Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Jacqueline Potter

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0200, written 24 Apr 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report24 Apr 2025
Reference2025-0200
DeceasedJacqueline Potter
CoronerSamantha Marsh
Coroner areaSomerset
CategoryMental Health related deaths · Suicide (from 2015)
Organisation namedSomerset NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published4

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Part 1 

1.  Somerset Foundation Trust of Trust Management Office, Level 1, Yeovil 

District Hospital, Yeovil BA21 4AT 

Part 2 

      1.    Somerset Foundation Trust 

2.  Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of 10-18 Union St, 

London SE1 1GH   

3.  Royal College of General Practitioners of 30 Euston Square, London 

NW1 2FB 

4.  NHS England of Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London SE1 

8UG 

5.  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2nd Floor Redmond 

Place, London E20 1JQ 

1 

CORONER 

I am Samantha Marsh, Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Somerset 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 
2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 6th December 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Jacqueline 
Anne Potter, aged 54, (known as “Anne”).  
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 10th March 2025.   
The conclusion of the jury inquest was a short form conclusion of Suicide in box 4. 

The Jury’s answer to ‘when, where and how’ was recorded in box 3 of the Record of 
Inquest as follows: 

“Anne was a 54 year old menopausal woman experiencing a number of stresses in 
her life.  The menopause contributed to her mental health decline and exacerbated 
her underlying anxiety. 
On the 27th September 2002, Anne took an overdose of paracetamol.   She was taken 
to Yeovil District Hospital where she received treatment.  She then received daily 
community mental health support. 
After found wandering in traffic and absconding from her home, on the 20th October 
2022, she agreed to a voluntary admission to Rowan Ward.  She was then detained 
on a section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act. On the 21st October 2022 this was 
upgraded to a section 2 detention. 
On the 24th October 2022, she was granted her first Section 17 Leave.  On the 31st 
October 2022, on a walk with a Health Care Assistant, Anne attempted to run into the 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 road. On the 16th November 2022, due to a number of incidents and no possible 
community support options, she was upgraded to a Section 3 detention. 
During her review on the 29th November 2022, Anne was authorised for Section 17 
Leave for an overnight stay at home on the 4th December 2022.  On the 3rd December 
2022 she had a day with her family in Bristol.  On the morning of the 4th December 
2022, following staff assessment of Anne, the overnight leave was granted.  Anne’s 
family did not receive appropriate information to assist them in keeping Anne safe for 
an overnight stay. 
She went home on the 4th December 2022 and in the morning of the Fifth December 
2022 Anne used a key to open the back door, took a car key and drove away.  Anne 
was driving on the Eastbound carriageway of the A303 and at 07:48 she deliberately 
drove into the path of a HGV tank lorry on the opposite carriageway.” 

The medical cause of death was recorded as: 
Ia)  Multiple traumatic injuries 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Anne first presented to her GP in 2008.  During this year she had three separate 
appointments relating to underlying anxiety and being unable to cope. There was no 
secondary mental health service involvement, nor was there any prescription of anti-
depressants at this time. 
Anne presented to the GP again in 2014, so six years later.  Her presentation at this 
time was felt by the GP to be a grief/bereavement reaction. 

From early 2017 up to the end of 2019 there were five separate consultations for 
gynaecological and/or gastroenterological presentations but despite secondary 
investigations, no underlying physiological cause was found and the GP felt that there 
was a high possibility that her tummy and bowel issues were related to her underlying 
anxiety. 

On the 18th December 2020, Anne had her first significant consultation about mental 
health symptoms.  She was extremely anxious and low in mood and stressed with life 
in general. 
On the 11th January 2021 Anne was emotionally fragile, anxious and stressed.  This 
was the first consultation at which menopause (or perimenopause) was mentioned. 
Given her presentation it would appear that her underling anxiety had been slowly 
building; possibly since 2008 but much more so since 2017.  Anne started taking 
Sertraline in February 2021 (she was prescribed this in the January but was too 
anxious about side effects to start taking it).  She was also started on HRT. 

By the end of May 2021 her symptoms appeared to be under control but it was 
impossibly to know if this was the Sertraline, the HRT or a combination of both. In July 
of 2021, following consultation with her GP, the dose of Sertraline was titrated down 
so that by the Autumn of 2021 she had stopped taking this medication altogether. 

In early September 2022, Anne’s presentation declined again and she agreed to re-
start Sertraline. On the 27th September 2022 Anne was at home with her husband 
 tablets. This was the first time 
when she informed him she’d taken 
Anne had done anything like this before and it was very much the start of her acute 
decline. After discharge from hospital she was seen daily by the mental health team, 
and declined an admission. 

