Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Glyn Ackerley

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0478, written 27 Nov 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Nov 2023
Reference2023-0478
DeceasedGlyn Ackerley
CoronerVictoria Davies
Coroner areaCheshire
CategoryEmergency services related deaths (2019 onwards) · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: NHS Pathways, care of the Department for 
Health and Social Care. 

1  CORONER 

I am Victoria Davies, Area Coroner for the coroner area of Cheshire 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 08 September 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Glyn ACKERLEY 
aged 56.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 22 November 2022.  The 
conclusion of the inquest was that: Glyn Ackerley died after becoming unresponsive at 
home on 4 September 2022, the cause of which cannot be determined. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Glyn Ackerley had a number of health issues which necessitated him taking pain relieving 
medication including 

. 

On 4 September 2022 he reported to his wife that he had swallowed 
left the address.  His wife telephoned for an ambulance (North West Ambulance Service) at 
21.48 and the call was triaged as a category 3 response based on the NHS Pathways 
algorithm.  At 22.37 the police called the ambulance service and advised that he was 
having difficulty breathing.  The call was upgraded to a category 1 response and the 
ambulance arrived at 22.52 

 and 

The evidence was inconclusive as to whether Mr Ackerley had in fact swallowed 

 as he reported to his wife, with levels of 

 found in his blood post mortem 

being consistent with both an overdose and the therapeutic range. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 
The current NHS Pathways process does not differentiate between a high risk and low risk 
overdose, categorising all such calls without additional symptoms as category 3.  Evidence 
was heard during the inquest that time is of the essence when dealing with an opiate 
overdose, and giving reversal medication prior to any respiratory depression or cardiac 
arrest will likely have a better outcome.  In light of the concerns raised by this case, NWAS 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 have reviewed their process and added in additional questions for call handlers to identity 
high risk medications involved in an overdose, which they then automatically categorise as 
a category 2 and send for a call back from a clinician immediately. 
NWAS gave evidence in writing that they had raised the concern and their suggested 
management with the National NHS Pathways team on 6 April 2023, with the result that 
the national team would continue to review the process but with clinical review in 15 
minutes and high risk medications being upgraded to category 2.  It is unclear from the 
evidence whether this is a proposed change to the process in place in September 2022 
which would mean Mr Ackerley would have had a category 2 response at 21.48, or whether 
the system remains the same.  If the system is not for a category 2 response for high risk 
medication, it is my concern that this will not allow for prompt treatment of those who have 
taken a potentially fatal overdose. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by January 17, 2024.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons: 
Mr Ackerley’s family 

I have also sent it to North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 27/11/2023 

Victoria DAVIES 
Area Coroner for 
Cheshire 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England (PDF)
Victoria Davies  
Cheshire Coroner Area 
The West Annexe 
Town Hall  
Sankey Street 
Warrington 
Cheshire 
WA1 1UH  

Dear Coroner, 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

6 March 2024  

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Glyn Ackerley who died 
on 4 September 2022 

Thank  you  for  your  Report  to  Prevent  Future  Deaths  (hereafter  “Report”)  dated  27 
November  2023  concerning  the  death  of  Glyn  Ackerley  on  4  September  2022.  In 
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to 
express my deep condolences to Glyn’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen 
to assure the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about Glyn’s care have 
been listened to and reflected upon.  

I apologise for the delay in responding to the coroner and for any anguish this delay 
may have caused Glyn’s family. Due to the initial email containing the Report being 
misdirected, the relevant team at NHS England only became aware of the Report on 
8 February 2024. I realise that Coroner Reports can form part of the important process 
of family and friends coming to terms with what has happened to their loved ones and 
appreciate this will have been an incredibly difficult time for them.  

In your Report you raised the concern that the current NHS Pathways process does 
not differentiate between a high risk and low risk overdose, categorising all such calls 
without  additional  symptoms,  as  Category  3.  You  also  raised  that  it  was  unclear 
whether  NHS  Pathways  would  be  making  changes  to  their  existing  processes 
following the inquest into Glyn’s care.  

NHS Pathways is owned by DHSC. However, the Transformation Directorate within 
NHS England have overall management and responsibility for the clinical governance 
of NHS Pathways, and it has therefore been agreed with the DHSC that NHS England 
will respond to your Report directly.  

Background on NHS Pathways System 

NHS Pathways is an interlinked series of algorithms, or pathways, that link questions 
and care advice to clinical endpoints known as “dispositions”. The system presents a 
series  of  questions  to  arrive  at  the  most  appropriate  disposition,  based  on  the 

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 presenting symptoms. The disposition will determine the response skill set and time 
frame that a patient requires.  

NHS Pathways uses a clinical hierarchy, to ensure that life-threatening symptoms are 
assessed at the start of any call, and progressing through to less urgent symptoms 
which require a less urgent response. NHS Pathways is not diagnostic, but instead 
works on the basis of 'ruling out'.  

Overdoses and ambulance categorisation 

Where an overdose has occurred, and in the absence of signs or symptoms indicating 
an  immediate  life-threat  (reduced  conscious  level,  breathlessness,  or  shock,  for 
example),  the  lowest  disposition  that  can  be  reached  is  a  Category  3  ambulance 
response. A quicker response will be actioned where there are symptoms indicating 
an immediate life threat.  

