Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Kumaran Chetty

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0629, written 14 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report14 Nov 2024
Reference2024-0629
DeceasedKumaran Chetty
CoronerAnna Morris
Coroner areaGreater Manchester South
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Community health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  

The Brinnington Surgery, Brinnington Road, Stockport SK5 8BS 

1  CORONER 

I am Anna Morris KC, Assistant Coroner for the Coroner Area of 
Greater Manchester South. 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroner's and 
Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners 
(Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 14th August 2024, I commenced an investigation into the death 
of Mr. Kumaran Chetty. At the inquest into his death on the 11th 
November 2024 I found that he died from an acute cardiac episode, 
contributed to by fentanyl and morphine toxicity. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

My findings at the inquest were as follows –  

The deceased was 51 years old at the time of his death. He had a 
number of chronic health conditions including ischaemic heart disease 
and cardiomyopathy. On the 19th April 2024 an ECG indicated that his 
left ventricular function was less than 25% ejection. He also suffered 
from chronic pain as a result of long standing colorectal issues and was 
under the care of a consultant. He was prescribed fentanyl by his GP in 
the dose of 1 25mg patch per 72 hours. He was also prescribed 
morphine sulphate. 

On the morning of the 9th May 2024, the deceased was found 
unresponsive in the kitchen at his home address. Paramedics attended 
and pronounced life to be extinct. Autopsy confirmed the presence of 
an acute left ventricular failure. Examination revealed the presence of 4 
fentanyl patches on the upper back of the deceased, which was in 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 excess of the amount he was prescribed. Toxicology reported the 
presence of fentanyl and morphine in levels associated with fatalities. 

There is no evidence that the deceased intended to take his own life. It 
is not clear whether his application of the patches was a mistake or a 
response to the level of pain he was experiencing. However, I find the 
excessive, even if accidental use of these strong opiates would have 
had a consequent effect on his already failing heart and is likely to 
contributed to his death from acute left ventricular failure. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course  of the inquest the evidence  revealed  matters giving 
rise to concern.  In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances  it  is my  statutory duty  to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

I heard evidence during the inquest from 

 of the practice. 

’s evidence was that Mr. Chetty was being prescribed fentanyl 
patches through the practice for chronic pain. The evidence was that 
Mr. Chetty managed his own medication at home and was assessed to 
have capacity to do so. 

His last prescription was for 10 patches as 1 x 25mg patch per 72 
hours. 
Chetty a month and was the maximum amount of this controlled drug 
that a patient could be prescribed at any one time.   

s evidence was that this prescription should last Mr 

On the 17th April 2024 Mr. Chetty was seen by his Consultant at Salford 
Royal Hospital. A letter sent to Brinnington Surgery by 
reported that Mr. Chetty had disclosed using multiple fentanyl patches 
in order to address his current levels of pain.  

This report of excessive fentanyl use outside of the prescribed regime 
was not identified by the Surgery upon receipt of the letter and did not 
trigger a medication review for Mr Chetty.  

I am concerned that the correspondence triage did not identify this 
excessive use of a controlled drug which is known to cause fatalities if 
abused.  

I am further concerned that there are no specific policies or procedures 
within the Surgery to flag up or review concerns around fentanyl abuse. 
As a known recipient of this and other strong opiate medication, all 
correspondence received by the surgery relating to Mr. Chetty’s 
treatment and care had the potential to reveal important information 
about his ability to self-manage his medication.  

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe you have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the 
date of this report, namely 9th January 2024. I, the Coroner, may extend 
the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action.  Otherwise, you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons namely Northen Care Alliance NHS Foundation 
Trust and 
useful or of interest. 

 on behalf of the family, who may find it 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your 
response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary from. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me the coroner at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

Signed: 

Anna Morris 
HM Assistant Coroner 
Dated: 

14th November 2024 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from The Brinnington Surgery (PDF)
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL 

Ms Anna Morris KC 
Assistant Coroner 
Greater Manchester South 

By Email: 

Clyde & Co LLP 
2 New Bailey Square 
Stanley Street 
Salford 
M3 5GS 
Telephone: 0161 236 2002 
Fax: 0161 832 7956 
DX 14302 Salford 
www.clydeco.com 

Our Ref: 

Your Ref: 

Date: 
20 February 2025 

Dear Madam Coroner  

Our Client: The Partners of the Brinnington Surgery 
Inquest touching the death of Kumaran Thanappa Chetty 
Regulation 28 Report Response 

We have been instructed jointly by Medical Protection, the MDDUS, and the MDU to assist the 
Brinnington Surgery (“the Practice”) in respect of its response to the Regulation 28 Report dated 
14 November 2024. Please accept this letter as the Practice’s response. We are grateful for the 
extensions  of  time  to  provide  this.  On  behalf  of  the  Practice,  we  wish  to  offer  our  sincere 
condolences to Mr Chetty’s family. 

The  Practice  acknowledges  the  concerns  you  have  raised  in  the  Regulation  28  Report.  It  is 
apparent that Mr Chetty was overordering medication and this was consequently overprescribed 
by the practice. The Practice has taken various steps to address all of these issues which are 
set out below.  

Areas of Learning/Change 

The Practice has undertaken two Significant Event Analysis meetings, one on 15 November 2024 
and the other on 6 December 2024. The headings below set out the areas in which the Practice 
has made changes that are relevant to the inquest. 

