Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Charlotte Burton

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0465, written 23 Nov 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report23 Nov 2023
Reference2023-0465
DeceasedCharlotte Burton
CoronerSamantha Goward
Coroner areaCambridgeshire and Peterborough
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  The Royal College of Physicians 
2.  Department of Health 
3.  NHS England 

1  CORONER 

I am Samantha Goward, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Cambridgeshire 
and Peterborough. 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 
2009  and  Regulations  28  and  29  of  the  Coroners  (Investigations)  Regulations 
2013. 
Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (legislation.gov.uk) 
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 (legislation.gov.uk) 

3  INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 7 October 2021 an inquest in to the death of Charlotte Burton was opened. 
Charlotte died on 28 November 2020.  The investigation concluded at the end of 
the inquest on 15 November 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was: 

Medical Cause of Death: 

1a. Acute left ventricular failure 

2. Morbid obesity and pre-eclampsia associated with cardiomyopathy 

Conclusion –  Died from a naturally occurring condition, the treatment for which 
did not commence in time to avoid death. 

 4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

1.  Charlotte Burton was aged 40 when she became pregnant with her second 

child.  She had a BMI of 45 and was using methadone as part of her treatment 
plan.  As a result, she was under regular surveillance during her pregnancy 
and had regular growth scans as her age, BMI and methadone use all placed 
her in the high-risk category. 

2.  While some concerns were raised regarding care during pregnancy, labour 
and immediately after delivery, which were investigated by the HSIB and 
reviewed by an independent expert Obstetrician, none of these were 
causative of Charlotte’s death. 

3.  Charlotte returned to hospital on 27 November 2020.  While speaking to a 
neonatal nurse, she was increasingly short of breath, she coughed up blood 
and was transferred to the emergency department. 

4. 

In considering the care provided to Charlotte at this stage, expert evidence in 
the fields of Obstetrics, Intensive Care Medicine & Anaesthesia and 
Cardiology. 

5.  Based on the expert evidence it was found that from the time Charlotte 

arrived in the ED, she had a number of signs and symptoms which pointed 
towards a likely respiratory and/or cardiac pathology which included 
shortness of breath, coughing up blood, fast respiratory rate requiring 
supplemental oxygen, bilateral lung crepitations and hypertension. 

6.  The initial medical review was reasonably comprehensive and the differential 
diagnosis and management plan appropriate, and appropriate blood tests 
and investigations were requested. The junior doctor quite appropriately 
included cardiomyopathy in the differential diagnosis. 

7.  Charlotte was given Frusemide due to concerns about heart failure and 

pulmonary oedema.  As heart failure was being considered, the high blood 
pressure should also have been addressed.  Expert evidence was that 
Frusemide should have been given twice a day, so a further dose should have 
been given around 1900 hours. 

8.  Charlotte had a raised NT-proBNP level and this is a test for heart failure, but 
can also be raised with pre-eclampsia.  A chest x-ray was said to be difficult to 
interpret, but did have signs of significant pulmonary oedema. 

9.  A history of Charlotte having to sit on the side of her bed to catch her breath 
when she got up in the morning, was also said to be consistent with signs of 
heart failure. 

 10.  Witness evidence from two of the Consultants (in Obstetric Anaesthesia and 

Nephrology) who reviewed Charlotte was that there had been some 
consideration of cardiac issues, which is supported by the medication 
prescribed, the undertaking of an echo and a decision to transfer to the 
coronary care team.  However, neither was aware of whether or not there 
had been a review by a Cardiologist and the Trust’s representative checked 
the records and confirmed that the echo was performed by a suitably 
qualified technician, but that there had been no cardiology input. 

11.  The expert Cardiologist was of the view that the treating Consultants had 

been falsely reassured by the echo showing a preserved ejection fracture and 
that this distracted everyone from understanding that the ventricle was 
having to work very hard, didn’t relax properly and that the heart was backing 
up and causing the pulmonary oedema. 

