Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Georgia Dehaney-Perkins

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0059, written 5 Feb 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report5 Feb 2024
Reference2024-0059
DeceasedGeorgia Dehaney-Perkins
CoronerSonia Hayes
Coroner areaEssex
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. 

, CEO, Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust 

1 

2 

3 

4 

CORONER 

I am Sonia Hayes, Area Coroner, for the coroner area of Essex 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 
2013. 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  13  September  2022  an  investigation  was  commenced  into  the  death  of 
Georgia  Gypsy  Catherine  Dehaney-Perkins  aged  36  years.  Georgia  Dehaney-
Perkins died on the 6 September 2022. The investigation concluded at the end 
of the inquest on 6 December 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was Narrative 
‘Ms  Dehaney-Perkins  consumed  prescription  medication  and  alcohol  and  had 
been  previously  found  at  the  same  location  when  she  went  missing.  It  is  not 
possible to determine if Ms Dehaney-Perkins intended the outcome to be fatal’ 
with  a  medical  cause  of  death  of  ‘1a  a  Combined  Alcohol  and  Drug  Toxicity 
(

) 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Georgia Dehaney-Perkins was found deceased on 6 September 2022 on Latton 
Common, Harlow by her family who had reported her missing that morning and 
gave this as the last known location of Georgia. Police did not attend Georgia’s 
home address and downgraded her from a missing person to a concern and did 
not  inform  the  family  of  the  decision.  Ms  Dehaney-Perkins  sought  medical 
assistance  when  she  began  to  struggle  with  her  mental  health  and  following  a 
misdiagnosis of cancer. Ms Dehaney-Perkins had a known history of self-harm, 
suicidal  ideation  and  being  found  as  an  at-risk  missing  person  with  inpatient 
admissions  for  care  and  treatment  due  to  her  deteriorating  mental  health.  Ms 
Dehaney-Perkins’ recent overdose of medication required admission to hospital 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 as  she  could  not  keep  herself  safe.  Ms  Dehaney-Perkins  attempted  to  hang 
herself on 28 August whilst in her bathroom on the ward. Ms Dehaney-Perkins 
was discharged on 2 September 2022 with 14 days’ supply of her medication. A 
24-hour follow-up call had not been made by mental health services. The Home 
First Treatment Team assessed Ms Dehaney-Perkins on 4 September at home 
and  transferred  her  care  back  to  her  care  co-ordinator.  Ms  Dehaney-Perkins 
was  suffering  from  mental  health  disorder  with  features  of  self-harm  that 
elevated  when  she  consumed  alcohol.  Ms  Dehaney-Perkins’  father  contacted 
the  Home  First  Treatment  Team  on  the  evening  of  4  September  asking if  they 
had  attended  that  day  and  informed  the  nurse  that  he  understood  that  Ms 
Dehaney-Perkins  had  consumed  alcohol,  police  had  attended,  and  she  left 
home  with  her  medication.  The  Home  First  Treatment  Team  nurse  did  not 
attempt to contact Ms Dehaney Perkins, her partner or the police. Ms Dehaney-
Perkins  died  due  to  Combined  Alcohol  and  Drug  Toxicity  (

) that interacted to increase sedation and cardiac arrhythmia causing 

death. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During  the  course  of  the  inquest  the  evidence  revealed  matters  giving  rise  to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action 
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

(1)  On  28  August  Ms  Dehaney-Perkins  was  agitated  and  distressed  on 
return to the ward from leave and had consumed alcohol that was known 
to  increase  her risk  of  self-harm. 

.  Staff  found  Ms  Dehaney-

Perkins and removed the ligature.   
a.  Ms  Dehaney-Perkins  was  admitted  to  a  room  with  an  assisted 
bathroom  (this  was  not  a  requirement  for  her)  with  a  fault  in  the  anti-
ligature  safety  mechanism  meant  that  the  safety  feature  could  not  be 
implemented.  

b.  There  was  no  risk  assessment  about  the  suitability  of  this  room  for  Ms 
Dehaney-Perkins a patient with a self-harming history at the time of the 
admission.  

c.  The  fixed-point  ligature  was  not  appropriately  updated  in  the  risk 
assessment and was not discussed at a discharge planning meeting.  

d.  The Trust Datix Report was incomplete 

(2)  Medication was appropriately withheld on 28 August when Ms Dehaney-
Perkins returned to the ward intoxicated due to potential interaction with 
alcohol that can cause increased sedation,  

(3)  arrhythmia and fatality.  

a.  This  risk  of  consuming  alcohol  with  her  specific  medication  was  not 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 discussed with the Ms Dehaney-Perkins or family.  

b.  Not all incidents of consumption of alcohol on return from leave were 

recorded and risk assessments were not updated.  

c.  Ms  Dehaney-Perkins  had  agreed  to  mitigations  of  medication 
management  by  her  family  that  were  not  recorded  on  the  care  plan 
on  discharge  on  2  September.  Ms  Dehaney-Perkins  demanded 
control  of  her  medication  on  4  September  against  concerns  of  her 
family who were forced to return medication.  

