Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Samuel Curless

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0089, written 19 Feb 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report19 Feb 2024
Reference2024-0089
DeceasedSamuel Curless
CoronerAnna Morris
Coroner areaManchester South
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Greater Manchester Police 
2.  The College of Policing 

1  CORONER 

I am Anna Morris, Assistant Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Greater 
Manchester South 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and 
Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners 
(Investigations) Regulations 2013 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 25th  October 2022, I commenced an investigation into the death of 
Samuel Curless (Sam). Sam died on the 24th  October 2022 at the 
Manchester Royal Infirmary. He was 29 years old. The investigation into 
his death concluded on the 2nd  February 2024 when I completed the 
inquest into his death. The medical cause of death was found to be 
1a) Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy caused by 1b) hanging. 

I recorded a conclusion of suicide. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Sam had a long history of anxiety and depression. He had reported 
feeling suicidal in the past. He was the sole carer for his young son and 
his son was a protective factor for him. 

On the 23rd  September 2022, the deceased was arrested at home in 
relation to an allegation of a serious criminal offence. He was taken to the 
police station where he was interviewed under caution. He was released 
on bail the same day with conditions not to have any contact with anyone 
under the age of 18. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 On Friday 21st  October, Sam was informed that all of his bail conditions 
were removed, but that he remained under investigation. He was 
provided with police documentation that confirmed this. Sam contacted 
the children’s social worker and informed her of the change to his bail and 
asked if he could now see his son unsupervised. The social worker told 
him that she would need to verify the bail position with the police before 
their plan could change. Sam agreed to continue with the supervised 
contact on Monday, but he would have found it difficult to hear and 
understand. 

At 14:05 on Saturday 22nd  October, Sam made a call to GMP 101 service 
from his mobile phone. This call was connected to a GMP Call Handler at 
14:12 and a police log was commenced. From the audio recording of the 
call, Sam could be heard telling the Call Handler that he thought he had 
found a dead body. He gave the location 

. He said it was the first plot near some stainless-steel 

containers near the car park. The conversation between the deceased 
and the call handler lasted approximately 40 seconds, after which Sam 
did not respond to further attempts at engagement. The call handler kept 
the line open for just over 5 minutes. 

As the deceased’s call to GMP was a 101 call (and not a 999 call), the 
Call Handler was not able to obtain the precise location using his mobile 
phone and data services. She obtained a street name to add to the 
location after talking to her supervisor. The Call Handler did not know that 
the deceased had any intent to take his own life, but she did conclude 
that there was a risk that the dead body he was reporting might not be 
dead. At 14:29 she graded the THRIVE risk as High and Graded the 
GMP Response as 1. She coded the call as G15 which includes a 
concern for welfare or risk of suicide.  Radio Operators dispatched GMP 
officers at 14:33. 

The Call Handler failed to call an ambulance at 14:29. It was a GMP 
minimum standard expectation that she should have done so at the point 
that she had a location to dispatch to and was part of her training in 
 gave evidence 
response to reports of a dead body. 
to the inquest that this was an admitted failing by GMP, but I found that it 
did not make any material contribution to the death. 

Two Officers attended 
the Grade 1 response time. They located the Sam in a shed 

 at 14:38 within 

 at 14:42. They found him suspended from a ligature 

The first officer on the scene assumed that she was looking at a dead 
body. She did not check for a pulse until around 14:46. A total of three 
officers were in attendance by this point. A further check at 14:48 
revealed that he was still warm and only at that point was he cut down. 
After further checks for a pulse, CPR was commenced by the officers at 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
    
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14:50. 

The three initial attending officers failed to administer any basic life 
support to Sam for approximately 8 minutes after discovering him 
suspended.  The officers failed to perform any immediate initial checks of 
Sam’s vital signs when they discovered him. The officers failed to remove 
the ligature and therefore an airway obstruction at the earliest 
opportunity. 

It was GMP and College of Policing Policy that officers attending a 
suspected sudden death should not assume death, should make 
preservation of life their priority and not delay in administering basic life 
support until an ambulance arrives. In their evidence to the inquest, these 
failings were admitted by the officers but I found that did not make any 
material contribution to the death. 

The attending officers all assumed that an ambulance had been called by 
GMP comms. In fact, one was only contacted at 14:48. NWAS went 
mobile at 14:57 and attended the scene at 15:01 and commenced 
advanced life support. Following paramedic intervention, spontaneous 
circulation returned at 15:24. 