12.  The expert accepted that it is much more common in older women and that 
to find it post pregnancy in a woman in her 40s was unusual.  She stated that 
she would not expect them to have a full knowledge, but would expect an 
understanding that the NT proBNP and pulmonary oedema could be related 
to heart failure. 

13.  In light of the findings of the various examinations, the treating team should 
have considered diastolic heart failure as a likely cause of the pulmonary 
oedema which should have led to IV frusemide, glyceryl trinitrate (or a 
suitable alternative), oxygen and treatment of the hypertension. 

14.  There were operational issues that delayed a transfer to the coronary care 
team. The inquest also heard evidence from the treating clinicians that the 
Trust does not have any Cardiology cover, not even on call, after 5pm 
weekdays or at the weekend.  It was stated that this was not an issue unique 
to this Trust and that there is a nationwide shortage of trained Cardiologists. 
The Trust does have the option to call Cardiologists at other hospitals, but 
there is no provision for on site assessment by a Cardiologist out of hours and 
transfer is often not possible due to severity of illness or the timescales 
involved. 

15.  It was found that had the nature of Charlotte’s condition been recognised, 

she should have been prioritised for a bed on either the coronary care unit or 
ICU.  Had Charlotte been under the care of ICU or specialist cardiac nurses, 
they may have recognised the need for cardiology input and discussed this 
with the on call Physicians to consider seeking advice.  It was accepted that 
that this would not have led to a transfer in Charlotte’s case, but on the 
balance of probabilities would have led to the Cardiologists or ICU clinicians 
giving the advice that experts recommended for appropriate treatment. 

 16.  Although Charlotte’s condition did improve by around 1745 hours, she 

remained short of breath on minimal exertion and by 1930 hours was again 
requiring oxygen.  From 2025 hours her respiratory rate and blood pressure 
were significantly elevated and oxygen saturations were persistently low. 
There should have been urgent escalation when Charlotte began to 
deteriorate again by 1930 hours. 

17.  18.  By the time the deterioration was recognised at 2245 hours, and 

intubation occurred at 2315 hours, this was sadly too late and was shortly 
followed by a cardiac arrest.  Had the appropriate treatment, under the 
advice of a cardiology or intensive care specialist commenced between 1900 
and 2100 hours, Charlotte would not have died when she did. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action 
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN ARE: 

1. The evidence indicates that there is a nationwide shortage of suitably trained 
Cardiologists and that, particularly in District General Hospital setting, this 
means that out of hours there is no provision for patients presenting with 
suspected cardiac problems to be assessed in person by a Cardiologist.  The 
system is therefore reliant upon doctors of different specialities or cardiac 
nurses recognising the condition and the need for contact with specialist at a 
different Trust.  This still does not allow for in person assessment unless there 
is a transfer which is not always possible due to the severity of the condition or 
cannot be achieved in a suitable timescale and this represents on ongoing risk 
of future deaths. 

 6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 18 January 2024.  I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is 
proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons: 

(1)  Charlotte’s family 
(2)  North West Anglian NHS Foundation Trust 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and 
all Interested Persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may 
find it useful or of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes 
may find it useful or of interest. 

You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, 
about the release or the publication of your response. 

 9  Dated: 23 November 2023 

Ms Samantha Goward HM Assistant Coroner 
For Cambridgeshire & Peterborough

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England (PDF)
Samantha Goward 
Cambridge & Peterborough Coroner’s Service 
Lawrence Court 
Princes Street  
Huntington 
PE29 3PA 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

10 January 2024  

Dear Coroner, 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Charlotte Burton who 
died on 28 November 2020 

Thank  you  for  your  Report  to  Prevent  Future  Deaths  (hereafter  “Report”)  dated  23 
November 2023 concerning the death of Charlotte Burton on 28 November 2020. In 
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to 
express my deep condolences to Charlotte’s family and loved ones. NHS England are 
keen to assure the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about Charlotte’s 
care have been listened to and reflected upon.  