(4)  The Home First Treatment Team attended a scheduled appointment on 
4 September and Ms Dehaney-Perkins appeared stable and updated the 
risk  assessment  that  the  risk  of  self-harm  remained  significant  when 
alcohol  was  consumed.  No  action  was  taken  following  a  call  raising 
some  queries  and  concerns from  family  that  evening  that Ms  Dehaney-
Perkins had left her home with her medication.  

 6 

7 

8 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
and your organisation have the power to take such action.  

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 31 March 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be  taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is 
proposed. 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I  have  sent  a  copy  of  my  report  to  the  Chief  Coroner  and  to  the  following 
Interested Persons: 

•  The family of Ms Dehaney-Perkins 
•  Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Trust 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it 
useful or of interest. 

The  Chief  Coroner  may  publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or 
summary  form.  He  may  send  a  copy  of  this  report  to  any  person  who  he 
believes may find it useful or of interest.  

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, 
about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

05.02.2024                    

HM Area Coroner for Essex Sonia Hayes 

4

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
28 March 2024 

Private and Confidential  

Ms Sonia Hayes   
HM Area Coroner for Essex Coroner’s Office    
Seax House Victoria Road  
Essex  
South Chelmsford  
CM1 1QH   

Chief Executive Office 

                   The Lodge 
          Lodge Approach 

Wickford 
SS11 7XX 

Dear Ms Hayes, 

Georgia Gypsy Catherine Dehaney-Perkins (RIP) 

I write to set out the Trust’s formal response to the report made under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of 
the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013, dated 5th February 2024 in respect of the above, which was issued following the 
inquest into the death of Ms Dehaney-Perkins. 

I would like to begin by extending my deepest condolences to Ms Dehaney-Perkins’ family. The 
Trust sympathises with their very sad loss.  

The matters of concern as noted within the Regulation 28 Report have been carefully reviewed and 
noted. I will now respond in full to these concerns in the hope that this provides both yourself and        
Ms Dehaney-Perkins’ family with comprehensive assurance of changes that have been made at the 
Trust to address the concerns you have raised. 

Concern 1) On 28 August Ms Dehaney-Perkins was agitated and distressed on return to the ward 
from leave and had consumed alcohol that was known to increase her risk of self-harm. Ms 
Dehaney-Perkins tied a ligature to this assisted toilet bar and hanged herself. Staff found Ms 
Dehaney-Perkins and removed the ligature.   

a)  Ms Dehaney-Perkins was admitted to a room with an assisted bathroom (this was not a 

requirement for her) with a fault in the anti-ligature safety mechanism meant that the safety 
feature could not be implemented.  

b)  There was no risk assessment about the suitability of this room for Ms Dehaney-Perkins a 

patient with a self-harming history at the time of the admission.  

c)  The fixed-point ligature was not appropriately updated in the risk assessment and was not 

discussed at a discharge planning meeting.  

d)  The Trust Datix Report was incomplete 

Response: All patients have a risk assessment completed within four hours of admission to the 
ward.    This is monitored through the clinical dashboard daily by the Nurse in Charge.  On 
admission the Nurse in Charge will delegate duties to ensure that all admission tasks are completed.  
Prompts have been added to the ward diary to remind staff to check that all tasks including risk 
assessments have been completed. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
    
      
         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cherrydown Ward has two assisted bathrooms which have reduced ligature handrails.  To reduce 
the risk of patients allocated to those rooms, the risks are documented in individual risk 
assessments and care plans.  If a patient is at significant risk of self-harm the ward would attempt to 
relocate patients to ensure that any high risk patients are not allocated the assisted bathroom 
bedrooms.  This will also be discussed in 1:1 support supervision and the monthly meetings with all 
qualified staff to ensure that this is taking place.  Documentation will be audited at the 1:1 support 
supervision’s with those staff that have patients allocated the assisted bathroom bedrooms. 

There is a prompt on the handover sheet to ensure that the Nurse In-Charge checks the handrails 
mechanism remains in a locked and upright position.  This is checked and signed for every shift.  
Regular audit and assurance are completed by the Ward Manager and Ward Clerk to check that this 
is being completed.  Regular inspections of all room fixtures including handrails are done as part of 
Ligature audits to ensure compliance with EPUT safety protocols.   

