Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Lilian Board

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0368, written 5 Oct 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report5 Oct 2023
Reference2023-0368
DeceasedLilian Board
CoronerPaul Cooper
Coroner areaLincolnshire
CategorySuicide (from 2015) · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedUnited Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1  ULH NHS Trust Legal Services 

1  CORONER 

I am Paul COOPER, HM Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Lincolnshire 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 08 February 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lilian Margaret 
BOARD aged 91.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 05 October 
2023.  The conclusion of the inquest was that: 

The deceased died on 1st February 2023 at Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, 
Lincoln after intentionally  ingesting 
was left. 

 tablets the day before. A note of intent 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

91 years old who lived alone, no carers but had friend and family for support, the deceased 
has a known history of Depression, T2DM, Heart failure and was under geriatric team for 
worsening mobility.  Family report that on 31.01.23 the deceased had taken possibly 

 (prescribed by GP), she had contacted a friend and told them she 

had taken the medication, friend has then subsequently called family who attend the 
property and find the deceased slumped by her bedside with a glass of water and empty 
blister packs, the deceased was unresponsive emergency services attended and admitted 
the deceased to LCH where she presented to A/E after taking fatal overdose 

. She had written a letter for family saying that she wants to end her life. Had 
respiratory arrest for which she received Flumazenil boluses (5 in total) after which she was 
kept in A/E resus and started on Flumazenil infusion. ITU was involved and she was able to 
maintain her airway so planned to keep in resus. Her GCS was 15 after Flumazenil but 
remained drowsy. She was also started on iv antibiotics for clinical suspicion of aspiration 
pneumonia. Infusion was later stopped after covering for half life of zopiclone of 8 hours. 
She was then moved to MEAU on 1.2.23 where she became drowsy again and had stat dose 
of Flumazenil. Was later reviewed by consultant and started on EOL care after discussion 
with family. She passed away on 1.2.23. 

 at Lincoln County Hospital can provide a cause of death: 

1a 

 toxicity 

Spoken with family who are aware that an Inquest maybe required given the history, they 
do not have any concerns regarding care or treatment, have requested for family to provide 
the letters which were left by the deceased.  family were present and seen the deceased at 
LCH. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

The deceased was prescribed 
Following discharge from hospital on 18th January 2023  LCH also prescribed 
The deceased therefore had two prescriptions of the same medication that she used to end 
her life. 
Are there any checks in place to avoid duplicity of prescriptions between hospital and GP ? 

 by her GP. 

. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by November 30, 2023.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

I have also sent it to 

ULH NHS Trust Legal Services 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 05/10/2023 

Paul COOPER 
HM Assistant Coroner for 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 Lincolnshire 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (PDF)
Mr Paul Cooper 
HM Assistant Coroner for Lincolnshire 
Gilbert Drive 
Endeavour Park 
Boston 
Lincolnshire 
PE21 7TQ  

Date :   24 November 2023 

Legal Services Department 
Trust Headquarters 
Lincoln County Hospital 
Greetwell Road 
Lincoln 
LN2 5QY 

Dear Mr Cooper 

Inquest touching the death of Lilian Board 

Thank you for providing us with a copy of the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths. This letter 
is the response from United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (ULHT).  

Firstly, at the outset, the Trust (and myself personally) would like to express our heartfelt condolences to 
Mrs Board’s family and friends for their loss.  

Response to issues raised by the Report 

Firstly, as a personal point of clarity in case this is relevant for any future reference, at the time of this 
patient’s  admission  to  ULHT  and  her  subsequent  death,  I  was  off  on  extended  sick  leave  receiving 
treatment  for  cancer,  and  my  position  was  covered  by 
  as  interim  Medical  Director  for 
ULHT from September 2022 to September 2023, after which I then returned back into my substantive 
Medical Director role. 

 by Mrs Board’s GP and her discharge 
I note that your concern is around the prescription of 
from hospital on 18 January 2023 where she was also prescribed 
. Mrs Board therefore had 
two  prescriptions  of  the  same  medication  that  she  used  to  end  her  life.  You  asked  if  there  were  any 
checks in place to avoid duplicity of prescriptions between the hospital and GP.  