1.  Incoming Correspondence Process 

The Practice has amended its process in relation to incoming letters. Every letter that is received 
is reviewed by the administrative staff. They now check EMIS (the electronic records system) to 
check  whether  there  is  flag  indicating  if  the  patient  is  prescribed  a  controlled  drug  (CD).  If  a 
patient is prescribed a CD, then the letter is now reviewed by a GP the same day or the following 
working  day  at  the  latest. The  duty  GP  or  another  GP  working  that  day  will  review  any  letter 
relating to a patient that is taking a CD even if the content of the letter does not relate to the CD. 
Furthermore, the system is such that the incoming correspondence is not sent to a GP if they 
are on annual leave or they are not in the Practice for a few days. 

Clyde & Co LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC326539 and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation 
Authority under number 460690.  A list of members is available for inspection at its registered office The St Botolph Building, 138 Houndsditch, London EC3A 7AR.  Clyde & 
Co LLP uses the word "partner" to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The Practice has created a workflow process map (enclosed) which now links to the individual 
protocol for each type of letter. This map shows what the incoming correspondence process is 
for each type of letter which now includes the requirement for a GP to review all incoming letters 
if a patient is prescribed a CD. 

The Practice has performed an initial audit of this new process. As part of the audit, all documents 
received within a 24 – 48 hour window were checked. The results of the audit were that the admin 
staff were following the process and felt comfortable with it. The Practice intends to undertake 
an audit of the system every 3 – 6 months.  

2.  Improved learning and awareness regarding medication 

Steps  have  been  taken  to  address  the  issues  raised  above.  This  was  discussed  at  the  SEA 
meeting on 15 November 2024 and will be incorporated into future meetings. The importance of 
accurate prescribing is now included during inductions with junior doctors. Representatives from 
the practice pharmacy team were present at this meeting and were involved in the discussions.  
Prescribing will also be discussed at subsequent meetings. The GPs have undertaken training 
provided  by  EMIS  in  relation  to  repeat  prescriptions.  Further  discussions  took  place  on  17 
January 2025. A new prescribing protocol is in development which was discussed at this meeting. 
This will include a specific policy on CD misuse.  The Practice is also developing an alert within 
EMIS to ensure all prescribers adhere to the new system. 

3.  Partner-level review of guidance and journal articles  

The partners at the Practice have reviewed the guidance and journal articles below. The learning 
gained from reviewing these documents was shared at a clinical meeting on 17 January 2025 
referred to at heading 4.  

Chronic  pain  (primary  and  secondary)  in  over  16s:  assessment  of  all  chronic  pain  and 
management of chronic primary pain 
Medicines  associated  with  dependence  or  withdrawal  symptoms:  safe  prescribing  and 
withdrawal management for adults 
sign136_2019.pdf 
Opioids Aware | Faculty of Pain Medicine 
NICE  guideline  NG193  for  chronic  pain:  reasons  to  be  cheerful  |  British  Journal  of  General 
Practice 
NICE chronic primary pain guidelines: what the busy GP needs to know 

4.  Clinical Meeting on 17 January 2025 

The practice held a clinical meeting on 17 January 2025 to undertake further discussions about 
chronic pain management. This was attended by medical, nursing, and pharmacy staff. The NICE 
guidelines 2022 were presented to all attendees. GPs were reminded that they should not feel 
pushed into prescribing something if this is not appropriate or there are risks involved. GPs were 
encouraged to gain a second opinion from another GP colleague before starting a dependence-
forming medication. The decision following the second opinion should be communicated to the 
patient via a text message. The link to the Greater Manchester Pain Management Resources 
Hub was recirculated following the meeting. During the meeting, GPs were reminded of advising 
patients about non-pharmacological management such as exercise, CBT, and acceptance and 

Clyde & Co LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC326539 and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation 
Authority under number 460690.  A list of members is available for inspection at its registered office The St Botolph Building, 138 Houndsditch, London EC3A 7AR.  Clyde & 
Co LLP uses the word "partner" to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 commitment therapy (ACT) and of the importance of avoiding prescribing opiate medication in 
the  first  instance  (excluding  cancer  patients  and  palliative  patients).  GPs  were  also  reminded 
about  the  importance  of  social  prescribing.  Since  the  meeting,  the  Practice  has  sourced  a 
treatment  plan  agreement  developed  by  Greater  Manchester  Medicines  Management  Group. 
The  Practice  plans  to  use  this  going  forwards  when  initiating  fentanyl  prescriptions  (again, 
excluding cancer patients and palliative patients). 

5.  Opioid medication audit 

The Practice has undertaken an audit of patients on opioid/opiate medication including morphine, 
oxycodone, fentanyl, and high strength opiates to see if the strength/dosage can be reduced. 
The  audit  started  prior  to  this  patient’s  death  and  the  Practice  has  been  reviewing  opiate 
prescribing for some time. The Practice has been able to reduce the dosage taken by a of number 
of  patients.  The  Practice  will  continue  its  attempts  to  reduce  the  dose  and  strength  of 
opioid/opiate medication for these patients. The Practice intends to undertake this audit on an 
annual basis. This will be in addition to the usual medication reviews which take place on a 6 – 
12 monthly basis. The Practice is also restricting the new prescription of opioids/opiates. This is 
through  education  of GPs  and  the  second  opinion  referred  to  above. The  practice  also  has  a 
Pain Management Health Coach who supports patients who choose to have their opioid/opiate 
medication reduced.  

The GP partners are confident that as a result of the steps described above that matters will be 
dealt with differently in the future. There has been extensive learning and reflection undertaken 
within the Practice and we hope that you and Mr Chetty’s family will be reassured by the actions 
taken. 

Yours faithfully 

Clyde & Co 

Clyde & Co LLP 

Clyde & Co LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC326539 and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation 
Authority under number 460690.  A list of members is available for inspection at its registered office The St Botolph Building, 138 Houndsditch, London EC3A 7AR.  Clyde & 
Co LLP uses the word "partner" to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications.

Related reports

Other reports by Anna Morris

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.