Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Lee-Ann Ince

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0333, written 20 Jun 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report20 Jun 2024
Reference2024-0333
DeceasedLee-Ann Ince
CoronerAlison Mutch
Coroner areaManchester South
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1) Greater Manchester Integrated 
Care Board. 
1  CORONER 

I am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South 
Manchester 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and 
Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners 
(Investigations) Regulations 2013 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 10th  May 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lee-
Ann Sarah INCE. The investigation concluded on the 22nd May2024 and 
the conclusion was one of suicide. The medical cause of death was 1a) 
hanging. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Lee Ann Sarah Ince was a victim of domestic abuse, who was in a 
coercive and controlling relationship. The prolonged exposure to 
domestic abuse during the relationship had a significant impact on her 
mental health. On 9th May 2023 she was found unresponsive attached to 
a ligature. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise 
to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 
The inquest heard evidence that agencies involved in supporting her in 
the months leading up to her death had a limited understanding of how 
behaviours could be twisted in a coercive and controlling relationship to 
make it appear as if the victim was part of the problem. In this situation it 
was clear that Lee-Ann was the victim of so called “love bombing” which 
meant that she was barraged with messages from the perpetrator. The 
impact of that on a victim’s mental health was not recognised. 

1 

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Her children had expressed their concerns to their school. The school 
had been proactive in sharing those concerns but there was little 
evidence that other agencies were then listening to “the voice of the 
child”. This meant that agencies who had direct contact with her did not 
have a full grasp of the situation or her vulnerability. The inquest was told 
that if information is not effectively shared and the voice of the child is lost 
there is an increased risk to the victim. 

A feature of her vulnerability was her physical health and how dependent 
she was, as a consequence, on the perpetrator to help care for her. The 
additional vulnerability and impact of this was not recognised by agencies 
involved in supporting her. The inquest was told that where vulnerability is 
not properly understood the risk presented to a victim of domestic abuse 
increases. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe you have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 15th  August 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons namely 
family, who may find it useful or of interest. 

 on behalf of the 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your 
response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 9  Alison Mutch 

HM Senior Coroner 

20.06.2024 

3

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Gmic 2 (PDF)
Preventing Future Deaths – Response Template (LI)

A ‘Regula(cid:415)on 28: Report to prevent future deaths’ was issued to the Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board (ICB) by the HM Coroner in
rela(cid:415)on to the inquest into the death of Lee-Ann Sarah Ince. The following extract is taken from the report which highlights the iden(cid:415)fied 
concerns:

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed ma(cid:425)ers giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless ac(cid:415)on is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.

1. The inquest heard evidence that agencies involved in suppor(cid:415)ng her in the months leading up to her death had a limited understanding
of how behaviours could be twisted in a coercive and controlling rela(cid:415)onship to make it appear as if the vic(cid:415)m was part of the problem. 
In this situa(cid:415)on it was clear that Lee-Ann was the vic(cid:415)m of so called “love bombing” which meant that she was barraged with messages
from the perpetrator. The impact of that on a vic(cid:415)m’s mental health was not recognised. 

2. Her children had expressed their concerns to their school. The school had been proac(cid:415)ve in sharing those concerns but there was li(cid:425)le 
evidence that other agencies were then listening to “the voice of the child”. This meant that agencies who had direct contact with her
did not have a full grasp of the situa(cid:415)on or her vulnerability. The inquest was told that if informa(cid:415)on is not effec(cid:415)vely shared and the
voice of the child is lost there is an increased risk to the vic(cid:415)m. 

3. A feature of her vulnerability was her physical health and how dependent she was, as a consequence, on the perpetrator to help care for
her. The addi(cid:415)onal vulnerability and impact of this was not recognised by agencies involved in suppor(cid:415)ng her. The inquest was told that 
where vulnerability is not properly understood the risk presented to a vic(cid:415)m of domes(cid:415)c abuse increases. 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 15th August 2024. I, the coroner, may extend
the period.