In  2019,  NHS  Pathways  developed  a  new  disposition  code  ‘Dx0124  Emergency 
Ambulance Response for Risk of Suicide (Category 3)’. This code facilitates improved 
visibility of overdose and suicide attempt cases within the ambulance dispatch queue. 

In April 2021, NHS England and Improvement, in collaboration with the Association of 
Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) published a new operational procedure1 for all 
ambulance services in England which sets out that, where an overdose is declared, a 
further clinical intervention should take place within 30 minutes, and/or the case will 
be automatically upgraded to a Category 2 ambulance response if this does not occur 
within 40 minutes. If, on review the clinical view is that, given the individual factors of 
the  case  this  should  be  upgraded  to  a  Category  1  or  2  emergency  ambulance 
response this is done without delay.  

In  October  2023  a  review  of  this  document  was  completed  by  the  Emergency  Call 
Prioritisation  Advisory  Group  (ECPAG,  NHS  England)  and  the  National  Ambulance 
Service  Medical  Director’s  Group  (NASMeD,  Association  of  Ambulance  Chief 
Executives) to ensure it remains fit for purpose.  

Assessing “high risk” vs “low risk” substances 

The  further  clinical  assessment  referenced  above  involves  gathering  clinical 
information about the substance(s) ingested and their quantities. It is recommended 
that  health  advisors  use  TOXBASE®  to  support  this  assessment.  TOXBASE  is  the 
clinical  toxicology  database  of  the  UK  National  Poisons  Information  Service  that 
clinicians  have  access  to,  to  help  support  clinical  decision  making  when  excess 
medications have been ingested.  

Health  advisors  are  not  clinicians,  and  their  training  therefore  ensures  an 
understanding  of  where  they  should  seek  supervisory,  or  clinical,  support.  This 
includes  instances  where  medical  information,  such  as  medication  names,  are 

1 Entitled ‘Category 3/ 999 Overdose and Suicidal Ideation Calls; Initial Assessment of 
Lethality/Toxicity Principles Document’ 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 volunteered  during  the  assessment  where  they  are  not  expected  to  understand  or 
identify the medication names or drug classifications.  

NHS Pathways also provides a telephone consultation tool called Pathways Clinical 
Consultation Support System (PaCCS). This is for use by experienced clinicians and 
lends  itself  more  to  a  consultation-led  assessment  rather  than  triage.  Within  each 
clinical  template  there  is  additional  supporting  information  and  links  to  approved 
websites that can be viewed if required. 

Should national guidance or standards be amended such that toxic substances, where 
identified,  impact  on  ambulance  categorisation  or  disposition,  NHS  England  would 
align the NHS Pathways system accordingly.  

Further information 

The specific details of this case were not shared with NHS Pathways. However, the 
NHS  Pathways  team  has  discussed  this  case  with  North  West  Ambulance  Service 
(NWAS)  in  response  to  their  concerns  regarding  overdoses  and  suicidal  ideation 
cases.  

On 6th April 2023, NHS Pathways discussed with NWAS:  

•  The background to decisions made. 
•  Understanding competing pressures in ambulance queue management. 
•  The requirement to not inappropriately increase risk in category 2 responses. 
•  Recommendation  that  concerns  and  proposals  for  change  should  be  raised 

with the Clinical Coding Review Group (CCRG) and ECPAG.  

•  That any changes to categorisation defined by these groups would be enacted 
into the NHS Pathways system, reflecting changes in national standards.  

•  Category 3 / 999 overdose and suicidal ideation calls. 
• 

Initial assessment of lethality/toxicity principles document that the Association 
of Ambulance Chief Executives issued in April 2021 was also re-shared. 

Governance of NHS Pathways 

The  safety  of  the  clinical  triage  process  endpoints  resulting  from  a  111  or  999 
assessment  using  NHS  Pathways,  is  overseen  by  the  National  Clinical  Assurance 
Group  (NCAG),  an  independent  intercollegiate  group  hosted  by  the  Academy  of 
Medical Royal Colleges. This group is made up of representatives from Medical Royal 
Colleges  and  other  clinical  professional  bodies  and  groups.  Senior  clinicians  from 
these organisations provide independent oversight and scrutiny of the NHS Pathways 
clinical content. The group considers all aspects of the triage process, including the 
impact on services, as well as the evidence base for changes to the clinical content. 
All changes to, and development of, the core telephone system and other platforms, 
are  formally  documented  and  presented  for  a  critique  in  accordance  with  agreed 
processes endorsed by NCAG. 

Alongside this independent oversight, NHS Pathways ensures its clinical content and 
assessment protocols are consistent with the latest advice from respected bodies that 
provide evidence and guidance for clinical practice in the UK. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking 
place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed 
by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical  Directors,  and 
other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key 
learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both 
a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends 
that may require further review and action.  

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information. 

Yours sincerely, 

National Medical Director

Related reports

Other reports by Victoria Davies

See all →

More reports categorised “Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards)”

See all →

Track Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.