On the 20th October 2022, Anne did agree to a voluntary admission to an acute 
psychiatric unit.  This was after she had been returned home by the police who 
responded to a member of the public who had called in after finding her wandering in 
traffic. Anne was detained under section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act.  She remained 
detained up till the date of her death; being placed on a Section 2 detention and this 
was upgraded to a Section 3 detention on the 16th November 2022. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Anne had a devoted and supportive husband and family, who were keen to be 
involved in her care and recovery; so much so that Anne started taking section 17 
leave from the 24th October 2022 (3 days after she was detained).  She would take 
escorted leave with either the staff or her husband in the local area for a couple of 
hours (gradually increasing to up to 6 hours at a time). 

On the 31st October 2022 whilst out with staff Anne ran into the road and was pulled 
back by the Health Care Assistant.  It was never established what Anne was actually 
trying to do on this occasion; whether she was trying to harm herself or whether she 
was simply trying to avoid going back to the ward as she did not like the ward 
environment and had said that she would rather be at home with her husband.  She 
remained on the ward without leave for three days after this incident. 

On the 29th November 2022 an MDT (Multi Disciplinary Meeting) took place. At this 
meeting section 17 overnight leave was authorised for the 4th December 2022 on the 
basis that there had been no incidents of risky behaviour and/or absconding (with the 
exception of the 31st October 2022) and since that incident leave between the 4th and 
29th November 2022 had gone ‘well’. Both Anne and her husband were keen for 
overnight leave and it was felt entirely appropriate to support this wish as part of her 
recovery. 

Anne went out for 6 hours on the 3rd December 2022 to a Christmas market in Bristol 
with her husband. This leave went well and without incident.  Anne appeared brighter; 
she was showing future planning with her family for the forthcoming Christmas period 
and was commenting on finding pleasure and enjoyment in things again (the mental 
health team highlighted her enjoyment at watching Strictly Come Dancing which whilst 
small, highlighted a departure from her previous anhedonia). 

Anne was assessed by a mental health nurse prior to her overnight leave on the 4th 
December 2022.  There were no concerning or alarming features or presentation that 
would have given the nurse (or the entire mental health team involved in her care) any 
clinical reason to withhold her planned leave.  The entire treating team were all very 
clear that there was no reason to not “let her out” that day. Her husband came to 
collect her at just after 10am that morning.  He was not given any formal or codified 
‘Risk Assessment’ document, but he had been very heavily involved in his wife’s care 
and treatment every step of the way and so the evidence was clear; even if he had 
been given such a document it would not have contained any information or details 
that wasn’t already within his knowledge. 

Overnight the leave appeared to go well.  Anne’s husband had locked the doors and 
windows and hidden those keys in a desk drawer.  He did not hide the car keys as he 
did not think for one minute that his wife would take the car.  That morning Anne 
found the back door key in the desk drawer and took the car.  She was seen driving 
erratically by multiple other road users who were travelling eastbound on the A303 
that morning. At around 07:48 Anne drove her car into the path of a fully laden HGV 
tanker travelling on the westbound carriageway.  There was nothing the tanker driver 
could have done to avoid the collision.  Anne died instantly of multiple traumatic 
injuries. 

It came to light after Anne’s death that she had been using her own personal device 
(mobile or tablet) to access websites pertaining to self harm.  It is unknown whether 
she had accessed the psychiatric unit’s wifi or whether she had made searches using 
her own personal data from her phone provider contract. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In 
the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

Part 1 

(1)  Anne was not sent home for her first overnight leave with any codified ‘Risk’ and 
‘Safety Planning’ document. Whilst it was widely accepted in this case that Anne’s 
husband was well versed and knowledgeable about his wife’s risks and the measures 
that might be necessary to help keep her safe whilst she was at home, not all families 
are as involved in their loved one’s psychiatric care, despite the Trust following the 
Triangle of Care principles.  
Whilst families are not mental health practitioners and are not expected to adopt that 
role within the community there appears to be an opportunity to supply families with a 
short, codified document dealing with salient points of risks and safety planning when 
a patient goes for their first overnight leave since being detained.  This may equip 
families with the knowledge to spot signs of declining mental presentation and/or risk 
and provide them with the knowledge and/or tools to take appropriate steps to assist 
in safeguarding their loved ones whilst they are in the community. 
This concern (and any action deemed appropriate by the recipients of this PFD) is not 
intended to override autonomy of the patient and their own ability/responsibility to 
keep themselves safe, but the concern centres around their being an opportunity to 
assist families in spotting early warning signs that ‘something is wrong’ and to seek 
help and intervention (if/when appropriate) to minimise the risk of a patient taking their 
own life whilst in the community. 