In response to the above, the table below sets out the ac(cid:415)ons that will be taken forward to address those highlighted concerns with respec(cid:415)ve 
(cid:415)mescales for the specified ac(cid:415)ons. Please refer below

Trafford Council / NHS GM                                                                            FINAL PFDLI 09082024
10

Page 1 of

 Matter of Concern 1

The inquest heard evidence that agencies involved in supporting her in the months leading up to her death had a limited understanding of how behaviours
could be twisted in a coercive and controlling relationship to make it appear as if the victim was part of the problem. In this situation it was clear that Lee-
Ann was the victim of so called “love bombing” which meant that she was barraged with messages from the perpetrator. The impact of that on a victim’s
mental health was not recognised.

Action

Progress to date

Next Steps

Timescales

1.1 - We will work collaboratively
to develop or commission
specialist training for
practitioners to better
understand the dynamics
where coercion and control is
present.

Whilst there has already been
training on Control & Coercion this
has been more focused on the legal
framework and definitions rather
than an understanding around the
dynamics and how this may impact.

Identify number of individuals to be
trained.

Agree scope of training and content
Commission sessions to be funded
by the Community Safety
Partnership

Training to commence
September 2024 with
the first courses being
rolled out in the latter
half of the year.
This will then be an
ongoing training offer.

Responsible
Agency
Trafford
Community
Safety
Partnership

.

We will develop and deliver
specialist training that focuses
on the dynamics of control
and coercion and how this
needs to be understood by
practitioners who are working
with victims and their families.
This aims to bring clarity on
who is the abuser and who is
the victims and support
effective decision making and
action

Bookings, advertising and monitoring
to be collated through Safeguarding
Learning & Development.

Progress against this will be reported
to the Community Safety Partnership
who will retain governance of our
partnership approach and delivery in
respect of domestic abuse.

1.2 - We will routinely make it
usual practice to invite
Independent Domestic Violence
Advocates (IDVAs) to initial Case

 Discussions with Trafford Domestic
Abuse Service (TDAS) have already
taken place in respect of existing
capacity, and this has been agreed

 Best practice and approach to be
agreed with all partners.

October 2024

Trafford
Council

Trafford Council / NHS GM                                                                            FINAL PFDLI 09082024
10

Page 2 of

 Conferences or other
safeguarding meetings where
they are supporting the victim.

The purpose of this is so that they
can advocate on behalf of the
victim and bring their specialism
and expertise.

This approach is to be embedded
within the council so that
opportunities to better support
victims is not missed.

in principle subject to capacity and
demand pressures.

The multi-agency risk assessment
(MARAC) process is well embedded
across the partnership and Trafford
Domestic Abuse Services are a key
stakeholder at these meetings and
actions are inclusive of considering
support needs to the victim.

IDVAs are routinely invited to
meetings were domestic abuse is a
feature but we will strengthen our
approach in respect of support at
Child Protection conferences.

Agreed changes to Safeguarding
procedures to be endorsed by
Trafford Strategic Safeguarding
Partnership (TSSP) and CSP.

Adult Social Care and Children’s
Social Care to update their
procedures in line with agreed
changes.

Performance reporting against this to
be developed and reported to
Strategic Safeguarding Partnership
and Community Safety partnership.

Briefings to be rolled out across
Adult and Children Services to
embed   requirements and
expectations across the service.

IDVA service to attend CSC
Leadership Forum (for all Practice
Managers and Head of Service) and
present in respect of their role as
advocates and support to victims of
violence to support embedding of
this practice requirement.

Children’s Safeguarding Unit to
amend current score card to monitor
invitation and attendance of IDVA as
advocate at Child Protection
Conference.

Trafford Council / NHS GM                                                                            FINAL PFDLI 09082024
10

Page 3 of

 1.3 – We will develop plans to
raise awareness of coercion and
the impact and harm of coercive
and controlling behaviour so that
it is better understood by
professionals and members of the
public alike.

Plans are already in place for
awareness raising campaign.

