Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

John Kirkman

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0344, written 8 Jul 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report8 Jul 2025
Reference2025-0344
DeceasedJohn Kirkman
CoronerPaul Marks
Coroner areaKingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
CategorySuicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANNEX A

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Chief Executive of NHS England

1

CORONER

I am Professor Paul Marks, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of City of Kingston
Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire.

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act
2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 11th June 2024, I commenced an investigation into the death of John Michael
Kirkman, aged 36 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 26th
June 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was: SUICIDE

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
John Michael Kirkman had a long history of paranoid schizophrenia which was difficult
to control despite appropriate medication. He had a number of detentions and
admissions pursuant to various sections of the Mental Health Act 1983. In the weeks
leading up to his death, he is likely to have researched the toxicity of 
products, and indeed, arranged for a number of packs of 
on his behalf. I have found that John was alive at 22.15 hours on 26th December
2023 and is likely to have ingested 
 some time between then and
03:00 hours on 27th December. He is likely to have died around 07:51 hours on 27th
December 2023. There was no realistic opportunity to have saved his life by the staff
at the home. There were no suspicious circumstances or third-party involvement
surrounding his death. I have found that John knew that taking these 
result in death

 to be purchased

 would

1

 5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –

Evidence was heard that if a mental health screening assessment is carried out in one
part  of  the  country,  the  results  and  conclusions  reach  may  not  necessarily  be
immediately  available  in  another  part  of  the  country,  when  a  further  assessment  is
carried  out.  Evidence  suggested  that  such  assessments  capture  important  clinical
information  and  the  lack  of  availability  of  preceding  data  may  adversely  influence
subsequent assessments. Screening may form the basis for onward referral for formal
mental health assessments. Absence of vital background information could result in an
incorrect  prioritisation  for  onward  referral  as  it  did  in  this  case.  The  situation  is  not
ubiquitous but does occur due to the use of different I.T. systems in various institutions.

6

7

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and
your organisation has the power to take such action, possibly by reviewing the
compatibility of IT systems within the NHS.
YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 2nd September 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting
out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed.

8

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons NHS England; MIND; Royal College of Psychiatrists and Family.

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of
your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.

9

8th July 2025

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England (PDF)
Professor Paul Marks 
Senior Coroner 
East Riding & Hull Coroner’s Service  
The Guildhall 
Alfred Gelder Street 
Hull  
HU1 2AA 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

22nd September 2025  

Dear Professor Marks,  

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – John Michael Kirkman 
who died on 27 December 2023.  

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 8 July 
2025  concerning  the  death  of  John  Michael  Kirkman  on  27  December  2023.  In 
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to 
express my deep condolences to John’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen 
to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about John’s care have been 
listened to and reflected upon.   

Your Report raised the concern that the use of different IT systems across different 
healthcare institutions means that the results of a mental health screening assessment 
carried  out  in  one  part  of  the  country  may  not  be  available  in  another  part  of  the 
country, and that this could adversely influence subsequent assessments. This is not 
unique  to  mental  health  records  and  fragmentation  of  IT  systems  remains  a  risk  to 
patient safety.  

The NHS in England has made significant strides in improving the sharing of clinical 
information across systems, with the National Care Records Service (NCRS) playing 
a  central  role.  This  includes  access  to  the Summary  Care  Record  (SCR)  -  which 
provides  vital  information  such  as  current  medications,  allergies,  and  adverse 
reactions - and the National Record Locator (NRL) - which helps to locate care plans 
and other key documents. These tools are designed to support clinicians in delivering 
safe and informed care, particularly in unscheduled or urgent scenarios. 

The SCR is a national database derived from GP records and is updated automatically 
whenever a GP record changes. It is accessible to authorised staff across the health 
and  care  system  who  are  involved  in  a  patient’s  direct  care,  offering  a  concise 
summary  without  exposing  the  full  record.  This  is  especially  valuable  during 
emergency or out-of-hours care. 