Sam was then taken to Manchester Royal Infirmary, where despite 
appropriate resuscitation and life preserving treatments he died on the 
24th  October 2022. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise 
to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

1.  That in respect of GMP Call Handler’s being required to call an 
ambulance to attend the scene, even where it is reported that 
someone is “dead” there has been no institutional learning 
following this incident. I asked 
 if there had been any 
learning, reflection or training since this incident. He said that there 
hadn’t on this issue. 

2.  That the training delivered to the first two attending officers did not 

adequately prepare them for responding to a scene where 
someone is found hanging in a way which is consistent with their 
priority to preserve life of a hanging casualty. 

3.  I heard evidence from Detective Superintendent 

 that both 

attending officers were part of a cohort of at least 650 officers 
within GMP (and a larger cohort nationally) who received their 

3 

 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 initial police training entirely online. I am concerned that both 
officers’ training on Sudden Death (and the training of others) was 
delivered as one of over 15 online modules on a given day and 
that at the time of the inquest, they had not received any 
classroom based or on the job training. I am concerned that they 
are not the only officers within GMP who have received this 
level/method of training input and therefore there is a risk that 
other officers on duty have inadequate training on this issue. 

4.  There was evidence given to me by Detective Superintendent 

 that there is an unknown number of GMP officers who are 

not meeting the expectation of receiving First Aid refresher training 
within 12 months, which since May 2022 has included training on 
how to resuscitate a hanging casualty. I am therefore concerned 
that there remains a cohort of officers who have not had the post 
May 2022 training that includes how to provide Basic Life Support 
to this kind of casualty until the arrival of an ambulance. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe you have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 15th  April 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons namely 1) Sam’s Family; 2) Independent Office of 
Police Conduct (IOPC); 3) Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council, 
who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your 
response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 9  Anna Morris 

HM Assistant Coroner 

19th  February 2024 

5

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from College of Policing (PDF)
Anna Morris 
HM Assistant Coroner 
Greater Manchester South area 

15 April 2024 

Dear Assistant Coroner Anna Morris 

I am writing in response to your Regulation 28 report following the investigation and inquest into 
the tragic circumstances of the death of Samuel (Sam) Curless on the 24th October 2022. 

I can confirm that the College of Policing have liaised with Greater Manchester Police and are 
aware of the actions they have subsequently taken in response to the concerns raised in your 
report. 

I would like to update you regarding your concern at point 2 and point 4 in your report as 
follows: 

•  There was evidence given to me by Detective Superintendent 

that there is an 

unknown number of GMP officers who are not meeting the expectation of receiving First 
Aid refresher training within 12 months, which since May 2022 has included training on 
how to resuscitate a hanging casualty. I am therefore concerned that there remains a 
cohort of officers who have not had the post May 2022 training that includes how to 
provide Basic Life Support to this kind of casualty until the arrival of an ambulance. 
•  That the training delivered to the first two attending officers did not adequately prepare 
them for responding to a scene where someone is found hanging in a way which is 
consistent with their priority to preserve life of a hanging casualty. 

A7 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 In 2020, the College of Policing commenced a national working group to review the First Aid 
Learning Programme (FALP). The review engaged and consulted with police clinical subject 
matter experts and input from clinical governance leads in forces, in addition to 
recommendations made by Coroners, the Independent Office for Police Conduct and the 
Manchester Arena Inquiry.  The FALP has now been published with a focus on casualty care, 
preserving life and providing police officers and staff with the first aid skills required as first 
responders. 

The FALP is not a scenario based curriculum. None of the high-level learning outcomes in the 
FALP modules are situation specific.  Police officers respond to varying incidents and the FALP 
has been developed to provide them with the required specific first aid skills for first responders. 

Police officers are required to follow their FALP training in all cases. 

The FALP does include learning outcomes for basic life support, including CPR, and performing 
manual airway techniques. 

Annual refresher training is a core requirement of the FALP licence, and as a result of the above 
mentioned review, the recommended training time for both refresher and initial training has 
been increased for all public facing officers. 

It has increased from four hours to six hours for annual refresher and nine hours to twelve hours 
for initial training. 

I hope this offers you reassurance with regards to your concerns raised in your report. 

Yours sincerely 

Chief Executive Officer 
College of Policing 

A8
Response from Greater Manchester Police (PDF)
Chief Constable

Anna Morris KC
HM Assistant Coroner
Coroner for Greater Manchester South

9" April 2024

Dear Ms Morris

Thank you for your report dated 19" February 2024 in respect of the death of Samuel Curless
and pursuant to Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 and
Paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

Having carefully considered your report and the evidence provided at the inquest | make the
following observations and recommendations to address your matters of concern.