Budget has been identified and
made available to support this.

Community Safety to work with
TDAS & Communications Team to
develop a public awareness
campaign on control and coercion.

Launch on White
Ribbon Day 2024
(25th November 2024)

Trafford
Community
Safety
Partnership

Use of existing budget on campaigns
to fund a social media campaign in
Trafford on ‘control and coercion’

Matter of Concern 2

Her children had expressed their concerns to their school. The school had been proactive in sharing those concerns but there was little evidence that other
agencies were then listening to “the voice of the child”. This meant that agencies who had direct contact with her did not have a full grasp of the situation or
her vulnerability. The inquest was told that if information is not effectively shared and the voice of the child is lost there is an increased risk to the victim.

Action

Progress to date

Next Steps

Timescales

2.1 – We will continue to progress
the dedicated multi- agency
Domestic Abuse Action Plan that
is detailed within Trafford’s
Ambitions for Children’s Plan
(Ambition 6)

There is a dedicated Domestic
Abuse priority within Trafford's
Ambitions for Children Plan
(Ambition 6).

The priority has a detailed action
plan that sits beneath it.

The focus of this plan has been to
strengthen the early identification of
domestic abuse by developing our
approach that supports our
understanding of children's lived
experience and to inform our
interventions.

Key actions that are being taken
forward under the auspices of that
plan include:

Ongoing and being
progressed.

September 2024

Trafford Council / NHS GM                                                                            FINAL PFDLI 09082024
10

Responsible
Agency
Children’s
Social Care

Children’s
Social Care to
lead but model
and approach
will need
endorsement
from Trafford
Strategic

Page 4 of

 Safeguarding
Partnership

Review of the Domestic Abuse
Practitioner role within First
Response Team (FRT Children’s
Social Care Point of Entry).
Discussions with TDAS to further
enhance their role and presence
within FRT building on the existing
0.5 days per week are already taking
place to further strengthen initial
response to domestic abuse /
violence concerns.

Embed Domestic Abuse
practitioners within our localities to
support early identification and
intervention.

Research and roll out an agreed
evidence-based approach to the
management of risk in respect of DA
across the partnership. Researching
models of intervention has already
been undertaken and an options
paper will formally be presented to
the Ambitions work stream for
endorsement and will include roll out
and implementation plan.

This options appraisal will include
consideration of Safe and Together
Model. The Safe and Together
Model is licensed and offers a suite
of tools and interventions designed

Trafford Council / NHS GM                                                                            FINAL PFDLI 09082024
10

Page 5 of

 to help child welfare professionals
become domestic violence informed.
The model aims to move away from
professionals focusing survivor’s
behaviour and moving towards
concentrating on the actions of
perpetrators.

Progress the business case to roll
out this training and then present to
the relevant partnership decision
making forums.

 September 2024

Childrens
Social Care
and Trafford
Domestic
Abuse
Services

2.2 We will roll out ‘Voice of the
Child’ Training across the
partnership

Victim Voice facilitator from TDAS
has been meeting with children and
young people within Trafford, who
have experienced domestic abuse to
understand their experiences of
seeking support from services. This
work is being used to inform learning
and practice across the partnership.
The next steps will include how this
can be incorporated into existing
training.

A pilot training programme delivered
by Access 27 has been implemented
with 2 sessions held and 25 social
care practitioners attending the
training. The programme involves a
powerful theatre performance that
highlights experiences of children of
living in a household where domestic
abuse is a feature as well as
considering the legislation,
identifying children as victims in their
own right.

Trafford Council / NHS GM                                                                            FINAL PFDLI 09082024
10

Page 6 of

 A dedicated resource pack specific
to Trafford has been developed as
part of this programme.

Evaluation of the session using
questionnaires to evaluate learning
had been used to inform impact of
the training.

