Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0344, written 8 Jul 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 8 Jul 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0344 |
| Deceased | John Kirkman |
| Coroner | Paul Marks |
| Coroner area | Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Chief Executive of NHS England 1 CORONER I am Professor Paul Marks, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 11th June 2024, I commenced an investigation into the death of John Michael Kirkman, aged 36 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 26th June 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was: SUICIDE 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH John Michael Kirkman had a long history of paranoid schizophrenia which was difficult to control despite appropriate medication. He had a number of detentions and admissions pursuant to various sections of the Mental Health Act 1983. In the weeks leading up to his death, he is likely to have researched the toxicity of products, and indeed, arranged for a number of packs of on his behalf. I have found that John was alive at 22.15 hours on 26th December 2023 and is likely to have ingested some time between then and 03:00 hours on 27th December. He is likely to have died around 07:51 hours on 27th December 2023. There was no realistic opportunity to have saved his life by the staff at the home. There were no suspicious circumstances or third-party involvement surrounding his death. I have found that John knew that taking these result in death to be purchased would 1 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – Evidence was heard that if a mental health screening assessment is carried out in one part of the country, the results and conclusions reach may not necessarily be immediately available in another part of the country, when a further assessment is carried out. Evidence suggested that such assessments capture important clinical information and the lack of availability of preceding data may adversely influence subsequent assessments. Screening may form the basis for onward referral for formal mental health assessments. Absence of vital background information could result in an incorrect prioritisation for onward referral as it did in this case. The situation is not ubiquitous but does occur due to the use of different I.T. systems in various institutions. 6 7 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your organisation has the power to take such action, possibly by reviewing the compatibility of IT systems within the NHS. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 2nd September 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons NHS England; MIND; Royal College of Psychiatrists and Family. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 8th July 2025 2
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Professor Paul Marks
Senior Coroner
East Riding & Hull Coroner’s Service
The Guildhall
Alfred Gelder Street
Hull
HU1 2AA
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
22nd September 2025
Dear Professor Marks,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – John Michael Kirkman
who died on 27 December 2023.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 8 July
2025 concerning the death of John Michael Kirkman on 27 December 2023. In
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to
express my deep condolences to John’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen
to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about John’s care have been
listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raised the concern that the use of different IT systems across different
healthcare institutions means that the results of a mental health screening assessment
carried out in one part of the country may not be available in another part of the
country, and that this could adversely influence subsequent assessments. This is not
unique to mental health records and fragmentation of IT systems remains a risk to
patient safety.
The NHS in England has made significant strides in improving the sharing of clinical
information across systems, with the National Care Records Service (NCRS) playing
a central role. This includes access to the Summary Care Record (SCR) - which
provides vital information such as current medications, allergies, and adverse
reactions - and the National Record Locator (NRL) - which helps to locate care plans
and other key documents. These tools are designed to support clinicians in delivering
safe and informed care, particularly in unscheduled or urgent scenarios.
The SCR is a national database derived from GP records and is updated automatically
whenever a GP record changes. It is accessible to authorised staff across the health
and care system who are involved in a patient’s direct care, offering a concise
summary without exposing the full record. This is especially valuable during
emergency or out-of-hours care.
The NRL complements this by indexing the location of digital and paper records
across the NHS, allowing health and social care professionals to securely retrieve
information from the source. It reduces duplication and ensures access to the most
up-to-date data. Importantly, it also provides visibility into which organisations are
currently involved in a patient’s care, enabling timely coordination - particularly in crisis
situations.
In the context of mental health, the NRL is especially impactful. It does not store
sensitive data, but instead points users to where documents such as Mental Health
Crisis Plans can be found. This allows professionals, such as Care Coordinators, to
gain a longitudinal view of a patient’s treatment history at the point of need. NRL data
can be accessed via the NCRS, and users can sort multiple document pointers by
creation date to find the most relevant information.
The NRL functionality allows any previous health assessment to be both located and
seen, however only 17 out of 54 mental health trusts can currently share data via the
NRL, mainly due to the need for system suppliers to implement technical pointers, but
also as there is currently limited funding for this development work. Some suppliers
have not participated in using the NRL due to their preferences for structured data
formats.
NHS England cannot currently mandate that suppliers undertake this work, but
significant progress is being made with the Shared Care Records services across the
country in adopting the NRL, which will increase accessibility substantially over the
next few months.
Beyond these national services, NHS England is committed to supporting broader
clinical record sharing across organisational boundaries. Since 2021, all primary and
secondary care organisations have been able to share a subset of patient information
within Integrated Care Board footprints via their local Shared Care Record. The Core
Information Standard defines the typical content of these records and provides a
consistent framework for data sharing.
Recognising the clinical need for greater interoperability, NHS England has launched
a national initiative to connect Shared Care Records across England. This investment
aims to ensure that authorised professionals can access safe, reliable, and accurate
records, regardless of where care is delivered. Local organisations, including
participating NHS Trusts, determine what additional information beyond the core
standard is shared, and individual Trusts are responsible for negotiating data-sharing
protocols to support enhanced local collaboration.
We acknowledge the ongoing challenges posed by disparate IT systems, particularly
in mental health services, where timely access to information can significantly affect
assessment and referral decisions. This is a recognised patient safety and clinical
quality issue. NHS England continues to develop solutions to address these
challenges, including the proposed creation of a Single Patient Record as part of the
NHS 10 Year Health Plan. It is intended that this record will bring a patient’s medical
records into once place and will build on existing foundations to support clinicians and
patients in accessing the information needed to aid clinical decision-making, subject
to appropriate permissions and privacy safeguards.
We remain committed to working collaboratively with partners across the health and
social care system to improve data sharing, enhance interoperability, and ensure that
patient care is supported by the best possible access to information.
Whilst NHS England does not have many details of this case, we have sought to obtain
further information to support a further review of John’s case. We hope the information
in this response clarifies the existing systems, and confirms our intention to deliver
improvements in this area to support clinical outcomes for patients such as John.
NHS England is also developing a specific framework for delivering personalised care
and support to adults and older adults with severe mental health problems. The
framework will set out the core aspects of care for people who require help from
secondary or integrated primary, voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE)
and secondary care mental health services. The framework outlines that all required
information relating to a person’s mental health assessment and their care and support
plan should be available to all staff who need it. This includes where people move
between different services across different geographical areas.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of John,
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
NHS England
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.