Trust has
taken the learning from the Inquest very seriously. The Trust continues to improve its policies and
put in place measures to ensure safe and effective services.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive Officer
AT RU MED®
HEALTHCARE
t.!/:b1
Bedfordshire Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust
j Appendix 1
\
L&D Streaming
Guidelines
2021-2022
For Urgent GP Clinic
(UGPC)
December 2021 Version 3
Agreed By
(CD Luton ED)
(Tier 5 ED Clinician)
(Matron Luton ED)
(Band 7 sister)
(Band 7 charge nurse)
(CEO Atrumed Healthcare)
(GP rep from Atrumed Healthcare)
(MD from Atrumed Healthcare)
(GM Acute & Emergency Medicine)
(Head of Nursing Acute & Emergency Medicine)
I Date Agreed
I December 2021
I Date of Review
I July 2022
IMaster Saved
I Bedfordshire Hospttals
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021 /22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 2 of 15
Guidelines for Streaming
These are guidelines and allowance is given for streaming nurses to be able to exercise their clinical
judgement. Attendees can be streamed to services that may not be in line with the pathways if the
streaming nurse's opinion is that the patient can be better supported in the alternative service onsite. The
decision will need to be supported by the reason for referring to that service.
1.
Aims and Objectives
1.1 Aim
The aim of streaming is to visually assess the patient who presents at the Emergency Department (ED) and
to make a quick decision as to where the patient can be best supported by urgent or acute care services and
to stream them to that appropriate service.
The aim is to provide a high quality, clinically effective and cost effective service that meets the urgent
primary medical care needs of patients in Luton.
The aim of this service is to provide a facility to deliver face to face urgent consultation to those patients
presenting at ED with urgent primary care specific conditions regardless of their status. The service will also
aim to deliver appropriate education at the end of the consultation to ensure that they are aware of the
alternative urgent care services including the 111 service. By integrating the approach and working with
patients and stakeholders, the aim is to reduce the walk-in attendances at Luton & Dunstable Hospital
Emergency Department for primary care conditions.
Ongoing care following streaming is a two-way process and patients can be quickly referred between the
Urgent GP Clinic (UGPC) and the L&D Assessment Teams if the UGPC clinician assessment identifies different
patient needs for immediately necessary same day treatment.
1.2 Objectives
• To ensure ED attendees are seen by the most appropriate healthcare professional based on their
presenting clinical need
• To improve patient experience when seeking emergency care services in Luton
• To minimise the amount of time spent waiting for assessment and treatment in ED for patients with
urgent primary care type complaints/conditions
• To ease the pressure of increased expectation/demand on the L&D ED
• To ensure a robust process with local primary care clinicians supporting those patients who have
attended the service
The UGPC shall be aware of and work to all relevant guidance including new and emerging policy guidance,
which relate to and link with urgent and/or unscheduled care.
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021 /22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 3 of 15
2. The Service
• Attendees to the Emergency Department (ED) can be streamed to the UGPC between the hours of
08.00 to 23.00. 7 days a week, 365 days a year. Outside of these hours attendees will be seen in ED
• During streaming an appropriately trained Band 6 (or higher) nurse speaks to the attendee and,
following the guidelines, makes a decision as to whether the attendee can be supported by a GP/
urgent primary care clinician or whether they need services that are better supported in the
Emergency Department
• The nurse speaks to the patient/ carer to ascertain the reason for attendance. This interaction is not
a triage, and the streaming nurse will make decisions as to where the attendee needs to be seen
based on the information given at this time. The streaming nurse in this role should ensure the
patient feels listened to, understood and if needs be, the rationale for the streaming decision is
explained. Where a streaming decision is contentious and the patient/carer is dissatisfied, this should
be de-escalated and confrontation avoided and a senior doctor or nurse asked to review the decision.
•
Ifthere are any queries or concerns about an attendee the ED Streaming Nurse can contact the UGPC
reception via extension 2545.
• The UGPC service offers appropriate healthcare services to attendees of the ED who present with low
acuity medical complaints/conditions that can be treated by a General Practitioner or urgent care
clinician under the leadership of a General Practitioner. Active communication is encouraged to
deliver high quality of care to all attendees.
•
The UGPC service will access patient records subject to permission and will ensure accurate clinical
records of all individual patient consultations are transferred in an approved structured electronic
format to General Practices the next working day following the patient's attendance.
• The UGPC will be able to evidence robust clinical leadership is in place.
