Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Adrian Gallagher

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0010, written 28 Dec 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report28 Dec 2023
Reference2024-0010
DeceasedAdrian Gallagher
CoronerVictoria Davies
Coroner areaCheshire
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Organisation namedMersey Care NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published3

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 
Department for Health and Social Care 
National Crime Agency 
Department for Science, Innovation & 
Technology 

1  CORONER 

I am Victoria DAVIES, Area Coroner for the coroner area of Cheshire 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 17 November 2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of Adrian Brendan 
GALLAGHER aged 24.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 19 
December 2023.  The conclusion of the inquest was that: 

This was a death due to suicide. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Adrian Gallagher had a history of mental health struggles dating back to 2013, with no 
definitive diagnosis.  On 12 June 2017 he was admitted to Hollins Park Hospital as an 
informal patient, but was discharged at his request on 16 June 2017.  The same day, he 
was taken to hospital having been found intoxicated at a bridge, with suicidal ideation.  He 
was formally sectioned under the Mental Health Act the following day and re-admitted to 
Hollins Park.  During the admission, Adrian’s condition appeared to stabilise with changes to 
his medication, and he was allowed long periods of unescorted leave.  By August 2017 he 
was awaiting a bed at Lea Court, a rehabilitation unit, and was spending the majority of the 
day away from the hospital.  His presentation during this period did not give the hospital 
team or his parents cause for concern in relation to self harm/ suicidal ideation.  On 9 
November 2017 Adrian returned to hospital following a period of leave at his father’s house. 
No concerns or changes to his presentation were noted.  Sadly, he was found deceased in 
bed the following morning, with his death confirmed at 08.50 on 10 November 2017.  His 
death was due to an intentional 

 overdose. 

Police interrogation of Adrian’s phone after his death identified that on 12 September 2017 
he made a purchase from 
.  It is not clear from the phone records 
what that purchase was, but it was the evidence at the inquest that the most likely 
. 
purchase was 

  It was 
the evidence of the attending police officer that, although not easy to do, you can also buy 
pentobarbital through the site. 

 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

 is available to anyone to purchase online, directly from the 
company.  The company appears to have some link to the UK as there is a UK helpline 
 appears to provide step by step instruction on how to end your life 
number.  The 
using certain methods, including how to make the death appear to be due to natural causes 
and therefore avoid referral to the coroner.  Whilst the introduction suggests it is aimed at 
those who are elderly and long-term suffering, there is also reference to suicide for other 
reasons within the book and is likely to appear to vulnerable mental health patients. 

According to the evidence of the police officer, you can also buy drugs to end your life 
through this website. 

The only check on age and ID appears to be after a purchase, to allow you access to online 
forums where you can get further advice on best methods. 

The 
to encourage/ assist in suicide. 

 has been banned in Australia (and possibly other countries) as it is deemed 

The 
directly to flag this). 

, in some format, is also available on Amazon (and I am writing to Amazon 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by February 22, 2024.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

Mr Gallagher’s family 
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 28/12/2023 

Victoria DAVIES 
Area Coroner for 
Cheshire 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department for Science Innovation and Techonology (PDF)
Rt Hon Michelle Donelan MP 
Secretary of State for Science, Innovation 
and Technology 
100 Parliament Street 
London SW1A 2BQ 

www.gov.uk/dsit 

21 February 2024 

Victoria Davies 
Area Coroner for Cheshire 

Dear Ms Davies,  

Thank you for your correspondence of 28 December 2023, and for the opportunity to respond 
to this Report to Prevent Future Deaths, regarding the tragic death of Adrian Brendan 
Gallagher. I would firstly like to extend my deepest condolences to the family and friends of 
Adrian. I was very sorry to read about the circumstances surrounding his death. 

The Online Safety Act (the act), as you may know, received Royal Assent in October last year 
and will ensure that tech companies take more responsibility for the online safety of their users. 
The new laws will apply to search services and all companies that allow users to post content 
online or to interact with each other (known as user-to-user services), including for example, 
online forums. The safety duties in the act will not apply to websites that do not host user 
generated content or facilitate interaction between users or are search services. With this in 
mind, I will set out how the act will protect users from illegal suicide and self-harm content once 
the relevant duties are in force. 

When the act's illegal safety duties are in force, all in-scope user-to-user services will be 
required to have systems and processes in place to proactively prevent users from being 
exposed to priority illegal content via their service, and to minimise the length of time for which 
such content is present. The priority offences are set out in schedules 5, 6 and 7 and include 
content that amounts to an offence under the Suicide Act 1961, as well as content facilitating 
the sale of illegal drugs, as per the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. This will help to protect all users 
- children and adults - from encountering such content. 

