Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0157, written 26 May 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 26 May 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0157 |
| Deceased | Dean Crossman |
| Coroner | Jo Wharton |
| Coroner area | Teesside and Hartlepool |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: • • The Chief Executive, NHS England The Chief Officer, NHS Tees Valley CCG 1 CORONER I am Jo Wharton, HM Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Teesside & Hartlepool 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 21 June 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Dean Ryan CROSSMAN aged 51. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest held between 24 and 26 May 2022. The conclusion of the inquest was suicide, the medical cause of death being hanging. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH • On the evening of 17 June 2019, Dean had contacted alluding to the fact he was contemplating suicide. When friends arrived, Dean was standing on the landing with a rope tied around his neck. His friends called the NEAS and when paramedics arrived, they spent nearly two hours with Dean trying to encourage him to attend hospital, but Dean refused. Paramedics contacted the Crisis Team (CT) and stayed with Dean until they arrived. • • Arriving around 3.15am, the CT were initially with Dean for about 90 minutes. Dean presented to the CT as hopeless and was deemed to be at risk of suicide. Dean refused admission to a psychiatric hospital and was not receptive to the help and intervention offered by the CT. The CT left Dean with his friend who agreed he would stay with Dean until 9.30am, when the CT stated they would return to carry out a full assessment. The CT then contacted the Emergency Duty Team (EDT) to request a formal MHA assessment in the community. The AMHP who received such request (around 4.20am), did not progress the MHA assessment, perceiving the following to be issues – the fact she was working alone, potential difficulty identifying a second doctor and potential delay securing a timely response from the private ambulance service (ERS Medical), which she thought in itself could significantly increase the risk to her own safety and Dean’s safety. Thinking it was unlikely that a MHA assessment would take place before the CT’s scheduled 9.30am visit, it was agreed that it be handed to day staff to co-ordinate. • Dean’s friend left him around 5.30am and went home. He left Dean sleeping on a chair in the living room, having removed the rope from the loft hatch. Concerned for Dean’s immediate safety, the CT called the police. The police attended Dean’s home around 6.18am and Dean told them he was not having suicidal thoughts at that time. The police officers removed the rope from Dean’s home and stayed with him until the CT arrived around 6.30am. • Upon assessment, the CT thought Dean’s presentation had changed and that he was no longer at risk of suicide. It was agreed that the CT would visit Dean again at 9.30am to review his mental state and discuss with Dean how they could best support him. Dean said he would engage with them and he was going to have a sleep and then a shower before they returned at 9.30am. The CT left Dean around 6.56am and contacted the EDT to advise that the MHA assessment could be stood down. • When the CT returned at 9.30am on 18 June 2019, sadly Dean was found hanging 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 1. Evidence was given at the inquest that at the time of Dean’s passing, there were issues accessing second (s.12) doctors out of office hours for the purpose of carrying out a MHA assessment, resulting in delays to MHA assessments being carried out. The EDT explained that since Dean’s passing, a “s.12 Solutions” App has been introduced, and although this had made a significant improvement, issues still exist trying to access a second doctor out of hours, as the EDT is still wholly reliant on second doctors making themselves available after midnight (with no fixed rota). 2. Evidence was given at the inquest that at the time of Dean’s passing, there were issues securing the timely attendance of the private ambulance service (ERS Medical) to transport patients after a MHA assessment had taken place, potentially resulting in an increased risk to both the AMHP and the patient for MHA assessments in the community. The EDT advised that since Dean’s passing, despite spot purchasing of private ambulances being introduced, issues still exist trying to get the private ambulance to attend a MHA assessment in a timely manner. 3. Evidence was given at the inquest that both of the above matters of concern are on-going national issues. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by July 21, 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons • Dean’s family • The Emergency Duty Team (under the remit of Stockton on Tees Borough Council) • The Crisis Team (under the remit of Tees Esk & Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust) • The Chief Constable of Cleveland Police I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 26 May 2022 J. Wharton Jo Wharton HM Assistant Coroner for Teesside & Hartlepool
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Jo Wharton
HM Coroner for Teesside & Hartlepool,
The Coroner’s Service,
Middlesbrough Town Hall,
Albert Road,
Middlesbrough,
TS1 2QJ
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
29 September 2022
Dear Ms Wharton
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths - Dean Ryan Crossman
who died on 18 June 2019.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 7 June
2022 concerning the death of Dean Ryan Crossman on 18 June 2019. In advance of
responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my
deep condolences to Dean’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure
the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Dean’s care have been
listened to and reflected upon.
I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to the Repost, and I apologise to
the family for the delay, as I appreciate this will have been an incredibly difficult time
for them.
Following the inquest, you raised concerns in your Report regarding:
1. Evidence was given at the inquest that at the time of Dean’s passing, there were
issues accessing second (s.12) doctors out of office hours for the purpose of
carrying out a Mental Health Act (MHA) assessment, resulting in delays to MHA
assessments being carried out. The Emergency Duty Team (EDT) explained that
since Dean’s passing, a “s.12 Solutions” App has been introduced, and although
this had made a significant improvement, issues still exist trying to access a second
doctor out of hours, as the EDT is still wholly reliant on second doctors making
themselves available after midnight (with no fixed rota).
