Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0056, written 2 Feb 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 2 Feb 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0056 |
| Deceased | Samuel Jordan |
| Coroner | Nicholas Rheinberg |
| Coroner area | Exeter and Devon |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust · Devon Partnership NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
NHS England, PO Box 16738, Redditch, B97 9PT
1
CORONER
I am Nicholas Leslie Rheinberg, assistant coroner for the coroner’s area of Exeter and
Devon
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 1st April 2020 an inquest was opened into the death of Samuel Thomas Jordan aged
25 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 30th January 2024.
The conclusion of the inquest jury was that Samuel Thomas Jordan died as a result of
suspension by a ligature, his death being by suicide whilst suffering from mental illness.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Samuel Thomas Jordan was sentenced to 8 weeks’ imprisonment at HMP Exeter. This
was his first time in prison. He suffered from mental illness which whilst in prison
manifested itself in bizarre behaviour and an act of self-harm. Following fights with a cell
mate on 26th March 2020 he was placed in a single occupancy cell where he was found
hanging about 4 ½ hours later
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
During the four months before his imprisonment, Samuel Jordan had been receiving
treatment for severe anxiety while registered as a temporary patient with a medical
practice in Launceston, Cornwall. Samuel had come to Cornwall from his home in
Whitchurch, Hampshire where he was registered with another GP practice. On entering
HMP Exeter, the prison Healthcare obtained a summary of Samuel’s GP records from
Hampshire via the NHS spine. The records from the Launceston practice were not sent
to the prison since the NHS spine only operates to transmit records from the permanent
GP practice and not a practice consulted on a temporary basis. As a result, Exeter
Prison Healthcare was unaware of Samuel’s mental health issues immediately before
coming to Prison and was unaware of a current medication prescription lack of which the
jury found contributed to Samuel’s death.
The inquest heard that prisoners coming to prison frequently were nomadic and
frequently had registered with GP practices on a temporary basis with the records from
such practices not coming to the notice of prison healthcare as such records are not
1
accessible through the NHS spine. Lack of access through the NHS Spine to the records
of the practice where Samuel was registered as a temporary patient was, the jury found,
a contributory factor in Samuel’s death.
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
6
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your
organisation has the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 2nd April 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons namely the Samuel Thomas Jordan’s family, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust,
Practice Plus Group, Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust, Devon Partnership NHS Trust
and Ministry of Justice.
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
9
Dated 2nd February 2024 SIGNED N.L.Rheinberg
Assistant Coroner
2
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Nicholas Leslie Rheinberg
Exeter and Devon Coroner’s Service
Room 226 County Hall
Topsham Road
Exeter
Devon
EX2 4QD
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
9th April
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Samuel Thomas Jordan
who died on 26 March 2020.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 2
February 2024 concerning the death of Samuel Thomas Jordan on 26 March 2020. In
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to
express my deep condolences to Samuel’s family and loved ones. NHS England are
keen to assure the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about Samuel’s
care have been listened to and reflected upon.
I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to your Report and I apologise for
any anguish this delay may have caused to Samuel’s family or friends. I realise that
responses to Coroner Reports can form part of the important process of family and
friends coming to terms with what has happened to their loved ones and appreciate
this will have been an incredibly difficult time for them.
Your Report raised the concern that NHS Spine only operates to transmit records from
a GP Practice where a patient is registered as permanent, and not a GP Practice
consulted on a temporary basis. In Samuel’s case, this meant that Exeter Prison
Healthcare were not aware of Samuel’s mental health issues or current prescription.
Your Report raised the point that prisoners were frequently nomadic and may be
registered with GP practices on a temporary basis.
NHS England has been working to improve the processes around information sharing
between the detained estate and the wider NHS. This includes enabling access to a
range of Spine connected services including Personal Demographics Service (PDS),
Electronic Referral Service (eRS) and GP2GP Transfer. As a result of these changes,
some patients transferring into the detained estate will have a GP2GP transfer
whereby the patient’s electronic GP record is sent from their previously registered GP
Practice to the new GP Practice that they register with within the detained estate.