It  is  important  to  point  out  that  the  policy  of  the  Trust  (Policy  for  Medicines  Management  Supply  of 
Medicines),  in  agreement  with  Lincolnshire  Primary  Care  colleagues  including  the  Primary  Care 
Networks, the Local Medical Committee and the Integrated Care Board, is that we supply patients with 
14  days  supply  of  medication  as  a  default  at the  point  of  discharge,  This  is  not  unusual,  as  almost  all 
acute  provider  Trusts  within  NHS  England  have  similar  policies  to  dispense  medication  supplies  upon 
discharge, with these supply arrangements ranging anywhere between 7-28 days depending on policies 
of  the  specific  NHS  Trusts.    A  degree  of  duplicity  is  accepted  in  this  regard,  as  the  vast  majority  of 
patients  discharged  with  a  component  of  overlapping  medication  to  ensure  non-interruption  of  supply 
will simply continue one lot of prescribed medication until this has been completed then switch over to 
the other medication prescription, and patients are counselled about doing this on a case-by-case basis.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 With regard to this particular case, I can confirm that a box of 

 was dispensed (

) in accordance with that policy. For further clarification, Trust staff have access to the summary 
care record, however pharmacy staff will check the validity of the prescription from the dispensary, but 
they do not perform medicines reconciliation from the dispensary. The nursing staff in conjunction with 
pharmacy staff (when appropriate) will however ask the patient what medication they are already on, on 
admission  and  for  example  if  they  are  running  out  of  any  particular  medication.  Nursing  staff  will  then 
check medication at the point of discharge to ensure that patient has their own supplies (or not) and that 
the drugs are as prescribed on the discharge letter, and how to deal with overlapping supplies. 

The  reason  for  why  such  components  of  the  relevant  policies  are  required  is  that  we  have  an 
overarching duty of care to ensure that patients do not come to harm by having an interrupted regime of 
treatment  in  the  intervening  period  of  time  between  being  discharged  from  our  care  and  then  seeing 
their  GP  for  an  amended  prescription,  which  can  often  practically  take  1-2  weeks  (and  in  some 
circumstances, even longer than 2 weeks). Significant harm can occur in circumstances where drugs for 
e.g.  heart  disease  /  stroke  /  epilepsy  /  depression  are  interrupted  in  this  fashion  even  for  only  a  few 
days, which is well recognised.  

We therefore do have to balance ensuring patients are discharged home with a sufficient supply against 
the  unusual  circumstances  of  this  particular  case,  where  I  gather  the  patient  may  have  deliberately 
misled  to  circumvent  processes  in  both  primary  and  secondary  care.  Regarding  that  balance,  it  is 
considered  that  many  more  patients  could  (and  would)  be  harmed  if  they  are  discharged  without  a 
supply of medication and then are entirely reliant on making timely arrangements (which is often beyond 
their control) to seek a supply of dispensed medication via their General Practitioner. GP representative 
bodies  themselves  are  very  clear  both  locally  and  nationally  that  secondary  care  have  the  onus  and 
responsibility  to  ensure  that  patients  are  discharged  from  hospital  with  medications  on  that  basis  to 
avoid inadvertent cessation. Having discussed this case with our Lincolnshire system Medical Director 
colleagues  in  the  Primary  Care  Local  Medical  Committee  and the  Integrated  Care  Board, they  concur 
with  that  consensus  and  maintain  the  opinion  that  the  current  Trust  policy  and  arrangement  remain 
appropriate. 

 tablets, so 
I note that in Mrs Board’s case, it is estimated that she took approximately 
even if ULHT had not discharged her with a further 14 day supply, that estimate implies that she would 
have still had a minimum of 
 tablets in her possession not dispensed by our Trust, which 
would in itself have been a likely fatal dose in overdose. 

We  hope  that  this  response  has  addressed  the  concerns  you  have  outlined.  However,  please  let  me 
know  if you  have  any  further  concerns  or  require  any further  clarifications  around the  nuances of this, 
and I will of course address these accordingly. In addition to the usual communication channels, I can 
be  contacted  via  telephone  /  Teams  etc  if  you  feel  that  might  be  more  helpful  depending  on  what  is 
required in that circumstance.  

Yours sincerely 

Medical Director

Related reports

Other reports by Paul Cooper

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.