Prevention of Future Deaths reports
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0152. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Reference | 2021-0152 |
|---|---|
| Deceased | Coral O’Donnell |
| Coroner | Alan Wilson |
| Coroner area | Blackpool and Fylde |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Community health care |
| Organisation named | Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Medical Director Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust CORONER lam Alan Anthony Wilson Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made INVESTIGATION and INQUEST The death of Coral Amy O’Donnell on 17** May 2019 was reported to me and | opened an investigation, which concluded by way of an inquest held on 29" April 2021. | determined that the medical cause of Elliot’s death was la Panton valentin leukocidin staphylococcus aureus pneumonia b Influenza A c i] Critical care acquired myopathy The conclusion of the Coroner was that Coral died due to natural causes. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The circumstances were set out in box 3 of the Record of Inquest as follows: Coral O’Donnell was regarded as previously healthy but was known to be susceptible to developing skin infections. She had attended a General Practitioner in early November 2018 in relation to an abscess for which she was prescribed antibiotics. On 8th January 2019 Coral was assessed by a nurse having presented with cough and cold like symptoms and after examination was felt to have developed a viral infection. After a deterioration in her condition during 10th January 2019 Coral was admitted to hospital in Blackpool that evening where investigations revealed she was neutropenic and concerns were raised she has severe pneumonia. By the next morning she required intubation and ventilation. Her history of skin infections, a known indicator of a very rare bacterial infection, was not appreciated during the early part of her admission until around 21st January 2019 when a concerning CT scan confirmed that this infection had been seriously damaging Coral’s lungs and in the absence of necessary mediation. Over subsequent weeks Coral’s condition fluctuated but she remained seriously unwell. Despite months of intensive care, she could not be successfully weaned from ventilator support. Her condition began to deteriorate further in early May 2019 before Coral died in the company of her family on 17th May 2019. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — e That when evidence of Staphylococcus Aureus was identified the clinical and microbiology teams did not consider the possibility of Panton Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) Staphyloccus Aureus, despite Coral’s history of skin infections and the severe pneumonia she presented with on admission in a previously young fit woman. e That there was a lack of awareness of PVL amongst senior clinicians, despite the fact that a senior Microbiologist from the hospital Trust confirmed that national guidance covering the treatment of such condition was in use at the Trust at the time, but none of the critical care team who gave evidence at the inquest seem to have been aware of that document. Although the court was told this has now been rectified there is a concern that some clinicians are unfamiliar with hospital protocols which may be relevant to their work; e That communication between the critical care and microbiology teams was problematic and neither team considered PVL until there was established damage to her lungs identified on a chest x-ray. Senior clinicians had not mentioned a susceptibility to skin infections to the microbiologists which may have resulted in Coral receiving the correct treatment at an early stage of admission. The lack of communication between Microbiology and the clinical team appears to have in part been contributed to by a previous cessation of the thrice weekly joint microbiology and critical care ward rounds, which the court heard have not been re-instated; ® That the number of microbiologists at the time of Coral’s admission was limited — a senior Microbiologist told the court her team ought to comprise six microbiologists, but were limited to a maximum of four at the time and that remains the case. e That there was a stark lack of awareness, noticeably amongst senior clinicians, about internal systems in place at the hospital Trust. The court heard about the Cyberlab system, and also a red flag system which the court was told a number of critical care clinicians had previously been unaware of. If clinicians have not received the necessary training in relation to such systems there is a risk they may not recognise potentially relevant information, placing patients at potential risk. | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by Tuesday, 6" July 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: e The Parents of Coral Amy O’Donnell ° Nurse Practitioner ¢ Dr i ce 1am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete, redacted, or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Dated:11/05/2021 Signature RA Sl sec~w Alan Anthony Wilson Senior Coroner Blackpool & Fylde
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: |) ii Clinical Director, NHS Blackpool and NHS Fylde and Wyre Clinical Commissioning Groups, Blackpool Stadium, Seasiders Way, Blackpool, FY1 6JX CORONER lam Alan Anthony Wilson Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made INVESTIGATION and INQUEST The death of Coral Amy O’Donnell on 17** May 2019 was reported to me and | opened an investigation, which concluded by way of an inquest held on 29" April 2021. | determined that the medical cause of Elliot’s death was la Panton valentin leukocidin staphylococcus aureus pneumonia b Influenza A ll Critical care acquired myopathy The conclusion of the Coroner was that Coral died due to natural causes. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The circumstances were set out in box 3 of the Record of Inquest as follows: Coral O’Donnell was regarded as previously healthy but was known to be susceptible to developing skin infections. She had attended a General Practitioner in early November 2018 in relation to an abscess for which she was prescribed antibiotics. On 8th January 2019 Coral was assessed by a nurse having presented with cough and cold like symptoms and after examination was felt to have developed a viral infection. After a deterioration in her condition during 10th January 2019 Coral was admitted to hospital in Blackpool that evening where investigations revealed she was neutropenic and concerns were raised she has severe pneumonia. By the next morning she required intubation and ventilation. Her history of skin infections, a known indicator of a very rare bacterial infection, was not appreciated during the early part of her admission until around 21st January 2019 when a concerning CT scan confirmed that this infection had been seriously damaging Coral’s lungs and in the absence of necessary mediation. Over subsequent weeks Coral’s condition fluctuated but she remained seriously unwell. Despite months of intensive care, she could not be successfully weaned from ventilator support. Her condition began to deteriorate further in early May 2019 before Coral died in the company of her family on 17th May 2019. In addition, | made the following findings: e That Coral’s consultation with a GP, orm. in early November 2018 was conducted in what appears to have been a proportionate manner; e That although an expert witness told the court that the Panton Valentin Leukocidin [PVL] strain of staphylococcus aureus [SA] often follows flu — like symptoms and may affect otherwise healthy young people, | made no criticism of the fact the GP did not know about PVL, particularly having considered the rarity of the condition and the evidence of other experienced doctors seemingly unfamiliar with PVL and by an independent GP who had never heard of it before; e That an independent microbiologist told the court that PVL—SA should be suspected if there is evidence of recurrent abscesses. He added that SA is a common bacterial infection, but the PVL is uncommon. e That although no referral had been made to a dermatologist, no criticism was made of this decision. The conduct of medical professionals who had assessed Coral before her hospital admission had been considered by an independent GP; e However, evidence was received that had such a dermatology referral been made, this may have resulted in the earlier recognition of PVL. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — e Although Staphylococcus aureus is a common bacterial infection, for the PVL strain of that infection to lead to the lung damage suffered by Coral is very rare. Nevertheless, one of the symptoms which may give medical professionals an indication that a patient may be at risk of PVL — SA is a history of skin infections and in otherwise healthy young people. There is clearly a lack of awareness of this condition in both primary and secondary care and in the absence of efforts to highlight this issue, young people such as Coral may continue to be placed at risk. e The court was told that there is a Public Health England publication entitled “Guidance on the diagnosis & management of PVL — associated Staphyloccocus aureus infections”, but amongst medical professionals any awareness of this guidance appears to be limited. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by Tuesday, 6" July 2021. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following interested Persons: e The Parents of Coral Amy O’Donnell ¢ Dr, Medical Director, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Nurse Practitioner Jin Dr GP | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete, redacted, or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Date: 11/05/2021 Signature AL Asan~ Alan Anthony Wilson Senior Coroner Blackpool & Fylde
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
INHS Blackpool Clinical Commissioning Group | Fylde and Wyre Clinical Commissioning Group The Stadium 22 June 2021 Seasiders Way Blackpool Mr A Wilson FY1 6X HM Senior Coroner www. fyldecoastecgs.nhs.uk Blackpool and Fylde Coroner’s Office Municipal Building Corporation Street Blackpool! FY1 1GB Dear Mr Wilson Thank you for asking the CCG to comment on the Regulation 28 report following the untimely death of Coral O'Donnell on the 17" May 2019, as a consequence of an infection caused by Panton Valentine Leukocidin Staphylococcus Aureus (PVL-SA). Your comments express concerns about the lack of awareness of PVL-SA in both primary and secondary care medical colleagues. You quite rightly point out that Public Health England have produced guidance on the diagnosis and management of PVL-SA but, unfortunately, awareness of this guidance is limited amongst medical professionals. Given the implications this poses to the ongoing treatment of patients across the Fylde coast | have already undertaken the following actions: 1. The matter has been discussed at our regular GP teleconference which takes place currently every fortnight to which all GPs across the Fylde Coast are invited. 2. | have arranged for information to also be circulated via our regular CCG bulletin to general practitioners, (sent weekly to all GPs). Our out of hours providers, FCMS are also copied into this bulletin. For your records, a copy of the bulletin is enclosed with this letter. As you will note we have directly referenced the information produced by Public Health England. | have also noted that patient microbiology reports from our colleagues at Blackpool Teaching Hospitals now contain a message to be aware of PVL-SA when a result has revealed a Staphylococcus organism. | trust this information and actions meet with your approval. The CCG would welcome any other comments you may have on the matter. With kind regards. Yours sincerely Executive Clinical Director Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre CCGs
Trust Headquarters Blackpool Victoria Hospital Whinney Heys Road Blackpool Lancashire FY3 8NR 5 July 2021 Mr Alan Anthony Wilson Senior Coroner Blackpool & Fylde PO Box 1066 Corporation Street Blackpool FY1 1GB Your reference: Regulation 28 - Prevention of future deaths Dear Mr Wilson Re: Coral Amy O’Donnell (deceased) – Inquest concluded 29 April 2021 Further to your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths, dated 11 May 2021, in relation to the death of Coral Amy O’Donnell, who sadly died in the company of her family on the intensive care unit of Blackpool Victoria Hospital on 17 May 2019. In my initial response letter, I explained that we would take actions to prevent a similar event from occurring. Below, I detail my responses to the matters of concern you have raised with us and what action we have taken: 1) That when evidence of Staphylococcus Aureus was identified the clinical and microbiology teams did not consider the possibility of Panton Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) Staphylococcus