Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0622, written 14 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 14 Nov 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0622 |
| Deceased | Hannah Aitken |
| Coroner | Anna Loxton |
| Coroner area | Surrey |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Suicide (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
IN THE SURREY CORONER’S COURT
IN THE MATTER OF:
__________________________________________________________
The Inquest Touching the Death of Hannah Mary AITKEN
A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths
__________________________________________________________
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1.
2.
Social Care
Home Secretary
Secretary of State for Health and
1 CORONER
Ms Anna Loxton, HM Assistant Coroner for Surrey
2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7(1) of Schedule 5 to The Coroners
and Justice Act 2009.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
Hannah Mary Aitken died on 14th September 2023, aged 22. Her inquest
was opened on 28th September 2023. Evidence was heard between 30th
September and 4th October 2024 and Findings and Conclusion were given
on 7th November 2024. I recorded a conclusion of Suicide.
I found the medical cause of death to be:
1a.
2. Autism, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Anxiety and
Depression
4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
On 14th September 2023, Hannah Aitken died at her supported
accommodation in Caterham, Surrey, from an overdose of a poisonous
with
substance, namely
the intention of ending her life from a company
. Miss
Aitken confirmed with the company by email on 30th August 2023 that
she intended to use this for
. The substance was recorded as
delivered on the afternoon of 14th September. Miss Aitken was
which she had obtained
RT4563
1
subsequently heard to call out to her support workers for help, stating
she had taken an overdose. She would not provide details of the
substance and had hidden the packaging. She became unresponsive and
subsequently suffered cardiac arrest, from which she could not be
resuscitated despite prompt attendance and efforts from South East Coast
Ambulance.
Miss Aitken had a long-standing mental health background of autism
spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, requiring
extensive periods of inpatient admission, and was under the care of the
Tandridge Community Mental Health Recovery Service, Surrey and
Borders Partnership. Miss Aitken detailed an intention to end her life in
a notebook, which was written some weeks prior to her death at around
the time of ordering the substance. This was located on her bed after her
death.
5 CORONER’S CONCERNS
The Court heard anecdotal evidence from three Emergency Medical
Consultants and others witnesses that in their direct experience, the use
of
for self-harm is increasing. However, none were aware
of a central monitoring system which is able to record incidents of
poisoning.
e are reportable substances under the
Poisons Act 1972. The only obligation under this legislation is that
domestic sellers must report reasonable grounds for believing
transactions are suspicious. There are no restrictions on the import of
from abroad.
Since 2020, the Home Office has received at least five Prevention of
The
Future Death Reports relating to s
Home Secretary has recently provided reassurance in response to the
Regulation 28 report relating to the death of Dr Jonathan Shaw that “the
Home Office is actively exploring legislative and policy options, including
working with or alongside officials of other Government Departments as
appropriate, for the control of
(and other similar substances)”.
The Home Office has clarified in evidence during this inquest that the
policy objective of the Poisons Act 1972 is to control access to explosives
RT4563
2
precursors and poisons and to detect terrorist use of these substances to
illicitly manufacture explosives or to cause harm to third parties.
Prevention of suicide/self-harm is not a policy objective of the Home
Office under this Act, and this falls under the remit of the Department for
Health and Social Care. No evidence was provided that there is active
consideration of controlling access to these substances to the general
public, whether under the remit of the Home Office or any other
Government department.
Whilst these substances have legitimate uses, including
there does not appear to have been consideration as to
whether the purity can be diluted, or any other measures taken, to reduce
the risk posed by the quantities in which these substances are currently
sold, against the risk to life that they can pose.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are:
-
-
can be purchased domestically with no
restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions;
can be purchased from abroad and imported
to Great Britain with no restrictions;
- The quantities and purity in which
are sold
do not appear to be those required for their legitimate use, for
example in
of
It does not
there
regulating/monitoring the use of s
outside the
limited provisions of the Poisons Act 1972, and it is not clear which
Government department would be responsible for this.
consideration
appear
any
is
-
Consideration should be given to whether any steps can be taken to
address the above concerns.
6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that the people listed in paragraph one above have the power to
take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
RT4563
3
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of its date; I
may extend that period on request.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for such action. Otherwise you must
explain why no action is proposed.
