Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Vera Spencer

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0616, written 11 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report11 Nov 2024
Reference2024-0616
DeceasedVera Spencer
CoronerSophie Lomas
Coroner areaDerby and Derbyshire
CategoryEmergency services related deaths (2019 onwards)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1 NHS Derby & Derbyshire Integrated Care Board

1

CORONER

I am Sophie LOMAS, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Derby and Derbyshire

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 14 December 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Vera SPENCER aged
94. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 25 October 2024.

The Medical Cause of Death was:

1 (a) Pneumonia

(b) Fall

2 Chronic Kidney Disease, Heart Failure

The conclusion of the inquest was: Accident

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

On 6th December 2023 Vera Spencer had a fall at her home address. She was able to use
her lifeline alarm which notified her next of kin who attended and called the ambulance
service. The ambulance service were first contacted at 22.11pm and an ambulance arrived
at 09.01am on the 7th December. By that time Mrs Spencer had been on the floor for 11
hours.

Mrs Spencer was taken to hospital where x-rays showed that she had sustained a fractured
hip and had showed infective changes in her lung consistent with a chest infection. She was
commenced on antibiotics for her chest infection and underwent a surgical repair of her hip
on 8th December 2023. Post-operatively Mrs Spencer was stable but late in the evening of
the 9th December 2023 her condition deteriorated. By 11th December Mrs Spencer
developed breathing difficulties; despite treatment her condition continued to deteriorate
and she sadly died on 11th December 2023 at Royal Derby Hospital.

The court heard evidence that the ambulance service was under severe pressure on the day
of Mrs Spencer’s fall which was due to a combination of high call volumes and long
handover delays at local hospitals. It was not possible to determine on the evidence
available whether the long lie whilst awaiting an ambulance contributed to the development
of pneumonia or whether earlier ambulance attendance and earlier treatment may have
prevented Mrs Spencer’s death.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

CONTROLLED

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
(brief summary of matters of concern)

At times when the ambulance service is under extreme pressure, individuals who have
fallen at home can wait many hours on the floor before paramedics can attend. This is
usually because falls are given a lower categorisation by the ambulance service because it
is not a life-threatening situation. Resultant long lies can increase the risk of pneumonia,
pressure damage and Rhabdomyolysis. The court heard evidence that other than the
ambulance service, there is no local falls service or team operating out of hours to assess
patients and assist them off the floor following a fall.

6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or
your organisation) have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by January 06, 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION

8

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons

The family of Vera SPENCER
East Midands Ambulance Service Governance Team

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or
of interest.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of
interest.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

Dated: 11/11/2024

Sophie LOMAS
Assistant Coroner for
Derby and Derbyshire

CONTROLLED

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Derby NHS ICB (PDF)
The Council House, 
 First Floor, 
 Corporation Street, 
 Derby, 
 DE1 2FS       

E: 

www.derbyandderbyshireicb.nhs.uk  

Date 17 January 2025 

Dear Sophie Lomas, 

Subject: Regulation 28 with respect to the death of Mrs Vera Spencer 

Thank you for raising your concerns with us on this important matter. 

Derby & Derbyshire ICB extend our sympathies to the family and friends of Mrs Vera Spencer over 
their loss. Secondly, we have examined the issues you raised in the regulation 28 notice. 

The Regulation 28 Notice identified: 

At times when the ambulance service is under extreme pressure, individuals who have fallen 
at  home  can  wait  many  hours  on  the  floor  before  paramedics  can  attend.  This  is  usually 
because falls are given a lower categorisation by the ambulance service because it is not a 
life-threatening situation. Resultant long lies can increase the risk of pneumonia, pressure 
damage  and  Rhabdomyolysis.  The  court  heard  evidence  that  other  than  the  ambulance 
service, there is no local falls service or team operating out of hours to assess patients and 
assist them off the floor following a fall. 

Derby & Derbyshire ICB response: 

At the time of Vera's fall, the Team Up falls service was resourced to support non-injurious falls, so 
an individual with a fractured hip would not have been suitable for that type of response. 

We are aware that some areas have since progressed into supporting injurious falls, and the plan 
is for all others to follow suit.  

Action 1: Derby & Derbyshire ICB will seek to accelerate the development and roll out of a 
falls prevention service that is available to all residents in Derby & Derbyshire that includes 
consideration of an injurious falls service.  This will be considered through in the local NHS 
planning & prioritisation process for 2025/26. 

Long  lies  are  variable  in  their  effect  on  an  individual,  this  is  usually  based  on  their  co-
morbidities/frailty prior to the fall.  If an individual is not able to be retrieved from the floor, then the 
main concerns are hypothermia, dehydration, immobility, severity of pain and acute kidney injury. 