• When the UGPC waiting area is full, attendees can still be booked in to the UGPC service but may be
asked to wait in an alternative location ie ED waiting room, additional UGPC space. The UGPC will
then contact the ED Reception and ask for patients to be sent to the clinic once space becomes
available in the waiting room. The Senior Manager on Call (SMOC) may become involved if the
number of patients waiting to be seen at the UGPC is impacting on the space available or capacity.
• Where waiting times are extended within the UGPC service and patients held in the ED waiting room,
the streaming nurse should be encouraged to review their initial streaming decision if there is
patient/carer concern and the ED pathway is now considered more appropriate. In this instance the
patient should be registered to ED by reception and taken off the UGPC registration screen.
• Streaming Guidelines and pathways are to be reviewed and audited annually by the Clinical
Governance Group. However any concerns or changes can be raised and discussed at any time within
the contract term.
• Any referrals made deemed to be inappropriate are to be recorded and discussed at the monthly
clinical governance meetings with appropriate action taken at the time.
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021/22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 4 of 15
3. Patient Criteria (please refer to pathways)
• Attendees presenting that are appropriate to be seen by a GP or nurse practitioner can be seen by
the Urgent GP Clinic on site.
• The UGPC clinician is able to refer to specialities for same day urgent admission when appropriate, so
if the attendee looks stable, they can be streamed to the UGPC.
• Unwell children can be streamed to the UGPC in accordance with protocols/pathways in Diagram 2 ..
The paediatric emergency department is for minor injuries and unstable/unwell children.
• The UGPC service is able to glue/steristrip and dress wounds, as appropriate to the symptoms being
presented.
•
If on closer examination a patient is assessed, by the UGPC, to require other same day hospital
services or further same day acute assessment they can be referred on following "Diagram 6.
Referring from UGPC to L&D Hospital", noting why the patient is being sent to L&D.
• The service will treat minor illness, some minor injury and attendees that present with exacerbation
of long term conditions including but not limited to the following:
Allergic reactions (where airways are not compromised)
Upper respiratory tract infection: coughs, sore throat, cold, flu (all ages)
Fevers, headaches and dizziness (in accordance with unwell child pathway- Diagram 2
Wounds requiring re-dressing (wounds requiring primary closure should be seen in Minors
Burns for re-dressing only- caution if any signs of toxic shock or infection should be seen in
Minors
Soft tissue/muscular pain
Back pain/ache non traumatic and walking (normal bowel and urine)
Eye care, not foreign body or penetrating trauma or chemical splash
Stomach and other alimentary problems
Genito - urinary tract infection or problems
Bites animal, insect or human not requiring complex wound closure or washout
All childhood ailments
Gynaecological issues
Pregnancy complications <20 weeks (in accordance with guidance in UGPC Specification)
Asthma and COPD - all ages (not moderate/severe respiratory distress)
Mental health - low mood/stress or anxiety (not suicidal)
Diarrhoea and vomiting (all ages)
Chest pain (as per protocol - Diagram 3)
Low mechanism road traffic collision (ie car -v- car)
Tetanus injection (which maybe provided by ED and administered by UGPC)
For children attending the Urgent GP Clinic it is mandated that national CP-1S requirements
should be adhered to
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021/22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 5 of 15
4. Patients not to be seen at the Urgent GP Clinic
• Attendees seen in the UGPC or ED within the previous 72 hours for the any problem
• Children with facial lacerations (This would potentially be classed as a head injury).
• Burns affecting special areas (Genitals/Face/Palms/Soles of feet)
• Children under 6 months old
• Floppy, unresponsive or fitting children
• Attendees with moderate/severe respiratory distress (as per the protocol Diagram 3)
• Any burns greater than the palm of the patients hand or that are circumferential are to be seen in ED.
• Suspected fractures
• No foreign body
• Patients requiring suture, perform x-ray or blood analysis
• Any head injuries
• Pregnancy complications >20 weeks
5. Referring Patients back to L&D
When the UGPC clinician examines the attendee it may become apparent that they have care needs that
cannot be provided in the UGPC or may require further assessment. If this is the case they can refer the
attendee to Medicine or Surgery through the GP Liaison Team (8am - 6.30pm), Paediatrics via Paediatric
Assessment Unit (PAU) using Urgent Connect (8am to 6.30pm) or directly to specialities. These cases will
be noted for the clinical governance group and for data reporting to Luton Clinical Commissioning Group
{LCCG).