Thorough risk assessments are being carried out using EPUT risk assessment tools including 
suitability of rooms for all patients on admission. There is collaboration with mental health 
professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, community mental health nurses, GP’s and 
social workers to gather comprehensive information regarding the patient’s history of self –harm and 
associated risk factors. 

The General Workplace Risk Assessment has been updated to include the fixed-point ligature. 
Multi-disciplinary team discussions are being undertaken to develop and to review individualised 
care plans and risk assessments as part of discharge planning. 

The Matron has made urgent contact with the risk management team in relation to the Datix Report 
for this matter – the datix report was approved by the Patient Incident Team on 26th March 2024. A 
further review of the process is being undertaken to improve sign off where there is a patient safety 
incident.  

Concern 2) Medication was appropriately withheld on 28 August when Ms Dehaney-Perkins 
returned to the ward intoxicated due to potential interaction with alcohol that can cause increased 
sedation,  

Response:  The Trust notes the above finding by HM Area Coroner.  

Concern 3) Arrhythmia and fatality  

a)  This risk of consuming alcohol with her specific medication was not discussed with the Ms 

Dehaney-Perkins or family.  

b)  Not all incidents of consumption of alcohol on return from leave were recorded and risk 

assessments were not updated.  

c)  Ms Dehaney-Perkins had agreed to mitigations of medication management by her family that 
were not recorded on the care plan on discharge on 2 September. Ms Dehaney-Perkins 
demanded control of her medication on 4 September against concerns of her family who 
were forced to return medication.  

Response: If a patient is identified as at high risk of alcohol misuse they are referred to the Drug 
and alcohol service.  It is also discussed with the patient advising them of the risks of using alcohol 
whilst on medication.  Where consent is given family are invited to ward reviews and discharge 
planning meetings and discussion around medication, risks and compliance is part of those 
meetings.  This is documented in the patients’ notes. 

A risk assessment is completed prior to a patient going on leave.  Upon the patient returning from 
leave one to one engagement is offered to the patient, if any incident has occurred whilst the patient 
has been on leave this is reported via Datix and the risk assessment is updated accordingly.  The 
incident is also documented within the patients’ notes and information is shared with all health 
professionals involved in the care of the patient during handover, Multidisciplinary Team meetings 
and ward reviews. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 In order to strengthen safety measures in relation to this concern the wards now have in place that 
post each discharge meeting, discharge plans are shared with all health professionals and 
family/carers (with consent) involved in the care of the patient.  A prompt is now written in the diary 
to remind staff to check the discharge plan that has been agreed for that patient including 
medication plans. 

Concern 4) The Home First Treatment Team attended a scheduled appointment on 4 September 
and Ms Dehaney-Perkins appeared stable and updated the risk assessment that the risk of self-
harm remained significant when alcohol was consumed. No action was taken following a call raising 
some queries and concerns from family that evening that Ms Dehaney-Perkins had left her home 
with her medication.  

Response: The Home First Team will support patients and carers when they contact the team 
raising concerns around risk. The patient will be contacted by a member of the team who will 
explore the concern and manage it accordingly.   

Where it is clear that there is an imminent risk to the person or to others, the Home First Team may 
consider requesting urgent police assistance to support with keeping the patient safe. 

Where there is no imminent risk indicated, and the Home First Team are unable to make contact, 
the team will feed back to the carer to inform them that no contact has been made, however every 
effort has been made to contact the patient.  Where this person is known to EPUT services the 
relevant team will be notified to provide follow up for the patient. 

If the carer has identified risk that is deemed to require further assessment / intervention, the Home 
First Team may consider whether a home visit is warranted and “cold call” the individual.  This would 
be also with the assistance of the Crisis 24 Team where appropriate. All staff have been reminded 
about ensuring that they work according to trust policy and this has been discussed in the business 
meetings. Assessments and clinical notes are reviewed with individuals during their one to one 
supervision to focus on the quality of their record keeping including risk assessments. 

I hope that I have provided reassurances around the steps that we have taken to address the issues 
of concern contained within your report. We appreciate that there is an acute need to embed and 
effect change, hence we will monitor the above provisions to ensure these are contributing to our 
overall aim of keeping patents safe and delivering therapeutic care. 

Please do let me know if you require any further information at this stage, including copies of any of 
the documents referred to above. 

We will await your direction before sharing a copy of this reply with the family / the CQC as required. 

Yours sincerely, 

Chief Executive

Related reports

Other reports by Sonia Hayes

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.