Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0368, written 5 Oct 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 5 Oct 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0368 |
| Deceased | Lilian Board |
| Coroner | Paul Cooper |
| Coroner area | Lincolnshire |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 ULH NHS Trust Legal Services 1 CORONER I am Paul COOPER, HM Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Lincolnshire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 08 February 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lilian Margaret BOARD aged 91. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 05 October 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that: The deceased died on 1st February 2023 at Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln after intentionally ingesting was left. tablets the day before. A note of intent 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 91 years old who lived alone, no carers but had friend and family for support, the deceased has a known history of Depression, T2DM, Heart failure and was under geriatric team for worsening mobility. Family report that on 31.01.23 the deceased had taken possibly (prescribed by GP), she had contacted a friend and told them she had taken the medication, friend has then subsequently called family who attend the property and find the deceased slumped by her bedside with a glass of water and empty blister packs, the deceased was unresponsive emergency services attended and admitted the deceased to LCH where she presented to A/E after taking fatal overdose . She had written a letter for family saying that she wants to end her life. Had respiratory arrest for which she received Flumazenil boluses (5 in total) after which she was kept in A/E resus and started on Flumazenil infusion. ITU was involved and she was able to maintain her airway so planned to keep in resus. Her GCS was 15 after Flumazenil but remained drowsy. She was also started on iv antibiotics for clinical suspicion of aspiration pneumonia. Infusion was later stopped after covering for half life of zopiclone of 8 hours. She was then moved to MEAU on 1.2.23 where she became drowsy again and had stat dose of Flumazenil. Was later reviewed by consultant and started on EOL care after discussion with family. She passed away on 1.2.23. at Lincoln County Hospital can provide a cause of death: 1a toxicity Spoken with family who are aware that an Inquest maybe required given the history, they do not have any concerns regarding care or treatment, have requested for family to provide the letters which were left by the deceased. family were present and seen the deceased at LCH. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) The deceased was prescribed Following discharge from hospital on 18th January 2023 LCH also prescribed The deceased therefore had two prescriptions of the same medication that she used to end her life. Are there any checks in place to avoid duplicity of prescriptions between hospital and GP ? by her GP. . 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by November 30, 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons I have also sent it to ULH NHS Trust Legal Services who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 05/10/2023 Paul COOPER HM Assistant Coroner for Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 Lincolnshire Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Mr Paul Cooper HM Assistant Coroner for Lincolnshire Gilbert Drive Endeavour Park Boston Lincolnshire PE21 7TQ Date : 24 November 2023 Legal Services Department Trust Headquarters Lincoln County Hospital Greetwell Road Lincoln LN2 5QY Dear Mr Cooper Inquest touching the death of Lilian Board Thank you for providing us with a copy of the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths. This letter is the response from United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (ULHT). Firstly, at the outset, the Trust (and myself personally) would like to express our heartfelt condolences to Mrs Board’s family and friends for their loss. Response to issues raised by the Report Firstly, as a personal point of clarity in case this is relevant for any future reference, at the time of this patient’s admission to ULHT and her subsequent death, I was off on extended sick leave receiving treatment for cancer, and my position was covered by as interim Medical Director for ULHT from September 2022 to September 2023, after which I then returned back into my substantive Medical Director role. by Mrs Board’s GP and her discharge I note that your concern is around the prescription of from hospital on 18 January 2023 where she was also prescribed . Mrs Board therefore had two prescriptions of the same medication that she used to end her life. You asked if there were any checks in place to avoid duplicity of prescriptions between the hospital and GP. It is important to point out that the policy of the Trust (Policy for Medicines Management Supply of Medicines), in agreement with Lincolnshire Primary Care colleagues including the Primary Care Networks, the Local Medical Committee and the Integrated Care Board, is that we supply patients with 14 days supply of medication as a default at the point of discharge, This is not unusual, as almost all acute provider Trusts within NHS England have similar policies to dispense medication supplies upon discharge, with these supply arrangements ranging anywhere between 7-28 days depending on policies of the specific NHS Trusts. A degree of duplicity is accepted in this regard, as the vast majority of patients discharged with a component of overlapping medication to ensure non-interruption of supply will simply continue one lot of prescribed medication until this has been completed then switch over to the other medication prescription, and patients are counselled about doing this on a case-by-case basis. With regard to this particular case, I can confirm that a box of was dispensed ( ) in accordance with that policy. For further clarification, Trust staff have access to the summary care record, however pharmacy staff will check the validity of the prescription from the dispensary, but they do not perform medicines reconciliation from the dispensary. The nursing staff in conjunction with pharmacy staff (when appropriate) will however ask the patient what medication they are already on, on admission and for example if they are running out of any particular medication. Nursing staff will then check medication at the point of discharge to ensure that patient has their own supplies (or not) and that the drugs are as prescribed on the discharge letter, and how to deal with overlapping supplies. The reason for why such components of the relevant policies are required is that we have an overarching duty of care to ensure that patients do not come to harm by having an interrupted regime of treatment in the intervening period of time between being discharged from our care and then seeing their GP for an amended prescription, which can often practically take 1-2 weeks (and in some circumstances, even longer than 2 weeks). Significant harm can occur in circumstances where drugs for e.g. heart disease / stroke / epilepsy / depression are interrupted in this fashion even for only a few days, which is well recognised. We therefore do have to balance ensuring patients are discharged home with a sufficient supply against the unusual circumstances of this particular case, where I gather the patient may have deliberately misled to circumvent processes in both primary and secondary care. Regarding that balance, it is considered that many more patients could (and would) be harmed if they are discharged without a supply of medication and then are entirely reliant on making timely arrangements (which is often beyond their control) to seek a supply of dispensed medication via their General Practitioner. GP representative bodies themselves are very clear both locally and nationally that secondary care have the onus and responsibility to ensure that patients are discharged from hospital with medications on that basis to avoid inadvertent cessation. Having discussed this case with our Lincolnshire system Medical Director colleagues in the Primary Care Local Medical Committee and the Integrated Care Board, they concur with that consensus and maintain the opinion that the current Trust policy and arrangement remain appropriate. tablets, so I note that in Mrs Board’s case, it is estimated that she took approximately even if ULHT had not discharged her with a further 14 day supply, that estimate implies that she would have still had a minimum of tablets in her possession not dispensed by our Trust, which would in itself have been a likely fatal dose in overdose. We hope that this response has addressed the concerns you have outlined. However, please let me know if you have any further concerns or require any further clarifications around the nuances of this, and I will of course address these accordingly. In addition to the usual communication channels, I can be contacted via telephone / Teams etc if you feel that might be more helpful depending on what is required in that circumstance. Yours sincerely Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.