Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Geoffrey Cheney

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0561, written 18 Oct 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report18 Oct 2024
Reference2024-0561
DeceasedGeoffrey Cheney
CoronerIan Pears
Coroner areaWest Yorkshire Western
CategorySuicide (from 2015) · Community health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1 Radis Community Care

1

CORONER

I am Ian PEARS, HM Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of West Yorkshire Western
Coroner Area

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 22 January 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Geoffrey Stuart
CHENEY aged 71. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 11 October
2024. The conclusion of the inquest was that:

Geoffrey Stuart Cheney hung himself and a short form conclusion of suicide was recorded.

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

On 8th November 2023 an initial assessment for home treatment was undertaken on
Geoffrey Stuart Cheney by the Kirklees Outreach Team. In that assessment Geoffrey
indicated that he regularly had suicidal thoughts, including
to hang himself. His family asked that

be removed.

in his flat

Geoffrey was admitted as a voluntary patient and after some time was deemed to be fit
enough to have unescorted leave. He undertook that successfully on a number of
occasions.

On 16th January 2024 he went to his home at

on unescorted leave. He put the chain on the door and hung himself

that was still in place.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
(brief summary of matters of concern)

From the evidence it was clear that there was an assumption that
could not be
removed and as a result no attempt was made to see if it was actually possible to have

removed

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or
your organisation) have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by December 12, 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION

8

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons

I have also sent it to

Pinnacle Group Limited

who may find it useful or of interest.

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or
of interest.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of
interest.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

Dated: 18/10/2024

Ian PEARS
HM Assistant Coroner for
West Yorkshire Western Coroner Area

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Kirklees Council (PDF)
Housing Services, Strategic Manager – Accessible Homes Team 
Homes and Neighbourhoods 
PO Box 1720 
Huddersfield 
HD1 9EL 

e: 

  t:

21.11.24. 

West Yorkshire Coroners/Radis Community Care 

Dear Mr Ian Pears. 

RE: Coroners instruction regarding future removal of adaptations.  

Kirklees  Council  write  in  support  of  Radis  Community  Care’s  response  to  the 
instruction  you  have  issued  to  them  in  connection  with  the  removal  of  future 
adaptations if they present a safeguarding issue.  

To  give  you  some  additional  background  with  regards  to  the  operational  structure, 
Radis Community Care is the company who are the care providers to our customers, 
Pinnacle Group Ltd and Kirklees Council hold responsibility for all policy aspects of 
the property management, including adaptations. 

Kirklees  Council  have  a  Housing  Assistance  Policy  which  lays  out  how  we  deliver 
adaptations.  Previously  there  was  nothing  in  the  policy  with  regard  to  removing 
adaptations should they present a risk to a person.   

Following your report, I can confirm that amendments have been made with immediate 
effect  to  reflect  that  we  may  remove  adaptations  should  they  pose  any  risk  to  any 
persons in the household. The Policy is currently undergoing a formal sign-off process 
following  several  amends,  but  our  process  for  this  has  already  been  updated.    For 
information, the section in the draft Policy reads as follows:  

Removing and re-using aids and adaptations.   

• 

It  is  standard  practice  that  generally  we  do  not  remove minor  aids  and  adaptations 
once  fitted.  If  the  adaptations  are  no  longer  needed  it  is  the  responsibility  of  the 
homeowner, landlord or tenant to remove them.  

•  There are exceptions to this, however, as some aids and adaptations, such as hoists 
and stairlifts can be re-used in other properties needing aids and adaptations. Also, we 
would  consider  removing  certain  adaptations  if  there  are  risks  to  persons  or 
safeguarding concerns.  

•  We may re-use some specialist equipment if we have suitable items in stock.  
•  For Council properties we will endeavour to match an adapted property to the needs 
of a person following appropriate assessments from the Accessible Homes Team. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 For additional information, on internal review of this case we are not entirely satisfied 
that  a  multi-agency  approach  was  taken,  and  Kirklees  Council  will  raise  a 
Safeguarding Adults Review (SAR) referral as soon as possible.  

Although we are not sure it will meet the criteria, we believe that a discretionary SAR 
will  help  us  identify  any  learning  for  future  purposes.  We  believe  there  are 
improvements that can be made in terms of joined up working and improvements on 
aligning  policies,  the  SAR  process  will  assist  us  with  this.    Specific  actions  and 
timescales will be determined by this process and an update can be shared with the 
Coroner’s Office as required. 

Should  a  SAR  not  be  undertaken,  Kirklees  Council  will  ensure  learning  is  shared 
across all relevant departments and agencies regarding the change to our Policy of 
assessing adaptations for risks to persons or safeguarding concerns and the removal 
of them where needed.   

We are keen to offer support to all agencies involved in this case and if anyone would 
like any further discussions, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Yours sincerely 

Strategic Manager - Accessible Homes Team
Response from Radis Community Care (PDF)
It is standard practice that generally we do not remove minor aids and adaptations once 
fitted. If the adaptations are no longer needed it is the responsibility of the homeowner, 
landlord or tenant to remove them.

There are exceptions to this, however, as some aids and adaptations, such as hoists 
and stairlifts can be re-used in other properties needing aids and adaptations. Also, we 
would  consider  removing  certain  adaptations  if  there  are  risks  to  persons  or 
safeguarding concerns.

Related reports

Other reports by Ian Pears

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.