(2) It transpired during the Inquest that if an in-patient (detained or voluntary) 
accesses the secure unit Wi-Fi there are no algorithms or ‘search detection features’ 
to prevent access to websites pertaining to self harm and so these can be readily 
accessed by a group who are already vulnerable due to their acute mental health 
presentation with some element of inherent risk of suicide.  It was noted, quite rightly, 
by legal representatives that workplace organisations can block access to certain 
sites they deem it undesirable for their workforce to access (such as sites relating to 
gambling, sexually inappropriate content etc) which shows that it is possible to limit 
access to certain websites and content when using a Wi-Fi provider.  By allowing an 
already vulnerable group to have unfettered access to websites dedicated to self 
harm creates a risk of further deaths. 

Part 2 

(3) I am (and remain, having previously issued a PFD in a similar vain on the 26th 
June 2024) concerned about the lack of ‘importance’ given to menopausal care 
available to women on the NHS; especially when compared to private sector meaning 
that women who are not fortunate enough to be able to access private clinics and 
facilities may not be able to access the services and expertise they need at a very 
crucial transitional phase in their lives. Menopause is not a lifestyle choice, it is an 
unavoidable part of a woman’s natural biological cycle.  Without wishing to introduce 
sweeping generalisations, menopause is likely to affect 50% of the population at 
some point in their lives [according to Statistics Times, women made up 50.75% of 
the UK population in 2024]. 

I am concerned that: 

(i) 

Certain elements of medicine and clinical practice training are compulsory 
but having heard evidence at the Inquest around mandatory and statutory 

4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 training modules I learnt that this covers areas such as GDPR training 
and disposal of sharp objects such as syringes. I was surprised to learn 
that menopausal training is not mandatory in any area of clinical practice 
or specialism.  I am concerned that there is no requirement to undertake 
essential compulsory menopausal training for those working in ‘relevant’ 
clinical practices such as Mental Health Practice, Obstetrics and 
Gynaecology and Oncology, or even general as a general GP. 

(ii) 

I was told that the Trust has just one ‘menopause specialist’ (a GP) who 
covers the entire Trust operations. Not all GP surgeries have a 
menopause specialist practitioner (or access to one) despite a GP usually 
being the first port of call for women in the community when seeking 
primary care. Those GP Surgeries who do have a practitioner who acts 
as a ‘specialist’ is often a GP with a personal interest who has taken the 
initiative to go on courses and broaden their learning and understanding, 
rather than any mandatory requirement for a Surgery [or group with 
multiple surgeries] to have an available community ‘front-line’ specialist.  

I was told that the Trust does not have an “expert” in this field and it would 
be difficult to have one as menopause isn’t a disease or an illness.  Whilst 
I do not dispute that is it not a disease, menopause is a condition; it 
does have symptoms and it does have recognised presentations, yet 
there appears to be a failure to recognise this condition as having equal 
importance to other ailments or diagnoses.  

I was told during a previous PFD Response relating to menopausal 
knowledge and care within the NHS that “It is important to ensure that 
women understand common symptoms such as anxiety, stress and 
depression which they might experience during the menopause and 
where and when to seek help.  The NHS website has resources….”  This 
emphasises my concerns entirely; the lack of importance given to 
menopausal symptoms.  If someone has concerns about heart disease, a 
worrying lump, a broken bone etc they expect to be able to consult a 
medically qualified professional who has a knowledge and understanding 
of their condition or presentation and can diagnose and treat accordingly; 
not just [and I paraphrase] ‘have a look at a website to help’. 

I appreciate that each and every woman will experience perimenopause 
and menopause differently, their individual experience is unique to them 
and this, to some degree, creates difficulties as a ‘one size fits all’ 
approach (which is perhaps achievable in other medical specialisms and 
disciplines) cannot be offered, but the lack of recognition of the 
importance of this condition remains a significant concern. I had 
previously been told (back in a 2024 PFD response) of a roll-out of 
specialist menopausal care and upskilling of GPs but there was little 
evidence during the inquest that this has happened/is happening and 
women continue to approach and navigate the menopause without the 
support of expert clinicians or practitioners who understand and can treat 
the symptoms they are experiencing. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and/or 
your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

5 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 19th June 2025.   I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting 
out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons: 
(i) 

Anne’s family 

I have also sent it to the following who may find it useful or of interest. 

•  The Menopause Charity 
•  The British Menopause Society 
•  Balance, Menopause 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.   

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it 
useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it 
useful or of interest.  

