Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Glenn Barton

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0084, written 30 Aug 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report30 Aug 2022
Reference2023-0084
DeceasedGlenn Barton
CoronerSamantha Marsh
Coroner areaSomerset
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 
2nd Floor, 2 Redman Place 
London 
E20 1JQ 

nice@nice.org.uk 

1  CORONER 

I am Samantha Marsh, Acting senior Coroner for the coroner area of Somerset 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 26th August 2020 the then-Senior Coroner, Mr Tony Williams, 
commenced an investigation into the death of Glenn Barton, aged 71.   

The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest, heard before me, on the 
16th August 2022.  
The conclusion of the inquest was Accidental death, including medical cause of 
death being  
Ia) Traumatic subdural haematoma  
II)  Myelodysplasia (Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukaemia) 

With a finding in box 3 that: 
On the 19th August 2020, Glen BARTON tripped on garden steps at his home 
address consequently falling and striking his head on the door of the garage. 
Glen had an existing diagnosis of myelodysplasia (chronic myelomonocytic 
leukaemia).  This meant he had a low platelet count which is a form of blood 
clotting disorder. 

The day after this fall, on the 20th August 2020 Glen drove himself to the Minor 
Injuries Unit at Bridgwater hospital where he was triaged by a trainee 
emergency nurse practitioner and assessed by an emergency care practitioner 
in accordance with NICE guidelines. As part of this assessment there was a 
telephone discussion with a staff grade clinician at Musgrove Park Hospital. 
Glen was then discharged home with written and verbal head injury advice as at 
that time he did not present with any clinical features that would indicate a CT 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 scan was required. 
It was not appreciated at the time of triage nor assessment that a diagnosis of 
leukaemia may have increased Glen’s risk of suffering a significant intracranial 
bleed following a relatively minor head trauma and the operative clinical 
guidance was ambiguous on whether a CT scan would be required. 

On the 21st August 2022 Glen developed severe headaches and vomiting 
following his fall 2 days previously. He attended Musgrove Park Hospital 
Emergency Department where a CT scan was requested.  This was not 
performed until 21:50 due to other patients presenting with a more urgent 
clinical need. There was no record of any neurological observations but nursing 
staff became concerned about his cognitive abilities.  The CT scan revealed a 
catastrophic subdural haematoma which was unsurvivable.  Glen was not a 
candidate for surgical intervention.  He died on the Twenty-second of August 
2020 as a result of the subdural haematoma  sustained at the time of the 
original fall.  There has been no evidence that an earlier scan would have 
changed the tragic outcome. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Glenn had his left arm amputated when he was 17, back in 1966. He was 
diagnosed with myelodysplasia (chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia) on the 31st 
December 2019, following a bone marrow biopsy. 
On the 19th August 2020 Glenn suffered a mechanical fall up some garden steps 
at his home.  Due to only having one arm he wasn’t able to fully break his fall, 
hitting his head on the garage side door and sustaining a graze on his head. He 
didn’t lose consciousness.  He elected not to seek medical attention on the day. 
The following day, 20th August 2020, he attended the Minor Injuries Unit (“MIU”) 
at Bridgwater Community Hospital where the underwent a full and thorough 
triage at 11.03 by a trainee emergency nurse practitioner who noted his 
diagnosis of leukaemia.  This took place 4 minutes after his arrival. 
He was then assessed by an emergency care practitioner (“ECP”) 20 minutes 
later who, again, conducted a full and comprehensive neurological assessment.  
The ECP contacted a Senior Doctor at Musgrove Park Hospital to discuss 
Glenn, given his diagnosis of Leukaemia. The consensus of medical opinion at 
the time was that in the absence of any clinical features and/or concerns within 
the neurological assessment, then Glenn was suitable to be discharged home 
with appropriate head injury advice. 
At 18:27 on the 21st August 2020 Glenn attended the Emergency Department at 
Musgrove Park Hospital with a headache.  This is the first time he had 
experienced that symptom since his fall two days previously.  A CT scan was 
organised which revealed a major brain haemorrhage. Discussions with had 
with the Neurological Department at Southmead Hospital and Glenn was not a 
surgical candidate.  He died the following day. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless 
action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  
During the course of the Inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise a 
concern.  In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless 
action is taken.  In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

NICE Guidance (Head Injury: assessment and early management published 
January 2014) states at para 1.4.12 that only patients who are on anticoagulant 
treatment should be offered/given a CT scan following a head injury with no 
other symptoms of concern (i.e. no loss of conscious, vomiting and no reduced 
CGS). It was clear from the evidence that there are other naturally occurring 
conditions, such as leukaemia, which can affect the ability of a patient’s blood to 
clot and so it would place such patients in the same potential risk category as 
those on anticoagulants, yet it is clear that a distinction is made.   
Consequently I am concerned that the guidance (that for the avoidance of doubt 
was followed during Glenn’s treatment) is ambiguous for such patients in terms 
of triage and a treatment/investigatory path meaning that there may be missed 
opportunities to CT scan patients in the future. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
your organisation has the power to take such action.  

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 18th October 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is 
proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons: 

(i) 
(ii)  Somerset Foundation Trust 
who may find it useful or of interest. 

 (Glenn’s wife); and 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner 
and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.   

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may 
find it useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest.  

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, 
about the release or the publication of your response. 

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 9 

30th August 2022                                             

4

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Nice (PDF)
2nd Floor 
2 Redman Place 
London 
E20 1JQ 
United Kingdom 

6 March 2023 

Samantha Marsh 
Senior Coroner 
Coroner’s Office 
Old Municipal Building 
Corporation Street 
Taunton 
TA1 4AQ 

Dear Ms Marsh, 

I write in response to your regulation 28 report of 30 August 2022 regarding the very 
sad death of Mr Glenn Barton. I would like to express my sincere condolences to Mr 
Barton’s family.  

We have reflected on the circumstances surrounding Mr Barton’s death, and the 
concerns raised in your report. 

We are currently finalising an update of our guideline on head injury [CG176].  As 
part of this, we did update our review of the risks of serious outcomes in people with 
head injuries and a history of coagulopathies. The guideline committee did not find 
convincing evidence that this should be an indication for a head CT in the absence of 
other signs and symptoms, with the exception of someone taking oral anticoagulants 
or antiplatelets, so have not added this to recommendation 1.4.12.  

A history of bleeding or clotting disorders remains in recommendation 1.4.8 as a risk 
marker in people who have some loss of consciousness or amnesia. 

Recommendations 1.3.1 to 1.3.12 describe assessment in the emergency 
department. 1.3.3 and 1.3.6 explain what factors should be checked for, and points 
to all the factors described elsewhere, including in 1.4.8.  It is therefore clear in the 
guideline that checking for “any history of bleeding or clotting disorders” is part of the 
assessment of people with a head injury. 

As we develop guidance, we identify gaps and uncertainties in the evidence base 
which could benefit from further research. The most important unanswered questions 
are developed into research recommendations. The committee has made a research 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 recommendation on the risks associated with a history of bleeding or clotting 
disorders, and NICE will keep this area under review to check for the need for further 
updates. 

Please do let me know if you require any further information. 

Yours sincerely, 

Chief executive 

                                                                                                                                 Page | 2

Related reports

Other reports by Samantha Marsh

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.