Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0522, written 11 Dec 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 11 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0522 |
| Deceased | Paul Perrott |
| Coroner | Deborah Archer |
| Coroner area | Plymouth, Torbay and South Devon |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Devon Partnership NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Devon
Partnership
NHS Trust
2.
3.
Langdon
Hospital
,
Langdon
Hospital
1 CORONER
I am Deborah Archer , Assistant Coroner, for the Coroner area of Plymouth , Torbay
and South Devon
2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice
Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations
2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 7th August 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Paul Perrott ,
age 34 The investigation concluded at the end of a jury inquest on 17th November
2023 .The conclusion of the inquest was suicide but the jury answered a number
of questions which raised concern over the level of observations and care given
to Paul during his time on Ashcombe Ward.
4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Mr Perrott was an inpatient on Ashcombe Ward , Langdon Hospital detained in
hospital under sections 37 and 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 . He had spent
most of his adult life in psychiatric hospital and had a recent history of self harm
in that he had attempted to hang himself
on
20th May 2020 before finally succeeding in carrying out the exact same act on 31st
1
July 2020 which this time resulted in his death. Mr Perrott was on 15 minute
observations at the time of his death but these were not recorded and no one
noticed he was missing until 15 minutes after his death .
5 CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
Despite the Trust having prepared a detailed report and addendum for my
consideration after the inquest I am still concerned about the following :
(1) Paul Perrott’s observations charts were not filled out adequately or at all on
the date of his death
(2) There appeared to be a lack of clarity over who was responsible for checking
the observation charts ,when they would be checked by staff over the course of a
working day and who would regularly feed back to staff if there was a problem in
this respect .
(3) At least one member of staff was unaware that Paul had described himself to
staff in May 2020 as looking for an opportunity to take his own life if it arose and
that Paul had attempted to take his own life less than 3 months previously in
exactly the same way as on 31st July 2020.
(4 ) Although certain changes to policy and procedures were described to me
there still seems to be a focus on risk in the “here and now “which does not
include an analysis of historical and contextual risks
6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
Although there have already been changes made to polices and procedures in
the hospital arising out of this death action should be taken:
• To review the procedures in place on the wards to ensure that
observation charts are regularly checked by ward management and
concerns feedback to staff quickly and appropriately
• To ensure that staff members are required and able to easily familiarise
themselves with the full history in relation to each patient they care for as
opposed to simply being made aware of any risks that present on the day
which may not take account of historical or contextual risk .
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such
action.
7 YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this
report,
namely by 5th February 2024 . I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is
proposed.
2
8 COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following
Interested
Persons :
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and
all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
( Brother of the Deceased )
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may
find it useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes
may find it useful or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response,
about the release or the publication of your response.
9
[DATE]
[SIGNED BY CORONER]
3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
CONFIDENTIAL
Trust Headquarters
Wonford House
Dryden Road
Exeter
EX2 9AF
Date: 5 February 2024
Re. Paul Perrott Regulation 28 Report for the attention of Deborah Archer – Assistant
Coroner, Plymouth Torbay and South Devon.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Devon Partnership NHS Trust
2.
3.
, Langdon Hospital
, Langdon Hospital
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
Although there have already been changes made to policies and procedures in the hospital
arising out of this death action should be taken:
• To review the procedures in place on the wards to ensure that observation charts are
regularly checked by ward management and concerns fed back to staff quickly and
appropriately
• To ensure that staff members are required and able to easily familiarise themselves
with the full history in relation to each patient they care for as opposed to simply being
made aware of any risks that present on the day which may not take account of
historical or contextual risk.
Audit Process and Checking Of Completion of Observations
The therapeutic engagement and observation policy (CO6) appendix 1 clearly states the
responsibilities of staff in respect of completing patient observations. In addition, “the nurse in
charge is responsible for ensuring that there are adequate staff resources for the
implementation of engagement and observations and that all staff required to undertake these
are competent to carry out this task”. The policy also states the responsibilities of individual
staff as detailed below.
Ward Managers are responsible for ensuring that all their staff are familiar with this policy and
are trained in the implementation of engagement and observations for the inpatients on their
1
LEGAL\65940745v1
ward. The Therapeutic Engagement and Observation Competency Assessment has been
developed to assist with this and to record that training has taken place.
Nurse in Charge: The inpatient nurse in charge of the shift is responsible for ensuring that all
staff authorised or delegated to carry out the intervention of engagement and observations are
competent to carry out this task. This includes any Allied Health Professionals, Bank or agency
staff who are requested to undertake this duty.
All inpatient Registered staff - have a professional obligation and individual accountability for
their practice and are responsible for ensuring they are familiar with this policy, adhere to its
requirements and associated procedures. This includes ensuring all documentation is
uploaded to the Digital Care Record in the correct place.
Delegation to Unregistered Staff and Students: The Registered Nurse remains accountable
for the decision to delegate engagement and observation to an unregistered member of staff
or student in training, also for ensuring they are sufficiently knowledgeable and competent to
undertake the role. Students may only undertake solo engagement and observation following
an assessment of their competence and confidence by their mentor and once the Therapeutic
Engagement and Observation Competency Assessment has been completed.