In your Report you raised the concern that there is a nationwide shortage of suitably 
trained  Cardiologists  and  that,  particularly  in  District  General  Hospital  settings,  this 
means  that  there  can  be  no  out  of  hours  provision  for  patients  presenting  with 
suspected cardiac problems to be assessed in person by a Cardiologist.  

In June 2023, NHS England published the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan, setting 
out  how  it will train,  retain and  reform  its  workforce  across  the  next  fifteen years  to 
ensure that we are improving access, providing safe and timely urgent and emergency 
care and continuing to reduce elective care backlogs. The Plan is underpinned by the 
biggest recruitment drive in NHS history.  

NHS England, together with the wider health system is also continuing to deliver the 
Medical Speciality Distribution programme; the programme was developed in light of 
the  Facing  the  Facts,  Shaping  the  Future  report,  published  by  the  former  Health 
Education England (now part of NHS England) and NHS England and a joint review 
of distribution of postgraduate medical training places.  The Programme commenced 
in Autumn 2022, initially looking at three specialties, one of which is Cardiology, and 
will  continue  over  the  next  10-15  years.  Work  is  in  progress  to  ensure  that  the 
distribution of post graduate speciality training is done in a way that: 

•  Addresses  health  inequalities  and  improve  fairness  for  patients  across 

England. 

•  Reduces variation of patient outcomes across England. 
•  Create fairer distribution of training places in remote, rural, and coastal areas 

to meet local population needs. 

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 A Webinar took place in November 2023, outlining how the Long-Term Workforce Plan 
will  shape  the  distribution  of  Speciality  Training  posts  going  forward  as  well  as 
providing  programme  updates.  This  can  be  found  here:  Distribution  of  Specialty 
Training:  Postgraduate  Doctors  in  Training  Webinar  |  Health  Education  England 
(hee.nhs.uk) 

Patient  safety  remains  a  key  driver  behind  this  work  programme,  being  led  and 
delivered  by  NHS  England  and  will  inform  future  decision-making  The  programme 
includes a range of specialities, including cardiology and will in future lead to improved 
access for patients to specially trained clinicians.  

NHS England is also in the process of developing a plan in collaboration with system 
partners to support the workforce in delivering interventions that detect and optimally 
manage major conditions such as cardiovascular disease. This should be finalised by 
March 2024. 

In 2013, NHS England published its 7-Day Hospital Services (7DS) Programme which 
introduced clinical standards regarding the provision of a “truly seven-day NHS” and 
requiring  acute  trusts  to  provide  board  assurance  compliance.  This  included  a 
requirement for all cardiovascular networks to implement the four priority standards of 
timely  consultant  review,  improved  access  to  diagnostics,  consultant  directed 
interventions and ongoing review into high dependency areas across all seven days 
of the week. There is a good level of compliance with these standards across acute 
trusts and many services and surgical and diagnostic lists are operating at weekends 
and evenings. 

The NHS continues to encourage local health systems to develop effective workforce 
planning  to  ensure  that  they  have  the  sufficient  qualified  staff  working  across  their 
Trusts and wider system that are required for their population care needs. The NHS 
People Promise also helps NHS providers to consider ways to recruit and retain staff. 
Work is in progress to ensure that future distribution of training posts to help ensure 
the  supply  of  doctors  is  matched  to  population  need.  You  will  need  to  refer  to 
Cambridgeshire  and  Peterborough  Integrated  Care  Board  (ICB)  on  what  system 
arrangements  they  have  in  place  for  their  cardiology  provision  and  workforce,  to 
include transfer policy on weekends.  

NHS England will also consider carefully responses to your Report from the DHSC 
and  the  Royal  College  of  Physicians  and  any  actions  required  from  us  to  support 
further improvement.   

I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking 
place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed 
by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical  Directors,  and 
other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key 
learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both 
a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends 
that may require further review and action.  

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yours sincerely, 

National Medical Director

Related reports

Other reports by Samantha Goward

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.