Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0392, written 22 Jul 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 22 Jul 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0392 |
| Deceased | Theo Bradley |
| Coroner | Elizabeth Didcock |
| Coroner area | Nottinghamshire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Child Death (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. The Chief Executive, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 1 CORONER I am Dr Elizabeth Didcock, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of Nottinghamshire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 16th September 2023, I commenced an investigation into the death of Theodore Riley Bradley The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 5th July 2024 The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative as follows: Theodore Bradley died from hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, caused by a placental abruption, secondary to sub clinical acute chorioamnionitis. The abruption led to a major antepartum haemorrhage, which was not recognised as an obstetric emergency that required immediate assessment of maternal and foetal wellbeing. Theo’s mother was not seen for 37 minutes on arrival at the Triage unit, at Kings Mill Hospital at 01.05 hours, when she was in pain and with significant vaginal bleeding, Had she been seen on arrival as she should have been, Theo would have been delivered by an emergency Category 1 caesarean section, likely by 01.25, certainly by 01.35, instead of at 02.02 hours as occurred. Had he been delivered at either of these earlier times, he would on balance have survived. The delay in Triage assessment made a more than minimal, negligible or trivial contribution to Theos death. Theo’s death was contributed to by neglect 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Theo was born at 02.02 hours on 14.9.23 with no heart rate, and no breathing effort or movement. He had suffered a period of prolonged intra uterine hypoxia, due to a partial placental abruption. His mother, which was not recognised during the telephone Triage call, at 00.37 hours on 14.9.23. , reported vaginal bleeding at 41 plus weeks gestation, the severity of was not seen as she should have On arrival at the triage unit at 01.05 on that day, been on arrival, nor thereafter until 00.42 hours, meaning there was a delay of some 37 minutes before she was seen. Whilst delivery thereafter was achieved in 20 minutes, by this time Theo simply could not recover from the acute hypoxic injury caused by the continuing interruption to his blood and oxygen supply, caused by the abruption, evidenced at the time of delivery Both the Trusts Maternity Triage policy and the Antepartum Haemorrhage policy were not followed Detailed Findings as to how he came by his death are provided in a written Determination dated 5.7.24 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows – 1, The lack of prompt action when a woman presents with an antepartum haemorrhage (APH). This Inquest revealed a culture within the midwifery team of not acting promptly when there is vaginal bleeding in pregnancy. There was an assumption that there was a benign cause for bleeding, rather than assuming, until proven otherwise that there is a serious cause, such as an abruption, that may require immediate intervention. Well established APH Trust guidance was not followed I set out that difficulty in effectively managing APH is also an accepted issue, for the neighbouring NUH NHS Trust , who are currently reviewing their guidance, and approach to managing APH. It is clearly a regional issue and may be a national one. I am not reassured that necessary actions to address these serious issues identified are in place. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by the 16th September 2024 I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 . COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 1. Theo’s family 2. The Regional Lead Obstetrician for the Midlands (NHS England)- 3. The National Clinical Director for Maternity- 4. The Care Quality Commission I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 22nd July 2024 Dr E A Didcock
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Please find below the organisational response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths issued by HM Area Coroner for Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire following the inquest into the death of Theodore Riley Bradley. We reiterate our apology and condolences to Theo’s family, and we hope this response and the implementation of actions reassures HM Coroner and Theo’s family that the necessary changes have been implemented. Matters of concern raised within the report and responses for each are as follows: 1) The lack of prompt action when a woman presents with an antepartum haemorrhage (APH). This Inquest revealed a culture within the midwifery team of not acting promptly when there is vaginal bleeding in pregnancy. There was an assumption that there was a benign cause for bleeding, rather than assuming, until proven otherwise, that there is a serious cause, such as an abruption, that may require