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, 
about the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

24th April 2025                                                       

6

Responses

4 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England (PDF)
Ms Samantha Marsh  
HM Senior Coroner  
Somerset Coroner’s Court  
Old Municipal Buildings  
Corportation Street  
Taunton  
Somerset  
TA1 4AQ 

Dear Ms Marsh, 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

5 June 2025 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Jacqueline Anne Potter 
who died on 5 December 2022.  

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 24 April 
2025 concerning the death of Jacqueline Anne Potter (known as Anne) on 5 December 
2022. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would 
like to express my deep condolences to Anne’s family and loved ones. NHS England 
are keen to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Anne’s 
care have been listened to and reflected upon.   

Your Report raises concerns around the importance of providing families with the tools 
and knowledge to assist in safeguarding loved ones with mental health illness when 
they  are  in  the  community,  along  with  the  perceived  lack  of  importance  given  to 
menopausal care available to women on the NHS. This response focuses on the issue 
of menopausal care and the areas which are within NHS England’s remit. 

Menopause and perimenopause are increasingly recognised as a time that can, but 
not always, cause considerable distress to a woman. We have seen a rapid increase 
in demand for menopause care in recent years, as a result of more media attention. 
Whilst  women  receive  high  quality  NHS  menopause  care  in  many  areas,  it  is  also 
acknowledged that variation across services locally / regionally remains.  

Many women who are experiencing menopause symptoms attend their GP for help 
and advice. Menopause care is part of the core curriculum for General Practice, which 
is the basis of training for all GPs in order to qualify. The GP curriculum: Clinical topic 
guides highlights menopause care as a requirement, which has more recently been 
updated to emphasise a changing landscape in the management of menopause, the 
need to be aware of the mental distress experienced by some women in this period, 
and being up to date on all evidence-based treatment options. Improving awareness 
of mental health symptoms during menopause will help GPs to consider this as one of 
the causes, and to provide appropriate advice and treatment options.  

Practice nurses also have a significant role in menopause care and are often the first 
port of call for someone experiencing difficulties, or who may have the opportunity to 
proactively enquire about the menopause. In 2024, NHS England published specific 

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Menopause  Educational  resources  to  enhance  learning  for  practice  nurses.  As  the 
demand for menopause care has risen in recent years, some GPs and practice nurses 
seek  further  qualifications  in  more  specialist  care  such  as  the  training  programme 
offered by the British Menopause Society. Many GP practices will now have at least 
one member of staff who is able to offer more complex menopause care. Whilst this 
may  not  be  available  at  every  GP  practice  in  England,  in  many  practices,  and 
increasingly, there is a lead person who is able to offer this.  

There is often variation between GPs and practices in the level of complexity of care 
they are able to provide. Women’s Health Hubs were piloted in 2023/2024, seeking to 
reduce  the  variations  in  reproductive  healthcare  which  women  reported  receiving. 
They  provide  the  option  for  women  to  be  referred  to  more  specialist  reproductive 
health  care  (including  menopause  care)  if  the  GP  needs  further  advice.  Women’s 
Health Hubs have yet to achieve full coverage, but have the potential to fill the gap in 
care where this is more complex. NHS England is working closely with its regions and 
Integrated  Care  Boards  (ICBs)  to  ensure  that  every  woman  can  access  good 
menopause care wherever they are in the country.  

Working in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) alongside mental health practitioners, GPs 
and menopause specialists are an essential part of good menopause care and are a 
key element of a future neighbourhood model of care, which will help to ensure that a 
range of professionals are involved in the most complex cases.  

A toolkit that supports local areas to provide menopause information events and group 
consultations is under development to improve access and also to provide a forum for 
learning for other healthcare professionals. NHS England is working on menopause 
workforce support packages for employees and employers and developing a range of 
tools to upskill, including two e-learning packages (Menopause Awareness – elearning 
for  healthcare and  Menopause and people professionals  eLearning  for  healthcare), 
decision support tools and a self-care factsheet to empower women to understand and 
self-manage  their  perimenopause  and  menopause  symptoms,  and  to  point  them 
towards further sources of credible information.  

Whilst I acknowledge the Coroner’s comments regarding menopause resources and 
use of the NHS website, appreciating that online resources do not compare to patient 
consultations with a medically qualified professional, the menopause page on the NHS 
website  has  also  recently  been  updated  to  include  the  most  up-to-date,  evidence-
based information on menopause. This includes information about symptoms, where 
to seek treatment, lifestyle changes that may help with symptoms, and signposting to 
other helpful resources.  

