Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0172, written 7 Apr 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 7 Apr 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0172 |
| Deceased | Christopher McDonald |
| Coroner | Sian Reeves |
| Coroner area | South London |
| Category | Mental Health related deaths · Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust 1 CORONER I am Sian Reeves, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of South London 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 21 March 2023, an inquest was opened, and an investigation commenced, into the death of Christopher McDonald, who was aged 41 at the time of his death. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest, which was heard over 7-days between 17 and 25 March 2025, with a jury. The inquest engaged the enhanced investigative obligation under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The medical cause of death was: 1a Ligature strangulation; and 2 Schizoaffective disorder. The conclusion of the jury as to the death was that Mr McDonald died by strangulation by a ligature that he applied around his neck, but the evidence did not enable them to say what his intentions were. The following matters were recorded in the narrative conclusion: (1) There were shortcomings in the decision-making in relation to the suspension of Mr McDonald’s section 17 leave on 24 February 2023, which possibly contributed to his death. The shortcomings were a lack of an individualised assessment and a failure to follow the “AWOL – Missing and Absent Persons Policy”. Had a member of the National Psychosis Unit (“NPU”) accompanied Mr McDonald back to the ward on 25 February 2025, it is possible that this may have mitigated any potential distress. (2) There was avoidable delay in the identification of the ligature by NPU staff. Had the NPU staff communicated Mr McDonald’s medical history to London Ambulance Service staff, it is possible the ligature would have been discovered and removed in the first instance, possibly increasing his chances of successful resuscitation. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Christopher McDonald was pronounced dead at 14:28 on 26 February 2023 at Bethlem Royal Hospital, National Psychosis Unit. Mr McDonald had a history of mental ill-health and had been formally detained under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 since 14 November 2020. Mr McDonald was admitted to the Fitzmary 2 Ward of the NPU at Bethlem Royal Hospital on 7 July 2022. His diagnosis was schizoaffective disorder. After Mr McDonald went AWOL on 24 February 2023, there is no evidence of an assessment of whether it was appropriate to permit Mr McDonald to remain at his mother’s address until Sunday 26 February 2023. In reference to section 10 of the Awol – Missing and Absent Persons Policy, v. 10, there is no evidence of an action plan being drawn up by SLAM staff and the police. No member of NPU staff accompanied the police to escort Mr McDonald back to the ward. When Mr McDonald returned to the ward on 25 February 2023, his level of observation should have remained intermittent, but there is no evidence of it being reviewed. There is no evidence of any observations between 12:15 and 9pm on 25 February. Mr McDonald was reviewed by the duty doctor at 16:50. There is no evidence of any discussion of observation levels. Section 17 leave was suspended pending review by the ward consultant. At 13:30 on 26 February 2023, Mr McDonald was found unresponsive. The NPU staff started an emergency response but did not find the ligature around Mr McDonald’s neck. The LAS staff were not informed of Mr McDonald’s history of suicidal ideation involving ligature. A senior LAS paramedic identified and removed the ligature between 1:50 and 1:55pm. Artificial ventilation was not applied by the ward staff because of the use of a non- rebreathe oxygen mask rather than a bag-valve mask. Due to the continued presence of the ligature it was not possible to administer successful CPR. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: The evidence heard at the inquest demonstrated that staff working on the NPU did not have knowledge or a clear understanding of the “AWOL - Missing & Absent Persons Policy” of South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (“SLAM”) Specifically: (1) Whilst there should be an individualised assessment of whether it is appropriate to suspend section 17 when a patient goes AWOL: (a) one member of staff at the inquest gave evidence that it was “standard practice” and “protocol” that leave would be suspended; and (b) there was no evidence of any individualised assessment in Mr McDonald’s case. (2) The policy provides that SLAM staff should always accompany the police if the patient is to be returned from their home. This was not done in this case, and there was no evidence that any member of NPU staff considered this once Mr McDonald was located at his mother’s address on 24 February 2023. (3) The policy provides that if the police are likely to be involved in returning the patient to hospital then an action plan – jointly drafted between the police and Trust staff - needs to be drawn up. This was not done in this case, and there was no evidence that this was considered or completed by SLAM staff. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation has the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 2 June 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: • I have also sent it to NHS England and the Metropolitan Police who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 9 7 April 2025 Sian Reeves
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Trust Headquarters Maudsley Hospital Denmark Hill London SE5 8AZ Date: 28 May 2025 Re: Prevention of Future Death Report – Mr McDonald Dear Sian Reeves, Thank you for your letter dated 7th of April 2025 regarding the Prevention of Future Death Report. We acknowledge the concerns raised during the inquest and are committed to addressing each point thoroughly and constructively. Below is the Trust’s formal response and the actions we are implementing to prevent similar incidents in the future. 1. Individualised Assessment Following AWOL Incidents It was noted that staff working on the NPU lacked a clear understanding of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) policy on AWOL, Missing and Absent Persons. There was no evidence of an individualised risk assessment prior to the suspension of Section 17 leave in Mr McDonald’s case, contrary to policy expectations. Action: AWOL Policy – Strengthened Measures to Prevent Future Incidents • The Trust’s AWOL Policy now mandates that a Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) risk assessment must be conducted following every Absence Without Leave (AWOL) incident. The Responsible Clinician is required to promptly review the patient's leave status thereafter. • During out-of-hours periods, staff must consult the on-call manager, Specialist Registrar, or Consultant to ensure appropriate clinical oversight and risk management. 1 •Bespoke Refresher training on all aspects of the AWOL Policy will be delivered to the National Psychosis Unit. Attendance will be monitored to ensure consistent understanding and application of the policy. • All wards must ensure that Section 17 leave conditions are explicitly documented in each patient’s individualised care plan. Compliance will be monitored through Mental Health Act Audits via the Trust’s electronic audit system, Tendable. • These actions will be shared and cascaded via Trust-wide through a blue light bulletin. Each directorate will be required to provide formal confirmation of full implementation to ensure accountability. 2. Staff Accompaniment During Police Return of Patients The policy states that Trust staff must accompany the police when the police are returning a patient from home. This did not occur when Mr McDonald was located at his mother’s residence on 24 February 2023, and there was no evidence that staff considered this requirement. Actions: • All wards will be reminded of the requirement for staff to accompany the police when patients are returning to the ward with the police as per Trust’s AWOL Policy. • Emphasis will be placed on collaborative working between clinical staff and the police in guidance and staff briefings which will be shared by the 16th of June 2025. 3. Joint Action Planning with Police The policy requires a jointly agreed action plan between police and Trust staff if police involvement is anticipated in returning a patient to hospital. This was not undertaken in Mr McDonald’s case. Actions: • The current AWOL Policy (updated November 2023) explicitly includes the requirement for a jointly agreed action plan between police and Trust staff if police involvement is anticipated in returning a patient to hospital. • The NPU will receive refresher training and all other Trust wards will receive a briefing/bulletin to reinforce the policy's procedures, including joint action planning. • This will include a requirement that for all patients on Section 17 leave, an MDT-developed care plan will outline steps to be followed in the event of non- return. 2 We are taking these matters extremely seriously and are committed to ensuring staff are fully equipped to implement policy requirements in practice. We remain focused on improving the safety and quality of care for all service users. Yours sincerely, Chief Operating Officer South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust 3
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.