immediate intervention. The Trust acknowledges that at the time of the incident staff behaviours and the subsequent culture around vaginal bleeding, negatively impacted the care received by Amelia Bradley in September 2023 as staff failed to recognise the urgency of the evolving clinical picture. Actions taken: The Trust has reviewed and updated its Antepartum Haemorrhage (APH) guideline to emphasise the clinical importance of bleeding in pregnancy, and the requirement for an immediate assessment of fetal and maternal condition with any degree of bleeding. The guideline now informs staff that best practice is to treat bleeding with an expectation of a worse-case scenario and then de-escalate if appropriate, rather than treating it as benign. A telephone assessment section has been included within the Antepartum Haemorrhage guideline. This includes the need to consider transfer into hospital by ambulance and highlights the need to prepare the midwifery coordinator and obstetric staff in preparation for an incoming admission. Quality improvement work has been initiated, informed by learning from Amelia and Theo’s care, which has resulted in the procurement of a new noticeboard to be fitted on Sherwood Birthing Unit, this will be in addition to our pre-existing Clinical Governance noticeboard. The purpose of the new noticeboard will be to provide up to date and succinct information to all staff relating specifically to new policy and guideline updates. Alongside the noticeboard, there will be the introduction a QR code, allowing an accessible means for staff to scan to acknowledge they have read and understood the updates. Compliance will be monitored by the ward leaders with escalation to the senior leadership team where required. A training programme has commenced focusing on the key areas of learning. This initially included refresher training for the core triage and Band 7 coordinating midwives on the Birmingham Symptom Specific Obstetric Triage System (BSOTS) BadgerNet (the Trusts Maternity electronic patient record) requirements. Delivered by the Trust’s Digital Midwife, the training including how to correctly document triage telephone calls within BadgerNet contemporaneously and how to utilise the ‘blood loss’ form correctly which in turn ensures any cumulative bleeding throughout pregnancy is captured. In addition, a BSOTS e-learning package has been mandated for all Midwifery staff to complete, it includes details on the process of reviewing patients in triage under the BSOTS model, highlighting the requirements of an initial review by a Midwife within 15 minutes of arrival and the pathways of care that would follow dependent on the symptoms on arrival and initial review findings. Completion of this training is being monitored closely by the Midwifery practice development team, with escalation to the Head of Midwifery of staff that do not complete the package within the deadline set by the Division. The contents of this training has also been reflected on the PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training (PROMPT) training. An acronym has been developed within Trust, RED – React, Escalate, Diligent, with guidance next to each point on the expected management of bleeding. This includes reacting to the initial reported blood loss by advising attendance to triage and consideration of calling an ambulance. Escalating to the coordinating midwife, obstetric and triage staff that an attendance with bleeding is anticipated, and being diligent around the assessment of bleeding – preparing for an abnormality until proven otherwise. Prompt cards of the acronym have been disseminated to all clinical areas and shared via email to all staff members, and additional prompt card advising the potential causes of bleeding has been shared alongside this. The Maternity team are currently developing an Antepartum Haemorrhage scenario video that includes role play of a phone call in progress whilst a midwife completes the BSOTS telephone call proforma. This consists of a prompt and brief assessment (triage) of women when they present with unexpected problems or concerns, and then a standardised way of determining the clinical urgency and setting the time in which they need to be seen. This will be available for staff members to access anytime and has been included within our BSOTS Training Needs Analysis (TNA). 2) Well established APH Trust guidance was not followed. The Trust acknowledges that Trust guidance was not followed during Amelia’s care. Actions taken: In addition to the guideline update highlighted above, the Trust has also reviewed the causes of Antepartum Haemorrhage section within the guideline. This has been amended and now clearly highlights that bleeding in pregnancy is not normal and can be unpredictable, and the expectation around quantifying and documenting repeated episodes of bleeding within the patient record has been added to support the ongoing risk assessments. The amended guideline received a multidisciplinary review including the obstetric service leads, midwifery matrons, and midwifery staff prior to ratification through the Maternity and Gynaecology Clinical Governance Meeting. Following ratification of