Aureus, despite Coral’s history of skin infections and the severe pneumonia she presented with on admission in a previously young fit woman. Firstly, I must apologise that we failed to consider or identify the possibility of Panton Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) Staphylococcus Aureus for Coral. The details and the outcome have been discussed within the team and department and we are truly sorry for what happened. It is clear from the Serious Incident review that there was a general lack of awareness of this rare and serious strain of Staphylococcus Aureus within the Critical Care Consultant team. The report findings and the need to consider PVL has been shared with all the clinical staff within the department and also discussed at the Morbidity and Mortality RESEARCH MATTERS AND SAVES LIVES - TODAY’S RESEARCH IS TOMORROW’S CARE Blackpool Teaching Hospitals is a Centre of Clinical and Research Excellence providing quality up to date care. We are actively involved in undertaking research to improve treatment of our patients. A member of the healthcare team may discuss current clinical trials with you. review meeting. The learning from this event will also be shared across the division and the wider organisation. Following discussion with the Microbiology team, we have ensured that the Critical Care Consultant team consider PVL Staphylococcus Aureus in all cases where Staphylococcus Aureus is isolated, particularly where the clinical picture supports such a diagnosis. As part of our learning, we have had a very low index for initiating triple therapy where patients’ presentation suggests PVL and this includes commencing Intravenous IgG in several patients. We are now confident that a similar situation in the Intensive Care Unit would not be repeated and that any cases discussed with microbiology where PVL was clinically likely, patients would be commenced on PVL cover from the start; we are now treating non-PVL MRSA/MSSA patients, as well as PVL patients, with extended PVL regimes. 2) That there was a lack of awareness of PVL amongst senior clinicians, despite the fact that a senior Microbiologist from the hospital Trust confirmed that national guidance covering the treatment of such condition was in use at the Trust at the time, but none of the critical care team who gave evidence at the inquest seem to have been aware of that document. Although the court was told this has now been rectified there is a concern that some clinicians are unfamiliar with hospital protocols which may be relevant to their work. We acknowledge that there was a lack of awareness and knowledge with regards to PVL amongst the Critical Care Consultants, for which we apologise. As part of the discussions within the department, the Trust PVL policy has been shared with all the Critical Care Consultants. The importance of this infection has been discussed at the departmental meetings. We can assure you that all the Critical Care Consultants are familiar with the Trust PVL document and we will continue to raise awareness amongst our colleagues and at local induction. 3) That communication between the critical care and microbiology teams was problematic and neither team considered PVL until there was established damage to her lungs identified on a chest x-ray. Senior clinicians had not mentioned a susceptibility to skin infections to the microbiologists which may have resulted in Coral receiving the correct treatment at an early stage of admission. The lack of communication between Microbiology and the clinical team appears to have in part been contributed to by a previous cessation of the thrice weekly joint microbiology and critical care ward rounds, which the court heard have not been re-instated. There are currently no joint ward rounds between the Critical Care Team and the Microbiology team, but there is better day to day communication and discussion at the Antimicrobial Stewardship Committee. At present, the day to day system is via telephone conversations with the Microbiology team, as and when required, plus the Critical Care Consultants will send e-referrals when they require Microbiology advice. However, we acknowledge that this falls short of what is ideal, and this needs to be improved. It has been highlighted that there is an objective to reinstate the three times a week joint ward round with the Consultant Microbiologist and Consultant Intensivist and the discussions to operationalise this are taking place. There are also imminent changes to the consultant staffing model that we believe will further improve matters. 4) That the number of microbiologists at the time of Coral’s admission was limited – a senior Microbiologist told the court her team ought to comprise six microbiologists, but were limited to a maximum of four at the time and that remains the case. The Trust is undertaking a staffing review, which takes into consideration the of role of infection specialists of various categories, not only microbiology trained medics, but also Microbiologists, Infectious Diseases Physicians, PhD grade Antibiotic Pharmacists and Clinical Scientists with or without FRCPAth. 5) That there was a stark lack of awareness, noticeably amongst senior clinicians, about internal systems in place at the hospital Trust. The court heard about the Cyberlab system, and also a red flag system which the court was told a number of critical care clinicians had previously been unaware of. If clinicians have not received the necessary training in relation to such systems there is a risk they may not recognise potentially relevant information, placing patients at potential risk. We can only apologise that it has been highlighted that there was a lack of awareness with regards to the Cyberlab system and this is not acceptable. All Critical Care Consultants have now received the appropriate training relating to the ‘red flag’ system and how to access information. All new Consultants and junior doctors will receive Cyberlab training as part of their Trust induction. We will continue to raise awareness through education and training for all staff working on the unit to ensure that this does not recur. I hope that the above responses provide you with the assurance that we have taken your concerns extremely seriously. We have identified a number of learning opportunities, which we believe will prevent a similar situation from happening again. Yours sincerely, Executive Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.