1. That in respect of GMP Call Handlers being required to call an ambulance to attend
the scene, even where it is reported that someone is “dead” there has been no
institutional learning following this incident. | asked QE if there had been
any learning, reflection or training since this incident. He said that there hadn’t on
this issue.

As a result of the issues identified in this case GMP commissioned an audit of 33 similar incidents.
The purpose of the audit was to understand whether call handlers were following the correct
processes and taking the required action when dealing with these types of incidents or whether
the issue identified in this case was a symptom of a broader issue across the department. The
result of the audit identified one case where the call handler hadn't contacted the Northwest
Ambulance Service (NWAS) or asked a colleague to assist in making a call to NWAS. The call
handler in question has received individual feedback on the issue. The other 32 calls examined
each resulted in call handlers either asking colleagues to call NWAS or the call handler calling
NWAS themselves when the initial call had concluded.

When dealing with calls of this nature the expectation is that the call handler will stay on the line
with the person reporting the incident to gather the correct information to create and update the
incident log to accurately reflect the incident and record the actions taken. Call handlers will
normally seek assistance from colleagues in the control room or within the dispatch area to call
an ambulance via the Ambulance Emergency lines that are dedicated to the police for such
instances.

Due to the nature of calls received by GMP there will be instances of call handlers being able to
call the NWAS directly once they have gathered all the relevant information and assessed that
they are then able to make that call. The process is not prescriptive, call handlers are trained in
THRIVE (threat, harm, risk, investigation, vulnerability and engagement) and in line with that
training they will assess whether they are able to make the call to NWAS themselves, or whether
they are required to continue with the call and request assistance from colleagues and supervisors
to contact NWAS.

Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS

Al

Cont.d pg 2

All Call Handlers receive training in respect of what action to take when dealing with death and
the trainers thread the relevant processes throughout the training course, referring students to
the service standards expected of them. The service standards are available via the internal IT
solution called SHERLOCK which can be accessed by call handlers at any time.

While the result of the audit undertaken following the inquest doesn’t indicate a broader issue
across the branch, the Force Contact, Crime and Operations Branch will further reinforce the
requirements on call handlers to call an ambulance when faced with a scenario such as that which
presented in the case of Mr Curless. This will be achieved by way of an email being sent to all
call handlers and by including an item on each call handling team’s briefing site.

2. That the training delivered to the first two attending officers did not adequately
prepare them for responding to a scene where someone is found hanging in a way
which is consistent with their priority to preserve life of a hanging casualty.

GMP’s Police Education Qualifications Framework (PEQF) Learning Support Team has reviewed
the training provided to student officers in relation to the Dealing with Death Procedure.

All student officers receive a bespoke presentation on the Dealing with Death Procedure. In
advance of the session officers are required to complete pre-reading which includes College of
Policing Guidance, a Dealing with Death aide memoir, relevant handouts, and a copy of the
Dealing with Death procedure.

The lesson plan for the subject is detailed and addresses the different types of death that police
officers can expect to encounter during their service which includes deaths caused by hanging.

Trainers delivering the course emphasise that unless a person is clearly deceased, i.e. the head
is separated from the body, insect infestation or the body has been underwater for a long period
of time, offices should check for signs of life and take relevant action, including calling paramedics
who are able to pronounce life extinct.

The training details the ‘five building blocks’ that officers must apply and adhere to in the event of
a death. The number one building block that is always to be addressed first is preservation of life.
Preservation of the scene is subordinate to the requirement to preserve life. The training
addresses the fact that bodies may appear to be deceased when they are in fact not and officers
must always check for signs of life even when they may believe that the person is dead. The
training provides several examples of cases where bodies had not been checked assuming death
and were later found to be alive.

To support the implementation of this learning, dealing with death has been presented at GMP’s
monthy Tutor Constable Forum to support those who tutor students on District whilst responding
to incidents. Finally, our training Sergeants undertake periodical in-class observations to quality
assure both the training content and that the delivery is in line with best practice.

Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS

A2

Cont.d pg 2

All Call Handlers receive training in respect of what action to take when dealing with death and
the trainers thread the relevant processes throughout the training course, referring students to
the service standards expected of them. The service standards are available via the internal IT
solution called SHERLOCK which can be accessed by call handlers at any time.

