Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Ava Hodgkinson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0016, written 10 Jan 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report10 Jan 2025
Reference2025-0016
DeceasedAva Hodgkinson
CoronerChristopher Long
Coroner areaLancashire and Blackburn with Darwen
CategoryChild Death (from 2015) · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. 

Care

1

CORONER

, Secretary of State for Health and Social

I am Mr Christopher Long area coroner, for the coroner area of Lancashire and
Blackburn with Darwen

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 21 August 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Ava Grace
Hodgkinson, age 2. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 8 January
2025. The conclusion of the inquest was that Ava died from natural causes due to
overwhelming sepsis caused by Streptococcus A infection..

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Ava Grace HODGKINSON died on 14 December 2022, at Ormskirk District General
Hospital, Ormskirk in Lancashire. Following a short illness Ava was examined by a G.P.
where no infection was found, but antibiotics were prescribed. The following morning,
Ava took the first dose of antibiotics, however her condition later worsened and she was
driven to Ormskirk District General Hospital in the early afternoon, where, upon arrival,
she was noted to be in cardiac arrest and despite attempts to resuscitate, she did not
recover. Miss HODGKINSON died of overwhelming Sepsis, resulting from Group A
Streptococcus infection.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –

(1) In evidence at the inquest it was explained that the Ava had seen her GP who had
prescribed amoxicillin with a dose of 250mg/5ml. The pharmacy did not have this
strength in stock but did have amoxicillin 125mg/5ml in stock but could not issue this as
restrictions currently in place prevent a pharmacist issuing any different strength of
medication without an amended prescription, even where the medication can be
provided to enable the same dose to be administered (here Ava's parents could have
been instructed to provide 10ml enabling the same dose of antibiotics to be provided).
This led to a delay in Ava receiving antibiotics. Evidence from the Department of Health
and Social Care included that this issue was being actively considered but it was

1

 explained the issue was complex and any change was likely to need public consultation
and ministerial support. It was also explained that it was not possible to provide any
timeframe for any appropriate steps to be taken to consider changing the restrictions
preventing pharmacists from issuing medication where they can provide the same
dosage of the same medication in a different denomination.

6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the
power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 10 March 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons: Mr & Mrs Hodgkinson (Ava's parents), the Department of Health and Socoial
Care and to the Lancashire's Safeguarding Board

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

DATE 10 January 2025                                 SIGNED BY CORONER

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Dhsc (PDF)
Minister of State for Health (Secondary Care) 

39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

28 March 2025 

Our ref: 

HM Coroner Christopher Long 
Coroner’s Court 
2 Faraday Court 
Faraday Drive 
Preston 
Lancashire 
PR2 9NB 

By email: 

Dear Mr Long,  

Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of  10 January 2025 sent to the Secretary of State 
about the death of Ava Grace Hodgkinson. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility 
for medicines regulation, pricing and supply. 

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Ava’s death, 
and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. 

The report raises concerns over the requirement to supply medication in accordance with 
the  prescription,  as  set  out  in  the  Human  Medicines  Regulations  2012,  which  prevent  a 
pharmacist from issuing different strengths of prescribed medication without an amended 
prescription, even when the same dosage could be achieved. 

Currently,  for  most  prescriptions,  there  is  clear  separation  between  the  function  of 
prescribing  and  dispensing  –  this  is  primarily  for  patient  safety.  It  provides  for  a  second 
clinical  check  on  suitability,  dose  and  interactions,  and  ensures  prescribers  have  clarity 
about the medication being supplied to the patient. 

The  Human  Medicines  Regulations  2012  (HMRs  2012)  require  dispensing  to  be  “in 
accordance with a prescription”, with some very limited exceptions e.g. Serious Shortage 
Protocols (SSPs) and more recently introduced original pack dispensing (OPD). This means 
that in practice, community pharmacists must supply the exact product, quantity, strength 
and formulation according to what has been originally prescribed. 

If the exact product isn’t available, there are obvious benefits from pharmacists being able 
to  supply  to  patients  with  an  alternative  straight  away  –  patients  are  able  to  start  their 
treatment sooner, patient journeys are reduced and there is a positive impact on the efficient 
use of GP Practice and pharmacy staff time. However, there are also  patient safety risks. 
For example,  if  formulations  or dosage  regimes  change,  then  patients  may  get  confused 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 and not take their medicines as intended and the prescriber will not have a clear view of 
what  their  patient  is  taking.  There  are  also  supply  chain  implications  –  it  could  affect 
suppliers’ ability to predict future demand that is primarily based on historic orders and/or 
have the unintended effect of creating a shortage of the alternative. The pharmacist may not 
always be aware of the wider supply situation of any product. For example, if a lower strength 
was supplied in place of the higher strength due to a shortage, it could mean that stock of 
the lower dose is rapidly depleted at an increased rate in order to match the required dosage. 
Serious  Shortage  Protocols  (SSP)  are  developed  with  oversight  from  DHSC's  Medicines 
Supply Team to ensure that any substituted alternative product can adequately support the 
increased demand. 

Nevertheless, I am committed to my officials exploring  new flexibilities. There has been a 
recent programme of engagement, since December 2024, as part of which my officials have 
discussed possibilities with stakeholders such as GP representatives, pharmacy bodies and 
patient groups. The stakeholder feedback has been sufficiently positive that the Government 
is minded, subject to the normal machinery of Government clearance processes, to proceed 
to a formal, public consultation. 

Any proposed new flexibilities would need amendments to the HMRs 2012 – and a public 
consultation on such changes is a requirement of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 
2021  and  would  need  to  be  joint  with  the  Department  of  Health  in  Northern  Ireland.  The 
consultation will seek wider views than those already canvased on if, and the circumstances 
in which, it may be appropriate to grant pharmacists the flexibility to supply an alternative 
dose  and  formulation  to  that  specified  in  a  prescription  written  by  a  prescriber.  My 
expectation at this stage is that consideration will be given to whether or not the flexibilities 
should  be  limited  to  cases  of  immediate  clinical  need  where  it  is  impractical  to  obtain  a 
prescription for the alternative medicine without undue delay. I am confident that a solution 
can  be  found  to  granting  new  flexibilities  that  will  receive  patient,  professional,  NHS  and 
pharmacy businesses’ support. 

Subject to the normal clearances, my officials aim to publish this by summer 2025. 

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. 

Yours sincerely, 

Minister of State for Health and Secondary Care

Related reports

Other reports by Christopher Long

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Child Death (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.