Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0165, written 20 May 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 20 May 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0165 |
| Deceased | Wilfred Breakell |
| Coroner | Brendan Allen |
| Coroner area | County of Dorset |
| Category | Community health care · Road (Highways Safety) related deaths · Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
20 May 2021 REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Town Hall, Bourne Avenue, Bournemouth Chief Executive, BCP Council, The 1 CORONER I am Brendan J Allen, Acting Area Coroner for The County of Dorset 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST The Coroner's Office for the County of Dorset, Bournemouth Town Hall, Bournemouth, BH2 6DY On 26 May 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Wilfred Roy Breakell. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 12 May 2021. The conclusion of the inquest was Accident 1a Multiple Fractures of Cervical Spine 1b Fall from a Bicycle 1c II 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Wilfred Roy Breakell died at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital on 18th May 2020 from multiple fractures of his cervical spine sustained on 17th May 2020 when he fell into a storm drain at Blackwater Junction, Hurn whilst riding his bicycle. The incident occurred at the northbound exit, which, at the time, had recently been refurbished. There was no barrier between the highway and the storm drain, which is lined with concrete paving slabs. Mr Breakell appears to have fallen into the storm drain and landed on one of the concrete paving slabs, resulting in the significant injuries that led to his death. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) Although there is now wooden fencing that runs from the end of the paved footpath in a northerly direction (adjacent to the pedestrian crossing), there is still no barrier between the highway and the storm drain where there is no paved area; that is, from the start of the exit from the A338 to the paved footpath adjacent to the pedestrian crossing. The evidence I heard at the Inquest from the investigating police officer is that cyclists use the A338 and the Blackwater Junction exit. There remains a risk that if a cyclist left the paved highway for any reason, he or she would be at risk of falling into the storm drain. In addition, if a vehicle lost control at the exit, that vehicle is at risk of leaving the highway and falling into the storm drain. A barrier between the highway and the storm drain would reduce that risk. The Coroner's Office for the County of Dorset, Bournemouth Town Hall, Bournemouth, BH2 6DY 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 15th July 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons; (wife of Mr Breakell) (daughter of Mr Breakell) (daughter of Mr Breakell) (daughter of Mr Breakell) I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 20 May 2021 Signature Brendan J Allen HM Acting Area Coroner for The County of Dorset The Coroner's Office for the County of Dorset, Bournemouth Town Hall, Bournemouth, BH2 6DY
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Transport and Engineering Town Hall Annexe St Stephen’s Road Bournemouth BH2 6EA Mr Brendan J Allen Date 13 July 2021 HM Acting Area Coroner The Coroner’s Office Bournemouth Town Hall Bournemouth BH2 6DY : Dear Mr Allen, Regulation 28 Report – Wilfred Roy Breakell Thank you for your letter of 21 May 2021 and the accompanying Regulation 28 Report, in connection with the Inquest on 12 May 2021 relating to the death of Mr Wilfred Roy Breakell that occurred at the Blackwater Traffic Signal Junction on 17 May 2020. BCP Council has undertaken its own investigation into the circumstances of this unfortunate incident. We have reviewed the audio recording of the Inquest which your offices kindly supplied to us. We have also discussed the findings of the inquest and your Regulation 28 Report with senior officers of BCP Council, and would respond as follows. The incident concerned is not recorded as a fatal road traffic accident on the Dorset Police collision database. It is appreciated that Police reports focus on the cause of the accident rather than the immediate cause of death but these reports hold information which is relevant to the Council’s reporting requirements and I have outlined this below. The Dorset Police Data Team’s view that the cause of Mr Breakell’s fall into the storm drain could not be established. In arriving at this decision the Data Team considered the report of the Police Officer in Charge of investigating the incident who reported that “The working hypothesis was he (Mr Breakell) was taken ill on his bike, has mounted the verge, travelled a short distance before falling into the ditch. All available evidence pointed towards this being a medical episode”. This was based on the ambulance crew’s initial opinion expressed whilst the Police Officer was on the scene that the incident was as a result of a medical episode. The Dorset Police Data Team therefore concluded that while the cause of death was injuries sustained in the fall, the cause of the collision was most likely a medical episode. Therefore this would not fall under the Stats 19 requirements to report the incident to the Department for Transport as a Road Traffic Accident. This means BCP Council are responding to a Regulation 28 Report for an incident which we do not have recorded as a fatal road traffic accident. In addition to this it is not clear in which direction Mr Breakell was travelling before he fell into the ditch. In their statement read out at the Inquest the family of Mr Breakell indicated that he Transport and Engineering Town Hall Annexe, St Stephens Road, Bournemouth BH2 6EA bcpcouncil.gov.uk bcpcouncil.gov.uk Your personal information will be held in compliance with the Data Protection Act 2018 and General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR). For further information about how we use your information, please read our Privacy Notice on our BCP Council website. 