While the result of the audit undertaken following the inquest doesn't indicate a broader issue
across the branch, the Force Contact, Crime and Operations Branch will further reinforce the
requirements on call handlers to call an ambulance when faced with a scenario such as that which
presented in the case of Mr Curless. This will be achieved by way of an email being sent to all
call handlers and by including an item on each call handling team’s briefing site.

2. That the training delivered to the first two attending officers did not adequately
prepare them for responding to a scene where someone is found hanging in a way
which is consistent with their priority to preserve life of a hanging casualty.

GMP'’s Police Education Qualifications Framework (PEQF) Learning Support Team has reviewed
the training provided to student officers in relation to the Dealing with Death Procedure.

All student officers receive a bespoke presentation on the Dealing with Death Procedure. In
advance of the session officers are required to complete pre-reading which includes College of
Policing Guidance, a Dealing with Death aide memoir, relevant handouts, and a copy of the
Dealing with Death procedure.

The lesson plan for the subject is detailed and addresses the different types of death that police
officers can expect to encounter during their service which includes deaths caused by hanging.

Trainers delivering the course emphasise that unless a person is clearly deceased, i.e. the head
is separated from the body, insect infestation or the body has been underwater for a long period
of time, offices should check for signs of life and take relevant action, including calling paramedics
who are able to pronounce life extinct.

The training details the ‘five building blocks’ that officers must apply and adhere to in the event of
a death. The number one building block that is always to be addressed first is preservation of life.
Preservation of the scene is subordinate to the requirement to preserve life. The training
addresses the fact that bodies may appear to be deceased when they are in fact not and officers
must always check for signs of life even when they may believe that the person is dead. The
training provides several examples of cases where bodies had not been checked assuming death
and were later found to be alive.

To support the implementation of this learning, dealing with death has been presented at GMP’s
monthy Tutor Constable Forum to support those who tutor students on District whilst responding
to incidents. Finally, our training Sergeants undertake periodical in-class observations to quality
assure both the training content and that the delivery is in line with best practice.

Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS

A3

Cont.d pg 3

This case has also been raised at the Tactical Organisational Learning Board (TOLB). The TOLB
is attended by representatives from across GMP with a view to sharing the learning and
reinforcing the key messages around preservation of life.

3. | heard evidence from Detective Superintendent HM that both attending officers
were part of a cohort of at least 650 officers within GMP (and a larger cohort
nationally) who received their initial police training entirely online. | am concerned
that both officers’ training on Sudden Death (and the training of others) was delivered
as one of over 15 online modules on a given day and that at the time of the inquest,
they had not received any classroom based or on the job training. | am concerned
that they are not the only officers within GMP who have received this level/method of
training input and therefore there is a risk that other officers on duty have inadequate
training on this issue.

A total of 650 student officers, across nine intakes, received online training between March 2020
and May 2021. The necessity to train officers online during this period was a direct consequence
of the COVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures prescribed by the Government in
response.

An additional 270 student officers, across four intakes, received a combination of online and in-
person training between July 2020 and August 2021. The hybrid nature of the training provided
to this cohort of officers reflected changes to the COVID-19 restrictions in place throughout the
officers’ training period.

In person training resumed in September 2021 for all subsequent student officer intakes.

The training provided to officers throughout the pandemic was delivered in line with College of
Policing guidance and licensing conditions and the online format provided by GMP reflected the
approach taken by Police Forces nationally to ensure officers could continue to be trained while
COVID-19 social distancing restrictions were in place.

While the officers’ actions in this case have given rise to questions in relation to the adequacy of
the training delivered via online methods there is nothing to suggest that this is a broader Force-
wide issue. However, in line with normal practice, the learning arising from the inquest has been
raised at the TOLB to ensure that learning is shared, and key messages are disseminated across
the force.

To further reinforce police officer and staff understanding of the Dealing with Death Policy and
the expected actions of those at the scene | have tasked the Organisational Learning Hub to
disseminate learning across the Force, using a variety of established communications channels,
which will include the following:

e Publication of a leading article on the intranet. All officers and staff have access to this site
and are able to read the article.

Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS

A4

Cont.d pg 4

e Including the information in the Organisational Learning Monthly Top Three Bulletin which
is e-mailed to every police officer and member of police staff member in GMP.

e Input at the Tactical Organisational Learning Meeting which includes a representative from
all districts, operational branches, People and Development Branch and other Subject
Matter Experts.

e Circulation to Organisational Learning Lead Officers and Deputy Organisational Learning
Lead Officers across the Force to ensure the messages are reinforced at a local level.