• The GP Liaison Team will take the GP referral and refer the patient to the most appropriate service
for General Surgery patients (all ages) and medical patients (over the age of 17) only between the
hours of 8am to 6.30pm Monday to Friday. GP liaison will make a recommendation as to whether to
send the patient to SDEC, ESU, ED or another accepting area for speciality referral.
• Referrals to PAU are made direct through Urgent Connect Monday to Friday or via the Bleep 733 out
of hours.
• Out of hours patients should be directly referred to the relevant speciality clinician. See Referring
from UGPC to l&D Hospital pathway Diagram 6.
• Patients that have been assessed as incorrectly streamed will be referred back to the Emergency
Department streaming nurse and details logged with the receptionist for follow up at the UGPC L&D
Clinical Governance meeting. The referral will be supported by a telephone call to the ED Doctor in
Charge to advise that the patient is being sent back and the reasons for the concerns.
• Patients that were inappropriately streamed {following further investigation from the GP) will be
referred to the appropriate assessment team and details logged for follow up at the UGPC l&D
Clinical Governance meeting.
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021/22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 6 of 15
•
If a patient is referred by the UGPC to a specialty team, but the referral is refused despite all
reasonable steps to refer, the UGPC can refer back to the Emergency Department. The UGPC will
then datix the incident so that it can be logged and reviewed and action taken appropriately.
6. Ambulance Patients
•
Patients who arrive by ambulance who meet the following inclusion criteria can be sent to the UGPC
(Diagram 7)
Independently mobile
NEWS2 less than 3 (correlate with clinical context, e.g. COPD, Anxiety etc ... )
No red flag features (such as; chest pa in, visibly in severe pain)
Has carer if required /No injury
If the ambulance patient attends UGPC without the relevant signed paperwork, they will be sent back to ED.
7. Secondary streaming
This involves patients being streamed to the UGPC after the triage process has occurred and the patient then
meets the UGPC criteria now that more clinical information has been obtained. This process can only be
activated; it is not in place all the time.
There are 2 routes for activation:
1) ED consultant in charge asks the SMOC to speak to the UGPC due to capacity and/or volume of
attendances
2) The UGPC informs the ED consultant in charge that they have capacity and can accept additional patients
This is in place for both adults and paeds.
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021/22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 7 of 15
Diagram 1- Ambulatory Patient
Look at the attendee
(ensure children are specifically
visualised)
Can the patient talk in
complete sentences without
becoming out of breath?
___D_o_ th_e_y_h..a_v_e...,c_h_es_t_p_a_in_?
__
See chest
pain protocol
Diagram 3
Can the patient walk?
(excepting long term
disability)
No
Is this an unscheduled return
visit within 72 hours?
Is this an injury or illness?
Injury less than 4 weeks
Send to ED for:
x-ray, suture,
exploration required,
or foreign body
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021 /22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 8 of 15
Diagram 2 Unwell Child
Initial visual review of the child and assessment by parent/carer
Is the child in obvious
respiratory distress, fitting or
looks shocked?
Is the child alert, responsive,
good colour and appears well
Has the child passed urine in
the last 12 hours?
YES
No
No
Does the child have a non-
blanching petechial rash?
YES
NICE CG160
Compliant
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021/22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 9 of 15
Diagram 3 -Ambulatory Chest Pain
GP
• Traumatic chest pain with no history of new
signifttant or danae,ous mechanism
• MIid/Moderate exacerbations of Asthma or
COPD, able to speak In full sentences and looks
well clinically
• Chest pain sent to ED by a Nurse or 111 that
doesn't feature in any RED criteria (Right)
• Pleurltic soundin1 chest pain (but not likely PE}
• Clinically looks well
• Panic attack/Anxiety• No previous cardiac Hx
• Patients on anticoagulants - depends on cardiac sounding chest pain or not & in case of
CONSIDERATIONS:
trauma whether minor or dangerous mechanism;
• Use of other pathways (eg; SDEC);
•
In case of shortness of breath- previous intensive care admissions/frequency of inhaler
use preceding hospital;
• Chest pain with history of aortic aneurysm;
L
• >65 years with pleuritic, traumatic or epigastric pain can be seen in UGP if age is the
single factor or clinically features the UGP criteria.