The act also creates a new communications offence of encouraging or assisting serious self-
harm which applies to acts both inside and outside the UK, if the act is committed by a person 
who is either in the UK when they commit the offence or are habitually resident in the UK. In 
other circumstances, a prosecutor may be able to rely on the common law position that, where 
a case has a "substantial connection" to the UK, the offence can be prosecuted in the UK 
unless it could be argued that the conduct ought to be dealt with by the courts of another 
country. Providers will be required to put in place systems and processes that allow them to 
rapidly remove content that amounts to this offence. 

Search services will also have targeted duties that focus on mitigating and minimising the 
presentation of illegal search content, such as image or text search results, to users. These 
duties will play a key role in reducing the volume of user traffic directed to websites with illegal 
suicide and self-harm content, whether or not the content on these websites is user-generated. 
This will reduce the ease at which users can find these kinds of horrifying sites and content. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 There will be sites and services that choose not to comply with the act's regulatory framework. 
In these instances, Ofcom has a suite of enforcement powers to support its regulatory 
functions. These extend to instances where a company is based overseas - if the service has a 
significant number of UK users or the UK as a target market. Ofcom's powers include the ability 
to impose substantial fines of up to £18 million or 10% of global revenue (whichever is higher), 
as well as applying to the court for business disruption measures. These are court orders that 
require third parties (those who provide an access facility to such services, such as internet 
service providers) to prevent, restrict or deter access to non-compliant services in extreme 
services. 

Every suicide is a tragedy, and my department is working with other departments to tackle the 
deeply concerning issue of vulnerable users gaining access to harmful content online, whether 
on services that are in scope of the act or otherwise. The act introduces much needed 
protections for users and we are working closely with Ofcom to ensure that the implementation 
of the framework is as quick as possible. 

Yours sincerely, 

Rt Hon Michelle Donelan MP 
Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology
Response from Department of Health and Social Care (PDF)
From Maria Caulfield MP 
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State 
Department of Health & Social Care 

39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

28 March 2024 

Ms Victoria Davies  
Area Coroner  
For the coroner area of Cheshire 

Dear Ms Davies, 

Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 28th December 
2023 regarding the death of Mr Adrian Brendan Gallagher. I am replying as Minister with 
responsibility for suicide prevention at the Department of Health and Social Care. 

Firstly, I would like to say how deeply saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr 
Gallagher’s death.  Whilst I know that it will come as little comfort to his family, I 
nevertheless hope they will accept my heartfelt condolences.  

The Government remains extremely concerned about the prevalence of abhorrent suicide 
and self-harm content online, and sadly, we are aware of the content that you have raised. 

We keep under constant review what the most appropriate actions are to take to reduce 
the harm caused by publications like the 
. In doing this, we work 
closely with other government departments, charities and experts to review actions 
regularly and continue to monitor the impact. This includes learning lessons from 
international examples where these are relevant. 

I welcome your decision to write to Amazon to flag these concerns. My officials continue to 
work with the police and suicide prevention charities to revisit the conversations they have 
had with online marketplaces on the sale of harmful publications. I would be interested to 
see a copy of Amazon’s response to you should they reply, to support those 
conversations.  

The Government is taking a leading role in tackling methods of suicide, collaborating with 
partners across the world in policy, law enforcement and society more broadly to limit 
access, and share research, evidence and lessons learned. This includes seeking to 
tackle at source the suppliers of harmful substances for the purposes of suicide.  

The Department of Health and Social Care leads a cross-sector, cross-government 
working group to tackle emerging methods, working with those partners. As a result of this 
group, there are now over thirty actions in place to reduce awareness and limit access to 
methods of suicide, including the one used by Mr Gallagher. The group meets regularly 
and remains vigilant to any further methods that we receive intelligence on, and will not 
hesitate to act should it be required. 

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 As a Government, we are committed to tackling online safety and reducing the prevalence 
of harmful suicide and self-harm content.  

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) will respond outlining how 
the Online Safety Act will address illegal and harmful self-harm and suicide content.  The 
Department of Health and Social Care will continue to work closely with DSIT and Ofcom 
to support this work.  We will also continue our support of programmes such as the 
Samaritan’s Online Excellence Programme, which provides support and guidance for 
some of the biggest online platforms.  

To close, we want to assure you that online safety and tackling methods of suicide are 
critical components of the Suicide Prevention Strategy, and we, alongside our expert 
advisory group, will continue to do what we can to prevent future deaths of this manner.  

I hope this reply is helpful.  Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. 