NHS England’s StatMand Reform programme is leading work to optimise, rationalise 
and redesign statutory and mandatory training during 2025/26 in partnership with the 
Department  of  Health  and  Social  Care,  Health  Services  Safety  Investigations  Body 
(HSSIB) and NHS Resolution. There are three levels of mandatory training: 

1.  Nationally mandated – typically associated with statutory obligations, largely 
summarised  in  the  Core  Skills  Training  Framework  or  in  other  policy.  This 
includes training on subjects such as the General Data Protection Regulation 
(GDPR)  and  handling of  sharp  objects,  amongst  many  other things.  It  is this 

 
 
 
 
 
  
 nationally mandated training that NHS England is currently reforming (as stated 
above).  

2.  Locally mandated – each employing organisation will determine what should 
be mandated to all or most of their staff to meet priorities and patient needs. 
This training varies between organisations, with some similarities.  

3.  Profession or role specific mandated – this is determined by the respective 
professions and royal colleges and will form part of standards for professional 
development and curriculum for future trainees.  

The potential for menopause training to be mandated has been raised as part of the 
NHS  England  reform  work,  which  is  yet  to  conclude  it’s  work.  It  is  likely  that 
menopause training would most appropriately fit at a professional/role specific level 
and we expect to engage with profession leads and royal colleges in due course to 
consider this, alongside a number of similar topics, once the reform of the nationally 
mandated training has concluded.  

In addition, the Technology Enhanced Learning (Workforce, Education and Training 
directorate (WTE)) team at NHS England manage and host training on the e-lfh hub 
and  Learning  Hub  platforms.  National  WTE  colleagues  work  directly  with  subject 
matter experts within professional bodies and the NHS to design, develop and deliver 
e-learning training sessions/modules. They also work within defined medical training 
curriculums, as defined by the professional bodies and NHS England, and design and 
develop relevant e-learning sessions.  

Menopause  related  online  training  available  at  the  time  of  Anne’s  death  in  2022 
included training within the General Practice 2012 Curriculum (e-GP) programme. The 
e-GP  Programme  provides  a  programme of  e-learning modules  covering  the  Royal 
College  of  General  Practitioners  (RCGP)  curriculum.  The  programme  has  been 
designed to:  

1.  Facilitate the delivery of the RCGP curriculum at national, local and individual 

learner levels. 

2.  Provide  relevant,  comprehensive  and  accessible  learning  content  for  GPs 

working in the UK. 

3.  Embody adult learning principles and support a blended approach to learning.  
4.  Support postgraduate doctors in training to become GPs.  
5.  Support GPs in Continual Professional Development (CPD) and revalidation. 

The  e-learning  modules  which  are  part  of  this  programme  include  ‘What  is  the 
Menopause’,  ‘Managing  the  Menopause’,  ‘Hormone  Replacement  Therapy  (HRT)’ 
and ‘Premature Menopause’. 

Other menopause related online training includes:  

•  The  Sexual  and  Reproductive  Health  (E-SRH)  programme,  developed  in 
partnership with the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH). 
The programme supports a range of healthcare professionals and compliments 
the redesigned FSRH Diploma (DFSRH) as well as other FSRH qualifications.  

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 In recent years, the NHS England National Menopause programme has also launched 
a  series  of  awareness  sessions,  including  the  ‘Menopause  awareness’  and 
‘Menopause and people professionals’ e-learning packages referenced earlier on in 
this response, as well as e-learning on ‘Menopause and occupational health’. 

NHS England notes that some of the above training became available following Anne’s 
death,  but  hopes  that  this  provides  some  reassurance  to  the  Coroner  and  Anne’s 
family  that  additional  resources  have  since  been  made  available  to  healthcare 
practitioners and further improvements have been made to menopause care, training 
and resources.  

Anne’s tragic death has highlighted important gaps in the care of women experiencing 
perimenopause or menopause and the potential for improvements. NHS England will 
continue to promote high quality and equitable coverage of menopause care for all.  

I  would  also  like  to  provide  further  assurances  on  the  national  NHS  England  work 
taking  place around  the  Reports  to  Prevent Future  Deaths.  All  reports  received  are 
discussed  by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical 
Directors,  and  other  clinical  and  quality  colleagues  from  across  the  regions.  This 
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Anne, 
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay 
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.   

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.  

Yours sincerely,  

Co-National Medical Director  
(Secondary Care)
Response from Nice (PDF)
2nd Floor 
2 Redman Place 
London 
E20 1JQ 
United Kingdom 

10 June 2025 

Samantha Marsh  

Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Somerset 

Sent via email: 

Our reference: 

Dear Ms Marsh,    

Re: Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report in respect of Jaqueline Anne 
Potter 

I write in response to your regulation 28 report, dated 24 April 2025, regarding the very sad 
death of Anne Potter. I would like to express my sincere condolences to Anne’s family.   