Diagram 4 - Nosebleed
ED
Attendees presenting with any of the below
symptoms are to remain in the Emergency
Department
• Active severe bleeding
• Bleeding not stopped in 20-30 minutes
• Trauma to nose/ face
• On anticoagulant therapy
• Has cancer of head, neck, ear, nose or throat
• Has bleeding or blood disorders
• Has advanced liver disease
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021/22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 11 of 15
Diagram 5 -Testicular Pain
• Nainjury
• Pain for > 48 hours
• Able to pass urine
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021/22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 12 of 15
Diagram 6 -
Referring from UGPC to L&D Hospital
r
UGPC Clinician identifies need for
further acute assessment
Is patient stable?
Refer back to ED
Contact Majors or
Paeds nurse in
charge as
appropriate
Contact GP Liaison
Team (8am - 6.30pm)
or PAU (9am - 5pm)
via Urgent Connect for
advice and referral
(tel 01582 297311)
or directly to
specialities by bleep
system or contact
number outside these
hours
If no response or refusal to accept the patient by the
specialty team, refer back to ED and UGPC to Datix
incident for follow up
Reasonable effort should be made by the GP to refer
the patient as this is in their best interests. This may
mean bleeping alternative contacts or routing the call
via switchboard.
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021/22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 13 of 15
Diagram 7 - Ambulance Pathway
Ambulance -ADULTS Direct Stream to UGPC
Ambulance Arrives
Inclusion Criteria for UGPC Streaming
Independently mobile
•
• MEWS less than 2 (correlate with clinical context, e.g .
COPD, Anxiety etc... )
• No red flag features (chest pain, other pain more than
7/10)
• Has carer /No injury
w
Streaming Assessment can be made by any one of the
following clinicians:
• Nurse in charge {NIC)
• Emergency Physician in Charge (EPIC)
• Sign Ambulance paper work {electronic/paper) by NIC
Ambulance clinicians can flag patients who they feel would
be suitable for UGPC in order to expedite offload.
I,
Ambulance Crew Role after streaming assessment:
• Reports to Reception
• Book in patient stating for UGPC Streamed Patient
• Give a copy of notes to patient to attend UGPC and
signed ECG if available
• Hand PIN to Reception
• Signpost patient to UGPC
• Handover complete and to log back in to service
L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021/22 for UGPC Version 2
Page 14 of 15
Diagram 8 - COVID pathway
Questions to ask:
Have you had a lateral flow test?
Have you had a PCR test?
Contact with positive patient in last 7 days?
CONSIDERATIONS:
• Refer Patients to the near Pharmacy for a free test (Dunstable Road near NISSA) if
presenting with new Respiratory symptoms and not double vaccinated before booking
in as National Guidelines states that everyone should know their status before going to
public places (NHS,2022);
• Patients on Isolation testing negative on the 5th and 6th day are no longer COVID+
(NHS,2022);
To be Read in conjunction with Diagram 6 (page 13} of L&D Streaming Guidelines 2021-2022 for
Urgent GP Clinic (UGPC), dated December 2021
Appendix 2
Mandy's Rule
• After streaming, patients seen and examined by clinicians at UGPC are who deemed to
require onward referral to inpatient specialties at hospital should be discussed with the GP
Liaison service or the relevant specialty registrar, following the agreed pathway in Diagram
6.
• This conversation will result in an agreed plan which may involve the patient attending
hospital immediately, being seen at a later time in SDEC or similar urgent clinic, or being sent
home with appropriate advice from UGPC.
•
It is imperative that both the referring clinician (in the UGPC) and the GP Liaison/ Specialty
registrar are in agreement that the proposed action is acceptable to both and is clinically
appropriate. Mutual agreement assures both clinicians that they are fully compliant with
their duties under NMC and GMC guidance, and are not in breach of their Duty of Care.
•
If agreement cannot be reached, and the UGPC clinician feels that the patient needs to be
seen without delay despite the specialty team not agreeing to this, the UGPC clinician
must record this in the medical notes, and then send the patient to the Emergency
Department.
If the UGPC clinician feels that the patient needs immediate hospital attention they must in
•
no circumstances send the patient home. They should primarily use the agreed and
commissioned pathways to make a referral, and only use Mandy's Rule to send the patient
•
to ED if agreement cannot be reached despite this.
It is stressed that this is not considered to be a normal situation, and every such case will be
investigated to determine how and why it occurred. learning will be taken from each case in
order to improve the system and prevent any future occurrences. All such cases will be
discussed at the regular UGPC/ED Joint Clinical Governance Meetings.
MRCS FRCEM
Consultant in Emergency Medicine
Deputy Medical Director
13th May 2022
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.