4. There was evidence given to me by Detective Superintendent that there is an
unknown number of GMP officers who are not meeting the expectation of receiving
First Aid refresher training within 12 months, which since May 2022 has included
training on how to resuscitate a hanging casualty. | am therefore concerned that there
remains a cohort of officers who have not had the post May 2022 training that
includes how to provide Basic Life Support to this kind of casualty until the arrival of
an ambulance.

All police officers receive the policing equivalent of the Health and Safety Executive's Emergency
First Aid at Work (EFAW) training certificate. This is known across all police forces as the ‘Module
1 & 2 First Aid’ training course and is derived from the College of Policing First Aid Learning
Programme (FALP) syllabus.

The FALP is split into 5 modules, with modules 1 and 2 being a universal requirement for all police
officers. Officers can go on to receive further first aid training depending on their role. Module 3
is specific training for those working in custody, Module 4 is the HSE First-Aid at Work training
and Module 5 covers enhanced training for those operating as firearms officers or police medics.
In the present case the officers who attended the scene would have been trained to Modules 1 &
2 (EFAW) level.

Basic Life Support (BLS) is taught at every level of first-aid training on both the initial and annual
refresher training. BLS is covered during the ‘no signs of life’ session and officers are taught that
first aid begins with the first opportunity they have to assess a casualty, in whatever circumstances
they are presented with which may include a suicide attempt, water rescue or any other incident
- BLS should then commence.

GMP uses the FALP as the core syllabus for its first aid training but in addition to the core syllabus
supplementary elements or scenarios are incorporated into the training based upon operational
risks and/or learning derived from incidents that have occurred in Greater Manchester or
nationally. From April 2022 one of the supplementary elements GMP introduced into the Module
1 and 2 initial and refresher training courses was ligature removal. This training will continue in
place moving forward.

In July 2023 GMP also introduced a ligature removal tool in every liveried police vehicle. To
ensure the tool remains available for use the presence of the tool in the vehicle forms part of the

Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS

A5

Cont.d pg 5

weekly vehicle checks. Alongside the introduction of this tool an instructional video was placed
on GMP'’s intranet that provided guidance on how to use the tool. The video remains accessible
on GMP’s Learning and Skills Hub which is a resource available to all police officers and staff.

The ligature removal tools were also provided to GMP’s First Aid training providers for
demonstration and use during first aid training for Modules 1 & 2. There are discussions underway
to further demonstrate this item of equipment within Police Personal Safety Training.

It is worthy of note that it is not a requirement of FALP Modules 1 & 2 for officers to be trained in
the use of a ligature removal tool. It is only at Module 3 of FALP that this training becomes
mandatory.

From May 2022 Module 1 & 2 training has been delivered in GMP on a 2-day initial course with a
1-day annual refresher requirement thereafter. Officers who fail to complete the 1-day refresher
training within a year of their initial training, and who therefore lapse in their EFAW compliance,
must begin the training cycle again by attending the 2-day initial training.

Prior to May 2022 Module 1 & 2 training was a blended learning approach consisting of 6-hour
contact training time and 3 hours e-learning. (Equating to 9 hours training each year as derived
from the previous version of the FALP).

The change to the delivery of first aid training in May 2022 brought with it a resource management
challenge with Districts balancing the amended training requirements with the need to maintain
safe staffing levels. This initially led to a larger number of officers failing to meet the annual
refresher requirement. There have been significant improvements with compliance over the last
two years as the training cycle has matured.

GMP has also improved the governance around first aid training to ensure that officers remain up
to date with their training requirements. The numbers are monitored by People & Development
Branch Learning Services Team and reported to the Clinical Governance Panel. Attendance data
is shared with GMP Districts and Branches on a regular basis, including individual officer details
and course booking dates. In addition, First Aid Training is a standing item at GMP’s monthly
Major Incident Response Governance Board (MIRGB) meeting which is chaired by the Deputy
Chief Constable (DCC). At the monthly meeting the DCC holds Districts and Branches to account
in respect of their compliance with the first aid training requirements. First Aid training will remain
a focus of the MIRGB moving forward.

| hope this response is helpful and demonstrates GMP’s commitment to learning from the tragic
death of Mr Curless.

Yours sincg¢ri

Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS

A6

Related reports

Other reports by Anna Morris

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.