Yours sincerely, 

MARIA CAULFIELD
Response from National Crime Agency (PDF)
OFFICIAL 

National Crime Agency 
PO Box 8000 
London 
SE11 5EN 

Victoria Davies 
HM Area Coroner, Cheshire 
By e-mail only 

20 February 2024 

Dear Ms Davies, 

Thank you for your letter of 28 December 2023 regarding  the death of Adrian 
Gallagher. 

I would like to say how deeply saddened I was to read of the circumstances of 
Mr  Gallagher’s  death.  I’d  like  to  offer  my  condolences  to  his  family  and  loved 
ones. 

I’m  grateful  to  you  for  raising  your  concerns  about  the  availability  of 
information regarding suicide methods online.  

As a result of your letter we have been engaging with Ofcom, the online safety 
regulator  under  the  Online  Safety  Act,  to  scope  out  how  we  can  work 
effectively  together,  within  our  respective  roles,  to  combat  illegal  suicide 
content online. The NCA understands that Ofcom is in the process of consulting 
on its draft codes of practice and guidance that will explain the steps regulated 
online  services  will  need  to  take  to  meet  their  legal  duties  under  the  Act  to 
protect their users in the UK from this sort of content. 

The  handbook  in  question  describes  a  number  of  drugs  that  have  been 
classified  as  Class  A  and  Class  B  under  schedules  2  and  3  of  the  Misuse  of 
Drugs  Act  2001.  These  are  being  tackled  under  the  HMG  Drugs  Strategy,  by 
prioritising breaking drug supply chains and limiting the volume of illicit drugs 
available in the UK. 

The  NCA  also  welcomes  the  Suicide  Prevention  strategy,  published  on  11 
September  2023  by  the  Department  of  Health  and  Social  Care,  alongside  a 
commitment to reduce the lives lost to suicide. The strategy sets out national 
ambitions for suicide prevention over the next 5 years, which include everyone 
having a role to play in suicide prevention. As a consequence of the strategy, 

Leading the UK's fight to cut serious and organised crime 
1 of 3 

OFFICIAL 

  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 OFFICIAL 

all  areas  of  the  country  now  have  local  suicide  prevention  plans,  including 
guidance on providing bespoke support to  specific groups and communities of 
concern, including those who have been in contact with mental health services. 
I  understand  this  is  supported  by  a  £57  million  investment  through  the  NHS 
Long Term Plan. 

Within  the  strategy,  the  NCA  particularly  welcomes  the  references  to 
continuing  to  support  search  engine  and  social  media  platforms  to  remove 
content that encourages suicide and provide ready access to suicide prevention 
services, and the read across to the Online Safety Act. The strategy also aims 
to clearly define who is responsible and accountable for keeping the public safe 
from  this  content.  Work  so  far  has  involved  high  quality  signposting  and 
support being prevalent across a wide range of platforms. A recent example of 
this  is  the  Google  OneBox,  a  pop-up  alert  that  provides  details  about  how  to 
contact Shout or the Samaritans. 

The strategy foreshadows the  recently  enacted  Online Safety  Act, which I am 
sure you are aware of. This Act requires all in-scope companies to tackle illegal 
content, such as suicide and self-harm content. Requirements have also been 
made  that  the  largest  services  will  have  to  offer  adults  optional  tools  to  limit 
their  exposure  to  legal  content  that  encourages,  promotes  or  provides 
instructions for suicide or self-harm. A further extension of this is the Criminal 
Justice Bill, introduced to the House of Commons on 14 November 2023, and, 
at time of writing, is in its reporting stage at the House of Commons. Sections 
11 and 12 of this bill look to replace Section 184 of the Online Safety Act with 
a broader offence covering “any act capable of encouraging or assisting serious 
self-harm of another person”, with an emphasis on harmful intent. 

I  also  wanted  to  bring  to  your  attention  the  work  that  Department  of  Health 
and  Social  Care  are  doing  with  Samaritans  on  the  delivery  of  their  online 
excellence programme. This involves developing a hub of excellence in suicide 
prevention and the online environment, working in partnership with Facebook, 
Instagram,  Google,  YouTube,  Twitter  and  Pinterest  and  aims  to  promote 
consistently  high  standards  across  the  sector.  This  will  be  crucial  in  changing 
the availability of harmful content online. 

Thank  you  for  bringing  these  important  concerns  to  our  attention  and  I  hope 
you find this brief summary of the work being done across the government and 
the NCA, helpful.  

If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Leading the UK's fight to cut serious and organised crime 
2 of 3 

OFFICIAL 

  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 OFFICIAL 

T/Deputy Director 
Borders & Commodities 
National Crime Agency 

Leading the UK's fight to cut serious and organised crime 
3 of 3 

OFFICIAL

Related reports

Other reports by Victoria Davies

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.