 GMP and CSC have a joint triage
front door process in place (MASH)
that involves screening of all
referrals to CSC at point of entry.
Recent inspections have identified
the Front door arrangements as an
area of strength,

A meeting has been held on
Tuesday 16 July 2024 between
Senior leaders within CSC and GMP
to scope further strengthening these
arrangements the work with
particular focus on the joint role and
decision-making practice of GMP
and TDAS role within triage.

Trafford Family Help services have
been reshaped and the model within
Trafford Family Support Service is
inclusive of having dedicated adult
practitioner expertise in respect of
domestic abuse, substance misuse

2.3 – We will further strengthen
and enhance Children’s Social
Care (CSC) & Greater
Manchester Police triage and
decision making at the point of
entry in respect of Domestic
Abuse

2.4 We will continue to strengthen
our Family Help services in
respect of response to incidents
domestic abuse and coercive
control

Dedicated daily triage arrangements
for partners to be implemented
specifically in relation to incidents of
domestic abuse.
This will need to be aligned and
reviewed in accordance current daily
risk meetings that take place as part
of Adult Social Care decision
making.

Policies and procedures to updated
following any changes and endorsed
through partnership routes.

Progress the work that is ongoing to
review the Reducing Parental
Conflict (RPC) Offer and its use as a
key intervention, within Family Help.

The review will inform an updated
action plan, held by the Reducing

In progress to be
completed October
2024

Children’s
Social Care &
Greater
Manchester
Police

In place and ongoing
Review of RPC to be
completed Dec 2024

Children’s
Social Care

Trafford Council / NHS GM                                                                            FINAL PFDLI 09082024
10

Page 7 of

 Parental Conflict Steering Group
attended by key partners and VCFE.

Learning from the evaluation and
any good practice learning to be
cascaded across the partnership

A dedicated training programme is
supporting our service redesign and
inclusive of Trafford Team Together
and Family Hub practitioners.

The Reducing Parental Conflict
(RPC)programme is in place across
Trafford as part of Family Help
approach. To date 323 people
across the partnership have been
trained in RPC toolkit since outset.

Matter of Concern 3 -

A feature of her vulnerability was her physical health and how dependent she was, as a consequence, on the perpetrator to help care for her. The
additional vulnerability and impact of this was not recognised by agencies involved in supporting her. The inquest was told that where vulnerability is not
properly understood the risk presented to a victim of domestic abuse increases.

Action

Progress to date

Next Steps

Timescale

3.1 - Any victim of domestic
abuse who comes into contact
with agencies who has
care/support needs due to their
health or disability will be routinely
referred to Adult Social Care for
assessment of their needs under
The Care Act 2014.

Victims are being identified and
referred through our Daily Risk
Management Meetings (DRMM) and
MARAC and this is well attended by
partners.

Members of MARAC and the DRMM
will be reminded to consider
disability and ethical needs when
considering levels of risk to potential
victims.

Policies and Procedures to be
updated in line with this
recommendation and cascaded
across the partnership.

The identified training programmes
that are in place and due to be rolled
out will be inclusive of this
expectation for appropriate referrals
to be made.

12 months – whilst
some departments or
agencies may be able
to effect change
quickly to ensure that
this is implemented
and embedded, we
also need to work with
wider partners to
ensure a consistent
approach.

Responsible
Agency
Adult Social
Care,
Community
Safety
Partnership
and GM ICB

Trafford Council / NHS GM                                                                            FINAL PFDLI 09082024
10

Page 8 of

 A Primary Care IDVA role has been
implemented and the postholder
provides direct advice, guidance and
support to the sector and
professionals where there is
domestic abuse and victims have
health needs.

3.2 – Adult Social Care to work
with specialist agencies such as
TDAS to develop bespoke
training around Domestic Abuse
and The Care Act 2014.

A programme of legislative
requirements and familiarisation is
already being rolled out across adult
services as part of the Improving
Lives Everyday Board This is
inclusive of all aspects of the Care
Act and statutory requirements.

A programme of familiarisation of
Care Act requirements when working
with parents who have care needs.
This work is being ed by the
Designated Social Care Officer and
will include considering whether
vulnerability and risk is enhanced as
a consequence of any adult needs.

