Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Miriam Stone

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0277, written 20 May 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report20 May 2024
Reference2024-0277
DeceasedMiriam Stone
CoronerSophie Lomas
Coroner areaDerby and Derbyshire
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Organisation namedDerbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1  Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Trust 

1  CORONER 

I am Sophie LOMAS, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Derby and Derbyshire 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 23 February 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Miriam STONE aged 
41.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 07 May 2024. 

The medical cause of death was: 

1 (a) Hypoxic Brain Injury 

(b) Cardiac Arrest 
(c) Ligature Application and Plastic Bag Asphyxia 

The conclusion of the jury at inquest was a narrative conclusion, namely that: 

“Miriam carried out the deliberate act of ligating herself 

 on 18th February 2022, but in doing so, it is not possible to ascertain her 

intention.” 

The  jury  found  that  a  lack  of  formal  risk  assessment,  a  safety  assessment  which  did  not 
include all relevant risks and an inadequate care plan were probable contributing factors in 
Miriam’s  death.  In  addition,  the  jury  found  that  the  level  of  observations  were  likely 
assumed rather than individually assessed and that the level set, namely Level 3 every 15 
minutes, was not appropriate. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

The circumstances are summarised in the findings of the jury: 

“  Miriam Stone died on the 20th February 2022 at the Intensive Care unit at the Hospital. 

Miriam  has  a  history  of  various  mental  health  disorders  including  Emotionally  Unstable 
Personality Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizophrenia and Bipolar. 

Miriam was admitted on numerous occasions and had a long history of self-harm by various 
methods 

. 

Miriam was admitted to Hospital on the 15th February  2022 following  an overdose.  Whilst 
in  hospital,  Miriam  undertook  actions  of  self-harming  and  was  distressed  culminating  in 

CONTROLLED 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 ligation  whilst  under  15  minute  observations.  This  resulted  in  a  decision  to  detain  Miriam 
under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act. Miriam was admitted to the Mental Health Unit on 
the  17th  February  2022  as  considered  to  be  a  high  risk  of  self-harm  or  completed  suicide 
and hospital considered a place of safety and assessment. 

Upon  admission  Miriam  was  presenting  as  calm  and  not  in  distress  and  was  being 
monitored  at  15  minute  intervals.  Miriam  was  interacting  with  staff  but  was  not  formally 
assessed  by  clinical  staff  and  a  safety  assessment  was  only  partially  completed. 
No  documented  decision  as  to  levels  of  observation  or  suicide  risk  exists  to  determine 
decisions made as to risk. 

On  the  morning  of  the  18th  February  2022,  13  minutes  after  being  observed  by  staff, 
Miriam was not observable in her bed space and staff recognising the ward toilet door was 
. This was 
locked, subsequently found Miriam in the toilet 
.
swiftly removed and revealed a ligature around Miriam’s neck 

Miriam was taken to hospital where she was intubated and ventilated. Despite treatment, 
her condition deteriorated and she died on 20th  February 2022. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

Miriam  was  admitted  to  the  mental  health  unit  at  approximately  8.30pm.  The  unit  has  a 
staff handover between 9.00pm and 9.30pm. The evidence at inquest was contradictory as 
to  which  shift  had  assumed  responsibility  for  completing  admission  tasks  including  risk 
assessments  and  care  /  safety  plans.  It  was  recognised  that  admission  shortly  before  or 
during  shift  handover  can  increase  risks  relating  to  the  quality  of  information  sharing  and 
the allocation of admission tasks such as assessing the level of observations required. 

The court heard evidence that whilst efforts would be made to avoid admission during staff 
handover  time  this  was  a  local  practice  rather  than  part  of  any  formal  policy.  The  court 
further heard evidence that senior staff considered that avoidance of admission at handover 
times would be difficult to achieve because there were too many different oranisations who 
might  be  requesting  admission.  This  appeared  to  overlook  the  fact  that  it  is  the  bed 
allocation team based at the trust who are the central point of contact. 

The current operational  policy covering  admission  procedures  (Acute Inpatient Operational 
Policy)  does  not  mention  a  need  for  handover  time  to  be  protected,  avoiding  admission 
during  this  time.  Without  a  formal  policy  on  this  topic  there  is  a  risk  that  future  deaths 
could occur. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by July 15, 2024.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

CONTROLLED 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 20/05/2024 

Sophie LOMAS 
Assistant Coroner for 
Derby and Derbyshire 

CONTROLLED 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
: 

Corporate Services 
Ashbourne Centre 
Kingsway Site 
Kingsway 
DERBY 
DE22 3LZ 

17 June 2024 

Ms Sophie Lomas 
Assistant Coroner for Derby and Derbyshire 
Coroners Court 
Town Hall 
Rose Hill 
Chesterfield 
Derbyshire 
S40 1LP 

Dear Ma’am 

Re: Regulation 28 Response: an inquest touching the death of Miriam Stone 

May I first begin on behalf of the Trust by conveying my condolences to the family of 
Miriam, in particular to 
 for her loss. I was updated following the 
conclusion  of  the  inquest  and  am  sorry  that  the  Jury  found  issues  with  the  care 
afforded to Miriam. 

I am informed that the Trust confirmed to court on 7 May 2024, following an update 
from the manager of the bed management team that it was already the custom and 
practice  of  the  bed  management  team  to  not,  wherever  possible,  admit  patients 
during handover times and that this custom and practice was already in operation at 
the  time  of the  inquest  but  was due  to  be  placed  into  the  revised policy  which  had 
recently  been  under  review.  The  Trust  however  acknowledged  that  due  to  the 
presenting  risk  of  a  patient  it  may  not  always  be  possible  to  avoid  handover  times 
given the urgent nature of the services the Trust provides. 

On Wednesday, 8 May 2024 the Trust sent to your office confirmation that the policy 
which  governs  the  admission  to  an  acute  ward,  ‘Acute  Inpatient  Mental  Health 
Services  for  Adults  of  Working  Age  Policy  and  Procedure’,  had  been  amended  to 
include  the  line  detailed  below.  That  correspondence  also  confirmed  that  the 
updated version had been communicated to the bed management team already but 
would be formally approved on 6 June 2024. 

It is best practice for admission during staff shift handover period [7am-7.30 am, 1.45 
pm-2.30  pm  and  9pm-9.30pm]  to  be  avoided  where  possible,  unless  there  is  an 
urgent requirement related to immediate patient safety. Learning from incidents has 
shown  that  admission  during  these  specific  periods  leads  to  an  increased  risk 

Trust Headquarters, Ashbourne Centre, Kingsway Hospital, Derby DE22 3LZ 

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 relating to transfer of information or allocation of admission actions. Admission times 
will be co-ordinated by the bed management team, the referring team, the ward staff 
and the patient and carers involved. 

Following the above actions, the formalisation into policy of the custom and practice 
that already existed has been achieved and I hope that this information reassures 
you and the family of Miriam that practical steps had already been taken prior to your 
Regulation 28 Report being sent to the Trust and that the risk you identified has 
been mitigated against. 

Yours sincerely 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Related reports

Other reports by Sophie Lomas

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.