2 was most likely negotiating the traffic signal Toucan facility across the mouth of the junction (i.e. cycling from east to west). They further indicated that Mr Breakell then failed to negotiate a 90 degree right turn when reaching the east side of the Toucan crossing, surmising that this was either because the pavement was too narrow here, causing him to end up in the ditch or there was no physical barrier to prevent him from doing so. statement given to the Inquest he reported that there was physical In PC evidence indicating that Mr Breakell may have been riding up the ‘off’ slip road of the A338 Spur Road before leaving the road just short of the paved area of the shared footway/cycleway and then ending up in the storm drain which runs parallel with the off slip road. PC also confirmed that there was evidence of damage to Mr Breakell’s cycle helmet resulting from the crash and no evidence of another person or vehicle being involved in the incident. I am aware that following what happened on the morning of Sunday 17 May 2020 you remain concerned that there is a risk that future deaths will occur, unless action is taken to extend the existing timber post and rail fencing along the slip road to prevent cyclists falling into the storm drain. The A338 Blackwater Junction Improvements were completed in April 2020 and it was a project delivered jointly by Dorset and BCP Councils. The storm drain in question is designed to receive surface water runoff from the slip road through a series of road gullies situated against the kerb line. The scheme involved clearing the storm drain of vegetation and, to prevent surface water runoff from eroding its banks, concrete slabs were placed at intervals along the back of the storm drain, coinciding with each gully location. The engineers involved in delivering the original scheme have indicated that the original design did not include for any fencing at this crossing point adjacent to the ditch. They have stated that following a reported safety concern here, a temporary barrier was initially erected and then a permanent timber post and rail fence was installed. The permanent timber post and rail fencing was completed by the 15 June 2020. BCP Council acknowledges that someone has died here as a result of a tragic accident and would address the Coroner’s concerns and Regulation 28 Report as follows: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) There remains a low risk that a similar event will re-occur at this location. The small level difference from the slip road surfacing down into the ditch is in highway design terms deemed insufficient to require protection in the event of a vehicle leaving the carriageway. If the post and rail fencing is extended, it is as likely to cause injury to occupants of any vehicle that fails to negotiate the bends as to protect them from it. A known cause of injury and death to road users is from vehicles, including motorcycles and cyclists leaving the highway and striking posts, barriers or other obstructions that are not passively safe. There is a risk therefore that a timber barrier here could create an additional safety hazard. The concrete slabs in the storm drain are widely spaced and there is therefore a low risk that anyone would come into contact with them should they leave the road. The ditch runs parallel with the carriageway and is on the inside of the bend. The geometry of the road is such that any vehicle losing control here is more likely to end up on the outside of the bend away from the ditch than end up in the ditch itself. The Council has reached these decisions in the context of a public highway which is a regulated environment and also in the context of professional judgement of experienced and qualified officers. This project was delivered in accordance with the national Standards for Highways including the essential document for the design, construction and maintenance of highways, the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges. We would note that there is now a much improved crossing provision for both cyclists and pedestrians at this junction. This additional timber post and rail fencing would only be recommended if the accident record itself warranted it and there is no evidence of such a trend at the present time. There have been no recorded cyclist injuries here since October 2017. As 3 highlighted above we would be in danger of potentially creating greater numbers of injuries than the measure might prevent were this work to be undertaken. In light of the above, the Council does not believe it is appropriate to introduce additional fencing to the inside of the bend on the slip road. The Council will, however, continue to monitor this site and others like it in conjunction with the police. I trust this is satisfactory but please feel free to contact me should you wish for any further information. Yours sincerely Team Leader Road Safety BCP Council
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.