The NRL complements  this  by  indexing  the  location  of  digital  and  paper  records 
across  the  NHS,  allowing  health  and  social  care  professionals  to  securely  retrieve 
information from the source. It reduces duplication and ensures access to the most 
up-to-date  data.  Importantly,  it  also  provides  visibility  into  which  organisations  are 

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 currently involved in a patient’s care, enabling timely coordination - particularly in crisis 
situations. 

In  the  context  of  mental  health,  the  NRL  is  especially  impactful.  It  does  not  store 
sensitive data, but instead points users to where documents such as Mental Health 
Crisis Plans can be found. This allows professionals, such as Care Coordinators, to 
gain a longitudinal view of a patient’s treatment history at the point of need. NRL data 
can  be  accessed  via  the  NCRS,  and  users  can  sort  multiple  document  pointers  by 
creation date to find the most relevant information.  

The NRL functionality allows any previous health assessment to be both located and 
seen, however only 17 out of 54 mental health trusts can currently share data via the 
NRL, mainly due to the need for system suppliers to implement technical pointers, but 
also as there is currently limited funding for this development work. Some suppliers 
have  not  participated  in  using  the  NRL  due  to  their  preferences  for  structured  data 
formats. 

NHS  England  cannot  currently  mandate  that  suppliers  undertake  this  work,  but 
significant progress is being made with the Shared Care Records services across the 
country  in  adopting the  NRL,  which  will  increase accessibility  substantially over  the 
next few months. 

Beyond  these  national  services,  NHS  England  is  committed  to  supporting  broader 
clinical record sharing across organisational boundaries. Since 2021, all primary and 
secondary care organisations have been able to share a subset of patient information 
within Integrated Care Board footprints via their local Shared Care Record. The Core 
Information  Standard defines  the  typical  content  of  these  records  and  provides  a 
consistent framework for data sharing. 

Recognising the clinical need for greater interoperability, NHS England has launched 
a national initiative to connect Shared Care Records across England. This investment 
aims to ensure that authorised professionals can access safe, reliable, and accurate 
records,  regardless  of  where  care  is  delivered.  Local  organisations,  including 
participating  NHS  Trusts,  determine  what  additional  information  beyond  the  core 
standard is shared, and individual Trusts are responsible for negotiating data-sharing 
protocols to support enhanced local collaboration. 

We acknowledge the ongoing challenges posed by disparate IT systems, particularly 
in mental health services, where timely access to information can significantly affect 
assessment  and  referral  decisions.  This  is  a  recognised  patient  safety  and  clinical 
quality  issue.  NHS  England  continues  to  develop  solutions  to  address  these 
challenges, including the proposed creation of a Single Patient Record as part of the 
NHS 10 Year Health Plan. It is intended that this record will bring a patient’s medical 
records into once place and will build on existing foundations to support clinicians and 
patients in accessing the information needed to aid clinical decision-making, subject 
to appropriate permissions and privacy safeguards. 

We remain committed to working collaboratively with partners across the health and 
social care system to improve data sharing, enhance interoperability, and ensure that 
patient care is supported by the best possible access to information. 

 Whilst NHS England does not have many details of this case, we have sought to obtain 
further information to support a further review of John’s case. We hope the information 
in  this  response  clarifies  the  existing  systems,  and  confirms  our  intention  to  deliver 
improvements in this area to support clinical outcomes for patients such as John.   

NHS England is also developing a specific framework for delivering personalised care 
and  support  to  adults  and  older  adults  with  severe  mental  health  problems.  The 
framework  will  set  out  the  core  aspects  of  care  for  people  who  require  help  from 
secondary or integrated primary, voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) 
and secondary care mental health services. The framework outlines that all required 
information relating to a person’s mental health assessment and their care and support 
plan  should  be  available  to  all  staff  who  need  it.  This  includes  where  people  move 
between different services across different geographical areas.  

I  would  also  like  to  provide  further  assurances  on  the  national  NHS  England  work 
taking  place around  the  Reports  to  Prevent Future  Deaths.  All  reports  received  are 
discussed  by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical 
Directors,  and  other  clinical  and  quality  colleagues  from  across  the  regions.  This 
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of John, 
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay 
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.   

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.  

Yours sincerely,  

National Medical Director  
NHS England

Related reports

Other reports by Paul Marks

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.