Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0379, written 9 Nov 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 9 Nov 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0379 |
| Deceased | Mollie Dimmock |
| Coroner | Crispin Butler |
| Coroner area | Buckinghamshire |
| Category | Child Death (from 2015) · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
C.G.BUTLER SENIOR CORONER · BUCKINGHAMSHIRE REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) CORONER I am CRISPIN GILES BUTLER, senior coroner for the coroner area of Buckinghamshire 2 CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) RegIulations 2013 . http://www.legislation.gov/uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/pdfs/uksi/2013/1629/part/7 /made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 3rd July 2020, I commenced an Investigation into the death of Mollie Daisy DIMMOCK, who died at 03 : 11 on 25th June 2020 at Stoke Mandeville Hospital, 34 minutes after being delivered. The Investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 14th October 2021. The medical cause of death was confirmed as: Coroner's Office, 29 Windsor End, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire . HP9 2JJ C.G.BUTLER SENIOR CORONER · BUCKINGHAMSHIRE 1 a Perinatal asphyxia 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Molly's death was confirmed when she was 34 minutes old at 03: 11 on 25th June 2020 at Stoke Mandeville Hospital from perinatal asphyxia due to hypoxia caused by umbilical cord compression from shoulder dystocia which lasted for five minutes before Molly was fully delivered . A narrative conclusion was recorded : Molly was a large for gestation age baby. On the balance of probabilities, comparison between the 20 week and 36 week ultrasound scans demonstrate accelerated fetal growth . Retrospective review of the 36 week scan by the Health Safety Investigation Branch clinical panel considered that the abdominal circumference of Molly was under measured and this led to an under estimation of her fetal weight. Molly's mother was not referred for obstetric consultation following the 36 week scan . The first opportunity for an obstetric discussion with Molly's parents about the risks of delivery came late in labour, early on the morning of delivery. On balance, Molly's parents did not have the understanding that shoulder dystocia was a risk. The option of proceeding straight to a caesarean section was not offered to Molly's parents and consent was procured on the basis of a trial delivery with Kiel land's forceps, only with caesarean section as an option thereafter. Molly's head was delivered at 02 :31 and shoulder dystocia was identified. Molly's body was delivered five minutes thereafter with the umbilical cord wrapped around her neck. Molly was unresponsive, although there was evidence of a heartbeat reported, and, notwithstanding attempts to resuscitate her, she was confirmed to have died 34 minutes after delivery. The risk of shoulder dystocia was heightened by Molly's size. Coroner's Office, 29 Windsor End, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire . HP9 2JJ C.G.BUTLER SENIOR CORONER • BUCKINGHAMSHIRE 5 CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken . In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you . The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows . - NICE Guidance NG121 last updated 25 April 2019 relates to intrapartum care for women with existing medical conditions or obstetric complications and their babies. Within this Guidance, whist there is reference at paragraph 1.17 to guidance in respect mode of birth for large-for-gestational-age babies, there is no definition of a large-for-gestational-age baby in the Guidance. There does not appear to be any national guidance or accepted definition of large for-gestational-age such that application of the Guidance is open to interpretation and variation depending upon an NHS Trust's own policies and guidance, and , in turn, the interpretation of obstetricians and other clinicians advising potential parents in anticipation of delivery modes. It is clear that NG121 is intended to provide guidance in relation to many potential scenarios which may impact upon care and mode of delivery decisions. The uncertainty surrounding when section 1.17 of the Guidance should be relevant arises through the lack of a definition of a large-for-gestational-age baby. Application of section 1.17 of the Guidance includes consideration of shoulder dystocia and options for continuing labour or caesarean section relevant to both the life of the mother and the baby. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN Coroner's Office, 29 Windsor End, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire. HP9 2JJ C.G.BUTLER SENIOR CORONER • BUCKINGHAMSHIRE In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation have the power to take such action . 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 4th January 2022 I, the coroner, may extend the period . Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action . Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed . 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons and other agencies: The Family of Molly Dimmack Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) NHS England (National Maternity Lead) Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of you r response. Coroner's Office, 29 Windsor End, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire. HP9 2JJ C.G.BUTLER SEN IOR CORONER • BUCKINGHAMSHIRE The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form . He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of you r response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 9th November 2021 Crispin Giles Butler, Senior Coroner for Buckinghamshire Coroner's Office, 29 Windsor End, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire . HP9 2JJ
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
2nd Floor 2 Redmond Place London E20 1JQ United Kingdom 4 January 2022 Crispin Butler Coroner’s Office 29 Windsor End Beaconsfield Buckinghamshire HP9 2JJ Dear Mr Butler, I write in response to your regulation 28 report of 9 November 2021 regarding the very sad death of Molly Dimmock. I would like to express my sincerest condolences to her family. In your report you state that, while NICE’s clinical guideline on intrapartum care for women with existing medical conditions or obstetric complications and their babies [NG121] makes recommendations on the mode of birth for large-for-gestational-age babies, as there is no standard definition of large for gestational age, the guidance is open to interpretation and is inconsistently applied. During the development of NG121, the committee acknowledged that there is a lot of uncertainty around the diagnosis of large for gestational age. There is no standardised definition and clinical suspicion of large for gestational age, particularly during labour, is subjective and often inaccurate. While ultrasound estimation of fetal weight is likely to be more accurate, it is difficult to perform accurately during labour. Given this uncertainty the committee felt it was important to give the woman balanced information to support shared decision making. The discussion between healthcare professionals and a woman with a baby suspected of being large for gestational age should focus not only on the potential risk of adverse outcomes for the woman and the baby, but also on the uncertainty around the diagnosis of a large-for-gestational-age baby and what it might mean for the woman and her baby if such problems did occur. We believe that if the guideline were to provide a cut off it would be liable to convey inappropriate certainty, or reassurance if the cut off is not reached. As such, we do not believe that any action is required of NICE. Yours sincerely, Chief executive
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.