We would like to thank you for including NICE in this important report. We have reflected on 
the circumstances surrounding Anne’s death and the concerns raised. We note there are five 
distinct concerns raised in your report. It is important to note from the outset that we do not 
consider  the  concerns  raised  are  directly  attributable  to  NICE,  but  note  your  report  is  also 
addressed  to  NHS  England,  Somerset  NHS  Foundation  Trust,  the  Royal  College  of 
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal College of General Practitioners. We have 
outlined the concerns below, detailing NICE’s response to each in turn.  

1.  The  lack  of  a  codified  ‘Risk’  and  ‘Safety  Planning’  document  to  be  given  to 
relatives  and  carers  to  assist  families  in  spotting  early  warning  signs  that 
‘something is wrong’ and to seek help and intervention (if/when appropriate) to 
minimise the risk of a patient taking their own life whilst in the community.  

We do not believe there is any NICE guidance that explicitly covers this matter, but our quality 
standard suicide prevention [QS189], quality statement 4, stresses the importance of asking 
the person if they would like their family, carers or friends to be involved in their care. The 
NICE  guideline,  self-harm:  assessment,  management  and  preventing  recurrence  [NG225] 
also has a number of recommendations that are not entirely specific to this situation, but that 
indicate  an  approach  of  involving  the  family  and  carers  (with  the  person’s  consent)  and 
providing written materials. For instance:  

1.10.1  ‘After  an  episode  of  self-harm,  discuss  and  agree  with  the  person,  and  their  family 
members and carers (as appropriate), the purpose, format and frequency of initial aftercare 
and which services will be involved in their care. Record this in the person's care plan and 
ensure  that  the  person  and  their  family  members  and  carers  have  a  copy  of  the  plan  and 
contact details for the team providing the aftercare’ (my emphasis). 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1.5.15 ‘Together with the person who self-harms and their family and carers (if appropriate), 
develop or review a care plan using the key areas of needs and safety considerations identified 
in the psychosocial assessment’ 

1.4.1 ‘Be aware that even if the person has not consented to involving their family or carers in 
their care, family members or carers can still provide information about the person’. 

Our  guidance  emphasises  the  importance  of  involving  family  and  carers,  and  of  providing 
written information. We do not specifically mention the document or circumstances outlined in 
this report, but NICE’s recommendations are not intended to cover all clinical circumstances.   

2.  Wi-Fi access to harmful websites whilst in NHS facilities.  

NICE does not have responsibility for managing NHS care or services and therefore we would 
be unable to comment on this concern.  

3.  No compulsory training in menopause 

Again, we do not consider that this concern is directly for NICE as we are not responsible for 
setting the curriculum for undergraduate and trainee doctors in the UK, this is the role of the 
General Medical  Council (GMC).  We  understand  that there  is  currently  work  being  done to 
integrate menopause care into both GP and specialist training curricula, with menopause as 
part of the GP Specialty Training Curriculum (although still not a standalone module) and the 
RCOG  launching  a  Special  Interest  Training  Module  (SITM)  in  Menopause  Care  in  2024. 
However, only a very small number of trainees will access this. It is the view of our consultant 
clinical advisers that menopause care is not consistently or comprehensively taught across all 
UK medical schools, and there is no national standard requiring in-depth menopause training 
for all medical students. You may wish to share this part of the report with the General Medical 
Council (GMC)  and  with  Health  Education  England  (part  of  NHS  England)  for  their 
consideration. 

4.  Lack of menopause specialists or menopause services in the NHS  

We believe this concern will be better answered by NHS England and the Royal Colleges. 

5.  There  has  not  been  a  roll-out  of  specialist  menopausal  care  and  upskilling  of 

GPs, as was promised in a previous PFD.  

As noted above, we believe this concern will be better answered by NHS England and the 
Royal Colleges. 

We note your report also mentions a previous prevention of future death report sent to NICE, 
NHS England and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust in June 2024 on a similar matter. Within 
our  response,  sent  in  August  2024,  we  stated  that  following  publication  of  the  menopause 
update in November 2024, we would assess if any further changes relating to mental health 
and menopause are needed, in response to the HSIB recommendation and taking into account 
the issues raised in the initial PFD. 

NICE’s surveillance team have informed us that ‘With the updates that have been made to 
menopause: identification and management [NG23] in November 2024 and the conclusions 
of the 2023 surveillance review, we are satisfied NG23 and the mental health guidelines are 

                                                                                                                                 Page | 2 

 
 
 
 up to date in relation to the HSIB report. We are tracking studies in this area identified by the 
2023 surveillance, so this topic will remain on surveillance’s radar’.  

I hope this response has helped outline our role and the recommendations that are in place 
on this important topic. I would like to reiterate my sincere condolences to Anne’s family.   