8 COPIES
I have sent a copy of this report to the following:
1. See names in paragraph 1 above
2.
and
c/o
, Associate Solicitor, Leigh Day, Panagram, 27 Goswell
Road, London EC1M 7AJ
3. The Chief Coroner
In addition to this report, I am under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a
copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who,
he believes, may find
it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me at the time of your response, about the release or
the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
Signed:
ANNA LOXTON
DATED this 14th day of November 2024
RT4563
4
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
From
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for
Patient Safety, Women’s Health and Mental Health
39 Victoria Street
London SW1H 0EU
15 January 2025
Our ref:
Ms Anna Loxton
HM Coroner’s Court
Station Approach
Woking
GU22 7AP
By email:
Dear Ms Loxton,
Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 14 November 2024 sent to the Secretary of State
for Health and Social Care about the death of Hannah Mary Aitken. I am replying as the
Minister with responsibility for Patient Safety, Women’s Health and Mental Health.
Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Hannah’s
death and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances
your report describes are very concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters
to my attention. Thank you also for the additional time provided to the Department to respond
to the concerns raised in your report.
Your report raises concerns over the continued ease of availability of the substance involved
in this case (which I will not mention by name) to members of the public.
It may first help to clarify the Department’s role in suicide prevention. As lead for suicide
prevention policy, the Department’s role is to coordinate activity across government and
other agencies to ensure effective and cohesive action is being taken in the right areas.
However, suicide prevention is a cross-Government issue and given its complexity, specific
actions and mechanisms are led by a wide range of departments and organisations. To
support this coordination, DHSC published the Suicide Prevention Strategy for England in
2023, setting out priority areas for action to support joint working. The five-year strategy set
out actions aimed at reducing the rates of suicide in England, and work continues to deliver
effective suicide prevention initiatives.
On methods of suicide specifically, Government departments have taken steps to reduce
access to, and awareness of, this substance. DHSC leads a Concerning Methods Working
Group to raise awareness of and tackle access to substances such as this one. The working
group involves representatives from the voluntary, community and social enterprise sector,
police, academics and the NHS, as well as Government departments including Department
of Science, Innovation and Technology and the Home Office. The group develops and
delivers rapid targeted actions to collectively reduce public access to emerging methods,
including this one. Over 30 of the actions identified and implemented by the group have been
to tackle this substance specifically.
The group has worked with businesses, including online suppliers and manufacturers of the
substance, to reduce people’s ability to purchase it for non-legitimate purposes including
suicide, and to raise awareness around safeguarding concerns with businesses where
required. Government departments have also previously worked with manufacturers to
reduce the lethality of the substance if ingested. This included work with online platforms to
remove it from sale to individuals in its pure form. The group continues to work operationally
with a range of organisations, and we are actively considering opportunities to work with the
Border Force, using existing legal provisions, to help detect packages at the border which
may be linked to vulnerable individuals and intended for suicide. The group’s actions are
kept under review.
On the issue of further regulation, the Department is working closely with the Home Office
to convene Government departments and agencies to identify whether regulation is
appropriate and would achieve the intended aim, and if so which body is best placed to take
forward any reviews into this.
You also raised the issue of monitoring. The Department monitors trends of this substance
and other concerning methods as part of the working group. We have approaches in place
to collect intelligence from a wide range of sources. We use Office for National Statistics
data, and we are exploring how to make better use of national near real time suspected
suicide surveillance data to make sure we can identify and respond to trends more quickly.
Regional Leads within the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities also pass on
information from local organisations to central teams for monitoring. Whilst we observed an
increase in the number of suicides using this method a few years ago, we have not found
concrete evidence that the numbers have increased in the last few years, and since the
Concerning Methods Working Group was set up. We are working alongside the National
Police Chiefs’ Council to bring together important local intelligence. The government will
obtain near to real-time data from across the country on deaths by suspected suicide by
gender, age group and method. We will engage with NHS England and others to look for
ways we can strengthen information and monitoring routes into and out of national teams to
address the concerns raised in your report.
More broadly, as part of our mission to build an NHS fit for the future, the Government has
committed to tackling suicide as one of this country’s biggest killers and the 8,500 new
mental health workers we will be recruiting will be specially trained to support people at risk
from suicide. Ultimately, it is our aim to help and support people as early as possible, so they
don’t feel the need to turn to these types of substances to take their own life.
I hope this response is helpful, alongside a separate response which I understand the Home
Office will be providing. Thank you for bringing these important concerns to my attention.
