Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0150, written 19 Mar 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 19 Mar 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0150 |
| Deceased | Sheridan Pickett |
| Coroner | Jyoti Gill |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 1 CORONER lam Jyoti Gill, HM Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of Manchester South 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 12% August 2024 an investigation commenced into the death of Sheridan Tate Pickett, age 27. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20h January 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was suicide. The medical cause of death was 1(a) multiple injuries consistent with a fall. 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On 9th August 2024 Sheridan Pickett caused himself to fall from a height out of a window at leading to him sustaining fatal injuries. A police investigation has determined there was no third-party involvement in his death. 5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — 1. The inquest heard evidence that Mr Pickett had a history of mental health issues and received an online diagnosis of ADHD from a private service provider (which prescribed Mr Pickett with medication too). Following his diagnosis Mr Pickett was admitted into an NHS hospital having taken an overdose. In their discharge letter the hospital suggested that the ADHD medication should not be recommenced. This information was not provided to the private ADHD provider which continued to prescribe Mr Pickett with ADHD medication. lam concerned that there are no current guidelines governing communication and information sharing as between private psychiatry providers offering assessment, care and treatment in relation to neurodiversity and NHS services involved with providing care and treatment in parallel. 6 | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 14'" May 2025. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out he timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: Mr Pickett’s mother and father on behalf of the family, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust who may find it useful or of interest. am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. may also send a copy of your response to any other person who | believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Jyoti Gill HM Assistant Coroner 19th March 2025
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Minister of State for Health (Secondary Care) 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 11 June 2025 Our ref: HM Assistant Coroner Jyoti Gill Coroner’s Court 1 Mount Tabor Street Stockport SK1 3AG By email: Dear Ms Gill, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 19th March 2025 sent to the Secretary of State / the Department of Health and Social Care about the death of Mr Sheridan Tate Pickett. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for medicine regulation and prescribing. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Pickett’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. The report raises concerns over the importance of adhering to clear guidelines for online prescribing and information sharing between private providers and NHS services. When used appropriately, online prescribing provides a valuable route for patients to access their prescription medicines which takes pressure off GP practices. Prescribers, whether working for the NHS or privately, in-person or remotely, are accountable for their prescribing decisions. They are expected to take account of appropriate national guidance. Prescribers should work with their patient and decide on the best course of treatment, with the provision of the most clinically appropriate care for the patient always being the primary consideration. In addition to the duty of the prescriber, patients themselves must be honest when providing information to an online prescriber so that they receive advice and medicines which are appropriate for them and so that risks can be managed. The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) sets out the precautions to put in place if certain medicines requiring additional safeguards are to be supplied online. These include but are not limited to assuring that the person has provided the contact details of their regular prescriber, such as their GP, and their consent to contact them about the prescription; and that the prescriber will proactively share all relevant information about the prescription with other health professionals involved in the care of the person (for example their GP). Further information on this can be found here: Guidance for registered pharmacies providing pharmacy services at a distance, including on the internet. The above guidance was updated (February 2025) in response to concerns relating to unsafe prescribing and supply of medicines online and includes strengthened safeguards designed to prevent people from receiving medicines that are not clinically appropriate for them and may cause them harm. Specifically, the February 2025 guidance sets out what to include in a risk assessment when prescribing services are involved, this includes considering how the diverse needs of people using pharmacy services are identified, and how staff get users’ valid consent (for example, how staff assess the mental capacity of users). The February 2025 guidance states that “The risk assessment should cover the whole service, including the medicines and treatments which are provided”. The guidance also sets out strengthened safeguards that should be in place before supplying certain medicines online. It states that a prescriber should not base prescribing decisions on the information provided in a questionnaire alone. To ascertain further details about procedures followed by the provider that prescribed Mr Pickett’s medication, you could directly approach the General Medical Council (GMC) and the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) who may have responsibility for their regulation. The report gives no indication that the online provider acted unlawfully but in situations where this could apply, the GPhC and other professional regulators, the Care Quality Commission and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency have the powers to investigate and take action against prescribers, products and suppliers who do not comply with legislation and national guidance. In your report, you raise concerns that there are no current guidelines governing communication and information sharing between private providers and NHS providers. The following guidance, Hospital discharge and community support guidance - GOV.UK states that: ‘health and care professionals (such as clinicians and social workers) should share appropriate and accurate information early to support a safe and timely discharge, for example, about medication (including whether medication has changed since hospital admission) and immediate support needs, including transport and equipment required. They should also seek information from those involved in the patient’s care prior to admission early on so this can be used to inform discharge planning. Sufficient and accurate information should be provided on discharge to enable any providers of onward care and support to meet the needs of the person transferred to them. This includes details about the person’s condition, information about the person’s medications, whether a personalised care and support plan or personal wellbeing plan has been updated or established, and arrangements to have their care and support regularly reviewed to support their recovery.’ I can confirm this does apply to communication with private as well as NHS providers. Lastly, I would like to assure you that we are committed to tackling suicide as one the biggest killers in this country. As part of this, the 8,500 new mental health workers we will recruit will be trained to support people at risk, to reduce the lives lost to suicide. We are also committed to continuing to deliver the cross-sector Suicide Prevention Strategy for England published in 2023. This identifies a number of groups for tailored or targeted action at a national level, including people in contact with mental health services. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Yours sincerely, MINISTER OF STATE FOR HEALTH
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.