Head office address: The Council House, First Floor, Corporation Street, Derby, DE1 2FS       

Page 1 of 3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 In  exceptional  circumstances,  next  of  kin  or  responders  from  the  above  options  could  attend  on 
scene and support to confirm the need for ambulance, or recover if able, and manage symptoms 
and risks e.g. pain relief, temperature regulation, hydration, safe movement/pressure care, if a long 
wait for an ambulance is incurred. However, we are aware that in periods of severe strain upon acute 
& ambulance services that this approach may not always be successful in mitigating the risk of harm 
to patients. Therefore, the ICB recognises the need to look at further actions that may be put in place 
to mitigate the risk of harm. 

Further options that the ICB will consider for alternative ambulance response out of hours: 

Option A: DHU have staff trained in falls recovery as they provide some cover for the Team Up / 
UCR provision. Their falls response provision could be extended to cover 20:00-08:00, and Team 
Up and step-up virtual wards would provide the continuation of clinical support next day.  If this was 
in situ, this individual could have been responded to by a team, observations completed, ambulance 
need confirmed through on-screen head to toe assessment, perhaps an urgent visit arranged from 
DHU medic for pain relief. It is likely that with a hip fracture suspected, the responders would not be 
able to safely lift the individual off the floor (teams only have seated lifted equipment). This option 
would  offer  the  person  in  person  support,  confirmation  of  need  and  pain  and  other  symptom 
management, but not remove the need for ambulance attendance in this case. 

Option B: EMAS have a community first responder network who are volunteers and trained in falls 
recover, deployed exclusively by EMAS EOC. The provision can be variable in the hours available, 
and  geographies  covered  However  we  can  explore  the  possible  extension  of  this  service  for  the 
people  of  Derby  &  Derbyshire.    Again,  these  teams  would  be  limited  to  providing  on  scene 
support/monitoring but would likely not be able to recover the individual as they only have access to 
seated lifting equipment.  

Option  C:  ICB  to  consult  with  technology  enabled  care  providers  to  ensure  they  consider  the 
provision of community-based response as an integral part of their services. Where TEC services 
do  not  provide  in  person  response,  there  is  an  increased  dependence/reliance  on  ambulance 
services for attendance to pendant alarm alerts. However, like the above option, if the TEC provider 
had attended in person, and confirmed the individual was significantly injured, the team would not 
recover, keep the individual safe, and escalate to the ambulance service to attend. 

Option D: The district and borough technology enabled care providers that we have commissioned 
as part of the Team Up Enhanced falls response; all operate as 24/7 responding services for their 
main service provision (fee paying TEC services). Therefore, they could be commissioned by the 
ICB to extend this enhanced offer to cover 24/7, maintaining similar processes we have in place now 
for  UCR.  The  provision  offered  by  these  providers  is  limited  to  Derby  City,  High  Peak  (excluding 
Glossop  currently),  Chesterfield,  South  Derbyshire,  Bolsover,  and  parts  of  NE  Derbyshire  and 
therefore DHU would potentially offer a solution for the remainder. 

Action 2:  Derby & Derbyshire ICB will seek to implement options that further mitigate the risk 
of a long lie following a fall that is available to all residents in Derby & Derbyshire. 

Derby & Derbyshire ICB recognise that there are times when the East Midlands Ambulance Service 
(EMAS)  is  under  extreme  pressure.  These  situations  lead  to  unacceptable  response  times  for 
severely  ill  and  injured  people  within  our  community.  Indeed  we  have  just  come  out  of  an 
unprecedented EMAS critical incident due to such pressures. 

Head office address: The Council House, First Floor, Corporation Street, Derby, DE1 2FS       

Page 2 of 3 

 
 
 
 
 
 In  this  critical  incident  the  local  NHS  worked  together  with  the  local  authorities  and  the  voluntary 
sector to reduce the response times for patients in the community. In the short term we will continue 
to work as a multi-agency group to try and minimise response times by EMAS. In the medium term 
we recognise that we will need to identify ways in which the demand for healthcare and healthcare 
beds can be reduced. This will require a blended approach that looks at: 

1.   Reducing the flow of people into our urgent & emergency care services through prevention  
2.  Improving flow through our acute sector and reducing length of stay in hospital beds. In the 
short term we have the local roll out of a technology known as Optica that has a proven ability 
to reduce length of stay in hospital settings  

3.  Continued working with social and voluntary care services to improve the speed of discharge 

of people when they are well back to their usual home setting. 

Yours sincerely, 

Chief Medical Officer  

Head office address: The Council House, First Floor, Corporation Street, Derby, DE1 2FS       

Page 3 of 3

Related reports

Other reports by Sophie Lomas

See all →

More reports categorised “Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards)”

See all →

Track Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.