Yours sincerely,
PARLIAMENTARY UNDER-SECRETARY OF STATE FOR
PATIENT SAFETY, WOMEN’S HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH
Security Minister 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF www.gov.uk/home-office 07 February 2025 Ms Anna Loxton HM Assistant Coroner for Surrey HM Coroner’s Court Station Approach Woking GU22 7AP By email: Dear Ms Loxton, HANNAH MARY AITKEN REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Thank you for the Regulation 28 report, dated 14 November 2024, sent to the Home Secretary following the inquest into the death of Hannah Mary Aitken, who tragically died on 14 September 2023. I am responding on behalf of the Home Secretary, in my capacity as the Security Minister. Firstly, I would like to offer my heartfelt condolences to Ms Aitken’s family and loved ones at this difficult time. My thoughts are with them as they continue to navigate their profound loss. Thank you for the additional time provided to the Department to respond to the concerns raised in your report, which I have carefully noted. I am very grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. Your report has raised several matters of concern, which are relevant to both the Home Office and Department of Health and Social Care, namely: • The substance in question can be purchased domestically with no restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions; • The substance in question can be purchased from abroad and imported to Great Britain with no restrictions; • The substance in question is sold at levels of purity and in quantities which represent significant risk to life whether by self-harm or terrorist use; • The quantities and purity in which the substance in question are sold do not appear • to be those required for their legitimate use; It does not appear there is any consideration of regulating/monitoring the use of the substance in question outside the limited provisions of the Poisons Act 1972, and it is not clear which Government department would be responsible for this. Your report also highlights that there have been several tragic cases where this material has been used in incidences of death by suicide. Please note, following another tragic 1 incidence of death following ingestion of the same substance, the Home Secretary has recently written to Ms Catherine McKenna, the Area Coroner for Greater Manchester North, detailing action the Home Office is taking on this issue. The letter emphasised the Government’s determination to ensure all reasonable steps to prevent further loss of life are taken. The Home Secretary has also written to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care to ask that they give priority to this issue as part of their continued work on implementing the goals of the Suicide Prevention Strategy. This sets out actions aimed at reducing the rates of suicide in England. I have provided further detail below on joint action that is already underway. The substance described in your report is a “reportable” poison listed in Part 4 of Schedule 1A of the Poisons Act. For the avoidance of doubt, this means that whilst it can be bought by members of the public, suspicious transactions need to be reported by retailers if there are questionable grounds for suspecting it is intended for any illicit use. The Poisons Act was amended in October 2023 to strengthen controls, and enhance our suspicious activity reporting requirements, including new obligations for online marketplaces. As well as the requirement to report suspicious transactions, economic operators supplying any reportable substances must now demonstrate that their personnel are aware about which of their products contain listed substances, and are instructed on their obligations. As your report captures, the Home Office is aware of the issues relating to this substance. My officials have been undertaking work across Government to both reduce access to this substance, and raise awareness to suppliers of the dangers of this substance. To this end, the Homeland Security Group (HSG) have been working to improve retailer awareness of their legal obligation to report suspicious activity for regulated and reportable substances. Specifically, HSG have engaged with online platforms to encourage them to voluntarily remove the sale to individuals in its pure form. Government expertise in relation to substances of concern is also shared to inform retailer sales practices. This includes encouraging suppliers to use declaration of use forms for sales of such substances. This work will continue to ensure suppliers are meeting their requirements under the Poisons Act. Furthermore, if during the processing of suspicious activity reports a safeguarding concern is identified by Counter Terrorism Policing, consideration will be given to disseminating this intelligence to police forces to consider a welfare check. Similarly, Border Force has introduced guidance for its officers (operating within its existing legal provisions). This guidance provides instructions on the action they can take if they are in receipt of information, in any form or manner, that leads to a detection of goods at the border containing an item that may be intended to assist with suicide. This of course relies on Border Force working closely with police forces and other relevant agencies to safeguard vulnerable individuals to the full extent possible. This work is complex, and Border Force will continue to monitor its policies, exploring opportunities to improve its ability to take action. Where possible, Border Force will also continue to ensure that frontline staff who may encounter these items know what action to take, and are supported on a case-by-case basis when required. On the issue of further regulation, an aspect of the concern you have raised relates to individuals based in Great Britain, purchasing this substance from overseas retailers. As the Poisons Act only applies to Great Britain (i.e. England, Scotland, and Wales), there is no obligation for retailers based outside the specified jurisdiction to report transactions which they believe to be suspicious. The Department is seeking to address this, as well as 2 the other issues raised in your report, such as the purity and quantities of the substance in question that are available for sale. My officials are working closely with the Department for Health and Social Care, convening relevant stakeholders to consider the potential benefits and proportionality of further regulation. Thank you for your report and for bringing these important matters to my attention. I hope that my response, alongside that of DHSC, has been able to address some of your concerns. I can assure you that the Home Office will continue to work in collaboration with relevant Departments and wider partners to take action in this area. Yours sincerely, Security Minister 3
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.