Further details are available via the links below:
• Detained estate overview: https://pcse.england.nhs.uk/services/medical-
records/detained-estates
• GP2GP Transfer: https://pcse.england.nhs.uk/services/medical-
records/gp2gp-transfer
• Primary Care Support England (PCSE) web guidance regarding registering
patients with the detained estate: https://pcse.england.nhs.uk/help/patient-
registrations/patient-registrations
Patients within the adult male and children and young people’s secure estate (adult
male prisons, young offender institutions and secure training centres) have the
opportunity to register with healthcare at their place of detention. This means a GP2GP
transfer can now take place, electronically transferring the patient’s community GP
record into the clinical system in place across the secure estate, and then back out to
the community when the patient registers with a GP on release. The ability for a
GP2GP transfer of a community GP record into the prison healthcare system was
rolled out to the male prison estate between February and July 2022, so this option
was not available at the time of Samuel’s death, but I hope provides assurance around
current practice.
Regarding management of temporary resident patients and information flow, the
relevant NHS England guidance
found here:
https://pcse.england.nhs.uk/help/patient-registrations/patient-
registrations. Specifically, within the ‘Managing temporary registrations’ section, this
guidance includes the following points:
to GP practices can be
•
•
•
‘A temporary registration (GMSE) can be in place for three months. A GMSE
form will need to be completed by the patient.’
‘GP practices can apply discretion in judging when it is appropriate to
permanently register the patient with their GP Practice’. We note that in this
matter, Samuel was a temporary resident at the GP Practice in Cornwall for
four months.
Information sharing back to the patient’s permanent registered GP Practice is
currently
process:
via
https://pcse.england.nhs.uk/services/medical-records/temporary-resident-
forms-gms3
managed
PCSE
a
• Once a GMSE form is received by the patient’s registered GP Practice, the
information should be transferred into the patient’s GP record and made
available via the Summary Care Record.
The Summary Care Record has been enabled for viewing in the detained estate for a
number of years. In 2020, when Samuel died, SCRs were accessed using the
Summary Care Record application. However, currently users across the detained
estate will access the SCR via the National Care Records Service NCRS (see further
information below).
In summary, there are existing processes around the management of temporary
resident patients. These support GP Practices to take over the management of
patients by registering them permanently at the new practice where this is appropriate.
Where care continues to be provided on a temporary basis, there are existing
information flows to send information about the care episode back to the patients’
registered GP Practice via the GMS3 form, where the patient has consented, and for
this information to then be integrated into the patients’ registered GP record so that
the information can be made available in SCR and other GP extracts. Separate work
over the last few years has also enabled patients’ healthcare information to flow into
and out of the detained estate via the GP2GP process with GP Practices within the
detained estate being able to receive and manage the patient’s longitudinal GP record.
If a patient has not consented to a GP2GP transfer via the GMS3 form, the GP2GP
transfer cannot take place and the registered GP should instead be contacted directly
for a summary.
For further background information, the NCRS is the improved successor to the
Summary Care Record application (SCRa). SCRa has provided access to Spine
services for clinical users for a number of years. NCRS has been developed gradually
over the last four to five years, and as the NCRS product has matured, we have been
migrating users across from SCRa to NCRS throughout 2023.
As a minimum, the SCR contains important information about:
• current medication
• allergies and details of any previous reactions to medicines
•
the name, address, date of birth and NHS number of the patient
In addition, details of long-term conditions, significant medical history, or specific
communications needs, is now included by default for patients with an SCR, unless
they have previously told the NHS that they did not want this information to be
shared. For more information, and to illustrate the type of content included in an SCR,
an example SCR is available here: Additional Information in the SCR
Additional Information in the SCR includes the active problems and many significant
past problems for a patient as recorded by their registered GP practice. In reference
to Samuel’s case, this could include mental health conditions (e.g. bipolar disorder) or
previous psychotic episodes. In addition, a history of deliberate self-harm, suicide
attempts or suicidal ideation where these have been recorded as problems in the
patient’s GP record. However, apart from the date, the SCR would not include further
details of the episodes of deliberate self-harm, suicide attempts or suicidal ideation.
Therefore, the SCR does not contain any documents (e.g. a mental health care plan
or mental health crisis plan) but the SCR can act as a signpost to unscheduled care
clinicians to seek further information from other teams involved in the care of the
patient.
I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking
place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed
by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and
other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key
learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both
a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends
that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.