Policy states that observation audits to check completion of observations are completed
monthly by senior nurse managers. This process is in place through the quality review of
clinical records and the results of those audits are submitted to the governance manager,
feedback to staff and ward governance meetings. The audit performance is then reviewed
monthly with ward managers at inpatient governance meeting. Engagement and observation
competency checklists are completed for all new staff and these are reviewed and stored by
ward managers with the senior nurse manager’s administrator monitoring compliance for
wards.
An amendment to the Trust therapeutic engagement and observation policy has been
requested to state that the nurse in charge of each shift is responsible for ensuring completion
of observations on a shift by shift basis and taking immediate action where these are not
completed. This will go through ratification in January 2024 and has been discussed with the
Director and Deputy Director of Nursing.
Evidence previously provided to the coroner highlighted there is a regular audit process in
place regarding the quality monitoring of observations but this is a retrospective audit. The
amendment to policy will ensure all staff are clear on responsibilities for checking observation
completion on a shift by shift basis and actions to be taken where gaps or omissions are
identified.
In addition, the patient observation record has a tick box on each observation sheet where the
nurse in charge adds their initials to evidences completion on a shift by shift basis. This has
been reviewed on each inpatient ward by the senior nurse manager to check it is being
completed by the nurse in charge.
Clinical Risk Assessment for Patients
All clinicians and practitioners are responsible for developing, updating and maintaining their
competencies in relation to assessing, formulating and managing clinical risks. Registrant
Clinical staff complete this training 3 yearly as a minimum requirement.
The Clinical risk assessment policy focus on risk to self is the same as the general principles
for clinical risk assessment. This is that each patient has a personalised risk assessment
which outlines potential risks, the immediacy and severity of those risks, whether a clinical risk
2
LEGAL\65940745v1
is stable, increasing or decreasing and what protective measures can be put in place to
manage the risk.
Mental state examination is a key factor in assessing risk as well as historical, static and
dynamic risk factors. A mental state examination consists of a review of a patient’s
appearance and behaviour, speech, mood, affect (observed emotional state), thoughts,
perceptions, cognition and insight. Mental state examination focuses on a person’s state of
mind at the time of the assessment. In addition, where applicable, patients are offered 1:1
sessions by clinicians.
Significant and complex risk (or the potential for those risks) should be discussed in a multi-
disciplinary team meeting and reviewed at regular intervals until the risk is felt to have
reduced. This is regarded as a good practice (4 steps to safety programme). This is already
embedded in the hospital. This model acknowledges the dynamic nature of risk and the
significance of relevant historical risk factors. In addition, it allows for flexibility in making
adjustments to risk management plans.
The ward handover document has been re-designed. As such, there is a document for each
patient which has a photograph of the patient and a section where key historical risk is
recorded. This approach makes it possible for a new staff to the ward to have quick access to
useful historical risk information during their shifts. This takes into consideration that most
patients have lengthy hospital stay with a significant amount of information within the clinical
patient record. The handover document is accessible to staff both in hardcopy and
electronically. In addition, the new electronic recording platform has been designed in such a
way that all clinically relevant risk information are captured on a single domain. This can be
updated as new information is received. This is a departure from a system of multiple risk
information recording domains. This document is accessible to ward staff even when a patient
moves to another ward.
The hospital also employs the use of HCR-20 (Historical Clinical Risk management) tool. This
recommended tool is a structured tool to assess the risk of violence and it records historical
risk factors in details. The task of completing the HCR-20 document is usually undertaken by
the hospital psychology department. The document is presented and shared with members of
the Multidisciplinary team after 3 months of admission then every 6 months till a patient is
discharged. The HCR-20 assessment is completed for every patient. This is also stored
electronically and available to all staff.
Besides documentations, relevant historical factors are discussed in risk meetings attended by
members of the multidisciplinary team. There is a daily risk meeting (except Tuesday when
clinical review meetings take place) on all the wards. Furthermore, historical risk information
are discussed, shared and recorded in patient’s note between teams when a patient moves
ward.
Relevant to risk management, the Trust operates a Risk recording system. There is an already
embedded practice where an account of incident is recorded electronically and once uploaded,
this is risk information is immediately cascaded electronically to members of the
multidisciplinary team and hospital managers. This is received via their NHS emails.
The hospital holds a Directorate operational meeting three times a week. This is attended by
ward managers, clinicians, senior nurses, managers and profession Leads. Any significant risk
event within the directorate is discussed and learning is shared. The risk information as part of
the message from the meeting is cascaded via email to all staff.
3
LEGAL\65940745v1
As part of risk management, the hospital added a practice in 2020 that ensures there is also
staff member in the main ward area who is able to identify any risk issue and respond
appropriately.
- MSc RGN RMN
Executive Chief Nursing Officer & Allied Professions Lead
Director of Infection Prevention & Control
Trusts Caldicott Guardian
Honorary Senior Lecturer University of Exeter.
Signed:
Date: 05/02/2024
4
LEGAL\65940745v1
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Devon Partnership NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.