the guideline, the updates have been shared with all staff members. The guideline updates have been shared via email and in person on shift handovers, and all staff have been asked to sign a registration sheet as evidence that they have read and understood the amendments. Additional support and training will be provided on an individualised basis to staff that do not understand the changes, this will be supported by their line manager and the practice development midwives. Antepartum Haemorrhage cases will continue to be reviewed through our ‘triggers’ incident review meeting, to ensure that the recommendations within the updated guideline are being followed. ‘Triggers’ is a weekly multidisciplinary case review meeting where there are set criteria for cases to be reviewed and membership includes Obstetricians, Matron for Maternity Governance, specialist midwives including the Fetal Monitoring Lead, Audit Lead and Clinical Governance Midwives, incidents are then escalated in line with the Incident Reporting Policy. The Triggers meeting is an open forum for staff members to attend for their own learning, and aims to identify learning from incidents, along with identification of cases further escalation and investigation. Cases will also be escalated into regional and national conversations as appropriate. 3) Regional and National theme with APH management. During the Inquest it was acknowledged by HM Coroner that difficulty in effectively managing and identifying bleeding in pregnancy is a theme from incidents across our region, and potentially nationally in maternity care. Within our Local Maternity and Neonatal System (LMNS) we are actively engaging with colleagues at Nottingham University Hospitals to review both APH and Intrapartum Haemorrhage (IPH). Following a rapid initial meeting we have asked for support from the Regional Midwifery and Obstetric teams and also the Health Innovation Network, noting that the first step is to review the available evidence. This review is expected to be completed by the end of September, with a plan to meet in early October to look at the next steps following this. Both Trusts have shared the Regulation 28 reports received and any immediate subsequent actions taken to ensure that learning has been shared. This has been supported through the LMNS Perinatal Quality Surveillance Group (PQSG). Additional Information: In addition to the actions discussed above, it was recognised that wider cultural work was required, this has been undertaken by our Perinatal Quad (four senior leaders from the Trust’s Women and Children’s Division). The Perinatal Quad have attended a series of workshops, following the NHS England Culture and Leadership Programme. This is a modular programme and provided the Trust an opportunity to understand our culture using evidence-based tools. The aim of this work is to nurture and grow our safety culture, enable psychologically safe working environments and continue to build compassionate leadership within the service. This programme has provided dedicated time for the Perinatal Quad to work and learn together and embed a wider culture programme around ensuring staff voices are heard, that issues impacting the delivery of high quality and safe care are addressed openly whilst also ensuring senior leaders are accountable and active in influencing and embedding change. They now form part of the Perinatal Staff Experience Team (PeSET) and are accountable for ensuring co-design of cultural improvement actions identified through the thematic analysis of the Staff Score Survey results for 2023. This identified three key areas of focus for 2024/2025 are Communication, Leadership, and Staff Health and Wellbeing. The PeSET have begun communicating with clinical staff members during safety walk-arounds on clinical areas, addressing their concerns and opening direct channels of communication to the senior leadership team. Updates are being sent to all staff following a ‘You said, We did’ format highlighting the changes that are being made. This has supported the Perinatal Quad in improving an open culture amongst clinical staff members, which will continue to be built upon as the work progresses and evolves with time.
King’s Mill Hospital Mansfield Road Sutton in Ashfield Nottinghamshire NG17 4JL 16 September 2024 Dr E Didcock Assistant Coroner for Nottinghamshire The Council House Old Market Square Nottingham NG1 2DT Dear Dr Didcock, Theodore Bradley - Regulation 28 response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHSFT I am writing to you in my role of Acting Chief Executive. Attached is the organisational response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals to your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths. In addition, please find the supporting documents referred to within the response - Revised Antepartum Haemorrhage Guideline LIMS (Learning in Maternity Services) – Reacting to blood loss LIMS - Causes of antepartum haemorrhage I would like to take this opportunity to offer my personal apologies and condolences on behalf of the Trust to the family of Theodore. Yours sincerely Acting Chief Executive
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.