Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Sheridan Pickett

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0150, written 19 Mar 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report19 Mar 2025
Reference2025-0150
DeceasedSheridan Pickett
CoronerJyoti Gill
Coroner areaManchester South
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Organisation namedPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

1 CORONER

lam Jyoti Gill, HM Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of Manchester South

2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 12% August 2024 an investigation commenced into the death of Sheridan Tate
Pickett, age 27. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20h January
2025. The conclusion of the inquest was suicide. The medical cause of death was 1(a)
multiple injuries consistent with a fall.

4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

On 9th August 2024 Sheridan Pickett caused himself to fall from a height out of a window
at leading to him sustaining fatal injuries. A police
investigation has determined there was no third-party involvement in his death.

5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

1. The inquest heard evidence that Mr Pickett had a history of mental health issues
and received an online diagnosis of ADHD from a private service provider
(which prescribed Mr Pickett with medication too). Following his diagnosis Mr
Pickett was admitted into an NHS hospital having taken an overdose. In their
discharge letter the hospital suggested that the ADHD medication should not be
recommenced. This information was not provided to the private ADHD provider
which continued to prescribe Mr Pickett with ADHD medication.

lam concerned that there are no current guidelines governing communication
and information sharing as between private psychiatry providers offering
assessment, care and treatment in relation to neurodiversity and NHS services
involved with providing care and treatment in parallel.

6 | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the
power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 14'" May 2025. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
he timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons: Mr Pickett’s mother and father on behalf of the family, Pennine Care NHS
Foundation Trust who may find it useful or of interest.

am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.

may also send a copy of your response to any other person who | believe may find it
useful or of interest.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Jyoti Gill
HM Assistant Coroner

19th March 2025

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Dhsc (PDF)
Minister of State for Health (Secondary Care)  

39 Victoria Street  
London  
SW1H 0EU  

11 June 2025  

Our ref: 

HM Assistant Coroner Jyoti Gill  
Coroner’s Court   
1 Mount Tabor Street   
Stockport  
SK1 3AG  

By email: 

Dear Ms Gill,   

Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 19th March 2025 sent to the Secretary of State / 
the Department of Health and Social Care about the death of Mr Sheridan Tate Pickett. I am 
replying as the Minister with responsibility for medicine regulation and prescribing.        

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Pickett’s 
death and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances 
your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to 
my attention.   

The report raises concerns over the importance of adhering to clear guidelines for online 
prescribing and information sharing between private providers and NHS services.  

When used appropriately, online prescribing provides a valuable route for patients to access 
their  prescription  medicines  which  takes  pressure  off  GP  practices.  Prescribers,  whether 
working for the NHS or privately, in-person or remotely, are accountable for their prescribing 
decisions. They are expected to take account of appropriate national guidance. Prescribers 
should work with their patient and decide on the best course of treatment, with the provision 
of the most clinically appropriate care for the patient always being the primary consideration. 
In addition to the duty of the prescriber, patients themselves must be honest when providing 
information  to  an  online  prescriber  so  that  they  receive  advice  and  medicines  which  are 
appropriate for them and so that risks can be managed.   

The  General  Pharmaceutical  Council  (GPhC)  sets  out  the  precautions  to  put  in  place  if 
certain medicines requiring additional safeguards are to be supplied online. These include 
but are not limited to assuring that the person has provided the contact details of their regular 
prescriber, such as their GP, and their consent to contact them about the prescription; and 

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
   
   
   
 that the prescriber will proactively share all relevant information about the prescription with 
other health professionals involved in the care of the person (for example their GP). Further 
information  on  this  can  be  found  here:  Guidance  for  registered  pharmacies  providing 
pharmacy services at a distance, including on the internet.   

The  above  guidance  was  updated  (February  2025)  in  response  to  concerns  relating  to 
unsafe prescribing and supply of medicines online and includes strengthened safeguards 
designed to prevent people from receiving medicines that are not clinically appropriate for 
them and may cause them harm. Specifically, the February 2025 guidance sets out what to 
include  in  a  risk  assessment  when  prescribing  services  are  involved,  this  includes 
considering how the diverse needs of people using pharmacy services are identified, and 
how  staff  get  users’  valid  consent  (for  example,  how  staff  assess  the  mental  capacity  of 
users).  The  February  2025  guidance  states  that  “The  risk  assessment  should  cover  the 
whole service, including the medicines and treatments which are provided”.  

The  guidance  also  sets  out  strengthened  safeguards  that  should  be  in  place  before 
supplying certain medicines online. It states that a prescriber should not base prescribing 
decisions on the information provided in a questionnaire alone.   

To  ascertain  further details  about  procedures  followed  by  the  provider  that  prescribed  Mr 
Pickett’s medication, you could directly approach the General Medical Council (GMC) and 
the  General  Pharmaceutical  Council  (GPhC)  who  may  have  responsibility  for  their 
regulation.   

The report gives no indication that the online provider acted unlawfully but in situations where 
this could apply, the GPhC and other professional regulators, the Care Quality Commission 
and  the  Medicines  and  Healthcare  products  Regulatory  Agency  have  the  powers  to 
investigate and take action against prescribers, products and suppliers who do not comply 
with legislation and national guidance.  

In  your  report,  you  raise  concerns  that  there  are  no  current  guidelines  governing 
communication and information sharing between private providers and NHS providers. The 
following guidance, Hospital discharge and community support guidance - GOV.UK states 
that:  

‘health and care professionals (such as clinicians and social workers) should share 
appropriate and accurate information early to support a safe and timely discharge, for 
example, about medication (including whether medication has changed since hospital 
admission)  and  immediate  support  needs,  including  transport  and  equipment 
required. They should also seek information from those involved in the patient’s care 
prior to admission early on so this can be used to inform discharge planning.  

Sufficient and accurate information should be provided on discharge to enable any 
providers of onward care and support to meet the needs of the person transferred to 
them.  This  includes  details  about  the  person’s  condition,  information  about  the 
person’s  medications,  whether  a  personalised  care  and  support  plan  or  personal 
wellbeing plan has been updated or established, and arrangements to have their care 
and support regularly reviewed to support their recovery.’   

 I can confirm this does apply to communication with private as well as NHS providers.  

 Lastly, I would like to assure you that we are committed to tackling suicide as one the biggest 
killers in this country. As part of this, the 8,500 new mental health workers we will recruit will 
be trained to support people at risk, to reduce the lives lost to suicide.   

We are also committed to continuing to deliver the cross-sector Suicide Prevention Strategy 
for England published in 2023.  This identifies a number of groups for tailored or targeted 
action at a national level, including people in contact with mental health services.   

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.    

Yours sincerely,   

MINISTER OF STATE FOR HEALTH

Related reports

Other reports by Jyoti Gill

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.