Yours sincerely, 

Chief Executive     

                                                                                                                                 Page | 3
Response from Rcog (PDF)
Samantha Marsh 
His Majesty’s Coroner for Somerset 
Somerset Coroners Service       
Somerset Coroners Court                           
Old Municipal Buildings                              
Corporation Street                                    
Taunton TA1 4AQ                                       

Dear Ms Marsh, 

Re: Jacqueline Anne Potter 

19 June 2025 

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future deaths following the inquest into 
the death of Jacqueline Anne Potter on 24 April 2025. 

This loss is a devastating tragedy for the immediate and the wider family, and the 
healthcare professionals involved. We would like to begin by extending our deepest and 
heartfelt condolences to Anne’s family for their profound loss. 

This response has been developed following input from members of the Royal College of 
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) Patient Safety Committee and Senior Officers of 
the College.  

We recognise and respect the narrative conclusion from the inquest that Anne died from 
multiple traumatic injuries through suicide, secondary to her menopausal symptoms 
contributing to her mental health decline and exacerbation of her underlying anxiety. 

We also recognise the matters of concern as outlined in your letter as follows,  
‘Certain elements of medicine and clinical practice training are compulsory but having heard 
evidence at the Inquest around mandatory and statutory training modules I learnt that this 
covers areas such as GDPR training and disposal of sharp objects such as syringes. I was 
surprised to learn that menopausal training is not mandatory in any area of clinical practice 
or specialism. I am concerned that there is no requirement to undertake essential 
compulsory menopausal training for those working in ‘relevant’ clinical practices such as 
Mental Health Practice, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Oncology, or even general as a 
general GP’. 

Page 1 of 2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 At present, it is only a requirement for doctors on the General Medical Council’s specialist 
register for obstetrics and gynaecology to have demonstrated competency in menopausal 
and postmenopausal care. 

To support doctors in this aim, the RCOG provides educational initiatives, including its 
curricula on which the MRCOG qualification is based and tested through examinations, 
elevating care standards through clinical guidance, assisting in career advancement through 
examinations, coordinating professional development initiatives and events, and offering 
support services to its members.  

The RCOG’s core training curriculum which provides a framework for the training of 
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists ensures that management of the menopause is covered as 
a key skill. Understanding and management of the menopause is a key area on the syllabus 
for the MRCOG examination, which is an essential qualification in our speciality.    

The College also has a Special Interest Training Module (SITM) in menopause care. This SITM 
is aimed at learners with an interest in menopause care. It provides training on how to 
assess and investigate women with menopause-related symptoms, understand the benefits 
and risks of HRT and alternative therapies, and counsel and advise women accordingly.  

Additionally, for General Practitioners who would like to develop a more advanced 
knowledge of women’s healthcare, the RCOG also provides the Diploma of the Royal College 
of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (DRCOG). The core syllabus for this examination also 
includes diagnosis, investigation and management of the menopause. The DRCOG is 
primarily undertaken by those in General Practice who have an interest in Women’s Health 
but is not mandatory. 

Throughout the course of each year the RCOG and our Specialist Society (British Menopause 
Society) also host numerous training and education events which are accessible to all 
healthcare professionals, several of which support additional education into various aspects 
of care for menopausal women. 

I hope this is a helpful response to this matter.  

Yours sincerely, 

Chief Executive 
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 

Page 2 of 2
Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
30 June 2025 

Mrs S Marsh 
c/o Somerset Coroner’s Court 

Sent via email to  

Dear Mrs Marsh 

Trust Management Headquarters
Trust Management Headquarters 
Yeovil District Hospital
Yeovil District Hospital
Higher Kingston
Level 1 
Yeovil
BA21 4AT
Peter.Lewis@somersetft.nhs.uk

REGULATION 28 REPORT – PREVENTION OF FUTURE DEATHS – Jacqueline Anne 
Potter  

I am writing in response to your correspondence dated 24 April 2025 regarding the Regulation 
28 Notice of the Coroner’s (investigations) Regulations 2013 following the inquest regarding the 
death of Jacqueline Anne Potter which concluded on 7 March 2025.  

We have set out the matters of concern as raised in the report below and our response to them.  

MATTERS OF CONCERN 

Part One 
1. 

Lack of Risk and Safety Planning document for section 17 (MHA) leave 

Following the concerns raised by the family and the coroner in Mrs Potter’s inquest, the 
Mental Health and Learning Disability Service group have developed supportive 
guidance for families and people who matter when a patient is on Section 17 Leave from 
an inpatient unit. This is currently out for feedback from teams and will be shared at the 
operational meeting next month for approval prior to production via the patient 
information team.  We will also be sharing the draft document with service users and 
carers to ensure it covers the information that they feel is necessary to support them. 