2. Evidence was given at the inquest that at the time of Dean’s passing, there were
issues securing the timely attendance of the private ambulance service (ERS
Medical) to transport patients after a MHA assessment had taken place, potentially
resulting in an increased risk to both the Approved Mental Health Professional
(AMHP) and the patient for MHA assessments in the community. The EDT advised
that since Dean’s passing, despite spot purchasing of private ambulances being
introduced, issues still exist trying to get the private ambulance to attend a MHA
assessment in a timely manner.
3. Evidence was given at the inquest that both of the above matters of concern are
on-going national issues.
It is critical that when a MHA assessment is required it is undertaken in a timely
manner. The issues regarding availability of s.12 doctors are widely recognised and,
as a result, the Independent MHA Review (2018) recommended that the Government
review and address the factors that affect the timely availability of these clinicians.
Section 12 doctors are approved by the Secretary of State under section 12(2) Mental
Health Act 1983 and, in recognition of the national staffing issue, the Government
confirmed in the White Paper, ‘Reforming the Mental Health Act' (August 2021), that it
has commissioned research to explore the factors promoting and inhibiting the
accessibility of s.12 approved doctors to participate in MHA assessments in England
and Wales.
The Department of Health and Social Care commissioned the National Institute for
Health and Care Research (NIHR) to carry out a study of the reasons for and nature
of reported difficulties in accessing s.12 doctors for MHA assessments. The NIHR
published the outcome of their study in September 2021 in the report “The availability
of section 12 doctors for Mental Health Act assessments: Interview perceptions and
analysis of the national MHA Approvals Register Database”. A link the report is : here
The study had two main findings:
• Firstly, the main problem is the availability of s.12 doctors, rather than overall
numbers. This suggests a need to focus on encouraging psychiatrists and other
s.12 doctors to make themselves more available for doing MHA assessments.
• Secondly, there is currently no real way to tell how many s.12 doctors are
needed without better information about the numbers of MHA assessments
attended by different doctors, in what circumstances.
The Department is working with regional approval panels to increase the number of
s.12 doctors and consider what more can be done to improve availability, alongside
the Mental Health Act reforms.
that bring
Integrated care systems (ICSs) are partnerships
together NHS
organisations, local authorities and others to take collective responsibility for planning
services, improving health and reducing inequalities across geographical areas. Each
local system has responsibility to ensure that the section 12 rota for their area is
adequately managed, to ensure 24/7 availability of s.12 doctors. NHS England
recognise that, while doctors may indicate their availability for certain times and days
on local rotas, this does not obligate them to accept a request to attend and undertake
a MHA assessment. The National NHS England Mental Health Team will review this
issue via our regional NHSE teams to understand if there are any local areas where
this is a particular concern, and if there is anything further that can be done nationally
to help mitigate the issues. This may include sharing and promoting best practice
approaches from areas that are successfully ensuring s.12 doctor availability,
including after midnight / out of hours.
It is also critical that appropriate transportation is commissioned and is available to
transport someone to the appropriate setting, to meet their needs in a timely manner.
This is particularly important after a MHA assessment has taken place, and is the
responsibility of Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) who commission services for their
footprint. Integrated Care Boards replaced Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) as
the statutory NHS organisation which is responsible for developing a plan for
meeting the health needs of the population, managing the NHS budget and arranging
for the provision of health services in a geographical area.
In recognition of the significant role the ambulance service plays in responding to
mental health calls, the NHS Long Term Plan, published in January 2019, stated that
“Ambulance staff will be trained and equipped to respond effectively to people in a
crisis”, alongside a programme of investment (£70 million by 2023/24) to improve the
capacity of ambulance services to respond to urgent and emergency mental health
needs.
There are three key strands to the NHS Long Term Plan work programme on
improving the mental health response of ambulance services:
1. funding of mental health nurses and other mental health professionals working
alongside colleagues in integrated urgent care clinical assessment services (CAS)
and ambulance emergency operation centres (EOC) and providing on-the-scene
response;
2. training for ambulance staff to improve skills and competencies in relation to
supporting patients with mental health needs; and
3. capital funding for dedicated mental health response vehicles to increase
capacity to respond in a more timely manner, in a more suitable vehicle. A vehicle
specification has been developed with patients, clinicians and fleet experts.
One of the aims of the Long Term Plan ambition is to provide timely assessment
from trained mental health staff. For patients detained under Section 136 of the
Mental Health Act, ambulance services have committed to an average 30-minute
response and this is reflected within ambulance quality indicators (AQIs).
The NHS England Ambulance Quality Indicators (AQIs) were first introduced in
2011 to drive strong performance and identify areas for improvement across the
sector. The data includes, for example, call answer and response times, and
clinical outcomes of patients treated by the ambulance services for a number of
presentations.
The AQI system indicators specification has recently been updated (and will
apply to data from 1 October 2022) to support improvement in mental health
response, and advises that services should aim to achieve the measure of a
mean (average) Section 136 response time of 30 minutes or less.
As set out above, this investment is largely intended to support emergency response
and conveyance but, where appropriate locally, it may also help to alleviate pressure
on critical transportation requirements after planned MHA assessments, as in this
case.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHSE work taking place
around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by a
Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors and other
clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings
and insights around events, such as the sad death of Dean Crossman, are shared
across the NHS at both a national and regional level, and helps us to pay close
attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.