Performance reporting and
partnership reporting arrangements
to be strengthened. Reporting in
respect of MA training is already
operational through formal
partnership arrangements and the
Strategic Safeguarding partnership
is currently updating its score card.
Specific reporting in respect of
compliance in respect of this training
to be included so that impact and
effectiveness can be considered.

The Domestic Abuse Partnership
Board to receive updates on the
work of the primary care IDVA and
the difference that this role is making
for victims at the quarterly Board
Meeting
Specialist training course to be
developed and rolled out in respect
of The Care Act & Domestic Abuse

Attendance and reach of the training
to be reported and formally
monitored through Safeguarding
Learning & Development so that
any issues and actions needed can
be reported and progressed through
single agency and multi-agency
meetings.

Trafford
Council /
Trafford
Domestic
Abuse
Services

To be launched within
12 months.

Our objective is to
develop the content of
this course throughout
Q3&Q4 of 2024/25 to
be launched and
delivered from April
2025 onwards.

Trafford Council / NHS GM                                                                            FINAL PFDLI 09082024
10

Page 9 of

 3.3 A dedicated task & finish
group (underneath the Domestic
Abuse Partnership Board) to
specifically develop our approach
and response to supporting
victims of domestic abuse who
have physical disabilities/health
needs.

Invites to be sent in August and
for the group to commence work
in September 2024

The Domestic Abuse Partnership
Board is well established and has
membership from across the
partnership. The Board meeting
starts with lived experience and the
voice of survivors. Consideration to
be given to how we can hear form
survivors with health needs to better
inform our work.
Agreed Task & Finish Group to
include Adult Social Care, Children’s
Services, Health, Strategic
Safeguarding, Police and
Community Safety representatives

Group to ensure that there are
robust plans in place to ensure
provision around accessible
accommodation, support for victims
who need tailored interventions due
to ill health or disability.

Plans to be presented back to the
Domestic Abuse Partnership Board

 August 2024

Trafford
Council

Trafford Council / NHS GM                                                                            FINAL PFDLI 09082024
10

Page 10 of
Response from Gmic (PDF)
E: 

12 August 2024

Ms A Mutch
HM Senior Coroner
Coroner’s Court
1 Mount Tabor  Street
Stockport
SK1 3AG

Dear Ms Mutch,

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Lee-Ann Sarah Ince

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report dated 20/06/2024 concerning the sad death of Ms Lee-Ann
Sarah Ince on 09/05/2023. On behalf of NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care (NHS GM), I would
like to begin by offering our sincere condolences to Ms. Ince’s family for their loss.

Thank you for highlighting your concerns during Mr. Ince’s Inquest which concluded on 22nd May 2024.
On behalf of NHS GM, I apologise that you have had to bring these matters of concern to our attention.
We recognise it is also very important to ensure we make the necessary improvements to the quality and
safety of future services.

Further to the notice issued to the Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board in respect of the above,
partners in Trafford have agreed to file a joint response to ensure that the action we take is as robust
and as effective as it can be.

Following receipt of the notice, partners convened a working group which consisted of colleagues from
Health, Adult Social Care, Children’s Services, Greater Manchester Police and Community Safety and
consulted with Trafford Domestic Abuse Services throughout.

We welcome the comments and observations made by HM Coroner and are resolute in ensuring that
recommendations are translated into tangible actions which made a difference to victims of domestic
abuse.

We remain committed as always to a journey of continuous improvement and we submit the attached
document which sets out what we intend to do as a partnership, and timescales for action.

The Community Safety Partnership Board which has commissioned the Domestic Homicide Review will
retain local governance to ensure that these actions are met and to report back to the HM Coroner on
progress upon request.

Yours sincerely

Chair of Trafford Community Safety Partnership
Corporate Director of Place at Trafford Council

Chief Nursing Officer
GM Integrated Care

Related reports

Other reports by Alison Mutch

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.