We believe that this document will provide additional support and information for families 
and people who matter to give them the knowledge to assist them with understanding 
the purpose of leave, their role and contact details should they require advice and 
guidance or emergency support.  

The document sets out why Section 17 Leave is beneficial to patients, how and by 
whom it is granted, an explanation of risk assessments that are carried out ahead of 
leave, and what the role of the family member or carer is during that time.  

The role of the family/carers is described as providing a safe and calm environment 
during the period of leave, encouragement of routines such as regular meals and 
medication, to act as a point of communication with any concerns to hospital staff and to 
assist the patient to return on time as agreed. There is also the option for the relative or 
carer to discuss any concerns with this level of responsibility, and to not accept it if they 
feel unsure or unable. There is also key information if they have concerns of who to 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 contact, what numbers to use and what concerns they may want to call the inpatient 
ward about if they are unsure.  

The guidance stresses there is support available 24 hours a day, even if it is just to seek 
some guidance and who to contact in a more urgent situation.  

2. 

Wi-Fi access whilst in an inpatient mental health unit 

Following the inquest, further enquiries were made on this point within the Trust with our 
cyber security manager.  

All Trust devices accessible to patients on our inpatient mental health units have 
parental control software installed which filters out inappropriate content and restricts 
access to harmful material. This is in addition to security features on our Wi-Fi which 
blocks certain categories from view as part of our web filtering policy. This is a Trust 
wide approach. 

Additionally, some desktop devices in some inpatient mental health sites have a browser 
extension loaded onto the device which will divert users away from certain search terms 
to a free, 24/7 mental health support site. This can only be used on PCs and is not 
suitable for mobile devices, but it effectively blocks patients accessing this type of 
information when they use a search engine on a ward PC e.g. google, safari. Our IT 
team explained that they could not currently see that this programme is available to 
download onto mobile devices.  

Private devices would not connect to the Trust Network, due to security reasons, and 
instead would connect to the public ‘NHS Wi-Fi’ which is essentially a connection 
straight out to the internet.  Any changes made to this connection would have to be 
made county-wide and would affect all devices which connect to it.   

The Trust has a Standard Operating Procedure for our mental health wards which 
outlines the parameters for use of Trust and personal IT equipment on the wards and 
includes guidance on when access to mobile phones and the internet may be restricted 
or withdrawn.  The guidance lists considerations of risk related to the use of mobile 
phones, including if the patient has a history of accessing self-harm or suicide related 
websites.  

Part 2 

3. 

Menopause and Mental Health 

We have previously responded about the changes that have occurred at Somerset NHS 
FT over the last 2 years in relation to education and training around the link between 
mental health and menopause. 

There is an ongoing task and finish group which is leading on this piece of work and has 
focused on improving clinicians understanding of what to look for, ask about and 
consider when assessing patient who may fit in this category. If there is a potential 
consideration, we add a prompt to our electronic patient record, Dialog+, to ask these 
questions. Whilst it is not expected that mental health clinicians will make a primary 
diagnosis of menopause we expect it to be on the list of considerations of patients who 
meet the criteria. For the clinician there must be consideration of what Mental Health 
and menopausal symptoms might look like, with an awareness of potential for 
overshadowing, and the need to establish a proper history from the patient. This is 
supported by the training offered by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and internal 
training. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 We also recognise the importance of, and support colleagues to undertake, screening 
and signposting patients to other services and websites which offer support and 
guidance for those who may meet the criteria for menopause to be considered..  This 
includes the updated NICE guidance, Overview | Menopause: identification and 
management | Guidance | NICE. The 2024 update includes the consideration of 
psychological support for early menopause and cognitive behavioural therapy as a 
possible management option. There is also additional guidance on the use of HRT for 
the management of depressive symptoms, which do not meet the criteria for a diagnosis 
of depression, associated with menopause within the guidance which can provide a first 
line approach for GP’s managing patients and for mental health professionals to 
highlight in communication with the patient’s GP if they feel the patient meets this 
criteria.  

We still have the benefit of having the Director of General Practice working at the Trust 
who is a specialist in menopause management. This is not something many secondary 
care providers have. Dr Patrick supports the mental health team and the wider trust in 
providing up to date education and support, which involves training sessions of what to 
look for and consider, and where to signpost. There are further dates for training for 
colleagues being arranged.  

I hope that the above information has been helpful. Can I also take this opportunity to express, 
personally and on behalf of the Trust, my condolences to the family of Mrs Potter, for their loss. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require further information. 

Yours sincerely 

Chief Executive 
Somerset NHS Foundation Trust

Related reports

Other reports by Samantha Marsh

See all →

More reports categorised “Mental Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Somerset NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.